Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 05.05.24 Ever so sorry if I have entered this in the wrong part of this website.   My grandfather is in his 70's and retired.  He asked me to help him find a work pension that he was paying into when he was working. From 1967 - 1982 he worked for a Fabric Dying Company, Celanese, Spondon Derby UK. I have already used the GOV.uk Trace Pension Scheme. It listed a few pension companies : Akzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme formerly Courtaulds Pension Scheme.  I do not fully understand how this works but I think this scheme is administer by a company called Willis Tower Watson. We have called this company, got through to the pension department submitted all my grandfather's details (D.O.B. , N.I. no. etc.) but that agent tells that they have no record of my grandfather and ask what is the name of the pension scheme. Here is the problem, his home was burgalled in 2005 and a briefcase which contained his legal documents was stolen. So he does not know who was the Pension Scheme company. I have a this phone number 01332 681 210 for Celanese but it just rings and never gets answered. So I am asking for help if anyone can tell us where we can try next. I am also hoping for a massive long shot that one of them members on this website, worked for or knows someone who worked for British Celanese Spondon Derby and could tell us of any pension company. Thanks for any help.
    • Well I sent them the letter of claim, the only responses so far was a few emails reopening the claims on the parcels where they asked for information such as proof of value (which I get) but other things like photos of the parcels, which I haven't got as I never took photos of them. It's been well over the 14 days since I sent the letter now anyway, so what do you think I should do now?
    • Know it has already been answered, but? Does not explain why JCI has registered a different default date when they get the information from the original creditor, Virgin
    • Since you were stopped at the time there is no requirement for the police give you anything there and then or to send you anything before they have decided how to deal with the offence.  They have three choices: Offer you a course Offer you a fixed penalty (£100 and three points) Prosecute you in court  The only option that has a formal time limit is (3). They must begin court proceedings within six months of the date of the alleged offence. Options (1) and (2) have no time limit but since the only alternative the police have if you decline those offers is (3) they will not usually offer a course beyond three months from the date of the offence and will not usually offer a fixed penalty beyond four months from that date. This is so as to allow time for the driver to accept and comply with their offer and to give them the time to go to option (3) if he declines or ignores it.  Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, the action they take will usually be in accordance with the National Police Chiefs' Council's guidance on speeding enforcement. In a 40mph limit this is as follows Up to 45mph - no action. Between 46mph and 53mph - offer a course Between 54mph and 65mph - offer a fixed penalty Over 65mph - prosecution in court So you can see that 54mph should see you offered a fixed penalty. Three weeks is not overly long for a fixed penalty offer to arrive. As well as that, there has been Easter in that period which will have slowed things down a bit. However, I would suggest that if it gets to about two months from the offence date and you have still heard nohing, I would contact the ticket office for the area where you were stopped to see if anything has been sent to you. Of course this raises the danger that you might be "stirring the hornets' nest". But in all honesty, if the police have decided to take no action, you jogging their memory should not really influence them. The bigger danger, IMHO, is that your fixed penalty offer may have been sent but lost and if you do not respond it will lapse. This will see the police revert to option (3) above. Whilst there is a mechanism in these circumstances  to persuade the court to sentence you at the fixed penalty level (rather than in accordance with the normal guidelines which will see a harsher penalty), it relies on them believing you when you say you did not received an offer. In any case it is aggravation you could well do without so for the sake of a phone call, I'd enquire if it was me.  I think I've answered all your questions but if I can help further just let me know. Just a tip - if you are offered a fixed penalty be sure to submit your driving licence details as instructed. I've seen lots of instances where a driver has not done this. There will be no reminder and no second chance; your £100 will be refunded and the police will prosecute you through the courts.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

little bit of debt


pike
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4112 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a few debts coming out the wood work they all show on credit report

 

Most of them have now gone to debt collectors no phone calls just letters at the moment

 

phone debt £86 disconnection fee moved home orange wont accept payment tell me to pay DLC collections

 

British gas debt disconnection fee and charges £90 odd moved house

 

Hsbc balance £404 default £1109(2010)

Hsbc £1300 default 2009

Hsbc £1700 default 2010

 

those all lumped together DG solicitors sent letter with slight reduction before they pass it on was paying £1 per month now nothing

 

Credit card Santandere £1700 now with westcot the credit card was taken out at the time when the bank would send you a cheque would there be a CCa with that type of account?

 

My credit rating is 1 out of 5:sad:

Not working at the moment

What is the best way forwards with this?:violin: thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they offered you a reduction, then the debts are unenforceable. Looking at those figures, it seems there are a LOT of unfair/unlawful penalty charges there.

 

Regarding orange, if you can find their bank details and have a reference number, pay them direct. They cannot refuse payment this way, even though they try and tell you otherwise.

 

 

Can i ask if you have FULL statements of accounts for all these debts? If not, then SAR the OC's and CCA the dca's. Once those CCA's are sent off AND received, the account is basically in dispute and unenforceable/uncollectable until such a time they comply with the request.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for you reply

The HSBC accounts were two overdrafts and one loan they were charging a overdraft fee of £150 on the two overdrafts so £300 per month

what shall i do about debts that do not show on credit report

as have had a few letters from debt collectors asking me to contact them but i ignored them they are a overdraft from another bank and credit card about 3 years ago

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe if you word it that you require all data on you that it will cover all accounts with one SAR.

 

I am sure some one more knowledge will be along to advise you if this is the case so hang on until you have it

confirmed and thus save money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply's

 

Has anyone got a address to send the SAR to HSBC once i get the info i will post back

 

there is lots of overdraft charges @ £150 per month on the two accounts can those fees be reclaimed?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do wish people would stop giving false hope with the "if they offer a discount it is unenforceable" what a load of twaddle. I agree if they offer large discounts it is quite possible, but a small discount? I have even been offered discounts on ccjs.

 

The key question with regards to loans and credit cards is when were they taken out. Prior to April 2007 they could be unenforceable depending on the agreement. Post April 2007 it is much less likely. It is however worth sending a cca request off.

 

The UE route is a legitimate avenue to persue but never ever pay one of these companies to do it for you. A certain Basil Rankine is still doing time for his part in one of these schemes.

.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

With DCA's pretty much any discount means theres something wrong with the debt. We've seen it over and over and over on these forums and indeed many other forums. To get proof, simply sar the OC and look at the figures contained on the paperwork. We dont say it just because we can. WE say it beause 99.9% of the time the debt IS unenforceable.

 

You might well be right fletch, but the OP will still need to request a SAR to check the details so they can be sure if it is or it isnt.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes a SAR would show if there were any reclaimable charges. A cheaper CCA request might show if the account is legit. Of course DG are part of HSBC so not a classic DCA.

 

I think most of that has been suggested. I am just aware the OP is not working so the cost of two SARs is a big chunk of weekly JSA.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if theyre on jsa, thry cpuld suspend repayments or even pay just £1 a month. a sar is a good idea because it will show any reclaimable charges which will reduce tbe debt. Or couple it with interest and in some cases it could wipe the debt out.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...