Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dismissed on capability grounds after work accident...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4098 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

First time poster on here, but have been reading the boards for a while.

 

Wondering if anyone can advise which way to go with this:

 

*Employed more than 12yrs by current employer

 

*Had accident at work 13 months ago (employer admitted liability, PI claim in hand)

 

*Unable to work full time since

 

*Paid for all Injury Assessments myself (Employer refused)

 

*Harassed to see the reports (i was happy to if they covered the cost to me)

 

*Told in a meeting in Nov'12 I would be dismissed if I 'didn't get myself right' and would receive a letter the next day ( I had no idea what the meeting was to be about)

 

*Took 5 wks of me asking, to actually receive the letter (which was different to what was mentioned in meeting)

 

*Verbally dismissed 3rd wk in Dec (I asked for this to be confirmed in writing,still waiting!)

 

*Have started me training in another role,less money,to run concurrent with notice period, then 3 months in that position but only as sickness cover, then 'who knows'

 

I'm aware I may have one or two grounds for unfair dismissal. Would appreciate some advice from you guys. Also would a tribunal only hear one claim, or if there are several grounds would they be heard in the same case?

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you had any guidance that you have as disability as defined by the equality act? What adjustments would you need to do bathe old job full time?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi JuCo

 

You mention that you were verbally Dismissed which you asked to be confirmed in writing and to date you are still waiting on this letter.

 

When you were informed of the dismissal were you also informed of your Rights to Appeal as per the companies policies and procedures as you have a timelimit in place for appealing their decision?

 

Now IMO I would not wait for their letter but would Appeal their decision to Dismiss you.

 

I would also request copies of the following documents:

 

Disciplinary Policy and Procedure.

Sickness Policy and Procedure

Health & Wellbeing Policy and Procedure

Health & Safety Policy and Procedure

 

Please have a look at this ACAS Website link good info their: www.acas.org.uk/

 

I would also have a look at this Health & Safety Executive (HSE) link: http://www.hse.gov.uk/riddor/reporting-change.htm

 

These PDFs may be of use:

Edited by stu007

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi stu007,

 

No, I was not informed of the right to appeal. I was worried about the timeline with having nothing concrete in writing!

 

Thank you for the ACAS links, I shall have a little look as soon as I get the chance :-)

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if you cannot do the job they are within their rights to dismiss and retraining is not a bad option. Lost income goes on the insurance claim.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the measure is "can you do the job with reasonable adjustments." Whether they dismissed fairly and with enough information may require more information and that is where stu's guides are really useful. Think of it as two events; one between you and insurers about lost income, and one between you and boss about can you do the job. Related but not totally intertwined.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would appreciate further views and advice from other CAGGERS. No surprise that I'm fairly stressed with the situation. It seems like they are determined to let my notice run it course, maybe preventing me from going to an ET?

 

Cheers all

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would appreciate further views and advice from other CAGGERS. No surprise that I'm fairly stressed with the situation. It seems like they are determined to let my notice run it course, maybe preventing me from going to an ET?

 

Cheers all

 

Hello there.

 

Emmzzi's the expert, but I do know that if you're worried about your notice period messing up your ET1, then you should submit the form even if you're technically still employed.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As said, 2 things here, one is the PI, which insurers will deal with, the other is the dismissal on capability grounds. Employer has to jump through a lot of hoops before they do that and from what you say they have done none of them. Also, when you get all the paperwork suggested by stu007 get advice on doing a "Statutory Questionnaire" and submitting it to them under the EqA. That will most likely be dealt with at the same time as your tribunal claim for the wrongful dismissal (contractual part). There is are two good reasons for looking into this 1. burden of proof on employer and 2. damages claim can be unlimited wheras the wrongful or unfair dismissal has a compensation ceiling.

 

Yes, the measure is "can you do the job with reasonable adjustments." Whether they dismissed fairly and with enough information may require more information and that is where stu's guides are really useful. Think of it as two events; one between you and insurers about lost income, and one between you and boss about can you do the job. Related but not totally intertwined.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ericsbrother :-) That about sums it up, a completely half baked attempt at dismissal, in my opinion. Do you see a case for wrongful, as well as, unfair dismissal? I shall have a look at the 'Statutory Questionnaire'

I've been told by ACAS that I could go to tribunal now, over failure to provide me with written notice of dismissal after I've requested it (now over 5 weeks). My main concern now is what actually is my dismissal date, did my 12 weeks notice start when I was verbally dismissed? I don't want to be missing that deadline!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It would now appear that my employer has started a 'propaganda' campaign against me,telling anyone who will listen. Along the lines of 'We don't want her to leave, she is forcing us to dismiss her and give her the letter' I was verbally dismissed,all I want is the letter to see the grounds :x Stressed!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Hi, I heard person X say this. Is that correct? That you do want to keep me and have a great role for me?"

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This can still be completely true if you are unable to do the job, of course... you may be seeing conspiracies where there are none.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...