Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder

amac31

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    186
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About amac31

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder

Recent Profile Visitors

268 profile views
  1. The order states: 1. The hearing listed to take place on XX September 2019 at XXXX be vacated. 2.The claim be discontinued against the Defendants: and 3.There be no order as to costs.
  2. We received a letter today from Ascent legal stating that their clients do not wish to proceed with the claim any further and they will discontinue the claim as long as there is no Order as to costs. they have asked us to sign a consent order and send it back and they will lodge it with the court and this will conclude matters. Should we sign this and return it or is there another reason for this course of action?
  3. I have resent them to the email address you provided with all of the info on them complete.
  4. Do I have any way of defending this on the 23rd on the basis of falsified paperwork?
  5. Ok, but I cannot see how it is legal when the original docs are all in her maiden name because we were not married in 2008. She has signed them in her maiden name, the Legal charge is registered with land registry and signed in her maiden name so the documents they have sent have no resemblance of the originals . So if have no case to answer to we have just got to give in and let them obtain a CCJ after all these years even though the loan is secured and they could just start repossession . Does that mean that any Tom , Dick or Harry can just make up a credit agreement and a set of paperwork that loosely resembles the originals? They have said that they do not want to go to court and want us to agree repayment terms but we are in Dire Straits so there is no reasonable amount we can offer that will satisfy them for a debt of over 11k. Is it better for us to take our chance in court and let the judge decide the best outcome given our circumstances?
  6. Why can it not be used? they have obviously doctored or created paper work to suit their needs, surely this is some kind of fraud? they have produced these documents after the fact and inserted my wife's married name. We were not married until 2 years after this agreement was taken out. The original correct paperwork has her correct name at the time but the documents they sent me months after requesting them do not represent true copies of the originals in any shape or form.
  7. ok, I will redo tomorrow but as I said if I remove all the identifying info then you will not see the reason for my defence.
  8. I will have another go tomorrow, I have been scanning and redacting for hours now.
×
×
  • Create New...