Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yeeeeees! Well done on your victory!  👏
    • Hearing held today in court. I attended in person and Evri had an advocate attend on their behalf to defend their position that my contract is with Packlink and not with them. I also provided a copy of Evri's terms and conditions which explains that a contract is entered into when a parcel is sent with Evri. The judge pointed this out to the Advocate and agreed there is a contract between me and Evri under the Ts and Cs. The judge explained that while Packlink are responsible for organising the delivery of the item, it is Evri who are responsible for handling the goods and delivering them, and therefor Evri has a responsibility to handle the goods with reasonable care and skill. So am pleased to say the judge found in my favour. Hearing lasted about 75mins. Evri has been ordered to make payment within 21 days. Also nice to meet @jk2054 in person.
    • Good morning,    I just wanted to update you on the situation.    I have visits piling up with my current employment and they need doing before I finish at the end of this month.  I am moving to Wiltshire in 3 weeks for a new job helping care homes with their Dementia patients. I tried to work it out and at a guess I will be doing about 20-25,000 miles a year. So need a vehicle that can cope with that mileage, my old car would have done it easy but 🤷‍♂️ I have taken out a loan and got a friend to find me a reliable car that can cope with the miles and hasn't been written off in the past.   I phoned Adrian flux to see if I could use the last months insurance on a new car I have bought, the girl I spoke to phoned Markerstudy and asked them but they said no, my new car doesn't have any modifications.    I had an email from someone who saw one of my appeals for information, they live near the site of the accident and know a nearby farmer who has a security camera at his entrance that catches the traffic and specifically registration plates as he has been robbed before. They said they would reach out for me and see if he still has the data. Unfortunately it wont catch the scene of the crash.   The Police phoned me and said they were closing the report I made, even if they found footage of the vehicle at the time I said the actual incident would be my word vs theirs.  My first response was I am sure google maps would show that they turned around at that location which would verify my version of events, but upon reflection I do understand, I have seen people doing make up with both hands while driving, eating from a bowl steering with their knees and veering all over the place. I am sure some of these people go off the road and claim that someone forced them off.    Markerstudy phoned me yesterday to say that my car is now at Copart, the £80 tank of Vpower diesel was emptied on entry to the site for safety reasons, which I get but it sucks.  It is awaiting being assessed and shouldn't be too long, which is a relief.  I am really glad things do not seem to be going the way of the other stories and they seem to moving quickly.   However I was informed that my car was a structural write off before I bought it - this destroyed me, I was almost sick.  and this is going to affect any offer of money - after hearing the first statement this didn't affect me.   They need to wait for the assessor to check it over but it is highly likely to be written off and the maximum they can offer is £2300.  I was desperate for a car as I was working for an agency at the time, no work no pay, and did not do a vehicle check because I didn't know about them.  The seller did not tell me that it had been structurally written off, he told me that it had the front wing damaged while parked and was repaired at an approved repairer.  Markerstudy records state that it was sold at auction, no record of repair at an approved repairer.  I bought it bank transfer with hand written receipt.    It gets worse.    It turns out my airbags should of gone off. For some reason they are not working. I think we can figure out why.  If I had hit that car head on and had no airbags.    Some good news.    I can arrange a time with Copart to go and take my stereo equipment and any personal items that are left in the car only. I cant live without music and need quality sound, my speakers and amps are Hertz and JLaudio, (no I am not a boy racer with booming subs, I am an audiophile on a budget) I was really worried I wouldn't get them back so this is a huge relief for me. It is stuff I have built up over years of saving and collecting. Everything to do with the vehicle and mods I have declared need to stay to be assessed.   The accident has gone as a fault on my record, I have to remove 2 years NCB which means I still have some to declare which is good.  So it appears at this point that it may be resolved quickly, not in the way I was hoping, but not as bad as I presumed it was going to be based upon that tow truck drivers attitude and behaviour and the horror stories I read.   I am not going to buy the car back and try to make money with all the parts on it, I don't have the time or energy.   I may need an xray on my back and neck.  The whole situation has left me feeling physically sick, drained and I need it done.   The lesson learnt from this  -  My conscience is 100% clear, my attitude to safety and strong sense of personal responsibility - A rated tyres even if on credit card, brake fluid flush every year, regular checks of pads and discs, bushes etc, made avoiding what I believed to be a certain broadside collision possible.   Get a dashcam (searching now for the best I can afford at the moment)  -  Research your insurance company before you buy  -  Pay for total car check before you go and see a car and take someone with you if you are not confident in your ability to assess a vehicle.      Thank you to everyone here who volunteers their time, energy and information, it is greatly appreciated.  You helped my sister with some advice a while ago but we weren't able to follow through, she is struggling with long term health conditions and I ended up in hospital for a while with myocarditis, when I got out and remembered it was too late.  I am going to make a donation now, it is not a lot, I wish I could give more, I will try to come back when things are on a more even keel.    Take care
