Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
    • As the electric carmaker sees sales fall and cuts jobs, we take a closer look at its problems.View the full article
    • Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this? Every day is a school day.
    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant is an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cap Quest Letter for a debt we do not owe fraud? , cat debt from over 7yrs Ago?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3956 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everybody.

 

Before I begin, I shall explain that this thread relates to a company named Cap Quest, from 27 Rye Close in Fleet, Hampshire.

 

I've googled Cap Quest so I have a good idea that they operate underhanded and have some serious issues.

 

However it makes me wonder how many innocent people have paid them for debts that they just do not owe.

 

We have received a letter today (28th June 2013) from Capquest?

 

I had no idea who they are but having read the letter I am now seeking advice on how to go about responding if at all.

 

The letter starts off ' MAKE US AN OFFER TO CLEAR YOUR ACCOUNT'

 

Interesting I thought...What Account?

 

It claims that they purchased an account from Freemans PLC and cleverly worded starts off by saying 'AS YOU ARE AWARE' insinuating that we have had contact from them before, which we have not.

 

Bearing in mind it's now the 28th June 2013, they claim they bought the so called debt on 6th July 2006? And to date have not been able to come to a suitable repayment plan to clear the outstanding balance. I better make it clear that we have no such debt and have never had an account with Freemans PLC. Who are they? I can only assume they mean Freemans Catalogue. Also if they purchased the debt in July 2006, as per their letter, How old is the actual debt? When and who took it out?

 

There is no reference numbers on the letter just the company name which makes me even more suspicious.

 

This is the first time we have ever heard of CapQuest and have never been contacted by Freemans PLC.

 

Well I assume that's because we do not have any debt with them, just a hunch, lol.

 

I would like to know how true the Statute Barred information is as if its correct the debt we do not owe is over 6yrs old anyway, but I'm still interested to know how they attribute the debt to us when it does not exist. Or maybe it does exist and has been done fraudulently?

 

has someone actually taken out a fraudulent debt in our name? We have lived here for 12 yrs and have never had a catalogue, or anything from a company called Freemans PLC. I Cannot think what else it could be.

 

I have a copy of both mine and my wife's credit file from June 2012 from experian and not anywhere does it show a credit file relating to Freemans PLC so I'm even more suspicious. How did Cap Quest get our name and address and relate it to a bad debt from Freemans which they purchased in July 2006? Which is not even on our credit file from experian? Very weird....

 

Please anyone reading this make sure before you take any action you check out the debt they claim you owe, as they are a well dodgy company from previous posts.

 

Anyone with any info that may help me or anything that can advise me on then please reply. But I'm pretty sure were safe and I'm in the frame of mind to just ignore the letter.. If that's a bad idea and there are any loop holes I could fall in to then please advise me.

 

thanks a lot...

 

Connectorblock.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I would think in the first instance you should ignore the letter - meanwhile, keep a beady eye on your credit file just to ensure that nothing does crop up.

 

I suspect this is a phishing trip where they have spammed lots of people with a similar name in the hope of obtaining a reaction.

 

Your question regarding Statute barred debts. It is fairly safe to say that as they have acknowledged the date as being 2006, then they are well aware that the debt is very likely to be statute barred. However, apparently they are entitled to pursue these until such times as the "debtor" advises that it is statute barred and that they have no intention of contributing any more funds to the account.

 

It is an awkward situation to be in when you know dam fool well you are not the person they are seeking - what is the correct thing to do ? Why should you have to prove that you are not the person they are seeking and indeed the OFT advise that you do not have to. It is for the creditor/DCA to prove they have the right person !!

 

We see this quite often on CAG and even when people have provided irrefutable proof they are not the person the creditor wants.. it still takes for ever and a lot of stress before they back off.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks citizenB,

 

I have taken the stance that I'm not going to reply as I also believe its a phishing trip on their behalf. As you say they are well aware that the so called debt is statute barred?

 

But having said that, What is the Debt? It's not on my credit file so how does the debt exist? I never took it out nor did my wife, so are they just hoping I'll ring them up and just pay it out of fright.

 

One would think that being in our name at our address it would be on our credit file already, as if they purchased it in 2006 as a bad debt it must be an old debt, or one that just does not exist.

 

I'm wondering if either my name or my wife's name is out there on a mailing list or something like that...

 

I have heard of companies buying mailing lists and the like from companies and then they pursue you as they have your personal details.

