Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

default past 6 years sold on


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4162 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

No they took £1 and got a lot of information, it was £2 for online instant access, NON of which i received, http://www.equifax.co.uk/Products/credit/statutory-report.html

 

There has been a £1 taken out of my balance in my bank account and i have not spent £1 anywhere so it can only have been taken by these people,

all part of there tricks i believe

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I managed to get a copy of my credit report yesterday,

pretty awful sight

 

well i have a few defaults on my file dating back to 2006, the only thing is that i had written to my lenders back in feb 2006 and told them i wouldnt be able to make payments,

 

so on my file i have had a couple of yellow payments missed, then it goes red with 3, 4 4 4 4 4 4 D so they have a red number 4 for months before it goes to default?

Does this mean they will stay on my file until the D date which is actually 6 months after i wrote to them back in 2006.. my last communication with them...

I was hoping to start fresh now but the my file still has some long time defaults not removed yet.

 

Also looks like a company brought a debt off the bank and have also done the red 3 4 4 4 thing, so the default is well after the actual date it was defaulted..

i hardly want to write to any of the company's concerned as i will in now way acknowledge the debts and i do not want to remind them...

advice please

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you look at your file it will say what date the default is registered and what date it will be reported until.

 

Well this is certainly not the case with my report, None show a date it will be reported till?

 

So the debt where i have 1 2 D is where i have not paid 3 times the 3rd being the default but i have a credit card that shows its been settled then a firm called lowell? have me down as 4 4 4 4 4 4 for about six months before defaulting me, i have no idea who they are and can only guess they brought this debt,,

 

so does the default start from the FIRST non payment or the first Default that i have received on the file as for some reason my credit history is showing that the debts only defaulted in october when in fact i stopped paying in feb and sent a letter to who ever i owed saying i was not in a position to pay anyone,,

so no contact since feb 2006 but defaults start in october 2006

i am confused

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowell are a debt purchase/collection company.

A default is placed when a debtor fails to rectify

a default notice that requiers certain action within

a fixed period eg pay the arrears on a loan.

At that point the account is defaulted and an

entry placed on credit files, this is the DEFAULT Date

these entries are on a credit file for 6 years after which

they are automatically removed PAID OR NOT.

The default date CANNOT be changed.

I think you are confusing defaultt date with a date

indicating when a debt becomes statute barred.

Statute Barred 6 years from the date of the last

payment after which no payment is made or acknowledgment

is made to the debt.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply,

 

So the last time i made contact with my lender all that time ago should be my only concern, my debt that was with egg credit card i wrote a letter to then in feb 2006 explaining my difficultys and i was not in a position to pay then anything,

they defaulted me in april 2006 after they put 1 2 D on my credit file, then in may it has a settled on the account?

i know nothing about it, i buried my head in the sand and surfaced only recently to check my file as i would like to restart my life,

then it says i have a default to lowells in october ?

So is the complete thing now statue barred or is the default with lowells still enforceable as that was not placed until oct 2006?

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that the May settled entry is when the debt was sold,

so the original creditor has been paid for the debt so it's ''settled''.

There can be only one default date for each debt.

If the default is for April 2006 then if no payment or acknowledgment

has been made since then it will be statute barred.

We need to know the EXACT date in April 2006 the default was placed.

Are we talking just ONE debt here?

Or due you mean that Lowell updated the credit file on the debt in 2006?

One debt one default date.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

many thanks brigadier

Exact date "Default Date 27/04/2006" and having re read my credit file the setteled was in oct 2007 not 2006!?

 

So it is the time i wrote to my lenders in feb 2006 explaining i couldn't pay which was my last contact,, meaning that its statue barred from then not april 2006 when the default was put onto my account.....

And i no longer should worry about the collectors?

I have more then 1 debt but they were all written to in feb 2006 as i had a breakdown lost my job etc etc

thank you for taking the time to reply

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK it is SB would you like me to draft a letter for you?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK it is SB would you like me to draft a letter for you?

 

Well thank you very much for the offer, as it is i intend to now give my new address to my 1 and only bank that i use.

So should any sharks come after me, should i send letter now then or do you think i should write now?

thank you ever so much Brigadier you are a great relief

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok heres a draft to send when your'e ready.

