Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HRMC Tax Calculation Advice


Baz1994
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3847 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have just received a Tax Calculation for 2012-2013 from HMRC advising that I have underpaid some tax.

 

Sorry to sound stupid but on checking the calculations presented against the relevant P60 the PAYE Income amounts differ - Can anyone possibly explain or give a reason as to why this is ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you have another job or income during the year? You should have a p60 for each job.

 

Do you have any benefits with your job which may be taxable?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you have another job or income during the year? You should have a p60 for each job.

 

Do you have any benefits with your job which may be taxable?

 

No only one job caro and only one P60.

 

I have no other benefits with my current employers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd get whoever does your wages to check your p60 and if it matches what they've told HMRC.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem. Let us know how you get on. :)

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HMRC will forward you copies of any additional employment data it holds. Telephone call will usually suffice, if you can live with the 45 minutes on hold!

 

I had a similar issue in 2010-2011 with an incorrectly keyed N.I number [mine was prefixed NM his was NP] for someone at the other end of the country. Both incomes were allocated to me for tax purposes which only came to light after receiving a demand for over 4k whilst everything I'd earned had been discharged via PAYE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you had only job, no benefits in kind like a company car, and no other factors to consider, you should see tax code 810L on your P60 - let me know if thats the case.

 

When you read down the tax calculation, does it make any mention of 'underpaid tax for previous years'? that can sometimes confuse people as HMRC often play catch up.

 

Im a little confused by the line you posted:

 

"No only one job caro and only one P60."

 

Do you mean you had a company car? If so, its entirely possible you could get an underpayment as HMRC can only estimate the car/fuel benefit at the start of the year, re-calculating it

when your employer sends in its P11ds

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Im a little confused by the line you posted:

 

"No only one job caro and only one P60."

 

Do you mean you had a company car? If so, its entirely possible you could get an underpayment as HMRC can only estimate the car/fuel benefit at the start of the year, re-calculating it

when your employer sends in its P11ds

 

 

I think it was a reply to the user with username "caro", rather than a typo for "company car".

Link to post
Share on other sites

HMRC will forward you copies of any additional employment data it holds. Telephone call will usually suffice, if you can live with the 45 minutes on hold!

 

I had a similar issue in 2010-2011 with an incorrectly keyed N.I number [mine was prefixed NM his was NP] for someone at the other end of the country. Both incomes were allocated to me for tax purposes which only came to light after receiving a demand for over 4k whilst everything I'd earned had been discharged via PAYE.

 

Many thanks for your reply and will give them a call.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you had only job, no benefits in kind like a company car, and no other factors to consider, you should see tax code 810L on your P60 - let me know if thats the case.

 

When you read down the tax calculation, does it make any mention of 'underpaid tax for previous years'? that can sometimes confuse people as HMRC often play catch up.

 

Im a little confused by the line you posted:

 

"No only one job caro and only one P60."

 

Do you mean you had a company car? If so, its entirely possible you could get an underpayment as HMRC can only estimate the car/fuel benefit at the start of the year, re-calculating it

when your employer sends in its P11ds

 

Yes it does actually, all starting to make sense I think ! They have mentioned that underpaid amount is from previous years (2011 & 2012). I have just received another Tax calculation for 2011-2012 this morning showing JSA amount plus PAYE income and another Tax Underpaid amount which has appeared on my latest Tax Calculation received for 2012-2013.

 

Does look like HRMC are playing catch-up !

 

There is also again a Flat Rate Job Expense figure for £120 in which I can only imagine is in respect of my previous employment with the Post Office for clothing allowance ? Will HRMC be able to confirm this ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cool....the penny drops :)

 

HMRC will indeed be able to confirm about the flat rate job expenses. That will stay in your code until such time as you tell them otherwise - so yes get in touch.

 

Unfortunately it can get confusing when HMRC play catch up. The fact you had Job Seekers Allowance would increase the likelihood of an underpayment as it isnt something that would have been included in your tax code for the year.

 

It sounds like someone is reviewing your file over the last three years and the 2013 tax calculation is the result of this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again and yes all seems to be falling into place. They have mentioned that the underpaid amount of £465.80 will be collected through tax code for 2013 and 2014, so I suppose that is some consolation as I have not got that spare at the moment :wink:

 

Will my Tax Code change again in that case ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ouch! you need to speak to them if they intend collecting this in your 2013/14 code

 

There are only 4 months of 2013/14 left (assuming any new code doesnt get to your employer in time for the November payrun)

 

This will mean that your pay packet could be hit hard in December if they try and take 9/12 of that debt in one go.

 

Given the close proximity to the end of the tax year, I would be arguing for them to begin collecting the debt from 2014/15 not 2013/14

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ouch! you need to speak to them if they intend collecting this in your 2013/14 code

 

There are only 4 months of 2013/14 left (assuming any new code doesnt get to your employer in time for the November payrun)

 

This will mean that your pay packet could be hit hard in December if they try and take 9/12 of that debt in one go.

 

Given the close proximity to the end of the tax year, I would be arguing for them to begin collecting the debt from 2014/15 not 2013/14

 

Oh dear dont need that right now :shock: Will get onto them in the morning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...