Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
    • Hello everyone,   Just thought id post an update.   I've today now finally received a claim form from PRA Group. Bit annoying as the last payment to them would have August 2018 so was nearly over the line. I believe my only grounds for defence is that they haven't managed to produce a copy of the DN notice, however from some online research I managed to find some case law that stated they can use their systems screenshot to show proof of it being sent.   I know I have to respond back to their claim form and will do so online on moneyclaim, is now the time to pick up the phone to them and negotiate a deal?   Any advice as always is much appreciated it.
    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fredrickson and barclaycard [morgan stanley] debt


eiggy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3832 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, I'm looking for some help with a Barclaycard debt.

 

The card was a Morgan Stanley which got sold to Barclaycard,

the account was opened in Dec 06 and defaulted in Sep 10 with a balance of £4K.

 

I received a welcome letter from Fredrickson International taking over from Lowell in August

and replied with a prove it letter.

 

Today I received a reply from Fredrickson which included what looks like a digital application for the card,

the application is populated with my home/work details so must be a copy of the actual application.

The application does not have my signature but page 2 of what they sent acknowledges a digital signature for me.

 

I've uploaded what they sent me although I'm not sure if it viewable

(any suggestions on how to upload it correctly appreciated).

 

Today I sent off a CCA request as I never actually made one in the first place, only a prove it letter was sent by me.

 

I was wondering;

 

Is what they sent any use to them for enforcement purpose?

 

Would the document satisfy my CCA request if they reply with the same document?

Where do I stand with this?

 

I've have a faint understanding that they need my actual signature on the agreement to make it enforceable

as the agreement is pre April 2007, I think I'm on the right track but need some human advice.

 

Any help is greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks.

Edited by eiggy
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've uploaded what they sent me although I'm not sure if it viewable (any suggestions on how to upload it correctly appreciated).

 

 

Copied from instructions posted by DX100uk

 

 

 

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets - as a picture[jpg] file

don't forget you can use a mobile phone or a digital camera too!!

'

BUT......

ENSURE: remove all pers info inc. barcodes etc using paint program

but leave all monetary figures and dates.

************************* ************************* *******

{DO NOT USE A BIRO OR PEN OR USE SEE THRU TAPE OR LABELS]

DO NOT USE ANY PDF EDITOR TO BLANK STUFF, THAT CAN BE REMOVED

************************* ************************* ***********

DO IT IN MSPAINT.EXE or any photo editing program

if you have multiple scans/pics

put them in a word doc FIRST and convert that to PDF

convert existing PC files to PDF [office has an installable print to PDF option]

..

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites [http://docupub.com/pdfconvert/]

it would be better to upload a multipage pdf if

you have many images too rather than many single pdfs

.

or if you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

or use word and save as pdf

try and logically name your file so people know what it is.

i'e Default notice dd-mm-yyyy

.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

where are the T&C's for that date?

 

tell us about the debt

 

is it on your CRA file?

 

whos shown as the owner there?

 

if BC sold the debt

there must be a VERY good reason

 

could be PENALT charges

and/or PPI to reclaim?

 

i'd get an sar off to BC to get all the statements and check.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

where are the T&C's for that date?

 

tell us about the debt

 

is it on your CRA file?

 

whos shown as the owner there?

 

if BC sold the debt

there must be a VERY good reason

 

could be PENALT charges

and/or PPI to reclaim?

 

i'd get an sar off to BC to get all the statements and check.

 

dx

 

Hello, thanks for the reply.

 

Sorry but I'm not sure what you mean by where are the t&c's for that date, the doc is just as sent.

 

The card was a Morgan Stanley opened in Dec 2006, the account was transferred to Barclaycard at some point and I defaulted in Sep 2010 with a balance of £4K.

 

I was hounded by ages by Mercers (when I think back to how they hounded me back then - I feel sick!) then it was passed on to someone (can't remember who) they eventually offered me a discounted settlement then it went to Lowell now its with Fredrickson.

 

The record on my CRA file is from Barclaycard and is marked as satisfied Feb 2012. No DCA has taken over the record or placed an additional record for the debt, this is unusual right?

 

Theres no PPI but there would be missed payment charges for the last 6 months or so, do you think its worth reclaiming those?

 

I've sent off a CCA request yesterday and I'm guessing they will reply with what they have already sent so I'm wondering what my next move should be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Eiggy,

 

The CRA shows the a/c as "Satisfied" ?? Any idea how or why this may be ? I wonder how Fredericksons would explain chasing the debt when the CRA files show the debt as satisfied.

