Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 2 foot of sea level rise   The Thwaites Glacier — dubbed the “Doomsday” glacier because of the grave impacts for global sea level rise if it melts — is breaking down “much faster” than expected, according to a peer-reviewed study published on Monday in the academic journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Using satellite imagery, scientists determined that widespread contact between the glacier and warm ocean water is speeding up the melting process. The climate crisis is interrupting natural processes across large parts of the continent, according to the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition. The glacier, roughly the size of the United Kingdom, could cause global sea levels to rise more than two feet if it melts completely, according to the study. “Thwaites is the most unstable place in the Antarctic and contains the equivalent of 60 centimeters of sea level rise,” study co-author Christine Dow said in a statement. “The worry is that we are underestimating the speed that the glacier is changing, which would be devastating for coastal communities around the world,” she continued. Read the full story here.       or here ... from the India civil service currents affairs exam Doomsday glacier Antarctica‘s Thwaites Glacier, roughly the size of Britain, is a fast-moving glacier in West Antarctica. Because of the risk it faces — and poses — Thwaites is often called the Doomsday Glacier. Because of its size (1.9 lakh square km), it contains enough water to raise the sea level by more than half a metre. Thwaites’s melting already contributes 4% to global sea level rise each year. Thwaites are important for Antarctica as it slows the ice behind it from freely flowing into the ocean. Credits: BBC Vigorous melting Salty and relatively warm ocean water is infiltrating beneath Thwaites Glacier, leading to significantly speedy melting. This process, termed as “vigorous melting“, is eroding its stability. However, its potential collapse could lead to a staggering 10-foot rise in sea levels, posing a dire threat to coastal communities worldwide. Previous studies discovered a deep connection to the east through which deep water flows from Pine Island Bay. That study also attributed the melting to the heat transport caused by channels bringing warm water towards the glacier from the north. With melting, glaciers become light and float off the land where they used to be situated. The resulting retreating grounding line exposes more of a glacier’s base to seawater, increasing the risk of melting. Since the late 1990s, the glacier has seen a 14km retreat of its “grounding line.” The grounding line is the point where the ice flowing off the land and along the seabed floats up to form a huge platform.   https://www.pmfias.com/current-affairs-for-upsc-civil-services-exam-may-28-2024/   or here Satellite data reveals Antarctica's Thwaites Glacier is melting faster than we thought | Space WWW.SPACE.COM Seawater rushing miles beneath the glacier makes the ice more vulnerable to melting.  
    • I have notified all parties and will start a new thread.
    • The messaging app's boss has taken to social media to deny Mr Musk's claim it "exports user data."View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lloyds TSB debt 1st Crud issue claim***Settled by Tomlin Order***


t_harv
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3555 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've had a similar letter come through from Northampton CC with the Claimant 1st Credit Ltd chasing an old Lloyds Bank debt which was sold to 1st Credit at the end of last year. I've not replied to their letters but tentative now due to the claim form now on my doorstep. Wondering whether to do similar as UK_Guy99 did and go straight to 1st credit asking to be put aside providing we agree a payment plan?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi t_harv and welcome to CAG

 

I would suggest you start your own thread rather than tag onto one that's almost 12 months old on which UK_Guy never bothered to conclude.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, t_harv,and welcome to CAG! :-)

 

You'll need to start your own thread giving specific details of your debt, the date the account was opened, last payment you made, etc.

 

I think you should call it Claim from Northampton CC - Old Lloyds Debt - 1st Credit.

 

When did you receive the claim form?

 

If you post a link here we'll come to your thread to help you.

 

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello to all those on CAG, hopefully someone much wiser than me can find me a solution!

 

I currently have four defaults on my credit file, one of which was placed by Lloyds TSB for an overdraft of just over 1XXX.XX in June 2011. The outstanding balance was since assigned to 1st Credit late last year and my credit file has another default showing under 1st Credit for the amount and 'Settled' under Lloyds TSB. I presume the latter will lob off soon enough (hopefully).

 

As I normally bury my head in sand once I receive paperwork, I've since ignored any letters from 1st finance for any payment agreements as their reputation via inspection online precedes them. The account was then 'passed on' to Connaught Collections who 'appointed' Moon Beever solicitors.

 

I today received a Claim form from Northampton CBCC stating the Claimant (1st Credit) claims the sum for debt and interest (interest being 8% per annum from when Lloyds assigned my account to 1st Credit last year). The Issue Date is 17 Apr 2014 and all payments must go to Moon Beever.

 

I would much prefer the CCJ not to stand as the 6 year cycle would restart following the issues of default almost three years ago. I presume I have to acknowledge receipt of the claim via online - just unsure of now the best process to avoid a CCJ.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

1ST CREDIT (Finance) Limited - Date of issue – 17 APR 2014

 

POC - The Claimant claims the sum of 1XXX.XX for debt and interest. The Defendant from xx.xx.2008 held an account with Lloyds Bank Plc and it was assigned account number XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. Lloyds Bank Plc granted Defendant an overdraft facility. Lloyds Bank plc demanded repayment of the outstanding sum on the account at that time. The account was in default on xx.xx.2011 and the outstanding balance was 1XXX.XX.

