Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Between yourself and Dave you have produced a very good WS. However if you were to do a harder hitting WS it may be that VCS would be more likely to cancel prior to a hearing. The Contract . VCS [Jake Burgess?] are trying to conflate parking in a car park to driving along a road in order to defend the indefensible. It is well known that "NO Stopping " cannot form a contract as it is prohibitory. VCS know that well as they lose time and again in Court when claiming it is contractual. By mixing up parking with driving they hope to deflect from the fact trying to claim that No Stopping is contractual is tantamount to perjury. No wonder mr Burgess doesn't want to appear in Court. Conflation also disguises the fact that while parking in a car park for a period of time can be interpreted as the acceptance of the contract that is not the case while driving down a road. The Defendant was going to the airport so it is ludicrous to suggest that driving by a No Stopping  sign is tacitly accepting  the  contract -especially as no contract is even being offered. And even if a motorist did not wish to be bound by the so called contract what could they do? Forfeit their flight and still have to stop their car to turn around? Put like that the whole scenario posed by Mr Burgess that the Defendant accepted the contract by driving past the sign is absolutely absurd and indefensible. I certainly would not want to appear in Court defending that statement either. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I will do the contract itself later.
    • Yes - ignore. Because of another MET victim today I looked at all our MET cases back to June 2014 ... yes, 10 years. They have never dared take a motorist to court and argue their case before a judge.  They have started the odd court case, but as a means of trying to intimidate the motorist into coughing up, when the motorist defended and refused to give in it was MET who bottled it and discontinued.
    • Unpaid wages should be pretty straightforward if you did the work. Don't be intimidated. You need only show you were due money, and did not get money.   The risk is that they have no money to pay you (and legal fees) - frankly a solicitor maybe be costing them more than your claim is for and I might have expected them to make a commercial decision to settle before this point regardless of the merits of the case.
    • Thanks so much FTMDave.  This is so much better   I'm still tempted to leave the blue section in is as if I lose it will at least save me a little bit of money.  But I get your point that it's pretty superfluous.   Thinking I'll get this in the post on Monday unless you think it's worth delaying?   
    • Hi All I have now received a Final Reminder, which I have attached. Can you confirm that I should still ignore this letter and take no further action. It does not appear to say "Letter of Claim" anywhere on the document but I just wanted to check with you all. Many thanks FightUnfairParkingTickets Parking Charge Final Reminder issued 29th May 2024.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Partner's credit history is in tatters


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3729 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I discovered that my partner's credit history is in serious problem with several defaults from mail order companies

when we opened an equifax credit report for her.

 

all of these debts are from mail order companies.

 

I think the late penalty charges all started very small but increased exponentially

and she got scared and stopped paying for them .

 

I would like suggestions please on how to clear the defaults from her record.

 

The mail order companies are listed below.

Mail Order Agency from Capquest Investments Limited.

Mail Order Agency from Jd Williams Ta Marisota

Mail Order Agency from Lowell Portfolio 1 Ltd

Mail Order Agency from Jd Williams Ta Simply Be

Mail Order Agency from Vertbaudet Uk Limited

Mail Order Agency from Jd Williams Ta The Brilliant Gift Shop

Mail Order Agency from Jd Williams Ta Fashion World

Mail Order Agency from Hennes and Mauritz

Mail Order Agency from Grattan - Grattan Agency}

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Jimkay

 

We need more info and amounts on debts etc...

 

Id be worried about Capquest and Lowell here incase they go for legal action, but please tell us more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As above.

 

Can you post some info about them.

 

Theyve probably been placed on the file correctly as its a genuine record of your credit.

