Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car sold with faults at time of sale?


ntlg*
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4120 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I purchased Renault Megane Dynamique from a small dealer on the 25th of Feb 2012. The MOT was passed on the same day.

 

I have had the results back from the MOT today and the car has failed on 3 points. The an off side front coil spring has snapped (the garage advised that it was dangerous to drive with this fault), the brake light switch is faulty and the steering lock also needs to be replaced.

 

My issue with this is that I purchased the vehicle with a provisional license, and the intent to learn and pass in the car. Due to random circumstances this did not happen and the car has mostly been off road for a year. I passed on the 8th of Feb and have driven the car on short trips since then.

 

I have just checked the paperwork and the total mileage on the car is around 1300 in 12 months (there were 2 longer distance trips with friends driving).

 

My query is firstly, can anyone advise how dangerous the car was to drive with the coil spring fault? How likely is it that the faults were present at the time of sale considering the low useage and would I be able to prove this if proceeding with an AA independent report, would this help to show that these issues were present at the time of sale?

 

Any information you could offer would be incredibly helpful. I apologise if these are idiotic questions but I am new to the world of both cars and MOTs so I want to have as much knowledge to hand before I call the dealer tomorrow to see if a compromise can be reached in regards to repairing the faults.

 

I initially emailed the dealer earlier today with the results of the MOT and an outline of my issue and they asked me to call them. I have not yet done so as I wanted to look into the details of the fault and to look through all the paperwork I have from the sale.

 

I have since drafted the below which I plan to email tomorrow and then follow up with a phone call later in the day, any feedback on the below would also be appreciated:

 

 

Hi,

 

 

I apologise for not calling yesterday, I was checkingthrough all of the paperwork that came with the vehicle at the time of sale.

 

 

I appreciate some time has passed since the sale of the carbut as per my previous email this car has been mostly off road since the saledate of the 25th of February 2012.

 

 

The purchase paperwork and DVLA paperwork has the mileagelisted as 50,282 and this is currently 51,768. So you can see this car has nothave enough use for these faults to naturally develop since the date ofpurchase.

 

 

It is my right,under the Sale of Goods Act 1979, to expect the second hand car to be ofsatisfactory quality (taking into account its age and mileage), meet anydescription given to me at the time of sale and to be fit for the purpose, thereforeI should expect to be able to get from A to B safely.

 

 

The MOTinspection carried out on the 25th of February 2013 showed that an offside front coil spring is required as the current one has snapped. I have alsobeen informed by the garage that it is dangerous to drive a car in thiscondition. The cost for this repair is quoted at £139.60 including Vat. A brakelight switch is also required as the brake lights are inoperable, which wouldbe £42.12. The final part required is asteering lock, but this repair has to be done via a Renault dealer who I havecontacted for an approximate cost.

 

 

As it has beenover six months since the purchase I appreciate that it is up to me to prove thatthese faults were present on the vehicle when it was sold. I will call later tosee how you wish to proceed with my complaint before taking this further but Iwould intend to contact the AA to carry out an independent report which wouldestablish the condition of the vehicle when it was sold Vs the time passed andmileage logged.

 

I would likefor arrangements to be made for the repairs to be carried out at no cost due tothe fact that these issues were present at the time of sale, whether you agreeto carry out these repairs or refund me for any costs accrued.

 

If we are unable to come to an agreement I will contactTrading Standards later today and make arrangements with the AA for theindependent report to be completed, I will then follow up with official letterto your registered business address confirming my intent to take legal action.

 

I believe the car (Reg FD04 ZFP) was not fit for purpose or ina road worthy condition at the time of sale. I also intend to contact VOSA andthe department of Transport to advise that the MOT Carried out on the 25/02/11by Christchurchgarage resulted in a dangerous car being passed as roadworthy.

 

 

I look forward to speaking to you later and hope we can cometo a satisfactory conclusion.

 

 

Many Thanks.

 

 

Lucy

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I don't think you'll have much luck with the dealer. Even though the car has been off the road for a while coil springs can snap at any time. You have done 1300 miles in it and the dealer has no way of knowing whether you have driven over a deep pothole, up a kerb or suchlike to cause the break.

 

As far as the brake light switch is concerned this could be due to it standing for such a long time. I'm not sure that the steering lock is part of the MOT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've no idea if the coil springs on your car, are anything like the ones on a Renault "Kangoo" van, but I've had 4 Kangoo's, and three of 'em have had a coil spring snap, and two were only discovered at MOT time.

 

Each was replaced by a second hand one, by my local chap, and I simply put them down as part of the running costs of a Kangoo.

 

Sam

All of these are on behalf of a friend.. Cabot - [There's no CCA!]

CapQuest - [There's no CCA!]

Barclays - Zinc, [There's no CCA!]

Robinson Way - Written off!

NatWest - Written off!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Coil springs in Renault megane are a common fault, I have 2 meganes at the minute both off them have a problem with the steering lock again a common fault. The brake light switch is an easy fix just up behind the brake pedal couple of wires to unclip pop a new one in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just tead the letter you have written, a Renault megane spring costs between £18 and £25 it would take a good mechanic about 30 minutes to change it. You could buy a brake light switch from a breakers for a fiver and fit it yourself. The steering lock is the most expensive part but I can't see how the steering lock has anything to do with an mot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is up to you the buyer to 'prove' that the faults were there at the time of purchase and I would suggest that is an impossiblity. After this length of time you will have been deemed to have accepted the car.

Any assistance offered by the seller will be purely as a gesture of goodwill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...