    • It seems the solicitor has got your case listed for this “appeal” but not for the Stat Dec(SD). You need to ensure you can perform your SD on the day. If you are able to make your SD in court, the situation you are in now is more straightforward than if you made your SD via a solicitor. You have been convicted of two offences (and two were dropped) via proceedings of which you were not aware. The way to remedy that is to perform an SD. No appeal is necessary (nor is it available via the magistrates’ court). If you are able to make your SD this is how I see it panning out: You will make your SD to the court. The court must allow you to make it as it will have been made within 21 days of you discovering your convictions. You will then be asked to enter pleas to the four charges again. At this point you should plead not guilty to all four but make the court aware that you will plead guilty to the speeding charges on the condition that the FtP charges are dropped. The prosecutor will be asked whether or not this is agreed. In my opinion the overwhelming likelihood is that it will be. If it is you will be sentenced for the two speeding offences under the normal guidelines. In the unlikely event it is not accepted,  the speeding charges will be withdrawn (they have no evidence you were driving). You have no viable defence to the FtP charges and so should plead guilty. This will mean 12 points and a “totting up” ban (as you have already suffered). You can present an “Exceptional Hardship” argument to try to avoid this (explained below).   Because of this, I don’t see any need to make an argument to ask to have any ban suspended (pending an appeal to the Crown Court) unless and until you are banned again. The only reason I can think the solicitor suggested this is to secure a (Magistrates')  court date. I was surprised when you said you had an appointment so quickly; a date for an SD usually takes longer than that. However, if you can use it to your advantage, all well and good. I can’t comment on the argument that the two speeding offences were committed “on the same occasion” as I don’t have the details. That phrase is not defined anywhere and is a matter for the court to decide. It’s an interesting thought (and only that) that such an argument could equally be made for the two FtP offences. If the requests for driver’s details arrived at your old address at the same time, with the same deadline for reply, it could be argued that you failed to respond to hem both “on the same occasion” (i.e when the 28 days to respond expired) and so should only receive penalty points for one. Hopefully you won’t need to go there. I think you have information about avoiding a “totting up” ban. But here’s the magistrates’ latest guidance on "Exceptional Hardship" (EH) which they refer to: When considering whether there are grounds to reduce or avoid a totting up disqualification the court should have regard to the following: It is for the offender to prove to the civil standard of proof that such grounds exist. Other than very exceptionally, this will require evidence from the offender, and where such evidence is given, it must be sworn. Where it is asserted that hardship would be caused, the court must be satisfied that it is not merely inconvenience, or hardship, but exceptional hardship for which the court must have evidence; Almost every disqualification entails hardship for the person disqualified and their immediate family. This is part of the deterrent objective of the provisions combined with the preventative effect of the order not to drive. If a motorist continues to offend after becoming aware of the risk to their licence of further penalty points, the court can take this circumstance into account. Courts should be cautious before accepting assertions of exceptional hardship without evidence that alternatives (including alternative means of transport) for avoiding exceptional hardship are not viable; Loss of employment will be an inevitable consequence of a driving ban for many people. Evidence that loss of employment would follow from disqualification is not in itself sufficient to demonstrate exceptional hardship; whether or not it does will depend on the circumstances of the offender and the consequences of that loss of employment on the offender and/or others. I must say, I still do not understand what the solicitor means by “As a safeguard we have lodged the appeal and applied to suspend your ban pending appeal due to the time limit for being able to automatically appeal without getting leave of the Judge.” When they speak of “leave of the judge” I assume they mean they have lodged an appeal with the Crown Court. I don’t know what for or why they would do this. It seems to follow on from their explanation of the “totting up” ban. If so, I’m surprised that the Crown Court has accepted an appeal against something that has not yet happened. But as I said, i is no clear to me. Only you can decide whether to employ your solicitor to represent you in court. If it was me I would not because there is nothing he can say that you cannot say yourself. However, I am fairly knowledgeable of the process and confident I can deal with it. That said, I do have a feeling that the solicitor is somewhat “over egging the pudding” by introducing such things as appeals to the Crown Court which, in all honesty, you can deal with if they are required. I can only say that the process you will attempt to employ is by no means unusual and all court users will be familiar with it. I can also say that I have only ever heard of one instance where it was refused. In summary, it is my view that it is very unlikely that your offer to do the deal will be refused. If it is accepted, you may be able to persuade he court that the two speeding offences occurred "on the same occasion" and so should only receive one lot of points. Let me know the details (timings, places, etc) and I'll give you my opinion. Just in case your offer is refused, you should have your EH argument ready. Whether it's worth paying what will amount to many hundreds of pounds to pay someone to see this through is your call.  Let me know if I can help further.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Accused of Flytipping


