Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

School dinner lady--


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3956 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

If it was done with malicious intent, the the sacking would be justifiable, however if it was a genuine mistake, I don't agree she should be sacked, retraining and an apology would have been fair I would have thought.

 

But it could also have been a mistake higher up than the dinner lady, she may have been completely oblivious as to what she was serving, in which case she's not at fault whatsoever.

 

But without knowing the full details it's hard to say CD.

Life is like an echo, it all returns......The good, the bad, the false, the true......So if you give life the best you have, the best will come back to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Awful situation if deliberate / without "due care".

 

However, as others have noted, did the dinner lady know?

 

Also if the recipient was led to believe the meal was halal, they haven't breached their religious obligations, though are entitled to feel offended for being misled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know how old the child is CD?

 

Perhaps the dinner lady should have take a little more care when asking a Muslim if they wanted Gammon, as to a child, depending on the age, they may not know that Gammon is pork, it's just a good job she didn't ask a child that had a peanut allergy if they wanted a particular dessert that contained peanuts :!:

 

She'd have had far more than a breech of religion at her feet!

 

Although, as Bazza said, the child was ignorant to what the Gammon was, so haven't done anything deliberate against their religion.

 

Do you have a link by any chance?

Life is like an echo, it all returns......The good, the bad, the false, the true......So if you give life the best you have, the best will come back to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm only going on what I've heard on the news. How would the dinner lady know that the child who was seven was Muslim any more then knowing any child was Christian. There is all this talk about Muslims not being allowed to eat pork but surly that would be an individual choice rather than a religious one..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Outrageous that this woman lost her job over something so effin trivial it hardly warrants a mention.

 

There should be a sign above the entrance to the dinner hall.

 

IF OUR MENU OFFENDS, GO ELSEWHERE!

Edited by osdset

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well there you go, it was an accident, the dinner lady was very apologetic, and it seems full of shame for her mistake, so no she should not have been sacked in my opinion!

 

If anything, the catering company, and how the staff are to serve should have been responsible for not having a more efficient method of keeping any dietry requirements in terms that any normal human being can use.

 

A British Muslim group has already branded the decision ‘heavy-handed’ and an ‘overreaction’.

 

Life is like an echo, it all returns......The good, the bad, the false, the true......So if you give life the best you have, the best will come back to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Outrageous that this woman lost her job over something so effin trivial it hardly warrants a mention.

 

There should be a sign above the entrance to the dinner hall.

 

IF OUR MENU OFFENDS, GO ELSEWHERE!

 

The only problem you have with this Odset, is it isn't just Muslims that have different dietry requirements - some dietry requirements can be fatal if mistakes are made.

 

Also, the education system is law, so all children must attend, which in turn means that they must cater for all dietry requirements, if it were a summer holiday camp then I may agree with you.

Life is like an echo, it all returns......The good, the bad, the false, the true......So if you give life the best you have, the best will come back to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Life is like an echo, it all returns......The good, the bad, the false, the true......So if you give life the best you have, the best will come back to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only problem you have with this Odset, is it isn't just Muslims that have different dietry requirements - some dietry requirements can be fatal if mistakes are made.

 

This is true. I used to volunteer / do a placement at a nursery and we had many children with dietary needs. There was a list somewhere which stated which children have these dietary needs and what they can and can't eat.

 

When I was at college, I was (and still am) wheat intolerant and have a few other dietary needs. Whilst they could cater for me, it was a lot easier to take my own food in because I knew exactly what I could and couldn't eat.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant see how one person can remember the dietary needs of 40+ children, never mind knowing each one, as it was said they dont wear name badges even! I would expect a 7 year old to be at least know what they can and cant eat!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is true. I used to volunteer / do a placement at a nursery and we had many children with dietary needs. There was a list somewhere which stated which children have these dietary needs and what they can and can't eat.

 

When I was at college, I was (and still am) wheat intolerant and have a few other dietary needs. Whilst they could cater for me, it was a lot easier to take my own food in because I knew exactly what I could and couldn't eat.

 

This is it Nystagmite, had the dinner lady had a list with the childs name on, and the child was wearing a name badge, then perhaps this may not have happened.

 

She can't be expected to remember!

 

I'm wheat/gluten free also, and on the odd occasion I do eat out I always ask.

 

Perhaps at 7yrs old the child should know what it can and can't eat, however from what I understand the child just pointed at the gammon, maybe the child didn't realise it wasn't halal meat.

 

It's such a shame, and to be honest an accidental chain of events on both the dinner lady and the childs side, but if I were the dinner lady I would be suing the catering company and/or the school for not helping to identify those children with specific dietary requirements.

Life is like an echo, it all returns......The good, the bad, the false, the true......So if you give life the best you have, the best will come back to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is absolutely outrageous that she was sacked. What's worse is that so many schools now provide halal meat to all children, and apparently it's the only meat on offer in prisons. Talk about minority rights over the majority.

 

Trying to remember the dietary requirements of 40 children would be a challenge to anyone.

 

My daughter's school has two lunch choices: If the main course of the day has meat there is a vegetarian option. If it's something like macaroni cheese/pesto pasta they all have the same. I don't think anyone has a wheat allergy but if they did they would be given vegetables and salad and not pasta. There is also a strict no nuts policy.

 

Instead of complaining the parents should have told their child always to have the vegetarian option. This poor lady should not be sacked, and she should sue for unfair dismissal if she isn't doing that already.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But that's your opinion CD, you have do allow others to have theirs.

Life is like an echo, it all returns......The good, the bad, the false, the true......So if you give life the best you have, the best will come back to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Instead of complaining the parents should have told their child always to have the vegetarian option. This poor lady should not be sacked, and she should sue for unfair dismissal if she isn't doing that already.

 

At the nursery I did my placement at, we had a few Muslim children and on the list of their dietary needs, it simply said vegetarian.

 

I do think there has been a huge overreaction here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But that's your opinion CD, you have do allow others to have theirs.[/quote

 

Oh I do. If someone don't like pork, that's a personal decision isn't it ?

 

The child is seven, so it's up to the parents to make that decision for them at the moment.

 

If the child said I'd prefer to play, chatter or go home rather than do my school work, we wouldn't be able to say "okay, that's your choice".

Life is like an echo, it all returns......The good, the bad, the false, the true......So if you give life the best you have, the best will come back to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the nursery I did my placement at, we had a few Muslim children and on the list of their dietary needs, it simply said vegetarian.

 

I do think there has been a huge overreaction here.

 

I agree :-)

Life is like an echo, it all returns......The good, the bad, the false, the true......So if you give life the best you have, the best will come back to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that Newspaper headline is a little of an overreaction - all they did was make a complaint that their child was almost served the wrong thing, it was the ridiculous knee jerking reaction by her bosses that got her sacked, even though when it comes down to it, I think they were the ones responsible!

 

Newspapers are fond of spreading hate, I won't buy into it!

Life is like an echo, it all returns......The good, the bad, the false, the true......So if you give life the best you have, the best will come back to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...