Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Write to the IPC complaining that UKPC have not observed the requirements of PoFA . IPC  Waterside House, Macclesfield SK10 9NR Dear IPC, I am writing to complain about a serious breach of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 by UKPCM. I feel that as it is more a breach of the Act rather than not just  complying with your Code of Practice which is why I am bypassing your operator. Should you decide to insist that I first complain to your operator, I will instead pass over my complaint to the ICO and the DVLA . My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA. You will be aware that this is not the first time that UKPC have fallen foul of the DVLA and presumably yourselves. I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPC to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I would think that should be sufficient for the IPC to cancel your PCN though  you should await comments from the Site team before sending your complaint. Don't forget to include both PCNs.  
    • Hi DX, Sorry, fell asleep as I was up all night last night writing that statement. Yes, I attached the rest of the witness statement on post 50, bottom of webpage 2. That's the important part.  It looks like the lawyer who wrote Erudio's Witness statement does not work for them any more. So, I'll have another lawyer representing instead. Not sure if I can use Andy's hearsay argument verbally if that happens.... I did not put it in writing. Apart from not sending deferral forms, my main argument is that in 2014 Erudio fixed some arrears mistake that SLC made and then in 2018 they did the same mistake, sent me confusing letters. What is the legal defence when they send you confusing material?
    • Chinese firm MineOne Partners has been ordered to sell land it owns near a US nuclear missile site.View the full article
    • That isn’t actually what the Theft Act 1968 S1 actually says, BTW. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/1 (1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it;   The difference between what you’ve said and the Act? a) intent to permanently deprive rather than  just depriving (which is why the offence of “taking without consent” was brought in for motor vehicles, as otherwise "joyriders" could say "but I intended to give it back at the end") b) dishonesty : If I honestly believed A's pen belonged to B, and took it and gave it to B - B might be found guilty of theft but I shouldn't be. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Mortimer/MCE - claimform very old Direct Car Finance - ***Time Order***


amac31
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3400 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

as asked several times

 

did you ever get an sar off to the OC?

 

if the car was faulty you should not have had to pay any dca

 

this smells

 

have you now got ALL the statements?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

If you could read and complete the following and post here amac31 :-

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-April-2014**(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I could not send a SAR to the original creditor as they do not exist anymore,

any statements or paperwork that we have left are supplied in post 50 above.

 

With regards the car being faulty, back in 2000/01

there wasn't the information available that we have today

so we were not aware of our rights with regards rejecting the vehicle.

 

If we had known about the statute barred rule

we would not have entertained Marlin's in the first place

as it was 6 years and 9 months between the original default

and them being allegedly assigned the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I could not send a SAR to the original creditor as they do not exist anymore, any statements or paperwork that we have left are supplied in post 50 above. With regards the car being faulty, back in 2000/01 there wasn't the information available that we have today so we were not aware of our rights with regards rejecting the vehicle. If we had known about the statute barred rule we would not have entertained Marlin's in the first place as it was 6 years and 9 months between the original default and them being allegedly assigned the debt.

Thanks for the reply Andy, I have uploaded the claim form in post 50 do you need any other details other than that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No that's fine amac.

 

I will have a refresher on your thread when I get chance.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to notice of assignment I cannot remember receiving one but not 100% as it was a long time ago. We definitely do not receive yearly Notice of Default sums in arrears.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

If we had known about the statute barred rule

we would not have entertained Marlin's in the first place

as it was 6 years and 9 months between the original default

and them being allegedly assigned the debt.

 

as you saying you made no payment on this debt from the default date

till marlins spoofed you?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as you saying you made no payment on this debt from the default date

till marlins spoofed you?

 

dx

 

A default was issued in January 2001 ,

was paid for a few months before that and nothing until the 17th January 2006.

 

This was paid to another DCA, not sure who this was now as a few DCA's had my account

until Marlins took it over in 2009.

 

Going back to an earlier post

 

Do we need to file the AOS in both of our names as we both received claim forms

with different passwords on them.

 

Do we both need to send a CPR 31.14 to the solicitor or is one copy enough?

 

from this point onwards does everything need to be done in both names

or will one copy with both names on be enough?

