Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • She's an only child and he as a brother and sister. He has no will and we have done a check on this to find out if he had left one and nothing has come up. He has savings of around 28k His sister and brother are well off so 28k is nothing to them and aren't interested in his money. This just leaves my wife/his daughter. Would this still need to go to probate there is no estate e.g house or business to sell and the amount left in his bank is just small? When his wife died they just closed her bank account and moved her money across to his account and we just assumed that once my wife has handed in the death certificate and shown evidence of who she is the same would apply to her? We don't know yet the council have only just written to us today with a guide of what to do next.  
    • Did your FiL leave a Will and if so who is the Executor? Strictly speaking banks could refuse to take instructions until Probate is granted but In practice I would expect the bank to take instructions to cancel the DD if the Executor presents the death certificate and a certified copy of the Will
    • Hi   Sorry I probably wasn't clear enough. He had lived in the flat until December 2022 with Dementia by this time it was unsafe for him to have capacity to live on his own and he had to move into a nursing home. We had left it too late to apply for power of attorney so approached a solicitor in March last year for Deputyship. We were still in the process of dealing with it by May 2024. He passed away a few weeks ago and the solicitor was contacted to halt the application and we will just pay the fees of what work he has done up until now. My wife was the named person on her dads bank account but we didn't have the ability to alter any direct debits hence the reasons for applying for Deputyship as we were having problems trying to stop some payments coming out of his account Eon being another difficult company. We kept his flat on from December 2022 - August 2023. it was at this point I contacted Sancutary housing to inform them he was no longer living in the flat, it had been cleared out and was ready for a new tenant and that he had Dementia and had moved into a nursing home December 2022 and explained the reasons why we kept it on. As the named person to speak on his behalf I asked them what proof they needed in order to give notice on the flat e.g proof of dementia and proof that he was living in a nursing home and anything else they wanted. The lady in the upstairs flat and some of the other residence in the street had asked about him and we had told them he had moved into a nursing home. The lady in the upstairs flat wanted his flat for medical reasons so asked us once we had given notice could be let her know and she'll ask them if she can have it. We explained the difficulties and it was left at that but I did tell her I would let her know once notice was given. I contacted the company by email a number of times and also telephone conversations and nobody followed it up and it wasn't till the end of February this year that the housing manager for the area wrote to our home address to ask about him that he had been to the flat a couple of times and nobody answered and he had asked some of the residence in the street and they hadn't seen him for sometime. There was an email address on the letter so I contacted him and copied in the last 2 emails I sent Sanctuary regarding me wanting to give notice on the flat for at least 9 months explaining that it went ignored as well as telephone calls. I also stated I wanted to have his rent payments returned from the date I wanted to give notice which was from August 2023 as the bank wouldn't let us stop the DD without POT or deputyship explaining we were in the process of Deputyship. He gave some excuse about not having POT to cancel on his behalf and spoke to someone in HR and said he would contact the nursing home to confirm he was there with Dementia and if it all checks out we can give notice on the flat which came to an end on the 22 March 2024. There was not mention of back payments for the rent already paid or the fact I had asked to give notice in August 2023. Despite someone living in the flat from 1st April they continue to take DD payments for the flat and have taken another 2 payments of £501. another concerning thing despite Eon not allowing us to cancel the DD to his account the lady upstairs informed Eon that she was moving into the flat February 2024 and Eon refunding the account to his bank and said in an email sorry you are leaving us and canceled his account. Something they wouldn't let us do but a stranger. She also changed her bank account to his address despite the fact notice hadn't been given on the flat yet. So we need to find out how much information Sanctuary actually had for her to tell her power company she was moving into the flat in February despite the housing manager only just getting in contact to find out where he was. So a complaint is going into Eon and Sanctuary and we are going to take advice and ask the bank to charge back the rent. My wife hasn't taken the death certificate to the bank yet to inform them of his passing.  
    • Yes, I believe the Starbucks was closed at the time the car was parked there 
    • hi lolerz many thanks for your reply and help. My 2 months has passed i was waiting until the court proceedings started. As i went through this process not that long ago, i shall look back at my old thread for how to respond. Ill get the docs scanned soon thanks.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ANPR ltd £100 parking notice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3833 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

i parked my motorbike on a cycle rack on private land,

came back to my motorbike with a parking notice on there,

it said i had broken their terms of contract with their employer

which costs them £100 and they demand recovering the costs from me,

 

i did some research and saw they have been taken to court for being a sham company,

as no where in their contract does it state that it costs them £100 so there is no debt to recover.

