Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sorry, I may have forgot to get back on this. Please monitor for a reply tomorrow
    • Yes, now its just about getting the WS / Court bundle finalised to send to the court / Evri. I've attached the most recent version of the WS / Court bundle to save having to scroll back up to the previous post (#204) where it was also shared. If you, @BankFodder or anyone else has any feedback on this, i'd be grateful for your thoughts. In my previous post #204, i'd also attached an invoice from Packlink which shows that I was charged by Packlink for these services: "drop-off at Her mes - Next day delivery" and "Proof of Delivery". It also has the payer's address and there are "Origin" and "Destination" fields which have the postcode of the sender [origin] and the recipient [destination] - I have redacted personal details in the attached invoice.  I am already including this in my evidence bundle (without the redaction) but wanted to share this redacted version so that other people can consider this as example in their bundle of Packlink and Evri's contract being instigated by the sender of the parcel who has paid for the service, and further shows that there is information in the invoice to identify that a third party beneficiary (the sender / recipient) is involved in this transaction. I have also attached this redacted invoice in this post to save having to scroll back up. Happy to get any thoughts and if this invoice is no good, then please let me know.   Draft - Witness Statement and Court Bundle redacted.pdf Packlink invoice - REDACTED.pdf
    • Does anyone know if I would be allowed to record conversations with health professionals for my own use on my phone without them knowing. I know that we are allowed to record phone calls. I do record some of my phone calls for my own use due to my disability and if anything is said then I am covered. I would only record audio in private area's of myself and the professional dealing with me. I know I could not get and other persons audio in it and I don't intend to. my only other option is to buy a body cam but I am not sure the rules regarding this.I never thought i would have to but things are getting worse Thanks for any guidance 
    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2669 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Make sure to keep detailed logs. FCA wont act on single cases, but as youve seen, they take all complaints when they investigate a PDL. Now if everyone started reporting them, the PDL's would soon sit up and take notice.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Fletch,

havent logged the calls.

Inventive signed for the original letter (which included a "communicate in writing only" request) on the 8th of July.

And no, she doesnt answer any of the calls, I told her to ignore them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fletch,

havent logged the calls.

Inventive signed for the original letter (which included a "communicate in writing only" request) on the 8th of July.

And no, she doesnt answer any of the calls, I told her to ignore them

Link to post
Share on other sites

If theyre still harassing you, report them and log every single attempt they make at contacting you. Don't put it off. report them asap. We've seen first hand that the FCA are coming down hard on rogue offenders. And also remember that you wont be the only person they are doing this to.

 

Ok renegadeimp, calls logged from today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If theyre still harassing you, report them and log every single attempt they make at contacting you. Don't put it off. report them asap. We've seen first hand that the FCA are coming down hard on rogue offenders. And also remember that you wont be the only person they are doing this to.

 

Ok renegadeimp, calls logged from today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If she has the self control not to get into an argument ( I know it takes me all my time to keep cool) it may be worth answering once and while refusing security just to tell them that they have a letter stating in writing only. If possible record that call but hopefully it should help.

 

I am aware that some firms tend to read the first few lines of a letter, particularly templates from websites and ignore the rest of the letter. I know this from experience

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick question guys,

Weve still had no reply from Wonga, Inventive or Pounds to Pocket. They all recieved, and signed for the letters on or around the 8th of July.

Ive got all the signatures from the Royal Mail site and the RD receipts.

So should I follow these up with another letter and if so, would it be a simple reminder letter or is their now another step? Or have we done "our bit" and continue to sit back and wait?

I ask because these are not the kind of people to trust and I wouldnt like to think that whilst we are sat here waiting, they may be plotting some devious move that I could have countered?

Thanks all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I would wait for them to contact you, if they start chasing you just a quick one liner of dear sr, I refer you to my letter of xxxxxx, received by yourselves on xxxxxx, enclosed is a copy of the POD

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Update again.

