Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HCEO on Doorstep Reed Rains rent for old LL - Please Help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3841 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I came home tonight to find two HCEO on the doorstep trying to collect £6815.87 apparently owed from a Money Order, breakdown as follows:

 

Judgement Debt - £5122.55

Judgement Costs - £0.00

Costs Of Execution - £111.75

Assessed Solicitor Costs - £0.00

*Interest To Date - £173.74

*HCEO Fees - £1532.78

Total Outstanding - £6815.82

 

As you can imagine this came as one hell of a shock, this all dates back to May when we moved out of our last rented property, the landlord refused to carry out any of the repairs we continually complained about, heating systems that didn't work, taps that ran constantly, a bath you couldn't use, the first time we did water came pouring through the ceiling and ruined the leather suite, the list goes on.

 

The property was managed by Reed Rains, we moved in on 15th December 2012 and out on 15th April 2013, the £1200 deposit has disappeared, the landlord doesn't have it and the deposit protection service has no record of it ever being submitted.

 

I had refused to pay the rent as the repairs were not being carried out, rooms were left totally unusable over winter because of the heating not working. The landlords solicitors sent me a letter stating they were seeking eviction, I replied informing them we had found another house and were moving out, we moved out and left the house in an immaculate condition.

 

Since then I have not heard another word from them until the HCEO's turned up today, they have left a Form 55 seizing my Car (bought for £400 5 months ago and probably worth 2) yet they have driven off without it, I understand this to be Abandoned Levy?

 

I have spent 20 years self employed and am signing on JSA now as times are tough but I still report any work done to the job centre and need the car to get to any jobs that may come up.

 

I have been told to get straight to the court tomorrow morning and enter an N244 stating all the facts and ask if there is a judge available to act on it immediately, also the usual 'Keep doors, windows closed and locked' etc

 

I know how to deal with Bailiffs but this is my first run in with HCEO's - can someone please give me some advice urgently?

 

Jayce

Link to post
Share on other sites

HCEO's can be dealt with in the same way as bailiffs

There is no right of entry for them no locksmith no nothing

as they are acting on a CCJ and you have heard nothing untill now you could apply to have it set aside

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

HCEO's can be dealt with in the same way as bailiffs

There is no right of entry for them no locksmith no nothing

as they are acting on a CCJ and you have heard nothing until now you could apply to have it set aside

 

Please do not give advice if you do not understand the rights and powers of a HCEO!

 

To the OP am someone will be along shortly to assist with your problem

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please do not give advice if you do not understand the rights and powers of a HCEO!

 

To the OP am someone will be along shortly to assist with your problem

 

For you information there is no right of entry for a Hceo to a residential address acting on a CCJ

No locksmith no nothing and yes it can be set aside if they never recived court paperwork

 

Unless you have anything constructive to post we shall leave it there

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

For you information there is no right of entry for a Hceo to a residential address acting on a CCJ

No locksmith no nothing and yes it can be set aside if they never recived court paperwork

 

Unless you have anything constructive to post we shall leave it there

 

Don't hceo's act under writ's?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A HCEO may enter a property to seize the defendants good's as commanded by the writ, you are correct in stating force may not be used however there is still a right of peaceful entry. Any person wilfully resisting or obstructing a HCEO commits a criminal offence and runs the risk of being arrested by the HCEO or a constable.

 

Applying to set a Judgment aside does not mean it will be set aside, there are a number of factors such as time limits. You may not also be aware that to stop a HCEO you must also apply for a stay on the execution not just setting the judgment aside.

Edited by danmcr
Link to post
Share on other sites

danmcr there is I right of peaceful entry for every bailiff And HCEO!!!!!

Bailiffs and HCEO may enter a property and seize goods

It does not mean that you have to give them entry

And you can refuse them entry

 

If you feel you need to discuss what can and can't be done I suggest you start a new thread

Rather than jumping on this one

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

danmcr there is I right of peaceful entry for every bailiff And HCEO!!!!!

Bailiffs and HCEO may enter a property and seize goods

It does not mean that you have to give them entry

And you can refuse them entry

 

If you feel you need to discuss what can and can't be done I suggest you start a new thread

Rather than jumping on this one

 

 

 

 

A HCEO can break into out houses, sheds and separate garages etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A HCEO can break into out houses, sheds and separate garages etc.

 

Acting on a CCJ to residential address

 

Detached sheds and garage yes

 

House you are very wrong

 

Any silly point you wish to make is not helping the op in any way

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

it can be set aside if they never recived court paperwork

 

 

Only if the claim form was NOT sent to the last known address. So it would be all downto whether or not the land lord was updated with the new address. All that said, they could be recourse if there is a legitimate reason for the set aside - it appears there could be given the issues mentioned by the OP. It will be a discretionary, rather than a mandatory, set aside.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I came home tonight to find two HCEO on the doorstep trying to collect £6815.87 apparently owed from a Money Order, breakdown as follows:

 

Judgement Debt - £5122.55

Judgement Costs - £0.00

Costs Of Execution - £111.75

Assessed Solicitor Costs - £0.00

*Interest To Date - £173.74

*HCEO Fees - £1532.78

Total Outstanding - £6815.82

 

As you can imagine this came as one hell of a shock, this all dates back to May when we moved out of our last rented property, the landlord refused to carry out any of the repairs we continually complained about, heating systems that didn't work, taps that ran constantly, a bath you couldn't use, the first time we did water came pouring through the ceiling and ruined the leather suite, the list goes on.