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6402 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This morning I received a hand delivered notice from my local Council accusing me of flytipping. It was addressed to a Mr and the last time I checked I was definitely female.:mad:

 

According to their notice on 12/10/06 at 15:30hrs I had "placed domestic waste on the footway in XXX XXXXXXXXXXX Road"

 

It gave me the option to pay £50 within 14 days or £75 within 21 days.

 

Now........I have been living at my property for 5 years. It is a converted flat above an office on a parade. We don't have wheelie bins. We don't have recycle bins. For the past 5 years I, like everyone else have placed our rubbish by the lamppost on the pavement.

 

So I would like to know what the hell are they on? :mad: Considering I had been out of the country until late Monday evening of last week, I'd like to know what on earth I could have accumulated over 2 and a half days that "posed a health and safety problem". I haven't been on a mega shopping spree. In fact I don't even recall putting any rubbish out last week Thu, and if I did it would have been the same type of black bin liner that I have been putting out for the past 5 years.

 

As soon as I got into work this morning I called them up and asked them to explain to me what the hell this was all about, but the telephone operator said that someone would call me back. She had better hope and pray that by the time she calls back I have calmed down otherwise she will have wished she stayed in bed this morning :mad:

 

****ed off is an understatement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Have you checked their website to see what their policies are on this? It might be worthwhile contacting the refuse department and find out their guidelines as to how someone in your position is supposed to put your rubbish out on collection days, given there are no wheelie bins or other facilities available.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you checked their website to see what their policies are on this? It might be worthwhile contacting the refuse department and find out their guidelines as to how someone in your position is supposed to put your rubbish out on collection days, given there are no wheelie bins or other facilities available.

 

I will have a look at their website, but there is a van that patrols the areas at least twice a day picking up bags and rubbish from the side of the pavement.

 

The woman from the Council has just rang me and told me she would have to call the refuse team to find out what it was all about as she had nothing in front of her :mad:

 

I will ask her as well when she calls back what their policy is. :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

.........I'd like to know what on earth I could have accumulated over 2 and a half days that "posed a health and safety problem".............

 

This may not relate the the actual contents of your rubbish bag. I think it more likely the "H&S" reference is to the fact that it was on the footpath and a passer-by might trip over it, fall, injure themself and sue the council.

 

 

Jimbo44

Jimbo 44 - always happy to help, but always willing to learn from being corrected too!!! Whilst any advice given may be based upon personal experience, please always be sure you seek guidance from a professional in the particular field.

 

Never be afraid to try something new. Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark, but a large group of professionals built the Titanic.

 

A 'click' on the scales is always appreciated if I have helped. Many Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had some problems with my rubbish last week (in Cardiff). Had too much for my wheelie bin so I put a bag down next to the bin. They emptied the wheelie bin but didn't take the bag!

 

A neighbour of mine works for the council and told me that they no longer take bags unless they are in the bin - even if the bin has 10 bags hanging from the top of it they must be in (on) the bin!!

 

He said that there are bar codes on the bins and if you offend, your bar code is scanned and it's basically a case of "three strikes and you're out", 3 offences and you get a £75 fine.

 

Now whether that is how it works where you live I don't know. How that relates to you and your lack of wheelie bins I don't know either but thought that this info would be of use to you when they ring you back.

If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

 

Always start with the User guide!

Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

 

RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This may not relate the the actual contents of your rubbish bag. I think it more likely the "H&S" reference is to the fact that it was on the footpath and a passer-by might trip over it, fall, injure themself and sue the council.

 

Jimbo44

 

Thanks Jimbo, but after 5 years of doing this and they have said nothing????? :confused:

 

Honestly, if these Council Idiots want a war they have chosen the wrong person to start one with :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take your point, Tinkerbelle! I guess the old saying, "there's one born every minute", applies here, albeit changed slightly to "there's a jobsworth born every minute"!!

 

With the upsurge recently in litigation against local councils I guess lots are getting very "hot" on the old H&S thingies.

