Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3775 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, im hoping someone can give me some advice.

 

I had a liability order against me, which i then agreed a repayment plain with the council directly,

 

at the end of last year i missed two months payment,

due to my husbands hours at work being cut, and having two toddlers to feed and clothe.

 

I have today received a letter from Equita bailiffs saying if i dont pay

or enter into a satisfactory arrangement then they will visit to remove goods.

 

I have rung the number on the letter,

and they have given me the mobile number of a bailiff

and told me i need to ring him directly as he has my case.

 

I know people on here say not to contact the bailiffs,

but i really dont want this escalating further,

 

i have left a voicemail message with this person asking for them to ring me back.

I cannot pay the full amount of £731.50

i am hoping he will agree to an arrangement plan.

 

My question is,

at what stage of the whole bailiffs procedure am i at?

the letter didnt mention imminent repossesion

(it only mentioned it if i didnt pay or enter into an arrangement)

 

what are my chances at this point of them agreeing an arrangement?

on a total of £731

what would be the amount they would accept?

 

The fact that the equita office wont deal with me

and they want me to ring him directly has scared me

and makes me think a visit is imminent.

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regardless of the bailiff intervention you have every right to pay the Council direct,

there is no law to say you have to deal with any bailiff.

 

As a suggestion...

..work on an income and expenditure plan and decide what are both affordable and sustainable payments for you to meet,

then set up a regular payment date/day and make your payments direct to the counci

l using your reference for the year in question online.

 

If a bailiff attends you do not have to let him in or even speak with them

(regardless of all the threats he will spout forth) other than to open a window

(preferably upstairs) and inform him you are dealing direct with the council,

 

remove any goods from outside your property (garden furniture etc)

and if you have a car make sure you park it at least a 10 min walk away from the house.

 

If you ensure the bailiff cannot access goods to do a 'paper seizure'(known as a levy)

then the most that can be added to your account are two visit fees

( total £42.50 and you will need to budget your payment plan to take these into consideration.

 

If you follow the above it would be advisable to ensure all payments are made without fail on the due date

, it is very rare for a council to take matters further if there is a history of regular payments

as that shows you are not refusing to pay.

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Twinmommy81

 

Welcome to CAG

One of the experts will be along shortly with advise,

First thing,

If the Bailiff turns up you do not have to let him into the property, what ever he says at this stage,

if you have a car on the drive either put it in the garage or move it away from the property,

this is so he can not place a levy on it.

 

I would also pay the council direct via the internet, even if it is not the full amount.

 

Leakie

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you both, so are you recommending that i continue to pay the monthly amoun

t i was paying directly online to the council?

 

I was paying £69 on the 3rd of every month,

 

i missed decembers and januarys payment,

 

if i carry on paying that amount on the 3rd feb?

 

my balance is £731 though,

will the bailiffs continue to write and visit until its cleared?

 

i really dont want them visiting for that long.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you asked the Council to confirm what is actually owing? You may find it is different to what the bailiffs claim. You need to speak to someone at the Council and ask the following questions:

1 - how many Liability Orders they have against you

2 - the dates they were obtained

3 - the addresses they were for

4 - the period of time each covers

5 - how much each one was for

6 - how much is still outstanding

7 - the dates they were passed on for enforcement

8 - the dates & amounts of any payments

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the council tax is solely in my name, and the family car is registered in my husbands name, can they still take it??

 

Because you are married and live at the same property your husband is seen to be jointly liable and class 'ownership' of the car to be joint, they can take it unless it is on finance (not a bank loan) or used solely by your husband in the course of his employment (not merely travel to and from place of work)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because you are married and live at the same property your husband is seen to be jointly liable and class 'ownership' of the car to be joint, they can take it unless it is on finance (not a bank loan) or used solely by your husband in the course of his employment (not merely travel to and from place of work)

 

Thank you,

 

i am going to try and clear the full amount as soon as i can,

but any payments will be made directly to the council,

 

i noticed earlier when trying to ring them that they tell equita about any payments made directly to them,

so im guessing if they are told ive paid it off (eventually)

they should stop writing/visiting? apart from any fees they add on?

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing to be aware of since Equita are involved. It might be your Council have off loaded some of their admin functions to a firm called Capita, who in turn own 2 Bailiff Co's one of which so happens to be Equita. Therefore if you ring the Council you may be talking to a Capita emploee rather than one from the Council & they are noted for being very unhelpful.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing to be aware of since Equita are involved. It might be your Council have off loaded some of their admin functions to a firm called Capita, who in turn own 2 Bailiff Co's one of which so happens to be Equita. Therefore if you ring the Council you may be talking to a Capita emploee rather than one from the Council & they are noted for being very unhelpful.

 

This maybe the case, as i tried to ring the council to ask for the info recommended above, and it put me straight through to the same equita office from earlier today.

Can i ask, regarding my husbands car, his father lives right next door to us, if we put the car on his driveway, would they know it was our car?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This maybe the case, as i tried to ring the council to ask for the info recommended above, and it put me straight through to the same equita office from earlier today.

Can i ask, regarding my husbands car, his father lives right next door to us, if we put the car on his driveway, would they know it was our car?

 

Possibly, can you lock it in a garage?

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you might also want to try and clear this a bit quicker

they wont want it to rollover passed march

as the new CTAX starts then.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This maybe the case, as i tried to ring the council to ask for the info recommended above, and it put me straight through to the same equita office from earlier today.

Can i ask, regarding my husbands car, his father lives right next door to us, if we put the car on his driveway, would they know it was our car?

 

The danger is they will clamp the car and you are then left to prove it is not to your household.....best to keep it well out of sight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...