Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just as the title says, if ever there was a good reason to ditch Micro$oft and move to Linux then this is it :-   Giving Windows total recall is a privacy minefield • The Register WWW.THEREGISTER.COM It's only a preview, and maybe it should stay there ... forever Help is available, most modern PC's can run a version of Linux suitable for your needs and it is not difficult to use or learn. Ubuntu is popular, new version is very modern Garuda Linux is the one I use, based on Arch, rolling release, bang up to date. I have friends and acquaintances, old and young, PC Literate and not. Most people who try it never go back to Windows Hamster
    • I've had to hide two of your posts.  Anyone clicking on your links gets sent to external sites.  On top of that your real name is showing on one screenshot.  Fellow Site Team member dx100uk has already politely asked - Anyway, jk2054 wants to see the communication you got from your local court which will have told you about the hearing date of 17 June, and will have mentioned a deadline for filing your Witness Statement.
    • I believe it is helpful to seek guidance from a range of places and decide on the validity of the sources and frequency of responses which are most helpful. A single voice can be a dangerous thing. As, of course, can groupthink. Scott, it feels like £4k on a solicitor for a £1.5k bill is overkill. Were we back in time I'd suggest small claims court as your claim sounds like it may be straightforward? By all means add that phrase on. I also suggest you contact the court and go and sit in on a couple of similar cases to get a better understanding before you shell out.
    • a card should be 16 digits...urm... note your dates above please. do not miss them no matter what happens  ......................... pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northamton, civil national business centre Name of the Claimant ? PRA Group Uk Portfolios ltd. How many defendant's  joint or self ? self Date of issue –  21 May 24 date of AOS - 07-06-2024 date for filing defence by - 21-06-2024 Particulars of Claim 1. The claimant claims the sum of £5600 for an outstanding debt owed. 2. On Mar 2000 the Defendant entered into an agreement with Barclays Bank Uk PLC for a credit card under reference ( 11 digit ref ). 3. on Mar 21 the defendant defaulted on the agreement  with an outstanding balance of £5600. 4. On Aug 21 the debt £5600 was assigned to PRA Group (UK) Limited, who itself assigned the debt to PRA Group UK Portfolios Ltd on Dec 23. 5. Notices of assignment were sent to the defendant in accordance with S136 Law of Property act 1925. 6. The claimant has instructed PRA Group (UK) Limited to act on its behalf in the recovery of the outstanding debt and to pursue litigation on its behalf. AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS 1. The sum of £5600 What is the total value of the claim? £6100  Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No - just emails threatening action   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? Yes   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? no Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? credit card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? before - in 2000   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? I don't recall - I suspect post / online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? am awaiting access - but I suspect it is    Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. assigned - debt purchaser has issued the claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Pretty certain - Yes   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? pretty certain - Yes   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? there's been gaps - they went very quiet  Why did you cease payments? Covid lockdowns  What was the date of your last payment? i thought it was 2020 - they say 2021 Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? no Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? no
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3068 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello there Jamberson,

 

Thanks again for your advice.

 

I browsed and found a known website

 

On their links page it says:

"The link below is to the Bailiff & High Court Enforcement section of the popular Consumer Action Group website. This is the most widely used and respected forum for all bailiff enquiries."

 

I came to the right place then.

Edited by This_is_not_great
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello again people,

 

I have a question, which might be related to my original post. What is 'county court judgment'.

I'm guessing the fact that I'm being chased by bailiffs means I have these against me already?

If so, does TE9&TE7 take care of these, if successful?

Or do I need a separate dealing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Legally they have a warrant of execution - a licence to attempt to seize your goods to take to auction, to settle a debt. That's all. Their favourite method is to clamp your car, and that forces 9/10 people to pay up, or their car is removed and sold.

 

The registering of the debt sounds more serious than it is. Basically, to get authorisation to appoint bailifs, the council needs to get TEC (Northampton County Court) to approve it - which they do automatically. So the debt is registered at the court, then bailiffs get the case to follow-up on.

 

The debt includes the original amount owed to the council plus the bailiff's own fees, charged during the process. Even in the event the bailiff can't get any goods and can't get payment, there's no black mark against you, it doesn't affect your credit rating whatever happens, and there will be no CCJ.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jamberson,

 

Thanks again.

So all they have is a warrant of execution for the PCNs (registered as debt) and that is what I've filed against, to TEC. Am I correct?

And IF TE9 & TE7s are approved, the warrant of execution is 'revoked' and all fees and related charges are revoked too, except, of course the original PCNs? Is this correct?

 

Thanks again in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow.

Almost as expected, I was told that the council received NOTHING from TEC and they tried to explain how TE9 & 7 work but not sure if that was even the correct information. I called TEC and they have definitely received my files and they are now filed in their system (17/06/2014). I called the council again to reiterate this. They repeated their initial response and asked me to contact TEC again. I am calling TEC as I type.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And obviously they never called back.

What should I do?

Because if the council haven't been informed, as far as they are concerned, the bailiffs are still due to commence their actions. The council need to have been notified by TEC in order to stop their actions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait until tomorrow and ask again. If TEC have just acknowledged receipt it is reasonable to assume they have only just forwarded it to the council. It should be on record there by tomorrow. Although you state bailiffs are due to commence actions, you did say above that the case had already been put on hold for 28 days. Plenty of time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait until tomorrow and ask again. If TEC have just acknowledged receipt it is reasonable to assume they have only just forwarded it to the council. It should be on record there by tomorrow. Although you state bailiffs are due to commence actions, you did say above that the case had already been put on hold for 28 days. Plenty of time.

 

Actually. TEC said they have definitely sent the files by email and also by post on 17/06/2014 and 18/06/2014 respectively.

But the council had no record of this at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait until tomorrow and ask again. If TEC have just acknowledged receipt it is reasonable to assume they have only just forwarded it to the council. It should be on record there by tomorrow. Although you state bailiffs are due to commence actions, you did say above that the case had already been put on hold for 28 days. Plenty of time.

 

But this is the second week. After this week, only 2 weeks remaining. worrying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

TEC acknowledged receipt of my forms on 17/06/2014

TEC confirmed transmittal of my forms by email to Tower Hamlet 17/06/2014

TEC confirmed transmittal of my forms by post to Tower Hamlet 18/06/2014

Tower Hamlet denies receipt of any of my forms either by email or post from TEC 24/06/2014

Newlyn postponed action (14/06/2014) for four weeks (until 11/07/2014).

TEC said it will take 19 working days from processing till decision (probably 14 or 15/07/2014)

and 6 weeks until I hear anything from them (around 25/07/2014).

 

I don't want to take chances with bailiffs.

What should my next action be?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you asked which email address they using to send to the Council? Sometimes the Council are being bypassed and everything is sent direct to the Bailiffs.

 

Hello there,

 

I asked which email address they used and TEC said that is confidential and they cannot disclose that to me.

 

Diretly to the bailiffs?

Is that true?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have done that. the council 'said they would call TEC and call me back'

They haven't called me back.

 

Check with the council again. If they deny receipt of forms from TEC, phone TEC and tell them the council don't have the forms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check with the council again. If they deny receipt of forms from TEC, phone TEC and tell them the council don't have the forms.

 

 

Yeah. But I have called the council 4 times and TEC 4 times already. TEC repeated the same line; the council will have to speak to them and tell them they haven't received it They won't take my word for it.

The council said they would. but I haven't' heard anything from them.

See my predicament?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...