 

To the Compliance Manager

their address#

 

Ref:xxxxxxxx

Dear Sir or Madam,

I write in reference to the debt for xxxxxx which you

allege is owed by mw.

Please take note I do not acknowledge any debt to you

or any company you may claim to represent.

From advice received and personal research I have determined

that any such alleged debt is STATUTE BARRED there for I will

not now or in the future be making any payment or offer payment.

You will now cease to process and remove from your records any

and all personal data you hold on me.

I am fully aware of the OFT Guidance on Debt Collection 2003/2011

and the sections on pursuing statute barred debt.

use as and when you want.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok guys I'm sort of in the same position

 

I have just paid for my file report and one says defaulted in Red on March 2010 BUT..... they say on the Equifax file - Date updated 24/01/2011 but the info given on the left is - Default Date 29/03/2010

 

Does this mean as I stay in Scotland the debt now has another start date from the 24/01/2011 plus another 5 years till it's Statue Barred??

 

-------J F M

2010 - 6 6 D

2009 - 2 2 3 4 6 6 6

Edited by somethingelseplease
edit
Link to post
Share on other sites

It is just an up date of the files the default date stays the same

creditors are supposed to keep the files updated and accurate.

So no change at all.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks mate,

 

My Ex put me in debt a few years ago and took out Clothing books in my name

 

So I was trying to swerve them....or think about paying them ((SIGH))

 

 

One says Current Balance £685 but also on the right it says

Default / Delinquent Balance £370

 

What does that mean? Am I due the £685 or £370 ??

Edited by somethingelseplease
edit
Link to post
Share on other sites

The default notice was issued to cover arrears of £370 which if paid would

have satisfied the default so as it was not the whole balance is due.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hi all,

i had quite a few defaults on debts to my name but they have all dropped off my credit history now and no ccj's

 

apart from one cahoot bank account overdraught which was 2600 pounds,

 

it has a non payment in the feb if 2006,

then goes in number form up to 6 from 1-6 months,

then it contuines showing number 6 until feb 2007 when it then shows a D

so even though i defaulted in feb 2006 it only shows a Default 1 year later!

 

I also noticed a few searches by debt companys,

is this normal to have a default listed a year later?

 

as i am now nearly 7 years past any defaults and was hoping to get my life in order but it seems i stiill cannot as this one still showing, how odd

any advise

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since it will drop off next February anyway, it's probably not worth worrying about. You could write to the creditor and ask them to amend the date but it's likely to be gone before they get around to it, if they agree. If they didn't agree you would have to go to the ICO, which would take at least a couple of months.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since it will drop off next February anyway, it's probably not worth worrying about. You could write to the creditor and ask them to amend the date but it's likely to be gone before they get around to it, if they agree. If they didn't agree you would have to go to the ICO, which would take at least a couple of months.

 

This really is a most helpful site, thanks very much for your swift responce, i really appreciate it, and i also thought pretty much the same thing as feb i will be clear, only thing now i wonder if i will ever be able to apply for credit again with any of the old creditors that lent me money before? as one day who knows,

Many thanks for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

i had quite a few defaults on debts to my name but they have all dropped off my credit history now and no ccj's

apart from one cahoot bank account overdraught which was 2600 pounds, it has a non payment in the feb if 2006, then goes in number form up to 6 from 1-6 months, then it contuines showing number 6 until feb 2007 when it then shows a D so even though i defaulted in feb 2006 it only shows a Default 1 year later!

I also noticed a few searches by debt companys, is this normal to have a default listed a year later? as i am now nearly 7 years past any defaults and was hoping to get my life in order but it seems i stiill cannot as this one still showing, how odd

any advise

thanks

 

Defaults should be placed within 6 months of the cause of action which within 6 months of the date when a pyment was due and no made, after which no urther payment was made, so a complaint yo the data controller of the creditor that placed the default as it is unfair.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Brigadier2jcs! you have once again helped me out of a bind!

 

I am all clear on the credit file soon then, and i guessed it wasnt right that they could default me a year later!, I doubt i will write to anyone as its only feb 2013 now and i wil have nothing on my credit file,

does this mean i could then apply for a mortgage or would there still be records on the banks i had problems with computers?

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that this default goes is unlikely to make a great difference to a mortagage application, lenders increasingly look to much longer periods of good++ credit management, so depending on the other factors on your credt files you may need to build a credit profile over a couple of years or so.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...