Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Need some advise ESA appeal in few days


chrisw3290
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4146 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Lets not worry about that right now.

 

I think your letter covers all the points needed. You can even use your social anxiety to your advantage by explaining the reason there is so much detail is that you feared you would forget.

I actually wrote out a short statement of the key points i wanted to say and read it out.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I am not good at writing letters myself. If you have a strong medical report to back you up, then you should be ok regardless on how you write the letter to the tribunal. You can explain everything on the day yourself. The reason i wrote a letter beforehand was because i thought i might forget something.

The panel will be interested more in how you felt at the time of the appeal when it got turned down, not how you feel now.

 

Regarding as appealing again, i believe you can appeal to upper tribunal only point of law for example if the panel made any mistakes on looking into your case.

Take all your medical history, whatever you have available and take someone with you too, take all your medicine. If you feel emotional on the day don't hold it back let the panel see how you feel. I know how you feel, its not easy to explain to somebody on how the illness affects you.

 

This is only my opinion, im not an expert in this matter. If you go with my advice, please dont blame me. At the end of the day you have to decide on how you present your case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One bit that jumped out at me - I've underlined it.

 

 

IntroductionI, Chrisw am appealing against the decision made in 2011 to decline the award of Employment and Support Allowance on the grounds that I have not attained 15 points from the combined Physical and Mental Health descriptors following my Work Capability Assessment.

 

When scoring the Personal Capability Assessment/Work Capabilities Assessment I feel that both the Medical Services doctor and Decision Maker have over-estimated my level of ability.

 

The medical doctor at the centre saw me for 10 minutes I think the whole WCA was misrepresented I explained to the doctor that I have serve chest and spinal problems in which he told me that I should be getting that sorted as it could cause problems.

 

By revising the Score card to take account of my actual Physical and Mental Health conditions, I am of the view that I satisfy the threshold of 15 points required for the award.I believe and I will demonstrate below that by scoring the descriptors relevant to my condition correctly that I do attain the required threshold of 15 points.

 

On the physical part of ESA I told the doctor at atos that I suffer from scoliosis, pectus carinatum in which I suffer low chronic back pain as a result I’m on medication for this.

 

I also suffer from social anxiety and depression in which is now being referred to a neurologist for further examination.

 

When I Walk I get lower chronic back pain in my spine I sometimes get pain at the top of my neck. In my Physical Terms I should have been awarded 18 points Mobilise more than 200 metres on level ground without stopping in order to avoid significant discomfort or exhaustion. (6) – This is due to my scoliosis which causes low chronic back pain.

 

When I walk I always have to stop after about 100 meters to rest for about 5 to 10 seconds before starting to re walk. The walking does stop me from doing a lot of things for example if I had no transport I would not be able to get any essentials, when I walk up stairs I tend to stop halfway to let the pain go down and then I will walk up the rest of the stairs

 

Sitting (even in an adjustable chair) for more than an hour before needing to move away in order to avoid significant discomfort or exhaustion. (6) - This is due to my scoliosis which causes low chronic back pain when I sit I always have to move or readjust or get up and have to get up and move to avoid some significant discomfort.

 

During my assessment I waited quite some time after my appointment I had to get up and move several times in order not to fell discomfort

 

Has some difficulty conveying a simple message to strangers. – Due to my social anxiety I find it very hard to ask for directions or any thing from a person I do not know and I tend to talk very quite or my voice On my mental heath terms I should have been awarded 18 points

 

Engagement in social contact with someone unfamiliar to the claimant is not possible for the majority of the time due to difficulty relating to others or significant distress experienced by the individual. (6) – This due to my social anxiety in social situations I find it very hard to communicate and have difficulty relating to others. I Avoid most social contact even with friends and family. If someone I did not know met me I would fell very insecure and would try to get away from this person. I find it very hard to communicate with people I tend to avoid gatherings and if I see someone I know with someone I don’t I tend to shy away, avoid eye contact and try and keep myself unnoticed.

 

I avoid busy areas such as social gatherings which included pubs, bars and busy shopping areas as I fell very insecure and very nervous in that area.

 

Cannot cope with minor unplanned change (such as the timing of an appointment on the day it is due to occur), to the extent that overall, day to day life is made significantly more difficult. (6) – If something in the day changes I tend to get very stressed or if something has happened that can upset me I can get suicidal thoughts but theses tend to go after about a hour.

 

As in my report to the doctors I have felt thoughts of suicide. In otherways I can get very nervos for example if I not expecting someone to come and visit me and they knock on the door I would get paranoid and avoid opening the door or tend to stay in my room so they cant see me. Everyone who visits me know to ring me in advance to let me know.

 

I fell the doctor was wrong as he does not know how I act outside a clinic. Having to wait for the WCA did get me very edgy. I did not know what to do and was afaid to ask whats happening and why was it taking so long.

 

Is unable to get to a specified place with which the claimant is unfamiliar without being accompanied by another person. (6) – If I go to a area which I’m unfamiliar with I tend to get stressed out as if I get lost I fell very nervous to ask people for directions and I find it hard to communicate with people I don’t know. That’s way if I go to a place I don’t know I try take a family member or friend if I can to help me get around. I I know the area I would be ok but very cautious.

 

But if I don’t know the area I will be trying to ask as many people as I can to help me if I cant get anyone I will attempt to go but half way there I would turn back to avoid it.

