Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all!   Thank you in advance for any help you can give me!!    I parked up (at 18:08) in a rush, entered my Reg and paid for an hour of parking. At 18:20 I got a ticket for not paying for parking.    I've just looked at my receipt and noticed why ... I put "22" instead of "21"  when i put in my Reg. yes... what a stupid mistake.    I seem to remember there being a court case or a rule change about entering the wrong reg but the company wasn't at a loss because i had paid for the parking just technically for the wrong car. Am i making that up?    Any advice would be gratefully received, even some key points i have to hit when doing the appeal      
    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
    • Well, what I've read from various sources suggest if a CCJ is 6 years old that if becomes pretty much ineffective for enforcement purposes in its original form.  And that if it's about to expire then the claimant needs to apply to the court to extend the original CCJ within the final year.  Even if they do apply for an extension within the 6 years they have to have a very strong argument for doing so such as the person being out of the country or could not be traced, basically show they were actively still perusing the debt I guess. Now if a claimant ever does apply within the 6 years to extend the CCJ, would the person named on if be notified by the court that such an application has been made?.  In my case I've heard nothing from the court so assume no such application has been made.  The original CCJ in my own case is now a year beyond the 6 years of issue so must now make things even less likely again. So whilst the CCJ exists that they have not enforced it in that time must surely make it unlikely they can now take it back to court because as said it would be very rare for a judge to agree to such action now. That said, I guess they now can't use the CCJ to continue with any action for an attachment order to our mortgage either?
    • Donald Trump now banned from countries including Canada and UK as convicted felon WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK There are 37 countries that bar felons from entering, even to visit.  
    • Well, they trashed their last election manifesto pledges, so nothing new really is it? They just find weasel words to try to claim they haven't actually failed if you just look at it just a little squinted and in this particular way  - and are stupid.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DLA and coucil tax bedroom tax


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4007 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hands up if you are on DLA mid to high rate? and now have to pay the excess in council tax?

me too but today i got a letter from them stating that now under the rule you can apply for something call severely mentally impaired disregard, the title says it all lol, so get claiming if you get the above mentioned benefits at the rates stated, you are entitled to claim the disregard and you may get it reduced even more please spread the word about this post to all of our disabled friends that have been caught out by this

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hands up if you are on DLA mid to high rate? and now have to pay the excess in council tax?

 

 

Me too but today i got a letter from them stating that now under the rule you can apply for something called "Severely Mentally Iimpaired Ddisregard" the title says it all lol, so get claiming if you get the above mentioned benefits at the rates stated, you are entitled to claim the disregard and you may get it reduced even more please spread the word about this post to all of our disabled friends that have been caught out by this

You will need to conatact your local council benfits section and ask to be sent the form to apply, hope this helps someone as it has done for me and do this asap as you will now have being possibly paying to much CTAX already, also if you do apply the form will offer the option for a health care professional to fill in the form this form, and state that they are in the opinion that you should receive the extra discount offered, there is sections that may be of assistance to you as in my case, so its may be worth looking into

Edited by mikeymack2002

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what is detailed on the application form, but also on the form it states much more unless you apply and meet the criteria then you may be overpaying, is there something I can put into my original post to clarify the form? thx Mike

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having been on DLA for 3 years due to circumstances i found myself in the place many will do in the near future, not being able to afford the extra cash to pay the council tax bill, for 3 years I was excempt then got this years bill, I panicked as they demanded the full amount but took off the single adult part of it, so my bill went for £0-00 pa to £80-00pm.

 

I spoke to the dept concerned at a residents meeting and they looked into it for me and stated, that they had got it wrong, now having had this new form I went to the Drs and they read the form and agreed to sign it for me, so I will have to wait till the documents have been checked to find out if indeed I can get this new discount, my OP was to bring to peoples attention that this IS avaible but has certain criteria to get it, so you will h ave to ask if you can apply for it then you MAY get this discount, if you don't know about it how can you apply for it,

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

People on DLA quite often work don't they? I'm not getting why someone in my position, self employed on housing benefits etc & have to pay an extra 20 quid a month council tax, & someone on DLA doesn't?

Sorry if i'm missing something. But I can't suddenly start getting more income anymore than someone on DLA?

(& if I could they would take 65p in the pound of it anyway?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is quite confusing, jadeybags. But DLA might be a red herring. I'm also on IR ESA in the Support Group.

 

It's all really confusing. My rent has gone up this month too, so it's a double whammy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

People on DLA quite often work don't they? I'm not getting why someone in my position, self employed on housing benefits etc & have to pay an extra 20 quid a month council tax, & someone on DLA doesn't?

Sorry if i'm missing something. But I can't suddenly start getting more income anymore than someone on DLA?

(& if I could they would take 65p in the pound of it anyway?)

 

Some work, some don't. Some also have bigger houses which they need to pay extra rent on, due to needing to store equipment and they have extra costs.

 

Disabled people generally can't work that many hours, hence WTC. But is there really no reason why a non-disabled person can't get a second job, go self employed as well as working, etc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some work, some don't. Some also have bigger houses which they need to pay extra rent on, due to needing to store equipment and they have extra costs.

 

Disabled people generally can't work that many hours, hence WTC. But is there really no reason why a non-disabled person can't get a second job, go self employed as well as working, etc?

 

In theory yes, but how many extra hours work will they have to do to cover the 20 pounds a month more council tax? Seeing as they take 65p in the pound off of any extra you earn. Or am I seeing it wrong. As I say, it's too confusing to argue with them about anyway, I just let them adjust the direct debits & eat less lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is quite confusing, jadeybags. But DLA might be a red herring. I'm also on IR ESA in the Support Group.