On xx.xx.2013 the debt was assigned to 1st Credit (Finance) Limited in the sum of 1XXX.XX

Notices of Assignment were sent to the Defendant in accordance with S. 136 Law of Property Act 1925.

AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS

1. The sum of 1XXX.XX

2. Statutory interest persuant to Section 69 of the County Court Act at a rate of 8% per annum from xx.xx.2013 to xx.xx.2014 xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 0.29 until Judgement or sooner payment.

 

It is the debt issuer who issues the claim and I did receive a Notice of Assignment. I need to check whether the Default Notice was issued by the original creditor (most likely yes). I have no recollection of annual “Notice of Default sums”. I stopped paying the original creditor due to me leaving work to go into further education. There were no disputes or DMP plans entered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply Daniella. I shall contact the Claimant(?) tomorrow to see if we can come to an amicable agreement. In the meantime, I will start researching into old statements for any unfair charges.

 

With it being an overdraft, there will be no need for a CCA1974 request from myself? Any other information I could start requesting to get the ball rolling?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at statements, it appears that the balance requested on the claim form is +£150 than the original overdraft limit. I'm not sure what this is made up of, presuming it is unplanned overdraft fees and other fees leading up to the account going into default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing to stop you acknowledging and defend all for now, once you have all the required info you can always negotiate if all in order. CPR 31.14 request to claimants sols for current ac

Edited by theoldrouge
mistype

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rang 1st Credit twice to no avail but a person from Connaught rang me back to discuss options. Weird.

 

They stated that I had fourteen days to pay back in full (till tomorrow basically) and the CCJ would not go on my record and the default would remain. If I were to agree a plan, I would have to enter into a judgement. Another thing which confused me was that I could receive another fourteen days to potentially cough up the full amount and the CCJ would not go on record (apologies if I have misinterpreted this, I presume this is paying off the CCJ in a month and it being struck off the register). Basically, they stated the claim via court would not go away if paid in full.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no negotiating with this crew....defend all submit a defence and then force them to negotiate...you must go through the process..... there are no short cuts.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for your reply. AOS submitted and now preparing a CPR31.14.

 

Do I also at this point request for the clarification of the amount claimed being larger than the original overdraft?

 

Totally lost on how to determine the unfair charges that lie within the overdraft itself. How do I find and quantify those?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will put them to strict proof within your defence.Make sure you use the correct CPR 31.14 Current account request dont worry about quantifying for now.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Current account claim and defence in the following.....edit to suit.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?420527-MKDP-HSBC-A-C-all-charges-Claimform-received

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks Andy. I shall edit to suit. To date I've received only an 'on hold' letter from their solicitors following the CPR production, nothing else.

 

Also I'm a bit miffed how just because I have misplaced my MCOL number, I can't re-access the particulars of my claim. There is surely something wrong there. Why claim's aren't assigned to Government Gateway's once the AOS is made, I don't know. I now have to email my defence and check via phone for the decision (I think).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Defence was submitted as per Andy's advice.

 

Received a Notice of Change of Legal Representative on the 3rd June from the Claimant along with two notice of assignments and statements from May 2008 to July 2011. They confirm that the debt is owing.

 

They will waive any charged interest applied to the account from the last payment made (early 2009) and accept a balance plus the Court cost if we agree to settle this out of court.

 

What are my options now? What is advisable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you post up your final draft of defence t_harv for reference.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

andyorch - see below:

 

The Defendant disputes the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.

 

DEFENCE:

 

1. It is admitted that the defendant held an account with Lloyds Bank Plc.

 

2. The defendant denies that the account exceeded the agreed overdraft limit due to overdrawing of funds but is as a result of unfair and extortionate bank charges/penalties being applied to the account.

 

3. The defendant refutes that the claimants claim is owed or payable. The amount claimed is comprised of amongst others default penalties/charges levied on the account for alleged late, missed or over limit payments. The court will be aware that these charge types and the recoverability thereof have been judicially declared to be susceptible to assessments of fairness under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 The Office of Fair Trading v Abbey National PLC and others (2009). I will contend at trial that such charges are unfair in their entirety.

 

4. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

The claimant is also put to strict proof to:-.

 

(a) Provide a copy agreement/facility arrangement along with the Terms and conditions at inception, which this claim is based on.

(b) Provide a copy of the Notice served under 76(1) and 98(1) of the CCA1974 Demand /Recall Notice and Notice of Assignment.

© Provide a breakdown of their excessive charging/fees levied to the account with justification.

(d) Show how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed.

(e) Show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

(f) Show how they have complied with sections III & IV of Practice Direction - Pre-action Conduct.

 

5. On receipt of this claim I requested documentation by way of a CPR 31.14 request, which was received by the Claimant on the 6th of May 2014. The Claimant has failed to comply with this request.

 

By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...