 

Do you actually recall if you applied online or with a signature on an application form. For online applications made after December 2004, a digital tick was an acceptable alternative to a signed signature box.

 

If you don't have all the old a/c statements but you think there may be penalty charges to reclaim, you can get the statements by sending a SAR to Barclaycard. However, if the only charges relate to the period from 2010 onwards after you defaulted on the a/c, there will not be much in the way of compound interest to claim on top.

 

If you do have the a/c statements, put the penalty charges on a site spreadsheet, after taking some time to read other threads here to see what's involved in the process.

 

:-)

Edited by slick132

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm..

 

looks like the card is up for sale if it shows settled.

so lowells have not sent an notice of assignment

that they've bought the debt.?

 

there must be lots to reclaim if you've been offered a discount.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm..

 

looks like the card is up for sale if it shows settled.

so lowells have not sent an notice of assignment

that they've bought the debt.?

 

there must be lots to reclaim if you've been offered a discount.

 

dx

 

Yes, Lowells sent me a hello/assignment letter back in March 2012. The discounted settlement was offered by who ever was pestering before Lowells.

 

Didn't think there was many charges, I always paid on time before the default. I remember getting late and over limit charges during the 6 months or so before the default but thats it. I've sent a SAR today to find out for sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Eiggy,

 

The CRA shows the a/c as "Satisfied" ?? Any idea how or why this may be ? I wonder how Fredericksons would explain chasing the debt when the CRA files the debt as satisfied.

 

Do you actually recall if you applied online or with a signature on an application form. For online applications made after December 2004, a digital tick was an acceptable alternative to a signed signature box.

 

If you don't have all the old a/c statements but you think there may be penalty charges to reclaim, you can get the statements by sending a SAR to Barclaycard. However, if the only charges relate to the period from 2010 onwards after you defaulted on the a/c, there will not be much in the way of compound interest to claim on top.

 

If you do have the a/c statements, put the penalty charges on a site spreadsheet, after taking some time to read other threads here to see what's involved in the process.

 

:-)

 

Barclaycard marked it as satisfied when they passed it on to Lowells in March 2012. I am surprised Lowells or Fredrickson haven't taken over the record or placed their own for this debt.

 

I don't recall signing anything, I've attached what they send me in a previous post. I don't know what to make of it.

 

SAR has been sent today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if Freds are not the current owner, they still have an obligation to follow procedure with a s78 Request.

 

See the BLUE writing in the CCA letter here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387435-CCA-Request-Consumer-Credit-Act-1974&p=4193472&viewfull=1#post4193472

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if Freds are not the current owner, they still have an obligation to follow procedure with a s78 Request.

 

:-)

 

Thanks for the reply, what do you think I should do? The letter said that my account has been put on hold for 14 days to allow me time to make my request and after this time debt collection on this account may resume.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait the 12+2 days then send the non compliance letter.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay I've looked at the letter and it answered those questions.

 

Could someone have a look at the uploaded document in post #3 and offer advice on its possible use for enforcement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd be awating the sar

 

where did that CCA in post 3 come from?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Freds are lying as usual. They know VERY well, that if they chase a debt such as a loan/cc etc, then they have to be able to produce a complaint CCA on demand.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

sar must be signed

 

cca's don't

 

you are OK

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Eiggy,

 

Having just read your thread back from the start, I think that Freds have already sent you the credit agreement even though they sent it in response to a Prove It letter as opposed to a CCA Request.

 

Can you confirm if the agreement itself is legible as the PDF is actually quite hard to read and it's substantially illegible in places.

 

In terms of it's content, it appears to be lacking a Cancellation Rights box. Also, a Signature box that would include the Tick box is missing.

 

So it may be that these points could be raised as part of a defence if court action was taken. Whether it is accepted, of course, is down to :-

 

1. How well you prepare and present your defence.

 

2. The judge on the day.

 

I wouldn't lose any sleep about signing the SAR - it'll cause no problems for you.

 

:-)

Edited by slick132
typo

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Slick, thanks for your reply.

 

The document they sent is really small and I can just about read it.

 

It doesn't state the amount of credit just that they will set my limit.

 

It also gives an example of total charges for credit assuming a limit of 1500 but gives no actual figures.

 

Does that help me?

 

It looks like it's missing a bit after interest rate (section E).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...