Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I have an old outstanding debt from 1994 due to MBNA for £20,000. The debt has been passed to various DCAs and is currently with PRA Group.  I sent them a CCA letter in January 2024. They acknowledged this letter and stated they would come back when they had more information, however the information did not arrive within the 12 working day scenario.. I have just received a copy of the agreement which goes back to 1994 from them. In their response letter they have stated " Please find enclosed documentation received to date: we are waiting further documents in order to complete your request. We have currently deemed this debt as unenforceable which means we are not able to take court or further action against you to recover the outstanding balance". They then go on to state "we are still legally entitled to:  1.Contact you to ask and repay what you owe 2.Pass your details onto a third party collection agency 3. Continue to report your account with the credit reference bureaux (as appropriate)". I'm at a loss as to what I should do next and would appreciate any guidance on this matter. I am currently paying £5.00 pcm. TIA      
    • A sinister tactic known as shoulder surfing is on the rise in the UK. Fraudsters are watching unwitting people log in to their mobile banking apps over their shoulder.View the full article
    • My understanding is that they won't provide the name to me whether the investigation is Live or Closed, & I have no legal rep as I didn't have P.I. Cover on my policy, & am intending to claim using OIC.org.uk, but remain completely stuck as they 100% cannot open a claim on the portal without both the Reg. No. & Name of the other driver.  
    • thanks again ftmdave, your words are verey encouraging and i do appreciate them. i have taken about 2 hours to think of a letter to write to the ceo...i will paste it below...also how would i address a ceo? do i just put his name? or put dear sir? do you think its ok?  i would appreciate feedback/input from anybody if anything needs to be added/taken away, removed if incorrect etc. i am writing it on behalf of my friend..she is the named driver  - im the one with the blue badge and owner of the car - just for clarification. thanks in adavance to everyone.       My friend and I are both disabled and have been a victim of disability discrimination on the part of your agents.   I have been incorrectly 'charged' by your agent 'excel parking' for overstaying in your car park, but there was no overstay. The letter I recieved said the duration of stay was 15 minutes but there is a 10 minute grace period and also 5 minutes consideration time, hence there was no duration of stay of 15 minutes.   I would like to take this oppertunity to clarify what happend at your Gravesend store. We are struggling finacially due to the 'cost of living crisis' and not being able to work because we are both disabled, we was attracted to your store for the 10 items for £10 offer. I suffer dyslexia and depression and my friend who I take shopping has a mobility disability. We went to buy some shopping at your Gravesend branch of Iceland on 28th of December 2023, we entered your car park, tried to read and understand the parking signs and realised we had to pay for parking. We then realised we didnt have any change for the parking machine so went back to look for coins in the car and when we couldnt find any we left. As my friend has mobility issues it takes some time for me to help him out of the car, as you probably understand this takes more time than it would a normal able bodied person. As I suffer dyslexia I am sure you'll agree that it took me more time than a normal person to read and understand the large amount of information at the pay & display machine. After this, it took more time than an able bodied person to leave the car park especially as I have to help my friend on his crutches etc get back into the car due to his mobility disability. All this took us 15 minutes.   I was the driver of my friends car and he has a blue badge. He then received a 'notice to keeper' for a 'failure to purchase a parking tariff'. On the letter it asked to name the driver if you wasnt the driver at the time, so as he wasnt the driver he named me. I appealed the charge and told them we are disabled and explained the situation as above. The appeal was denied, and even more so was totally ignored regarding our disabilities and that we take longer than an able bodied person to access the car and read the signs and understand them. As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us. I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge.     After being discriminated by your agent my friend decided to contact 'iceland customer care team' on my behalf and again explained the situation and also sent photos of his disabled blue badge and proof of disability. He asked the care team to cancel the charge as ultimately its Iceland's land/property and you have the power over excel parking to cancel it. Again we was met with no mention or consideration for our disability and no direct response regarding the cancellation, all we was told was to contact excel parking. He has replied over 20 times to try to get the 'care team' to understand and cancel this but its pointless as we are just ignored every time. I believe that Ignoring our disability is discrimination which is why I am now contacting you.     I have noticed on your website that you are 'acting' to ease the 'cost of living crisis' : https://about.iceland.co.uk/2022/04/05/iceland-acts-to-ease-the-cost-of-living-crisis/   If you really are commited to helping people in this time of crisis ..and especially two struggling disabled people, can you please cancel this charge as it will only cause more damage to our mental health if you do not.  
    • I've also been in touch via the online portal to the Police's GDPR team, to request the name of the other Driver. Got this response:   Dear Mr. ---------   Our Ref: ----------   Thank you for your request which has been forwarded to the Data Protection Team for consideration.   The data you are requesting is third party, we would not give this information directly to you.   Your solicitor or legal team acting on our behalf would approach us directly with your signed (wet) consent allowing us to consider the request further.   I note the investigation is showing as ‘live’ at this time, we would not considered sharing data for suggested injury until the investigation has been closed.   If you wish to pursue a claim once the investigation has been closed please signpost your legal team to [email protected]   Kind regards   ----------------- Data Protection Assistant    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Manpower/reed/Hayes - my various employment woes


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1583 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Surely Holiday Pay is "legally protected" like Minimum Wage for example. I would not be surprised if this was classed as an unlawful deduction, I thought one could not normally waive statutory rights even if one signs a contract to that effect?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 216
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Whether you give notice or end with no notice you are completely entitled to any accrued holiday pay. Every employee in the UK are entitled to 29 days holiday a year, this figure includes all bank holidays, if you work on a five day week basis. Or on a pro-rata basis if you work less than five days.