After over a month, the second one has come in. Pounds to Pocket have agreed to my terms but only for six months. On the same day they sent a DN by email. Must be something in that to trip them up with. Time to read up again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

P2p are just qq in disguise. After 6 months just tell them your circumstances remain unchanged.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most companies only set arrangements for 6 months or a year, just a pain in the backside when you renew it.

 

Was the DN an actual proper DN as set out in the CCA or a notice of intention to file a default. I know this is a moot point but I am yet to be convinced that email is an appropriate system for sending DN's. How can they tell when it was received? I know a DJ has suggested that in his opinion a DN is served on the day it is produced but I can not see that standing up to scrutiny

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Update again.

After over a month, the second one has come in. Pounds to Pocket have agreed to my terms but only for six months. On the same day they sent a DN by email. Must be something in that to trip them up with. Time to read up again!

 

I know you may not be in a position to do this otherwise you wouldn't be on this thread but

 

 

I have been in same situation and still am to a degree but

 

 

p2p will accept significant reduction if you send them email stating you can offer xxx amount.

 

 

They come back at first and say no but they accepted in the end a much lower amount.

 

 

Keep on at them.

 

 

I was offered a 6 month plan initially but 4 months in I tried to settle with a much lower full and final settlement

which with the help of a family member I sorted.

 

 

I still got few more to clear but keep chipping away.

 

 

Good luck with everything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another update guys,

 

after initially receiving a letter from Pounds to Pocket agreeing to the repayment plan (for six months)

we now receive a letter from them marked "Final Notice - Impending Account Sale")

and demanding three payments of £280.xx over the next three months.

 

It also states that her account will be sold on the 7th September

but the first payment they have demanded is not until the 15th September.

Whos fooling who here?

 

Then theres the usual threat of doorstep collectors and court action that may be used by the new owners of the debt

( they havent said who this will be yet).

 

So, bearing in mind that she already has an affordable arrangement in place for the next six months (in writing)

can I possibly use this latest letter against them in the foreseeable future?

 

And who has a name like Pete Ng (Final Resolution Team Manager)?

 

Thanks guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

H Merlin

Ng is a common Chinese surname and I have seen it pop up on several letters posted on the forum. Even if it is not his real name , so long as it can be traced back to an individual it is perfectly legit.

 

Ok , so if they do sell the debt , which the T&C's will say they can do, you have an arrangement in place and the new owners can not alter that . If the new owners try to get out of t , you will have a legitimate complaint.

 

I hope , for your peace of mind they do not sell it to the buffoons who are MMF (although another complaint against them would be fantastic)

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply Fletch, whats the story with MMF?

I see all the advantages of the debt being sold on ( none-forwarding of critical paperwork etc) and yes, it can be a pain dealing with DCAs but as long as everything is in writing I can build a wall for her against them.

Whatever happens, I will keep any repayments at an affordable level - this is generally a lot easier to do when a debt is sold on. You just have to be as awkward and as obstructive as the DCA - but keep it all on paper!:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

MMF (motormilefinance) seem to take little or no notice of their own policies and procedures let alone the FCA rules. They routinely do not answer letters or avoid answering the relevant parts .

It is a shame but the only way I ever seem to get a real response is to escalate the matter to the CSA (their trade body) and/or the Fos .

In one recent exchange I showed them letters and read receipts sent on 27th May yet they still continued to insist the first letter they had was the follow up one on the 2nd June

 

I have records and copies and then copies of those copies. My emails are IMAP and my letters are in a file as well as scanned on my PC and backed up into google Drive ( Overkill or what)

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. see what you mean Fletch.

Im a stickler for Recorded Delivery, everything I ever send is by RD.

This one might be fun then. I have four folders, one for each debt. Records, letters etc are meticulously kept. Bring on MMF!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. see what you mean Fletch.

Im a stickler for Recorded Delivery, everything I ever send is by RD.

