Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • go do a Direct Debit Guarantee Clawback to your bank if you've now got control of his bank account finny.
    • Hello, Just to check I understand things right, he moved to a nursing home, you then kept paying the rent for a period of time whilst you sorted his belongings. You have asked to give notice and asked for backdated payments of rent from when you first asked which went ignored? They are still taking rent payments.   Have I understood correct?   If I've got anything wrong please correct me.
    • I contacted Sanctury housing in August 2023 after informing them my father in law who had Dementia had moved into a Nursing home December 2022. We kept the flat for 8 months until such a time we could accomodate some of his furniture that my wife wanted to keep. I contacted them in August 2023 to let them know the situation by email as I was the named person that could speak on his behalf. I informed them that we had left it to late for POT and were seeing a solicitor for Deputyship of his financies. I asked them what information would they need in order to give notice on the flat and we could provide details of his condition and nursing home. This went ignored I left it a month and then called them October 2023. I was promised a call back from a manager over the next few days. This never happened and it was end of November when I contacted them again and they had no record of me calling them. I explained the email and again I was told the local manager to the area would call me. This never happened and I ended up emailing them in January 2024 with a copy of the email from August. Again this went ignored and I had explained to them that we couldn't just go to the bank and stop the DD as we had tried. This email again went ignored. I then had a letter written to our home address in February asking us to get in contact with them (local manager) as they were concerend nobody was living in the flat. He had an email address so I copied in the last 2 emails to say I had been trying to give notice since August 2023. I also stated that I would like the rent that was paid from August 2023 refunded back to his account as I had officially tried to give notice then and it went ignored. He replied to us about wanting to look at the flat then notice could be given once he had contacted the nursing home to confirm he was actually living there now. Notice was giving for the 22 March 2024 and this would be when rent would stop and no further payment would be taken by this point. The fact I asked to be back dated went ignored. I have since noticed on 2 banks statement for April and May that they are still taking Rent payments of £501 from his bank. Further to this which seems very strange. He was with Eon Next for his utility bill again we were having problems getting this stopped as they needed a named person on his account which there wasn't one despite me managing his online account for him. I didn't check the email address that often that I used to set it up and went to check as noticed the credit he had built up with not living there was all getting refunded in February. The email said £600 would be refunded to his account with a (sorry you are leaving us message) but how can he leave as nobody but himself had access to speak with them. I also noticed the lady in the flat above him had a letter from her bank sent to his address with his address details but his name which was dated 4th March well before we had given notice and it said (thank you for giving us your new address details) we have set all this up for your account.   So Sanctuary housing must have been aware he wasn't living there from the ignored emails for the lady above to start changing address details to move into his flat before the housing manager had even got in contact to ask if anyone was living there. What I basically want to know his do we have any legal standing to claim the rent back from when I first contacted them in August 2023? There is roughly £3000 to come back  
    • lowell letter = we've mugged you once - why are you not paying this other debt....😎
    • i see you are posting this all over the internet too. here you say it was returned by the safety camera dept UK, Wales Returned NIP Nov23 - Heard Nothing - Now It's been returned as refused and have SJPN Form. Help please? WWW.FTLA.UK UK, Wales Returned NIP Nov23 - Heard Nothing - Now It's been returned as refused and have SJPN Form. Help please?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3499 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have you checked your local council website on what it says there !

 

Most councils advise you not to leave until the Bailiff turn up,before they even consider a person homeless...

 

Sorry, that's what I meant to say at the start of this thread in point 2, with the local council having knowledge, that I remain until the bailiff arrive, rather than leave before hand and breach any chances of being re-housed perm or temp...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 210
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

 

Apologies, I didn't want to confuse both detailed subjects and are two different sections on the website...

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Think for now they are better off concentrating on the other thread to get their housing needs sorted first. I don't doubt the LL will then start proceedings for recovery of monies owed.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, that's what I meant to say at the start of this thread in point 2, with the local council having knowledge, that I remain until the bailiff arrive, rather than leave before hand and breach any chances of being re-housed perm or temp...

