Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Statute Barred Accounts on Credit Files?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3806 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You shouldn't "threaten" anything. If you are not going to follow through with any "threats" - don't make them. Not only does it make you a laughing stock, it allows them not to take the next person seriously.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 241
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Calm down Charlie!

As CB says approach this by way of an appeal for goodwill.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Charley,

 

Write to Ronan Dunne

CEO Telefonica UK

Executive Resolution

Suite K

Arlington Business Centre

Millshaw Park Lane

Leeds

LS11 0NE

 

You will get a prompt reply, the resolution of my problem was swift after trying to cancel a contract rolled over without notice.

 

Going to the TOP really does work.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this any good Brig,

 

Dear Mr. Dunne,

 

I am writing to regarding an old account I had with O2 that was closed in late 2007/early 2008. It was an 18 month phone contract which was run immaculately for 14 months and then I ran into financial trouble as a student and unfortunately was issued with a default notice.

 

I am concerned at the actions of one of your employees when I purchased the phone at your store in Liverpool city centre in September 2006. In the process of buying the phone the employee had to run a credit check but your systems were not working and she asked me to wait. So I waited and we tried again and it still would not work, so she asked me to come back later that day to try to buy the phone again. She made it quite clear before I left the store that I had not purchased the phone. I did not return to the store later that day or at any other time, however a week later the phone arrive at my house. I was very surprised and was immediately struck by what I thought was an illegal act by your employee to later start the purchasing process again, run the credit check and complete the transaction using my bank details that she must have saved without my presence or permission. As I did not want to cause any hassle for myself or the employee I just carried on paying the contract.

 

It is not my intention to cause any problems for your company or the said employee even though there are legal questions to be asked about what happened. The default only has 4/5 months to run on my credit file and it was for a relatively small sum but it is making life very difficult for me. I would be very grateful if under these circumstances you would consider removing the default as a gesture of goodwill on your part.

 

I do not admit liability for this debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this any good Brig,

 

Dear Mr. Dunne,

 

I am writing to regarding an old account I had with O2 that was closed in late 2007/early 2008. It was an 18 month phone contract which was run immaculately for 14 months and then I ran into financial trouble as a student and unfortunately was issued with a default notice.

 

I am concerned at the actions of one of your employees when I purchased the phone at your store in Liverpool city centre in September 2006. In the process of buying the phone the employee had to run a credit check but your systems were not working and she asked me to wait. So I waited and we tried again and it still would not work, so she asked me to come back later that day to try to buy the phone again. She made it quite clear before I left the store that I had not purchased the phone. I did not return to the store later that day or at any other time, however a week later the phone arrive at my house. I was very surprised and was immediately struck by what I thought was an illegal act by your employee to later start the purchasing process again, run the credit check and complete the transaction using my bank details that she must have saved without my presence or permission. As I did not want to cause any hassle for myself or the employee I just carried on paying the contract.

 

It is not my intention to cause any problems for your company or the said employee even though there are legal questions to be asked about what happened. The default only has 4/5 months to run on my credit file and it was for a relatively small sum but it is making life very difficult for me. I would be very grateful if under these circumstances you would consider removing the default as a gesture of goodwill on your part.

 

I do not admit liability for this debt.

 

Hello Charlie,

 

Yes that's good just split it in to paragraphs so it's easier to read.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Brig,

 

Finally got the statements from Lloyds, I've sifted through them and here's the outcome.

 

20th August 2007 - Overdraft limit of £1,500 exceeded, balance around minus £1,800 and never brought back into line. No payments in after this date.

 

Late November - Overdraft limit increased to £2,400

 

Late December - Overdraft exceeded again...balance now stands at minus £2,700. Last payment out, last activity on the account except for future fees and interest.

 

January 2008 - September 2008. Fees and interest accruing until account passed on to DCA. Final balance £3,800

 

 

 

Of the £3,800 balance £1,250 was charges applied once the overdraft was exceeded. So even without the charges I would have been £150 over my overdraft. In the 6 months running up to exceeding my overdraft I payed slightly over £150 in charges and interest. With these included I would have been just under my overdraft limit of £2,400.

 

Do you think we can do anything?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Brig,

 

I received a reply from Capital One basically saying that the default was placed 6 months after I missed the first payment and it's within the guidelines and they will not alter it ect. Any ideas on if it's worth writing back or should I just wait for it to expire.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi fletch70,

 

I wrote the letter to them acknowledging they acted in a timely manner but requesting they reset the default date to 3 months post instead of 6 as a gesture of good will. I've read that most banks reply they have to comply with the rules so I gave it a shot as 3 months is within the guidelines. I'm going to write back to them I just need ideas on what angle to take or maybe the address of somebody higher up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So it's only got a couple of months left to run before it is off?

 

No harm in trying ..I will leave it to the Brig although if I am totally honest I do not see a lot of hope (but stranger things have happened)

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it needs to be whoever owns the agreement now.

 

hang on I see that this is for an OD . It all depends on when they made the demand for payment and closed the account. If you do not know that then a SAR to LLoyds would be in order (costs £10). This would identify when this happened

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeh that's the crucial point here, wether statute barred in last activity by me or the date it was recalled. If it was the latter I'm best just leaving the thing alone because it's probably so close to the default date it's not worth attempting early removal. If it's last activity by me it barred in 3 weeks with another 8 months to run on default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?411313-Cause-of-action-statute-barred&p=4415336#post4415336

 

 

It will only be last activity if they had already closed the account and that was part of agreed repayment

 

I would suggest let sleeping dogs lie on this one unless they are being funny

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I need to get that default off as soon as possible so I can my independence back. After everything I have read and especially Brigs opinion I'm leaning towards it being barred 6 years after last activity. Especially as the account had been overdrawn for 4 months and they were demanding payments and applying charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 'rule of thumb' is 3 missed payment results in a default.

 

Cause of action not ever making any more payments, so SB = date when a payment was due after which no further payment was ever made and no unequivocal admission of liability in writing over 6 clear years.

 

 

 

 

 

+

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...