This one might be fun then. I have four folders, one for each debt. Records, letters etc are meticulously kept. Bring on MMF!

 

Just checking how you going on. Also to let you know that the quick quid one I am still paying off on 6 month arrangement they have emailed without me asking and extended again so don't worry when the 6 month is up they will probably make contact doing the same so long as you stick to the arranged payments. Hope all goes well

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all just an update -

 

Inventive are still ringing two or three times a day even after all this time.

It would seem that they are not going to comply with the original letter I sent which included the request

that all future correspondence should be in writing.

 

 

However, they received that instruction by Recorded Delivery and I have a copy of the letter and the receipt from the Post Office

and a copy of their receiving signature so we are not too worried about that one.

 

The good news is that yesterday (11/10/2014) she received an email from Wonga saying that her debt is one of the many

they have been forced to wipe so she now owes them nothing:-)

 

That email has been printed out and put in her "Wonga" file as it wouldnt surprise me if, in a year or two,

someone makes a quick buck by selling these cancelled debts on to a DCA,

and that DCA then tries to chance its arm with the usual threats to ex-customers in the hope

that by then most people will have deleted these emails and have no physical record of their cancellations.

It wont be happening here!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all just an update -

 

Inventive are still ringing two or three times a day even after all this time.

It would seem that they are not going to comply with the original letter I sent which included the request

that all future correspondence should be in writing.

 

 

However, they received that instruction by Recorded Delivery and I have a copy of the letter and the receipt from the Post Office

and a copy of their receiving signature so we are not too worried about that one.

 

The good news is that yesterday (11/10/2014) she received an email from Wonga saying that her debt is one of the many

they have been forced to wipe so she now owes them nothing:-)

 

That email has been printed out and put in her "Wonga" file as it wouldnt surprise me if, in a year or two,

someone makes a quick buck by selling these cancelled debts on to a DCA,

and that DCA then tries to chance its arm with the usual threats to ex-customers in the hope

that by then most people will have deleted these emails and have no physical record of their cancellations.

It wont be happening here!

Great news about the wonga. I settled with them only few weeks ago wish I had held out now. Anyway good luck with the rest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, another update -

 

having got an email from Wonga dated 10/10/2014 cancelling her debt to them,

she has now received another email dated 14/10/2014 headed

"Notice of our Intention to Register a Default".

 

 

They are now demanding the full amount and threatening to register a default 120 days after the original loan repayment date.

 

Now this could simply be one department not knowing what the other department is doing

as the "cancelled debt" letter came from "[email protected],

whereas this latest demand came from [email protected].

 

before I send the collections team a copy of the first letter, a quick question.

 

 

Are they entitled to change their mind regarding wiping the debt?

 

 

Just want to be fore-armed before we go head to head.

Thanks all

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes they can I suppose

 

 

however, just scan it

attach it to an email

 

 

an send it to collections.

 

 

chew on this mate

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi all.

thought I would drop by with an update.

 

Ive recently found out that my brother had a change of heart shortly after setting up payment plans with the payday loan firms

and decided not to pay any of them.

This, as you will recall.all started last June 2014.

 

The state of play 8 months on is this,

 

Pounds To Pocket - not one letter or phonecall from them.

Sunny - same as above.

Very Loans - as above again.

Inventive - still ringing on the same number although this is now down to 3 or 4 calls a week.

 

 

This, to me, is a good sign. It tells me they are being cagey.

 

If you recall, they were all sent Recorded Delivery letters (all signed for) stating that any further communication MUST be in writing.

None of them have complied - not one written communication from any one of them.

 

So what would happen should any one of them decide on court action?

Would the letters still stand after all this time?

Or could a judge take a view that some responsibility lies with us and that we should have taken further steps to address these debts?

 

Im expecting DCAs to get on the case some time in the not too distant future.

How do these letters stand regarding them?

 

I appreciate your input guys and gals and thanks all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...