 

Sorry, my apologies I missed that part

 

Local councils have a habit interpreting the law in different ways on homeless...

 

As for the council striking you off the waiting list due to eviction,contact the council your on the waiting list with !

 

LL wants all the money now and was trying to evict me via a S21 but keeps failing, I think he will try the S8 route now....(wants me out weather I paid or not)

 

Shelter have a very good guild on the eviction process http://england.shelter.org.uk/get_advice/eviction/eviction_of_private_tenants/eviction_of_assured_shorthold_tenants

 

And here http://england.shelter.org.uk/get_advice/help_with_money/rent_arrears

 

Possession orders,Some LLs are using this now to speed up evictions http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?50166-Enforcement-of-a-Possession-Order-using-the-HCEO-route

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Councils do not like rent arrears of any sort, so may affect any claim, but depend on circumstances. Suggest you contact them and see what they say!

Also speak to Shelter.

Was HB paid to you or direct to LL and you had to top up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has the LL served you with either s8g8 or s21 yet.

Has he obtained a repo order for either yet?

 

AFAIK most Councils' these days regard a s8g8 repo order granted as making yourself intentionally homeless. (rent arrears = T breach of Contract).

If you wait for bailiffs to evict, depending on your personal circumstances, Council may only offer you a emergency temp accom for a few nights in a hostel or B&B. not perm rehouse.

s21 repo order is regarded as 'no fault', even then Council may only offer up to 14 days in hostel or B&B, unless a property becomes avail in the interim for which you qualify. Most Councils will normally start looking once the Court repo action has been signed.

For either s8 or s21, if you vacate voluntarily before the hearing, even after having served your own valid NTQ, Council may regard this as making yourself 'intentionally homeless'. It may depend on where you live, availability of suitable Social Housing stock & how many claimants in the area are more deserving. eg disabled, medical, parent with young child.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the end the OP has had no court action even started yet !

 

Sorry to be blunt

 

OP would be better advised looking for a roof over there heads and worry about LL pursuing Rent arreas when LL actuality start the process ....

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has the LL served you with either s8g8 or s21 yet.

Has he obtained a repo order for either yet?

 

AFAIK most Councils' these days regard a s8g8 repo order granted as making yourself intentionally homeless. (rent arrears = T breach of Contract).

If you wait for bailiffs to evict, depending on your personal circumstances, Council may only offer you a emergency temp accom for a few nights in a hostel or B&B. not perm rehouse.

s21 repo order is regarded as 'no fault', even then Council may only offer up to 14 days in hostel or B&B, unless a property becomes avail in the interim for which you qualify. Most Councils will normally start looking once the Court repo action has been signed.

For either s8 or s21, if you vacate voluntarily before the hearing, even after having served your own valid NTQ, Council may regard this as making yourself 'intentionally homeless'. It may depend on where you live, availability of suitable Social Housing stock & how many claimants in the area are more deserving. eg disabled, medical, parent with young child.

 

Thank you for your detailed reply....No notice served yet and repo order either (last S21 just failed due to non-protection of my deposit)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Thank you for your prompt reply. Am I write in assuming that when I judge decides how much per month I can pay towards the CCJ, it will be within my means? (showing a financial statement of my finances and what I have remaining at the end of the month for debts)

Link to post
Share on other sites

My landlord is going to get a CCJ against me for rent arrears and I need clarification on the matter of HCE and the basis of when and how they can be instructed.....I plan to make a payment proposal to the judge with the CCJ and assuming i do not default....what other actions can be taken against me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When your hearing takes place you can make an offer to the court of affordable repayments..... make sure you have an I&E prepared to substantiate the amount you offer.... the Judge will then ask the creditor if they accept your proposals and will likely give his opinion to the creditor if he/she sees it to be realistic and should be given consideration. Your creditor is entitled to refuse any proposals and can either put forward what they see to be a realistic repayment amount or opt to seek enforcement.