 

Does anyone know how true it is about what citizenB says about statute barred being Apparently they are entitled to pursue these until such times as the "debtor" advises that it is statute barred and that they have no intention of contributing any more funds to the account.

 

I have never contributed funds to this account. perhaps if anyone knows the correct answer then I may have to write the standard letter on various websites already typed for this situation, just to keep them off our backs.

 

thanks....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know how true it is about what citizenB says about statute barred being Apparently they are entitled to pursue these until such times as the "debtor" advises that it is statute barred and that they have no intention of contributing any more funds to the account.

 

CitizenB is correct.

 

Statute barring only prevents court action. It odes not mean the debt does not exist (unless you are in Scotland).

 

Creditors are quite within their rights to chase debts until such time as the debtor informs them of the SB status and that they will not be paying anything.

 

Then under the OFT guidance on debt collection, chasing activity must stop.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks ims21,

 

I appreciate what your saying, It's only on paper that I'm the debtor? I don't know what the debt is and as its not on my credit file, i have no way of finding out. which makes me suspicious.

 

Perhaps if I call Freemans PLC and ask if they have ever had an account in our name before I contact Cap Quest, then I'll have a better idea if its fraudulent or just Cap Quest chancing their arm...

 

i formed the opinion that I was not going to reply, but in view of your comments it's probably best to reply with the standard letter in these circumstances that I can download. First I'll see what Freemans provide.

 

Having never dealt with this before, I find it unbelievable that these companies can obtain your name and address from data bases in the system and claim you owe money that you don't even know about. What happened to good pld data protection that these companies should abide by!!

 

I suppose there is also nothing stopping this spiralling out of control to the point where bailiffs are knocking at my door for a debt I don't even owe and never heard of. It's just complete madness, what's stopping them doing it all the time. I notice that on a lot of these forums relating to complaints about Capquest the value is more often than not under £500, I assume this keeps them under the radar and people are more likely to just pay it.

 

Thanks,

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is unlikely a Bailiff would knock on the door, there would have to be a claim issued prior to then.. but yes, there is always the chance that it could spiral out of control to the point where a claim WAS issued - although at that point you would simply complete the claim form that it isn't and never has been your debt.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The question you asked was about statute barring and citizenB's statement hence the answer I gave.

 

If this is not your debt then start by sending the chaser the "Prove It" letter from the library.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?428-General-debt-letter-if-you-know-nothing-of-the-debt

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ims21, Thanks for the advice, I seek out the library and the prove it letter.

 

CitizenB, please just confirm what you mean by a claim would have to be issued? Who is this done by? I assume its done after the so called debt collector, Cap Quest fails to resolve the issue? Also is this done after Bailiffs are instructed. Can you give me an idea of what happens in a hypothetical situation? Please appreciate my lack of knowledge on this subject as until today I was unaware of all of this.

 

As far as I'm concerned this debt does not exist. It's not mine/ours and I'd be interested to see any original agreement they have.

 

And yes on the claim form I'd write more than its not my debt....:mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The link I gave you above will take you direct to the "Prove It" letter template.

 

What citizenB means is that before bailiffs get involved, the creditor would have to sue you in court, win and for you not to pay.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to all, any other advise/opinions from anyone would be great.

 

I'll send the Prove it letter provided by ims21 and see what Freemans can turn up in their archives? Will be interesting to find out.

 

I'll update the post with anything further that's relevant.

 

thanks again to all...

 

Laters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everybody,

 

Just an update on whats happened.....

 

I have contacted Freemans Plc, which I believe to be Freemans Catalogue as per other threads I have read on this subject.

 

Freemans confirm that they have never had any accounts in our name and not at our address or at a previous address we had. We have only had 2 address's in 12 yrs. They even contacted their fraud departments to check their archives as we believe the debt to be over 6 yrs old and again confirmed that there was no record ever ever.....

 

Armed with this we contacted CapQuest and told them what we had found.

 

They claimed that the debt did exist and that it was from our previous address from August 2003. we moved to our new address in April 2001 so this was apparently taken out over 2 yrs after we moved out! I asked how they managed to trace us to this address and they claimed to use a tracing company on our name. So they are not even sure it is us in the first place.

 

I have written to them with the prove it letter as above and also asked how they have bought a debt that does not exist? They could provide me with no reference number or account number so we still have no idea who the debt is to.

 

In any case this is defiantly a weird style of obtaining debts from companies and an unfair way to trace people on their surnames.

 

The letter has been sent recorded delivery and we await their reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...