 

The property was managed by Reed Rains, we moved in on 15th December 2012 and out on 15th April 2013, the £1200 deposit has disappeared, the landlord doesn't have it and the deposit protection service has no record of it ever being submitted.

 

I had refused to pay the rent as the repairs were not being carried out, rooms were left totally unusable over winter because of the heating not working. The landlords solicitors sent me a letter stating they were seeking eviction, I replied informing them we had found another house and were moving out, we moved out and left the house in an immaculate condition.

 

Since then I have not heard another word from them until the HCEO's turned up today, they have left a Form 55 seizing my Car (bought for £400 5 months ago and probably worth 2) yet they have driven off without it, I understand this to be Abandoned Levy?

 

I have spent 20 years self employed and am signing on JSA now as times are tough but I still report any work done to the job centre and need the car to get to any jobs that may come up.

 

I have been told to get straight to the court tomorrow morning and enter an N244 stating all the facts and ask if there is a judge available to act on it immediately, also the usual 'Keep doors, windows closed and locked' etc

 

I know how to deal with Bailiffs but this is my first run in with HCEO's - can someone please give me some advice urgently?

 

Jayce

 

In the first instance you may have grounds to have the judgment set aside or at least until you can submit a defence. This would be done on a form N244 to the issuing County Court. The County Court claim number will be detailed on the Form 55 and should have two letters at the start dictating which court it is.

 

Alternatively you may wish to apply for a variation order and pay the sums owed over time.

Edited by HCEOs
Link to post
Share on other sites

HCEOs has nailed the way forward imho

 

danmcr, if the HCEO calls at the wrong address, as in say he is after Mr Smith at 1 Larch Street, but calls on and enters the garden of Mr Davies of 1 Larch Avenue, a tussle ensues as the HCEO tries to seize the ride on lawnmower Mr Davies is using. The HCEO grabs Mr davies, and pulls him off the mower, Mr davies lamps the HCEO, the police call, HCEO arrests Mr Davies for obstruction.... Would Mr Davies be able to rely on R v Tucker an Appeal Court case from 2012 where it was said that basically where the enforcer could be regarded as a trespasser the householder could use reasonable force to remove them.

Edited by brassnecked

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would appear danmcr has removed his post which read: "Sheriffs Act, Courts Act 2003". Both are incorrect in my opinion.

 

brassnecked, whilst I believe your tongue is firmly planted in your cheek, 'lamping' anybody would not be seen as reasonable force. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would appear danmcr has removed his post which read: "Sheriffs Act, Courts Act 2003". Both are incorrect in my opinion.

 

brassnecked, whilst I believe your tongue is firmly planted in your cheek, 'lamping' anybody would not be seen as reasonable force. :-)

Yes it was :-) BUT, would that appeal court case in the scenario allow for reasonable force if the HCEO tried to arrest for obstruction?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it was :-) BUT, would that appeal court case in the scenario allow for reasonable force if the HCEO tried to arrest for obstruction?

 

I'd say yes, probably, but the Police would still likely arrest him for assault in the first instance.

 

However, all of this comes down to some common sense on both sides. The lack of which I sometimes read on here regarding HCEOs and witness first hand with some debtors and even their neighbours :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst all help & advice offered is very much appreciated the OP has not been back since the initial post - something mirrored elsewhere. Until such time as we can have more info time may be better spent on current issues.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst all help & advice offered is very much appreciated the OP has not been back since the initial post - something mirrored elsewhere. Until such time as we can have more info time may be better spent on current issues.

 

To be honest I came on here for advice and it seemed to break down into an argument between a few people so I stopped checking back, since the initial visit I have found out much more information and am in a much stronger position now, it seems all of this was pushed through without my knowing to hide illegal activities by the landlord and management company, I have submitted an N245 to the court offering £5 per month, as I am on JSA this is all I can afford but I have also submitted many other court papers through the landlord not covering my deposit in a goverment scheme as required by law, not contacting me within 10 days to ask what I was doing with the deposit, breaking many aspects of the tenancy agreement etc.

 

I have the deposit of £1200 sitting there and the maximum court fine for the 'theft' of the deposit is 3 x £1200 combined they would pay the whole debt off plus the other cases I have submitted with relavent case law and precidents should see this settled pretty quickly

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting, what case law and precedents did you use?

 

It is important that you understand what you have used and can demonstrate why you have used them. If you can't you could end up with legal costs against you.

 

It is important you get this right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...