 

 

You ask about HCE...... if the creditor has reason to believe you have assets that would satisfy the debt, they can transfer the ccj (if awarded) up to a writ of fi'fa by way of the High Court that will then be given to a HCEO and they will serve the writ on you. At this point you will not know of the impending visit to seize goods until you get that knock on the door, if you cannot pay or agree repayment with the HCEO (again it is up to the creditor to agree the amount they require for instalments to be put in place).....

 

 

You will be to apply for a stay of execution to the writ along with submission of a variation order making your offer of repayment, if the creditor again refuses then the Court will consider your circumstances carefully and make their own ruling. If things get to this stage you will have incurred substantial 'costs' and the Court is unlikely to comment or remove them.

 

 

I hope you can now see it is not a simple case of you offering to make payments and they will automatically be accepted and that everything hinges on the creditor accepting them. Some Judges will overrule a creditor's refusal to accept repayments at affordable levels if they can see it would do no good to drag the matter through further hearings when reality tells them the creditor will be flogging a dead horse. Other Judges will just award the ccj and adopt the 'let them all sort it outside my courtroom' attitude.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When your hearing takes place you can make an offer to the court of affordable repayments..... make sure you have an I&E prepared to substantiate the amount you offer.... the Judge will then ask the creditor if they accept your proposals and will likely give his opinion to the creditor if he/she sees it to be realistic and should be given consideration. Your creditor is entitled to refuse any proposals and can either put forward what they see to be a realistic repayment amount or opt to seek enforcement.

 

 

You ask about HCE...... if the creditor has reason to believe you have assets that would satisfy the debt, they can transfer the ccj (if awarded) up to a writ of fi'fa by way of the High Court that will then be given to a HCEO and they will serve the writ on you. At this point you will not know of the impending visit to seize goods until you get that knock on the door, if you cannot pay or agree repayment with the HCEO (again it is up to the creditor to agree the amount they require for instalments to be put in place).....

 

 

You will be to apply for a stay of execution to the writ along with submission of a variation order making your offer of repayment, if the creditor again refuses then the Court will consider your circumstances carefully and make their own ruling. If things get to this stage you will have incurred substantial 'costs' and the Court is unlikely to comment or remove them.

 

 

I hope you can now see it is not a simple case of you offering to make payments and they will automatically be accepted and that everything hinges on the creditor accepting them. Some Judges will overrule a creditor's refusal to accept repayments at affordable levels if they can see it would do no good to drag the matter through further hearings when reality tells them the creditor will be flogging a dead horse. Other Judges will just award the ccj and adopt the 'let them all sort it outside my courtroom' attitude.

 

Thank you for your reply. So, at the point of agreeing a payment plan at the CCJ stage, making an offer via I & e of affordability if no guarantee of the judge deciding my offers of repayment is realistic & affordable?....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply. So, at the point of agreeing a payment plan at the CCJ stage, making an offer via I & e of affordability if no guarantee of the judge deciding my offers of repayment is realistic & affordable?....

 

 

 

Sadly that is the case....there is no guarantee your offer will be accepted.

 

 

Only recently I sat through a hearing with a lady who had exactly the same scenario, it would be fair to say the Judge gave the impression he was 'bored' with the claim from the outset, he asked the defendant."do you owe the money" and of course the answer was "yes", next question was "what attempts have you made to repay the claimant" reply ,"none as yet sir, my income is very limited as you can see from the sheet before you but, I can make token repayments until such times as my circumstances change and I offer £5 pcm" Judge turned to the creditor raised his eyebrows and asked if he was prepared to accept that amount..."no" was the reply...after a few seconds shuffling his paperwork the Judge explained he was granting the claimant's claim because their was no doubt the money was owed, he then looked up and said " I will not waste any further time on this matter and I suggest both parties take their discussion on how the debt will be satisfied outside my courtroom"

 

 

In direct contrast, another hear I attended....the Judge again made the order in favour of the claimant BUT she took everything regarding the couples finances into consideration and all but told the claimant that if they refused what was on offer they would be very 'foolish. The claimant accepted the offer even though he knew it would take three years to get his money back.....mind you, even I felt in awe of that Judge and quickly made a note to myself to tread carefully if ever I came across her again!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again for clarification. The only asset I possess is a car, would the HCE attend my address without notice and take it then? And/or can they take my basic possessions from my home if I do not allow them entry?