 

HOWEVER, if the defaults were placed there due to any charges on the account, then you can challenge them

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have listed the balance on them below .

she was making regular payment on most of them but generally stopped around June last year.Most of them had starting balance around £200 but the charges kept increasing astronomically and that's where she got afraid and chickened out.She did confirm though that she didn't sign anything- it was all agreed over the internet

 

Mail Order Agency from Capquest Investments Limited (1) , Default / Delinquent Balance £ 139, Current Balance £ 294

Mail Order Agency from Capquest Investments Limited (2) , Default / Delinquent Balance £ 453, Current Balance £ 661

Mail Order Agency from Jd Williams Ta Marisota , Default / Delinquent Balance £ 953, Current Balance £ 1043

Mail Order Agency from Lowell Portfolio 1 Ltd, Default / Delinquent Balance £ 195, Current Balance £ 329

Mail Order Agency from Vertbaudet Uk Limited , Default / Delinquent Balance £ 319, Current Balance £ 309

Mail Order Agency from Jd Williams Ta The Brilliant Gift Shop , Default / Delinquent Balance £ 203, Current Balance £ 203

Mail Order Agency from Jd Williams Ta Fashion World Default ,Delinquent Balance £ 212, Current Balance £ 212

Mail Order Agency from Hennes and Mauritz ,Delinquent Balance £ 151, Current Balance £ 151

Mail Order Agency from Grattan - Grattan Agency, Delinquent Balance £ 283, Current Balance £ 250

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to start thinking about SAR's and sending CCA's out. You seem to have a lot of charges you can potentially claim back. The CCA's will tell you if the new owners can actually legally enforce the debts.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

you prob only need 2 sars

 

I to JDW

I to Shop direct

 

what are the dates ranges of the defaults in the debt summaries please

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

With mail order accounts the delivery and payment for the 1st order is confirmation that the account has been opened and you agree to the terms & conditions, signature is not required.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Brigadier2jcs

I am not really contesting the acceptance of the agreements per se.

what I'd like to achieve is a freeze on the interests , claim back any unreasonable charges , agree an affordable repayment plan and remove the defaults from credit file.

I know you don't approach these credit companies begging or else they will take me to the slaughterhouse.

is it ok if I CCA all of them and SAR JD and Capquest?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm under the impression that if the debt has defaulted, interest can no longer be added. I'm sure Brig/DX will correct me if that's wrong. you are wrong yes - dx

 

With regard to the charges you mention, they need to be justified especially the DCA's charges

- see when the info comes back how much they have added on.

 

I believe the defaults will only be removed in two circumstances,

if the charges are unlawful and they agree they will remove it, otherwise it's a six year wait.

They will mark the debt as settled when it is paid but it will still stay on her record.

 

There are no shortcuts to cleaning up a credit record with that many defaults unfortunately!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Brigadier2jcs

I am not really contesting the acceptance of the agreements per se.

what I'd like to achieve is a freeze on the interests , claim back any unreasonable charges , agree an affordable repayment plan and remove the defaults from credit file.

I know you don't approach these credit companies begging or else they will take me to the slaughterhouse.

is it ok if I CCA all of them and SAR JD and Capquest?

Hi unfortunately making payments now will nor result in the removal of credit file entries, full & final settlement less than the total balance outstanding will get the entries marked partially satisfied or if full payment is made marked satisfied.

 

 

You MAY be able to negotiate with a creditor or DCA on an F&F settlement to get all negative data removed but increasingly they are refused.

 

 

Partially satisfied or satisfied debts should remain on the credit file for the balance of the six year life of the default.

 

 

SARs go to the original creditors not DCAs who will have little data apart from that supplied when the portfolio of debts was sold.

 

 

My concern here is the actual amount outstanding as if these should get into the hands of the Likes of the Lowell Group which sometimes consolidates all the debts they hold on one individual and if this amount is over £750.00 issue a Statutory Demand (1st Step in the Bankruptcy process).

 

 

Capquest is not any "easy" DCA to deal with.

 

 

You don't need to write "begging" letters a straight forward statement of finances. I&E and see what is reasonably affordable and stick to that amount, these debts are Not Priorities.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...