Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/restons - claimform - old cap1 card 'debt' poss SB'd


N_Just789
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3394 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I have received a DCA letter from Cabot for a CC debt that defaulted May 2007 and haven't been in contact with them.

 

In the meantime I had received letters from different DCA's as it has been passed around and was wondering if this would be considered statute barred.

 

I assume that it is, but just wanted to make sure and if it is the case,

 

do I need to write to them with a letter or complain to the OFT

 

Thanks

 

N

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi

 

 

if you have not made a payment or acknowledged the debt in writing in a 6 year (5 in Scotland) period the debt is statute barred.

 

 

Once statute barred it cannot become unbarred.

 

 

So May 2007 became statute barred in May/June 2013 if you made no payment/written acknowledgement in that time frame.

 

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

send them the statute barred letter from the green library tab to left

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

an update....

 

I sent them a letter as advised and looks like they have just ignored it.

 

I have received a letter from them to

 

"please call....urgently, and speak to one of their helpful customer advisors about the account",

 

of which I have no intention of doing?

 

Would the next step be to send them a follow up, or a different letter?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

prob just a std computer generated letter.

 

14 days isa bit quick for a human to get involved

 

await the sb letter reply.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gow long between you sending the letter and them sending you this one?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replying

You are probably right dx as its been roughly about a week?

 

Perhaps is was a cross over.

 

I will await for their reply.

 

In meantime I checked all my credit files and its not appearing on any of them..further proof of SB?

 

Thanks again

N

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi all,

 

I received a letter back from Cabot stating that it isn't SB

they received a payment of £4 in 2009

and they will be in touch to discuss payment.

 

 

Do I need to send a request for info letter

as I don't remember paying them this or should I wait for them to contact me again?

 

Thanks

 

N

Link to post
Share on other sites

write back stating you wish:

 

 

full details on the payment of £4.

 

 

when

where

by whom

by what method

at what bank.

 

 

bet they use the cash payment slip signed at bank counter excuse.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't remember paying them anything.

 

I don't have any record of paying them anything,

even letters of the whole issue have totals that differ by £6 not £4, so something is not right.

 

I even have an old credit report from 2009 and with my usual doodling haven't written that I have paid anyone on it.

Phantom payments??

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the creditor has previously taken you to court and a CCJ has been issued, the debt will still be enforceable,

with the court's permission, even if it is more than 6 years old.

 

 

If the CCJ was awarded after the debt itself had become statute barred,

then you can ask the court to set it aside. That £4 payment does look dodgy.

 

If it turns out that you do owe the money and it is not statute barred then you should claim back any over limit and late payment fees.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank for all your replies. :-D

Wow these DCA's are priceless...I have never had a CCJ, so I guess I need to ask them to enlighten me.

Could I send them the follow-up letter with a paragraph asking for more detail, or would I need to do it separately?

 

Thanks once again

 

N

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

who was the oc by the way?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thanks dx for the link to letter, was just what I needed.

 

I got knocked out by the flu for a few days.

 

Not completely out of it, but can now stand the brightness of a screen.

 

...The OC was capital one

 

Have sent off letter today will see if I hear anything and will be checking good old track and trace!

 

Thanks once again

 

N

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well even if it wasn't statute barred if it's a Capital One "agreement" from the early 2000s it's unlikely it would be enforceable anyway. :-)

 

I can't believe they think they can get away with the phantom payment. As if you would suddenly decide to make a single payment of £4 two years after your last one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Daniella

 

2001 apparently...Hmm...will see what they come up with.

 

I guess it was a tactic to scare as they were giving an amount and a date,

but I am more than certain I have not paid them anything.

 

I can't believe that they can get away with the whole idea of a 'phantom payment'.

 

Where on earth do they come up with these things?

 

They shouldn't be allowed to get away with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi everyone.

Thank you for all your help.

Ironically..

..the update is...

...wait for it...

...(you can almost hear the crickets in the silence!)..

...Nothing!

I haven't heard from them since!

 

The letter was delivered on the 6th December and so I make it that the proof was due Tues 17th.

 

However, the only thing I received was some usual 'repaying your account letter' dated the 9th.

 

Does this mean that they are just going to pass it on? Or is this done and dusted?

 

Thanks

N

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Does this mean that they are just going to pass it on? Or is this done and dusted?

 

 

How long is a piece of string :)

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone

 

...Probably a long one by the looks of it.

On Friday out of the timescale and via second class normal post, I receive a reply...

 

Dear N

 

Re: Acc

 

Thank you for your letter received in our office on 9th December

(Wrong you actually received it on the 6th December lying toerags and I have signature proof!)

 

I am sorry to learn that you have had to raise concerns (yawn) regarding this account

and can confirm that we will be confirming a through investigation into your concerns.

 

 

Once we have completed this, we will write to you again.

 

Please find enclosed a copy of our Internal Complaints Procedure for your information.

 

 

Please take time to read this as it explains how we deal with your complaint and when we will contact you again.

 

In the meantime, if you have any further queries please do not hesitate to contact me.

 

Yours sincerely

Blah Blah

 

Now,

I am sorry but this sound like a 'buying time trying to take the mic'.

 

 

That leaflet says that they can take between 4-8 weeks to solve the 'problem'.

 

 

Its funny as they were quick to talk about a 'payment' being made but now you can't come with when, where and how in the time-frame given.

 

 

The letter I send them giving them 7 days, not weeks.

 

Where do I need to go from here?

 

 

I guess they have covered their back.

 

 

If I make a complaint to the OFT,

 

 

I assume they will say that I have to wait,

 

 

but they have not given me what I have asked for nor did they reply with 7 days,

 

 

so technically the matter should be closed.

 

Thanks

 

N

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...