Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
    • Just be careful with your language on what you post here - Keep it above board Lets see what you send to the big boss. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Legal height for parking signs ?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3932 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please does anyone know if there is a legal height for parking signs?

I recently cut my head open on a parking sign in a local authority car park. I dropped something and as i straightened up I hit my head very hard on this metal parking sign which I am sure should not be at head height but much higher. I now look at all signs and they all seem much higher. High enough to easily walk under.

I wrote to my local council but their reply was

" the signs are of a standard height and size and not regarded as dangerous for anyone taking due care and attention"

I am sure these signs are dangerous and should be raised higher but I cannot find any laws or guidance on statutory heights for signs.

Can anyone help please ? Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take photos and go and speak to a no win no fee company. Ok not the best advice and I'm sure someone would be along soon with a better one but failing that, that is what I would do. Sadly they are the experts in accidents.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ashmk but did take photo's and asked my solicitor to take this up but she told me that she couldn't find any legal height for signs - she said it was not worth pursuing - don't think it was worth her while financially to be honest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the council are liable under health and safety regulations , it's the same as triping over an unevan foot path.

 

Totally ridiculous Councils are not even liable for uneven footways unless proven to be negligent. What are they meant to do raise everything above head height just in case someone bumps their head? What would have happened if you hit your head on a car wing mirror would you be suing Ford or the driver for your own carelessness?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what happens if a child cuts there head on a sign that's to low or a blind person or is that them been cerless.

 

What is the difference between a sign and anything else at head height? What if a small child runs into a table in McDonalds are you going to sue them for having tables?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I realise the need for signage but if you look at other signs in supermarket car parks and on roads they are not at head height - please just look.

 

This is a serious issue. I am not a careless person but I am disabled and this incident hurt me physically and emotionally. I was in A&E for a long time being treated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I totally agree with you, they have duty to place signs were there are not adanger to the public.

 

And where would that be? I once walked into a street light as I was too busy chatting does that mean I should sue the Council surely they shouldn't place street lights where people can walk into them? What about the tariff boards where are they going to be placed 10ft above the ground where no one can read them? If you are so sure they are negligent why use a no win no fee solicitor just sue the Council and claim costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your comment but we are not looking at street lights which could be identified by pedestrians and those who were visually impaired by the use of their stick.

I am sure that signage should be placed above 6ft - every other sign that I have observed is this height or higher and is still clearly visible.

This is not about making money. It is about ensuring safety.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your comment but we are not looking at street lights which could be identified by pedestrians and those who were visually impaired by the use of their stick.

I am sure that signage should be placed above 6ft - every other sign that I have observed is this height or higher and is still clearly visible.

This is not about making money. It is about ensuring safety.

 

So you can see a street light or a pole with a traffic sign on or a bench or a letter box or a road name sign or railings or a kerb or adverts on A boards or a pay and display machine but for some reason this parking sign is not visible until you hit it?? Maybe a photo of the sign might help but obviously don't get too close I wouldn't want to be sued for suggesting you go too near it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I want safer signs.

 

Then I would suggest you don't consult solicitors. I would raise it with the Council informally, as a health and safety hazard. They will have people whose job it is to investigate things like that, and will give it consideration. They may or may not agree with you - after all, everything is a danger in theory. You could walk into a lamppost, or trip over a kerb. But I'm sure they will consider it if they aren't worried that you are about to sue them, and that any perceived admission might undermine their defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Jambersom - i raised it with the council the same day I had the accident and was promised by the person I spoke to that he would send his men out to move the signs up. He felt sure that the snow and bad winter had caused them to slip down. He also promised to send forms to me so that I could give him all the details. That was in April of this year. I have received no paper work from this person and the signs remain at the same height. It was only when I contacted the Council last week to inquire as to why I had heard nothing that I received the reply that they

"concluded that the signs are of a standard height & size and not regarded as dangerous"

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you can see a street light or a pole with a traffic sign on or a bench or a letter box or a road name sign or railings or a kerb or adverts on A boards or a pay and display machine but for some reason this parking sign is not visible until you hit it?? Maybe a photo of the sign might help but obviously don't get too close I wouldn't want to be sued for suggesting you go too near it.

 

Dear green_and_mean

 

Most signs of this type you are able to walk under. I am sure you may now begin to observe signage just to prove me wrong.

 

I did see the sign but did not assess it's height prior to cracking my head open on it as I had no idea I was going to have an accident. I did not set out to injure myself that day.

 

I did not walk into it. I dropped my glasses and as I straightened up I cut my head open on it. It is positioned too low.

 

My concern is that had it been positioned at a higher level ,which other signs I have now noticed are,

my head would not have made any contact with it as I straightened up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear green_and_mean

 

Most signs of this type you are able to walk under. I am sure you may now begin to observe signage just to prove me wrong.

 

I did see the sign but did not assess it's height prior to cracking my head open on it as I had no idea I was going to have an accident. I did not set out to injure myself that day.

 

I did not walk into it. I dropped my glasses and as I straightened up I cut my head open on it. It is positioned too low.

 

My concern is that had it been positioned at a higher level ,which other signs I have now noticed are,

my head would not have made any contact with it as I straightened up.

 

Maybe if you had your glasses on you would have seen it before you bent down? It was an accident, sorry you got a bang on the head but it was no ones fault just move on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks but I need to get it sorted so no other person hurts themselves.

:O)

 

Yeah. Great sentiment.

 

What I find difficult it why your altruism has been dormant for a quarter of a year.

 

That was in April of this year.

 

And if anyone else got hurt during your dormancy should they be looking to you for redress, you having failed to protect them from themselves, following you becoming aware of 'your' problem?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...