Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Resume payments with the debt collectors? You say not to pay dca though do you not? 
    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
    • might of been better to have got them all defaulted 2yrs ago as we carefully explained before then you'd already be 1/3rd there and your current issue would not be one.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Customer Compliance Arranged Telephone Interview


PomBlue
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3761 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm new here and am not too sure if this is the right section for this.

 

 

I have been sent a letter from the DWP with a time and date when they will phone to carry out a Customer Compliance Interview over the phone. I've read on this site that these are generated by a computer and are unlikely to be specifically aim at me on suspicion that I've done something wrong. I've also read that they focus on your bank accounts etc but unless they have acquired these by some other means they are not going to have them to view at the interview. If anyone has had these prearranged interviews, over the phone, I would be interested to know what they actually ask.

 

 

I have a speech impediment and suffer from depression and poor sleep patterns and I don't take even mild pressure at all well. This usually results in me being almost mute. I have also read that they don't familiarize themselves with the client's details (I have found in the past with other things this to be true) so having to convey my situation at the outset is going to be stressful.

 

 

Can anyone advise on this?......and I hope I can find this when I return...

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you give permission someone can speak on the phone on your behalf. The just need to pass the phone over at the beginning to do the security questions and then the other person can handle the call and explain the situation. Then the compliance officer can decide how they want to proceed.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm new here and am not too sure if this is the right section for this.

 

 

I have been sent a letter from the DWP with a time and date when they will phone to carry out a Customer Compliance Interview over the phone. I've read on this site that these are generated by a computer and are unlikely to be specifically aim at me on suspicion that I've done something wrong. I've also read that they focus on your bank accounts etc but unless they have acquired these by some other means they are not going to have them to view at the interview. If anyone has had these prearranged interviews, over the phone, I would be interested to know what they actually ask.

 

 

I have a speech impediment and suffer from depression and poor sleep patterns and I don't take even mild pressure at all well. This usually results in me being almost mute. I have also read that they don't familiarize themselves with the client's details (I have found in the past with other things this to be true) so having to convey my situation at the outset is going to be stressful.

 

 

Can anyone advise on this?......and I hope I can find this when I return...

I don't have anyone locally or free at this time to do this.

 

 

I'm more interested in what they are going to ask, what I should expect. Not knowing this and being in the dark on this issue just makes me feel at a disadvantage. You know, information is power.

 

 

Often slowness and pauses are read as a sign of guilt or an effort to hide something. I will, of course, start off by trying to convey my situation to the person.

 

 

Anyway, thank you for your input.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Customer compliance interviews are not indicative that your under suspicion or have done something wrong. It's merely a check that the payments you're receiving are for the same set of circumstances you declared - they'll ask to see proof of savings/bank statement, who lives with you etc x

scotgal 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Customer compliance interviews are not indicative that your under suspicion or have done something wrong. It's merely a check that the payments you're receiving are for the same set of circumstances you declared - they'll ask to see proof of savings/bank statement, who lives with you etc x

It's a phone call, how will they see the proofs?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter is to prompt you to declare any changes in circumstances. In my CC interview they just photocopied my passport, tenancy agreement, landlord's statement that all the bills are in his name because I am a lodger, his utility bills, his TV licence, my 6 months worth of bank statements.

 

I wrote a letter to explain what the small cash payments made into my bank account were [to round up balance to £10 to enable me to withdraw all my money as can not pay by card].

 

Someone said she had to show the receipt about £9 loose change she paid into her own account. You sold something on E-bay, the £20 shows in your statement: income.

 

I have read the costumer compliance guidance and it is not true that they pick ppl randomly. There are certain risk groups upon whom they do random checks. Eg self-employed started claiming JSA / claimant recently separated from partner.

 

Where there is a fraud allegation but they do not have evidence, they do a CCI. Eg your ex claims you working as a hair dresser but not declaring it. He can not show any evidence, DWP can not find any evidence so they ask for bank statements to see if any income apart from what you declared / apart from benefits.

 

Please update us to say whether you were asked to show documents I listed above as it is pretty standard.

 

My JCP manager said it is because I finished the Work Programme, to update my file. Can not really believe it but never mind. Asked him why it is called CCI then. He said because they have nothing else to call it.

 

The adviser who was supposed to interview me was struck down by God [had an accident] so was not present. Another adviser photocopied my documents and manager claims that that was it: there will be no interview and no questions asked.

 

To OP: If it was anything serious, the fraud team would be dealing with it, not CC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCOI1 is the standard letter they should send but they change the wording to make it sound like you are guilty.

 

"A query has arisen about your entitlement" is not in the standard letter.

 

Form / statement MF47 is what you supposed to fill out during the interview.[ATTACH=CONFIG]49086[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]49087[/ATTACH]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Beatrice the OP has told us it's a telephone interview so an interview is taking place and questions will be asked.

 

PornBlue what I told you was personal experience, only a few months ago. Maybe they'll ask you to bring them in later or maybe they won't require any documents. The telephone interview will determine what happens next. If you feel you can't speak to them over the phone arrange an appointment to go in

scotgal 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update on my details if this will help those replying, I'm in the Support Group and recently I have had an ATOS medical at home. After the initial shock of the letter had subsided I thought all this arrangement of a phone call was because of the status of my claim i.e. my health etc.????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Additionally, reading above and other threads about the wording of these letters my letter has nothing too aggressive. The worst is, "When you claimed benefit you agreed to tell us immediately if the circumstances relating to your benefit entitlement changed." And then goes on to say that if there has been an unreported change then any overpayments will have to be paid back. This is pretty standard for almost all their correspondence is it not...?

 

 

Unless they are playing the softly, softly approach before they pounce...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had this telephone interview and the guy seemed to be too helpful at times warning me about reaching that £6000 level and so on. He typed out the main details of the info I gave him and these will be posted to me. I asked about "what next?" and he said there'll be no further action and my benefits won't change based on the phone call.

 

 

The only odd thing, which I've had before, was that he said the NHRC (who ever they are) had informed them that I had (or had had) an ISA with £8000 in it. When this came up before about two years ago and I told the guy I had no ID with a photo on it he went cold and never contacted me again. This gave me the impression that someone had used my details to open up such an account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only odd thing, which I've had before, was that he said the NHRC (who ever they are) had informed them that I had (or had had) an ISA with £8000 in it.

 

Might that have been HMRC ?

It may be worth your while asking for a search of bank accounts over on http://www.mylostaccount.org.uk/ to see if it turns up any information. The search won't cost you anything, and if the DWP ask again, you can tell them that you have made every effort to locate this ISA that they claim you have - It won't reveal any accounts that have been closed, just the dormant ones if they exist.

 

It is possible that someone along the way linked this account to your national insurance number in error, or it might have been a fishing trip on the part of the DWP.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...