 

Fight the good fight!!!

 

 

Jimbo44

Jimbo 44 - always happy to help, but always willing to learn from being corrected too!!! Whilst any advice given may be based upon personal experience, please always be sure you seek guidance from a professional in the particular field.

 

Never be afraid to try something new. Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark, but a large group of professionals built the Titanic.

 

A 'click' on the scales is always appreciated if I have helped. Many Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They may have enacted rules that prohibit kerbside rubbish being placed on the footpath at anytime other than 3 hours before scheduled collection. This might have happened in your area. From what I recall, they don't need to take you to court either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so the lady has called me back.

 

Basically she said that it could have been that the rubbish was left out at a time when it shouldn't have been, she doesn't know. She said that maybe the inspector spotted it when he was doing his rounds. Lots of "maybe" and lots of "could be"...no definite facts:mad:

 

She assumed that I was going to appeal and said that I should get the appeal in as soon as possible as they have to respond within 7 days. I explained to her about having lived her for 5 years, and she said put all that down in the appeal.

 

When I asked her about whether or not I should pay this fine, she said it was up to me, and that the sooner I get my appeal in the better, because if their response came after the 14 days and it was not a positive response then I would end up having to pay £75.

 

And as for this nonsense about time of day and what day, this is all news to me. I have never been told that I need to leave rubbish out on a certain day or time for that matter :mad:

 

Going off to write my scathing response to them now. :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again - let them take you to court for the £75. I would absolutely not pay it under any circumstances unless ordered to do so by a Court. Remember the Bill of Rights? A fine can only be imposed by a court, and only as a punishment for a criminal offence for which you have been convicted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again - let them take you to court for the £75. I would absolutely not pay it under any circumstances unless ordered to do so by a Court. Remember the Bill of Rights? A fine can only be imposed by a court, and only as a punishment for a criminal offence for which you have been convicted.

 

Have no intention of paying :D

 

Is it worth mentioning in the letter that if they don't throw out the fine I will make an official complaint against them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might not have heard of the 'time of day' rule, but that unfortunately doesn;t excuse you IF the council has enacted rules for the affected street(s) - and as we all know, ignorance of same is not a defence. Similarly, if identified as a flytipper unter the relevant act(s), there's no need for them to take you to court - if the fine is not paid or disputed, it is passed directly to Bailiffs. The only time it will come to court is to enforce payment, and they will not enter into the original dispute. I'd be careful - making an 'official complaint' won't mean squat if they have the powers enacted for the street, you need to find this out first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The "Appeal" has now been faxed and will be posted on my way home from work.

 

The council can't possibly in their right minds expect me to know of a "Policy Change" if I or anyone else for that matter have never been told about it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah - they do this by placing a 'Public Notice' in a newspaper you never read, and also on a few street lampposts where the sign is so high, a vertigo-suffering pigeon would be hard pressed to spot it (!). You might also find the council's website boasting about the policy in their effort to 'clean up the town'. The bottom line remaiuns the same, they'll get away with saying it's not their fault you weren't aware.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This morning I received a hand delivered notice from my local Council accusing me of flytipping. It was addressed to a Mr and the last time I checked I was definitely female.:mad:

 

According to their notice on 12/10/06 at 15:30hrs I had "placed domestic waste on the footway in XXX XXXXXXXXXXX Road"

 

It gave me the option to pay £50 within 14 days or £75 within 21 days.

 

Now........I have been living at my property for 5 years. It is a converted flat above an office on a parade. We don't have wheelie bins. We don't have recycle bins. For the past 5 years I, like everyone else have placed our rubbish by the lamppost on the pavement.

 

So I would like to know what the hell are they on? :mad: Considering I had been out of the country until late Monday evening of last week, I'd like to know what on earth I could have accumulated over 2 and a half days that "posed a health and safety problem". I haven't been on a mega shopping spree. In fact I don't even recall putting any rubbish out last week Thu, and if I did it would have been the same type of black bin liner that I have been putting out for the past 5 years.

 

As soon as I got into work this morning I called them up and asked them to explain to me what the hell this was all about, but the telephone operator said that someone would call me back. She had better hope and pray that by the time she calls back I have calmed down otherwise she will have wished she stayed in bed this morning :mad:

 

****ed off is an understatement.

 

:o Was that you on Rogue Traders last Night then Tinkerbelle..They were on about fly tippers last night ..lol :D

Lloyds TSB -PPI - Full refund . 05/09/06 :D:p (As Seen on TV) :p

Halifax settled in Full.. :D 22/09/06

TSB First Claim SETTLED IN FULL 19/10/06 :D

Second Claim to Lloyds TSB - Settled in Full

Firstplus - early settlement interest charges - Challenged the use of the rule of 78 - SETTLED IN FULL 12/1/07

PPI - GE Money / Purpleloans / Firstplus - Now Settled after 1 year long hard fight.