 

Also, if my first attempt at trying to sort out a payment plan via the courts at the CCJ stage and the HCEO's are instructed, can I try to stop them and apply back to the court to make an offer of payment again?

Edited by confusedbunny
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again for clarification. The only asset I possess is a car, would the HCE attend my address without notice and take it then? And/or can they take my basic possessions from my home if I do not allow them entry? If the car is not on finance then yes it would be up for grabs.

 

Also, if my first attempt at trying to sort out a payment plan via the courts at the CCJ stage and the HCEO's are instructed, can I try to stop them and apply back to the court to make an offer of payment again?

If you are unfortunate enough to have your offer refused at ccj and your creditor decides to transfer the debt up to a writ of fi'fa'

then the next step is a two fold to application (n244) to stay execution and an (n245) to a variation of affordable repayment.

 

 

If your creditor has refused previous offers you will need to use the n245 as grounds to get the stay in place, eg....application for stay of execution pending a hearing to a further application for variation to payments....... the most important of these applications is the stay of execution(n244) so if you are preparing your I & E ready to submit with the variation but not quite ready you must push ahead and make the stay application regardless. Once that is in the Court will likely stay enforcement until they get to see your variation application.

 

 

It is always advisable to make both at the same time and take them in person to your nearest Court that acts as a district registry for the High Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask what the approximate value of your car is?

 

For example, if you a driving something worth £20k that is clear of finance and the creditor tells the court, your offer will almost certainly be refused.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are unfortunate enough to have your offer refused at ccj and your creditor decides to transfer the debt up to a writ of fi'fa'

then the next step is a two fold to application (n244) to stay execution and an (n245) to a variation of affordable repayment.

 

 

If your creditor has refused previous offers you will need to use the n245 as grounds to get the stay in place, eg....application for stay of execution pending a hearing to a further application for variation to payments....... the most important of these applications is the stay of execution(n244) so if you are preparing your I & E ready to submit with the variation but not quite ready you must push ahead and make the stay application regardless. Once that is in the Court will likely stay enforcement until they get to see your variation application.

 

 

It is always advisable to make both at the same time and take them in person to your nearest Court that acts as a district registry for the High Court.

 

Thank you once again for a detailed reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the value of the vehicle covers all or a good portion of what you owe you may find that your proposal will be refused. Given this asset you should ensure your payment plan is sensible.

 

It really will depend on what is produced to the judge on the day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Im back! I have a few queries: quick outline of circumstances:

 

 

Deposit not protected

Past two S21's failed

Currently on a SPT

No way of paying off arrears to get it under two months

 

 

1. Can LL serve a S8 on any date (or does it have to be before rent due date)? (during a SPT)

2. Can the S8 be served by hand (in communal hallway) (LL has previously fabricated lies and produced false witness statements that notices have been served to me in person) how can I challenge this if he pulls this stunt again?

3.will I have a chance to put in a defence? and request a hearing?

4. For the S8, I am hoping to put in a defence of: (please advise me accordingly)

-the LL has failed to serve me a S48, despite asking several times (rent not "lawfully" due until served)

-LL has just quoted an over excessive figure on the S8, no rent statement given or challenged

-LL not served notice by post or in person (lied and verbally said served to me by a 3rd party company)

 

 

Does anyone think my points in #4 suffice to get the claim to fail? (I realise I am avoiding the inevitable)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...