 

Are you taking someone with you to the tribunal, and did you take someone with you to the ATOS assessment? If so point this out. Also explain any other examples of unfamiliar places you have had to be accompanied to - also what happens if not accompanied? Do you just not go?

 

If you are not going to be accompanied to tribunal or were not accompanied to the ATOS assessment then this descriptor will be a non starter. Again what evidence was in the WCA report for this descriptor and why were they wrong. You need to read this bit then delete it - as it is the questions I was asking you.

 

In Overall I should have been awarded with 36 points or 30 points which I hope that the Tribunal will support my appeal and that the Tribunal will authorise the re-instatement of my award.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

well my 1st hearing was like suspended when i went there as all i had was x-rays and they wanted more inforamtion. my solistor said that is good as useully they cancel it off. i was very distressed that day and i mean very distressed. and when they went outside they saw me in a distress mode

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am very surprised you took only x-rays as your evidence and very surprised that your solicitor said that it is good, i think you should have took all your evidence and get this hearing over and done. This means more waiting, more stress and more solicitors fee.

I was very stressful on the day, i told the panel please carry on and that i wanted to be here today. What you have written in your thread looks like you have a very strong case. Sorry it's shocking to hear that you just took your x-rays with you, that doesn't mean anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Xrays were given to the truibal without anything else this was because my stupid doctor sent the stuff on the day of appeal. So my lawyer said I was lucky because they would of normaly closed the case but I was lucky the truibal delayed it. I have now got everything I need to hopefully win. My lawyers and CAB said I stand a good chance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Xrays were given to the truibal without anything else this was because my stupid doctor sent the stuff on the day of appeal. So my lawyer said I was lucky because they would of normaly closed the case but I was lucky the truibal delayed it. I have now got everything I need to hopefully win. My lawyers and CAB said I stand a good chance

 

I think they might have adjourned it anyway because they didn't have the information in advance.

 

Thats what happened to my friend when she turned up on the day with all her supporting evidence.

 

I don't know if that usually happens though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right one last quick question. I got a lift but I don't want the person coming into my truibal as I don't want them knowing my medical problems. Will that effect my truibal or will that accept that

 

They can sit in the waiting room - available to help you if need it and reassure you while you are waiting.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although i respect your decision to keep your friends in the dark about mental health problems it can be this sort of behaviour that makes it harder for people to understand the issues. Are you sure your friend would not understand.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

My friend said that's ok but my view is what the truibal will think about that. As I'm thinking when I'm called jim I explain I got a ride but my mate is outside as I don't want them knowing my personal medical history

Link to post
Share on other sites

There wouldn't be a problem with you having a lift there - you have to get there somehow! Nor would there be a problem with your friend waiting in the waiting room or outside. The tribunal won't think anything of it. Their job is to try and assess you with as many points as they legally can. Hence why they tend to go through the ESA50 and the ATOS report with you and mainly rely on those items. Your points and answers would then be supported by whatever evidence you provide.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There wouldn't be a problem with you having a lift there - you have to get there somehow! Nor would there be a problem with your friend waiting in the waiting room or outside. The tribunal won't think anything of it. Their job is to try and assess you with as many points as they legally can. Hence why they tend to go through the ESA50 and the ATOS report with you and mainly rely on those items. Your points and answers would then be supported by whatever evidence you provide.

 

Yes, but if the person doesn't either have someone in the tribunal room or the waiting room, they won't award any points for not being able to go to unfamiliar places - as the Tribunal is held in an unfamiliar place to most people.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, but if the person doesn't either have someone in the tribunal room or the waiting room, they won't award any points for not being able to go to unfamiliar places - as the Tribunal is held in an unfamiliar place to most people.

 

I understand your point but still don't see it as a problem. His friend would have escorted him to the building / waiting room. Presuming the tribunal is set up in the same way as my two previous ones, a court usher will then take you from the waiting room to the tribunal room.

 

With regards to the tribunal itself, it is generally incredibly informal and friendly. Nothing like a Magistrates or Crown Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No worries, I'm not trying to smooth over your anxieties. Mine were both held in the County Court which is a relaxed sort of a place for a Court. I'd be surprised if it's held in the main Magistrates Court itself and not in a large side room. But, then again, I've been surprised before. Good luck with it anyway and, I appreciate it's easier said then done, but the tribunal really is on your side ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand your point but still don't see it as a problem. His friend would have escorted him to the building / waiting room. Presuming the tribunal is set up in the same way as my two previous ones, a court usher will then take you from the waiting room to the tribunal room.

 

With regards to the tribunal itself, it is generally incredibly informal and friendly. Nothing like a Magistrates or Crown Court.

 

sorry, rae, I was just making the point (probably badly) that having someone in the waiting room can lend credence to the need for points for certain descriptors, and not having someone there can stop you getting the points.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to make the point clearly that you have someone with you.

 

Yes, definately, and not just say it's your lift (which suggests a transport issue), but that they are accompanying you do stress and anxiety and the very unfamiliar situation.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has some difficulty conveying a simple message to strangers. – Due to my social anxiety I find it very hard to ask for directions or any thing from a person I do not know and I tend to talk very quite or my voice On my mental heath terms I should have been awarded 18 points

 

That descriptor is for physical disabilities, such as hearing or sight loss. The criteria you'd be looking at in relation to it being hard to ask for directions, etc. due to social anxiety would be engagement in social contact.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...