 

 

 

If my post has helped you, please click the scales! :grin:

 

Anything said is my opinion and how I understand the law, always consult professional legal advice before taking something to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might not have heard of the 'time of day' rule, but that unfortunately doesn;t excuse you IF the council has enacted rules for the affected street(s) - and as we all know, ignorance of same is not a defence. Similarly, if identified as a flytipper unter the relevant act(s), there's no need for them to take you to court - if the fine is not paid or disputed, it is passed directly to Bailiffs. The only time it will come to court is to enforce payment, and they will not enter into the original dispute. I'd be careful - making an 'official complaint' won't mean squat if they have the powers enacted for the street, you need to find this out first.

 

However the Law very clearly states that a Fine can only be imposed by a Court of Law following due process and after finding a Defendant guilty of a criminal offence. See the Bill of Rights Act 1689.

Link to post
Share on other sites

However the Law very clearly states that a Fine can only be imposed by a Court of Law following due process and after finding a Defendant guilty of a criminal offence. See the Bill of Rights Act 1689.

 

IT'S CIVIL OFFENCE! It is a civil penalty. No court action is required. Littering and their attendant practices were de-criminalised before parking. As to the Bill of Rights, there are people carted off to secure institutions to citing this in support of some misguided belief in 'what's right is right'.

 

Any council can have deemed to have servied notice on the populace by following the perviously advised notification procedures. If you don't believe it - leave a plastic bag out in Camden with some personal details, and you can experience it yourself first hand - Bill of Rights, or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that civil offences are now attracting penalties is simply the fact that the government are IGNORING the Bill of Rights Act 1689. The Act is VERY CLEAR. Unless an Act of Parliament specifically provides for a penalty, notwithstanding the CRA, then it is an unlawful penalty. The Decriminalisation of Parking has lead to unlawful penalties too... which are being challenged as we speak. (See the "Your parking ticket may be unlawful" thread).

 

The simple fact remains that penalties are unlawful unless you are convicted of a criminal offence; the Bill of Rights Act may be old and covered in cobwebs mate BUT IT'S STILL LAW.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's quite clear as I said...

 

And thereupon the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons, pursuant to their respective letters and elections, being now assembled in a full and free representative of this nation, taking into their most serious consideration the best means for attaining the ends aforesaid, do in the first place (as their ancestors in like case have usually done) for the vindicating and asserting their ancient rights and liberties declare:

  • That the pretended power of suspending the laws or the execution of laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal;
  • That the pretended power of dispensing with laws or the execution of laws by regal authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal;
  • That the commission for erecting the late Court of Commissioners for Ecclesiastical Causes, and all other commissions and courts of like nature, are illegal and pernicious;
  • That levying money for or to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative, without grant of Parliament, for longer time, or in other manner than the same is or shall be granted, is illegal;
  • That it is the right of the subjects to petition the king, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal;
  • That the raising or keeping a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace, unless it be with consent of Parliament, is against law;
  • That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law;
  • That election of members of Parliament ought to be free;
  • That the freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in Parliament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of Parliament;
  • That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted;
  • That jurors ought to be duly impanelled and returned, and jurors which pass upon men in trials for high treason ought to be freeholders;
  • That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void;
  • And that for redress of all grievances, and for the amending, strengthening and preserving of the laws, Parliaments ought to be held frequently.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This may not relate the the actual contents of your rubbish bag. I think it more likely the "H&S" reference is to the fact that it was on the footpath and a passer-by might trip over it, fall, injure themself and sue the council.

 

 

Jimbo44

 

They'd need to walk into the lamppost first :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also just for the record, the pink sheet of A5 paper says:

 

Offence of Leaving Litter

Notice of opportunity to pay a Fixed Penalty

The environmental Protection Act (EPA) 1990, Section 88

(as ammended by the Cleaner Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005 (CNEA), Section 19)

 

Having never in my 39 years ever received a "fine" I assume that is what is means?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh. My bad.

 

The EPA 1990 specifically provides for Fixed Penalties. You've appealed already, that's fine; you now need to find out from the Council what alternative measures they have put in place for refuse disposal at your address... they have a civil duty to remove refuse from properties.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...