 

In my area, DLA and support group doesn't matter - I'm on both and have had an effective 50% hike in payments due to other changes in their new 'council tax reduction scheme'

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just catching up on my filing - how can one person attract so much paperwork! - and I came across this year's council tax award letter. It states:

You are entitled to maximum Council Tax benefit because you are entitled to Employment and Support Allowance (Income Related).

So that's my area's policy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the title of this thread is slightly confusing (or unintentially misleading) as it refers to the bedroom tax.

 

There has always been the power to disregard a person from council tax if they are SMI "severely mentally impaired" (although the term has been changed over the last couple of years to EMI "enduring mental impairment").

 

What this disregard means is: -

 

  1. if the person who is SMI or has an EMI is the only adult in the property, the property becomes exempt for CT purposes - i.e. no bill, no CTB/CTR
  2. if the person who is SMI or has an EMI lives with other adults and they are all SMI/EMI, the property becomes exempt for CT purposes - i.e. no bill, no CTB/CTR
  3. if the person who is SMI or has an EMI lives with other adults who are all disregarded for CT on a basis other than SMI/EMI (for example as a student), the property gets a 50% CT discount - i.e. reduced bill, reduced CTB/CTR, normally still has to pay same amount
  4. if the person who is SMI or has an EMI lives with one other adult who is not disregarded for CT, the property gets a 25% CT discount - i.e. reduced bill, reduced CTB/CTR, normally still has to pay same amount
  5. if the person who is SMI or has an EMI lives with more than one other adult who is not disregarded for CT, the property gets no discount - i.e. same bill, same CTB/CTR

To qualify for the SMI/EMI disregard/exemption/discount as appropriate, the person who is SMI/EMI needs to satisfy 2 criteria: -

 

  • they must be certified by a medical professional as being SMI/EMI
  • they must be in receipt of a qualifying disability benefit, for example: - Disability Living Allowance (at the middle or highest rate of the care, component), Attendance Allowance, Constant Attendance Allowance, Severe Disablement Allowance, Incapacity Benefit, Income Support or Income-Based Jobseeker’s Allowance where a disability premium is included, Employment and Support Allowance, an increase in disablement pension for constant attendance, the disability element of Working Tax Credit, Unemployability supplement or Unemployability allowance.

Just to add that the above is a totally separate issue from the change over from national CTB schemes to localised CTR schemes

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To everyone that has commented on my OP I did'nt intend to confuse people with the post, I am brain damaged and I don't clearly state things the right way for that I am sorry, I will try to explain,

 

Years 2010-2012 I had to pay no CT this year 2013 it went up to £88-00 pm, I appealed this decision and was told about this new excemption, for which I have applied for, still waiting to hear the outcome

 

So with this in mind I thought it appropriate to let others know this, Also as stated there are certain criteria to be able to receive this, as I am not in the knowlegde maybe I posted in haste, also that on this form you will have to have a medical practioner fill in the for and they have to be a ble to say for certain that under the rules as listed below will apply....

 

If a person who resides within a premise is severly mentally impaired a discount or excemption can be given. whether it is a discount or excemtion that is applicable will depend on the circumstances of any other occupants

 

A person is considered to be severly mentally impaired if:

 

 

 

 

  • the person has a severe impairment of intelligence and social funtion (however caused which appears to be permenant (and)
  • the person obtains a certificate duly signed to that effect by a regestered medical practioner and,
  • the person is entitled to (although not in receipt of the following benefits)
  • Incapacity benefit under s.30A sscb (Social Securty Contributions and benefits Act 1992)
  • Attendance Allowance under s.64 SSCB Act
  • Severere Disabledment Allowance under s.68 SSCB Act
  • The care component of a DLA payable either at the highest rate or the middle rate under s.71 and s.72 SSCB Act
  • An increase in the rate of Disablement Pensions Act under s.104 SSCB Act
  • A disablity working Allowance under s.129 for which the qualifying benefits is:

A) one falling within s.129 (2) (a) (1)

 

 

 

B) Income support, and the appilicable amount formally payable included in a disability premium

  • An unemployalitlity suppliment under part 1 s. 7, SSCB Act
  • A constant attendance allowance under article 14 of the personal injuries (civilians) scheme 1983 or article 14, Naval,Military, and Airforce ect. (Disablement and Death) service Pensionorder 1983
  • An unemployability allowance under article 18 of either of the provisions referred to immeadiatly above
  • Income support where the amount includes a disability premium.
  • Incapacity benefits under s.41 and s.41 of the SSCB Act 1992
  • Employemnt and Support Allowance

Because of the complexity of the particular disregard or excemption it is essential that the Taxpayer be required to complete an application form. The standard form requires full details to be provided including evidence of benefits received and also a signature of a medical practitioner.

 

I typed all of the above by hand from my appilication form I now hope this will clarify any missunderstandings

Edited by mikeymack2002

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou to id6052 for the update but this does in fact relate to council tax but being some what daft in the way I communicate. I do struggle big time and am learning everyday, I have fully replied with the above to confirm the OP.

 

As I am learning every day I like to say a big thanks for the input of id6052 which will allow me to gain even more knowledge from this site to use in my everyday life, and this sort of thing allows me to become a smarter person

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Site team can you please adjust the thread topic tiltle take out the bedroom tax part of the title many thanks MM it should be just for Council Tax

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

My council additionally apply this to carers allowance, the disability premium of approx £14 (is it 13.80?) on esa and households with a child under 6. Low-rate dla also means you qualify - but is this true all over the country?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...