Edited by amac31
additions
Link to post
Share on other sites

On a quick look, very similar to lorry mans thread. No t&cs with ag and doubtful they will be able to obtain so 79(3) will finish theirs claim.Don't forget s79 request asap

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On a quick look, very similar to lorry mans thread. No t&cs with ag and doubtful they will be able to obtain so 79(3) will finish theirs claim.Don't forget s79 request asap

 

 

Excuse my ignorance but what is a s79 request and who do I send it to?

Link to post
Share on other sites

they will have to prove those payment close to the end of the 6yrs

 

pers i'd plumb for an SB defence

 

but where the hell you get the statements from to prove oneway or another

the debt WAS statute barred before you started paying marlin?

is another matter

 

incidentally

 

you need to redact the barcode from the claimform

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

but where the hell you get the statements from to prove oneway or another

the debt WAS statute barredlink3.gif before you started paying marlin?

is another matter

 

----Very much doubt you can dx,

 

Credit Corp US will deny any connection with CC UK,

 

but on the other hand doubt they can get the t&cs either:-)

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Am I right in thinking that I have until the 9th of June to submit my defence?

 

I have heard nothing back from CCA request or CPR request yet.

 

Any ideas on how to structure my defence?

 

Can I include in my defence that in the original agreement our £400 deposit

was used to pay for warranty and GAP insurance up front

and there was only £15 left as a down payment on car?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think you can surely use the fact that the car was faulty too?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and as Postggj's posts

 

that conditional sale agreement is pants

 

they took all the insurances off the deposit you paid first

 

they appears as stated to have re-added the £15 left after the insurances were deducted from the deposit.

 

etc etc.

 

and I very much suspect that the debt was ALREADY statute barred from 2001 when you started paying marlins.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh and I make you date the 8th not the 9th [33 days inc the claimform date [day 1]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still no replies from them, is there anyone who can help me set out my defence. I do not know which route to take given that the car was faulty from the beginning, they have not replied to CCA request , they have not replied to CPR request, they used deposit to pay off insurances and Marlin took over the account even though debt was probably statute barred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, would it be possible for someone to draft me a defence using the above facts as I need to submit it before Sunday. I do not want to

do it incorrectly and jepordise my case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

amac, whatever else you use, as in lorrymans case 79(3) will see them off, so plenty to be gleaned from his defence

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

just received some documentation from Mortimer Clarke after my CCA request and my CPR31.14 request.

 

The letter was produced on the 6th of June 20 days after the request and just 2 days before my defence was due.

 

As I have just received them today my defence was already submitted

which partly relied on them not complying with the requests.

 

They have sent me :

1. A copy of the agreement which is already posted earlier in this thread

and uses our deposit to pay off insurances and does not include T&C's

 

2. A dubious copy of the alleged assignment dated January 2008

although the assignment date is listed as October 2006 15 months prior .

 

3. 3 different default notices dated June, July and October 2000.

 

4. The termination notice dated January 2001 which is also posted earlier in this thread.

 

5. 2 statements of account dated December 2005 and May 2014.

 

Please could someone advise me how to proceed

because I'm not sure now whether they have everything required to proceed in court.

 

They state in their letter that their client has agreed to the extension of 28 days to file my defence

pursuant to CPR15.5(2)

but I must notify the court in writing of the agreement

but the problem is my defence was already filed before I received this.

 

They now say that they have all the evidence confirming our liability

and we must put forward our proposals to clear the debt

and they have included an income and expenditure form ( now in the bin ).

 

Let me know if I need to upload anymore documents and I will do it tonight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they can continue as they did in LMs case, but in order to obtain a ccj they will need the t&cs which as in LMs case I very much doubt they will be able to obtain. In these type of cases its who blinks first,its like a chess game, so dont ever give in, s79(3) will prevent them obtaining a judgement. What they have supplied mentions "I have read the relevant insurance details" so where are they? and of course "you agree to be bound by its terms" eg, charges, missed payments etc etc

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should I send the letter that you prepared for LM with regards to non compliance of the requests or should I just leave it and see if they proceed to court?

Would page 2 of the uploaded agreement ( headed Important - you should read this carefully: your rights ) not be classed as their Terms and conditions?

Edited by amac31
additions
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...