Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Caught foot on door RIPPED BOOTS - company don't believe claim!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3949 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is for my friend, she came in to work the other day and the front doors to our building are solid metal and glass doors (like fire doors) as she pulled the door it caught her UGG boot and ripped it....it also left a lovely swelling on her foot.

 

After inspection the door was viewed to have a jagged edge on the corner of the door...this would explain why it caught her boot!!

 

There were 2 witnesses to this incident, the accident book was filled in and a claim made for replacement boots.

 

 

Few days later my friend recieves an email from the landlord of the office block stating there is nothing wrong with the door, there has never been an incident in 4 years and they will not pay anything towards new boots.......what can she do PLEASE HELP!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm really sorry, but going on that picture I don't see anything on the door that's capable of ripping boots - it just looks like chipped paint. I'm not saying it's not there, just that I don't see it in that picture.

 

That's a moot point though, really. How did your friend make the claim for compensation? Did she fill in a form or write to them? If she wrote to them, can you post or type up a copy of what she wrote?

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, its not chipped paint its the metal of the door...i can see how you would think that however...ill try get a better picture at lunch.

 

here is what our HR wrote to the Landlord.

 

 

One of our employees suffered an accident today when entering the building via the ground floor entrance. Basically, the door, which is rather stiff and heavy swung forward as she entered and caught her left ankle, it tore right through her UGG boot ( picture attached) and caused bruising and swelling to her ankle. Her boots are ruined and she was quite upset about that as they are not cheap. On closer inspection of the door , the corner edging on the right hand side door( as you enter) is very sharp, can you organise someone to have a look at this door and rectify this as if she hadn’t had her boots on it would have been a nasty gash to her foot and I’m sure you agree we don’t want this to happen again. My other question to you, is , as a gesture of goodwill to her, would you be prepared to fund her a new set of boots ? as she is only a part time worker and I appreciate how much these will have cost her. If you can let me know, I’d appreciate it as it would be good to give her some good news.

 

This is there response:

 

xxx is away on holiday at the moment and I have just picked your email regarding the accident suffered by one of your employees yesterday. Whilst we are very sorry to hear about the incident, I have inspected the door in question and there are no defects evident to the door edge and the door itself is operating correctly. The door has been in situ and operated without incident for the last 4 years and although I can appreciate how upset your employee must be as a result of the damage to her boot, I am afraid that we are not in a position to fund a replacement pair of boots.

I presume the incident has been recorded in your accident book and it would be appreciated if you could please pass through a copy of the details for our files.

Regards

 

 

Our HR response:

 

Thank you for your response but I have to disagree, the door is very heavy and was definitely sharp on the edge, the damage to the boot clearly demonstrates that.

 

 

here are the boots.......

 

As you and anyone will know these are tough boots that would take alot to rip...

 

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/705/melsshoe.jpg/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at the second picture, she's very lucky she had the boots on really!

 

Have they responded to the second email from your HR yet?

 

How much did the boots cost when new? I know Uggs are expensive, but I have no idea what sort of money we're talking about. If they won't go down the 'gesture of goodwill' route, I think the only recourse here is a letter before action, but that depends on whether your friend would be prepared to go to the small claims court over this.

 

They may be spooked by the 'bruising and swelling' part of the first email - if they admit their door caused the damage to the boot, they'll be indirectly admitting that it also caused the injury to her ankle. It's possible that they're worried that admitting responsibility will open them to a personal injury claim.

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they havent UGGS cost £165..however she has sent this below and we are waiting there responce, have you a copy of the letter before action or a link to it?

 

 

Thank you, for your reply to xxxxx

I am very disheartened that she has dismissed the incident so easily and cannot help thinking she feels I have made this incident up. I fail to see what I have done wrong here.

As you clearly stated in your first E-mail to xxx this could have been so much worse had I not been wearing these boots and dread to think what the damage would have been to me personally..?

How would their response letter have read in that instance?

I just wanted mention when this incident happened there were two witnesses who were arriving for work at xxxx who asked if I was ok

So if it is a case that they don’t believe this incident happened I am happy to see if these 2 ladies were employees and not visitors for xxxx.Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as a letter before action goes, all she'd need to do is write to them detailing the incident again, and how much she expects them to contribute to the cost of replacement boots, and giving them a set time period to respond (pretty sure a month is usual). State in the letter that if she is not happy with the response, she will proceed to small claims but don't threaten court action unless she's actually going to follow through and do it. If she's claiming up to £300, the fee will be £35 I think, but she'd need to check this.

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Just a suggestion

 

Now what I would be asking is what qualification the individual has that inspected that door and for a copy of the Inspection report and Risk Assessment for these specific doors.

 

Remember this is actually a health & safety issue and they should be treating it as such.

 

Do you have any idea of the door manufacturer at all?

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would tell her to persue this and not give in. I had a similar thing happen a few years ago to a leather coat. The main door to our building was very heavy and when I went through it, it closed on me and the handle caught the shoulder of my coat and ripped it. I put in a claim from my employer for a new coat and they paid up. Tell your friend not to give in, they are insured against stuff like this, and to be honest they are very lucky she had those boots on as it could have been a very nasty injury and a much higher and different claim altogether .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...
So my friend is still persuing this with no joy, has anyone a template of a letter she can write please? its been months now

 

TIA

 

Hello there.

 

Can you tell us what your friend has done so far please? It's hard to tell what stage this is at after all this time.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

Can you tell us what your friend has done so far please? It's hard to tell what stage this is at after all this time.

 

My best, HB

 

she hasn't done anything major she as constantly been sending emails to chase this and requesting an update and if the situation has been resolved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Just a suggestion

 

Now what I would be asking is what qualification the individual has that inspected that door and for a copy of the Inspection report and Risk Assessment for these specific doors.

 

Remember this is actually a health & safety issue and they should be treating it as such.

 

Do you have any idea of the door manufacturer at all?

 

I must agree on the above statement

 

For a start, is the person from the landlord qualified in health and safety legislation to come to a conclusion the door is safe and no issues are present??

 

Is the landlords representative qualified in door construction and maintenance to state there are no defects

 

Have any modifications been made to the door since the incident

 

Has the landlord carried out any risk assessment on the door since the incident

 

I am no expert on doors, but i do know a bit on health and safety legislation, if i was mapping the area during a health and safety inspection i would expect that area of the door to have some sort of rubber seal on it as it definitely has sharp exposed edges.

 

You need to remind your employer that the landlord is failing in its duty under

 

The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...