 

40days later i receive another sham letter from them stating i now owe them £140 but if i payed it in the next 3 days its still £100.

 

They state in their letter they stuck the notice on the windscreen of my vehicle,

and they supposedly have photographic evidence to support this,

but in actual fact it was stuck to my tank.

 

I beleive this is a [problem] to scare people into paying the ammount.

Im more than willing to take them to court as the last 2 cases that have have won.

Any advice?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope no section, theyve supplied a phone number that sats WE DONT DEAL WITH COMPLAINTS WE ONLY TAKE PAYMENTS

Their warning signs have pictures of cars, the parking notice says i was parked on a loading bay ( i was on a cycling rack)

The notice was on my tank not my windscreen(dont have a windscreen on my motorbike? )

Link to post
Share on other sites

As they have tied themselves up in knots they wont be wanting to discuss appeals with you or anyone else so it is a fairly safe bet you can ignore them as they have failed to follow the ACOP laid down by the BPA so going to court wont be in their interest. If you get any correspondence that is headed letter before action then come back here and tell us the wording but other than that I dont see any real chance of it going further than more letters of this nature or maybe the 3 letters from Debt Recovery Plus

Link to post
Share on other sites

ANPR tried to be clever with their wording stating they pay the landowner £100 if someone trespassers on their land. They believe that would be a genuine loss which they could recover in court.

 

However the problem they have is any Judge would laugh at their argument.

 

You can see why Trevor was a clamper before 01/10/12 he didn't need to think to attach a clamp!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could submit a copy of their correspondence toa written appeal to POPLA (not online as it wont allow it) and point out that the company refuses to comply with the BPA CoP for appeals and you request a determination in your favour by default. Their response will be interesting for all future appeals.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could submit a copy of their correspondence toa written appeal to POPLA (not online as it wont allow it) and point out that the company refuses to comply with the BPA CoP for appeals and you request a determination in your favour by default. Their response will be interesting for all future appeals.

 

Or you could save a stamp - email everything to Bobby Nelson [email protected] (this is how I tell my 'clients' to submit their POPLA appeals)

 

"Dear Mr Nelson

 

Please find attached an appeal in the case of Mr xxxxxxx andANPR Ltd (POPLA Ref put the 10 digit number in here) along with the necessary attachments.

 

Please acknowledge by return safe receipt of the appeal.

 

Regards

 

Mr Reg Keeper"

Link to post
Share on other sites

As these companies are dragging it out and failing to provide a POPLA number a written complaint/appeal based on the failure to follow the CoP they signed up for wouldnt have a 10 digit ref no becuase the parking companies are now doing everything but providing that precious number. I want to know hoe POPLA answer that one, do theyknock back the appeal because there is no number or do thay accept that the parking co is ignoring the rules they signed up to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As these companies are dragging it out and failing to provide a POPLA number a written complaint/appeal based on the failure to follow the CoP they signed up for wouldnt have a 10 digit ref no becuase the parking companies are now doing everything but providing that precious number. I want to know hoe POPLA answer that one, do theyknock back the appeal because there is no number or do thay accept that the parking co is ignoring the rules they signed up to.

 

ParkingEye have neither accepted or rejected my current appeal. I stated that I would be questioning how their charge was a genuine pre estimate of loss if given POPLA code.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=47156&d=1382652502

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hello after ignoring it I'm now on the first debt collection letter and they reckon it is out of their hands , they also said and I quote , we are not responsible for any damages this company may cause *

On the original parking notice sticker they said they are not responsible for any damages caused to the vehicles when applying the ticket

That feels like a threat right ?

I hope the want to take me to court , they have no way of contacting them apart from letter. , their number to pay them is 50p per minute and they hold you as long as possible ( not paying them haha ) they also deal through a PO box ..

They aren't following guidelines set by dpa and need to be shut down and made to repay everyone they have scammed . I really really hope they take me to court . Their signs are all of cars for a start , and like the above poster said why put a cycling rack in a * loading bay *

Ow their website on the back of their poorly printed paperwork to pay is car fines.com , or should I say car fines . CON. Any further advice now I am receiving threatening letters from their supposed debt collection company ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The debt collection agency letter is just a waste of a stamp so dont bother with it at all. If you gte further letters threatening court action from the parking company -and them only- then post up the letter and you will get advice on what to do or say next.

For the moment you have nothing to get upset about

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...