 

So you need to know how many days you are owed, how many you have taken, and the difference is owed to you. Simples.

I am not a legal professional or adviser, I am however a Law Student and very well versed areas of Employment Law. Anything I write here is purely from my own experiences! If I help, then click the star to add to my reputation :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Layla.

It might be a bit too late to help you,but this is from the Manpower Employee Handbook.

 

HOLIDAYS...

In the event that you are dismissed for gross misconduct your entitlement to accrued holiday (if any) shall be the fixed amount of £10.

You may be required to use any outstanding holiday entitlement during your notice period.

 

TERMINATION...

After 4 weeks and up to 2 years continuous service-one weeks notice.

After 2 years continuous service-one week for each completed year of service up to a maximum of 12 weeks notice.

After 4 weeks continuous service you are required to give the Company at least one weeks notice before you cease to be available for work.This may be waived in exceptional circumstances.

 

So,the only time that they will pay £10 holiday payment,is if you get dismissed for gross misconduct.But if you do not work your notice,would that be classed as gross misconduct.

Your employment at the bank maybe finishing in 2 months time,but not your employment with Manpower.

 

 

Regards,John.

Edited by JOHNINYORK
Link to post
Share on other sites

Whether you give notice or end with no notice you are completely entitled to any accrued holiday pay. .So you need to know how many days you are owed, how many you have taken, and the difference is owed to you. Simples.

 

Have to agree with Ibruk above (although 28 days is more likely).

 

BUT that aside, (and ignoring arguments about carry forward of holiday from one year to the next), you can only ever lose accrued statutory holiday upon termination if you commit a repudiatory breach of contract i.e. gross misconduct. Failing to give notice is a breach but not a sufficiently serious breach as to be repudiatory.

 

The label your employer puts on your actions is not definitive.

 

For example they could say being late 5 mins is GM and as such you are dismissed w/o any accrued holiday or notice.

 

That would be a ludicrous argument and not one you could defend in ET. You should chase Manpower for this money. It appears you are owed it!

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have to agree with Ibruk above (although 28 days is more likely).

 

BUT that aside, (and ignoring arguments about carry forward of holiday from one year to the next), you can only ever lose accrued statutory holiday upon termination if you commit a repudiatory breach of contract i.e. gross misconduct. Failing to give notice is a breach but not a sufficiently serious breach as to be repudiatory.

 

The label your employer puts on your actions is not definitive.

 

For example they could say being late 5 mins is GM and as such you are dismissed w/o any accrued holiday or notice.

 

That would be a ludicrous argument and not one you could defend in ET. You should chase Manpower for this money. It appears you are owed it!

 

From what I know, and from googling, Holiday Pay is the same as the Min Wage in how it is to be treated - ie, this is a statutory right which cannot be "given away" as an employee, we cannot waive the right to Minimum Wage and sign a contract accepting less just to get the job, and thus, in the same way, regardless of what you signed when you started, you cannot waive your right to earn and receive your holiday pay. AFAIK, if Manpower want compensation for the No Notice (and as a temping Agency they should be used to this and I can see a Judge throwing it out) then they are more than welcome to pursue the OP through the County Court for their perceived financial loss.

 

Withholding the Holiday pay, regardless of what the contract says, is unlawful deduction of wages, and the OP can go to either Tribunal, or I suspect, a County Court for a CCJ (to speed things up) and will almost certainly win. As another example - one cannot waive the right to EARN holiday pay.

 

Look how much trouble companies got into for claiming holiday pay was "included" in your hourly pay rate... Holiday Pay is a sacrosanct, protected unwaivable right, and the OP should stand up for their right.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

the OP should stand up for their right.

 

Which is what I said :wink:

 

But yes perhaps the repudiatory breach (which in any event was merely an example and has not happened on the facts here) would only mean an employee lost accrued contractual holiday pay i.e. any holidays above the statutory minimum ....... I mean redudiatory breaches can disentitle an employee to notice pay which is also a statutory right no? che will go away and think about this :???:

 

But in any event we both agree that if this is statutory holiday entitlement then it cannot be lost merely for failing to give notice!

 

NB this would seem to answer this:

 

All employees are entitled to be paid in lieu of accrued holiday on termination of employment, irrespective of how that employment ends. As the right to paid holiday is a statutory one, an employee is still entitled to it even if their employment ends by reason of gross misconduct, without notice or payment in lieu

 

http://www.personneltoday.com/articles/2007/03/14/40532/minimum-holiday-entitlement-q.html

Edited by elche

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I have a temp job and everyone was sent an email saying the company won't allow a change of hours as we all signed the contract and its fixed hours 2pm to 10pm.

 

however me and others are going back to college and uni next month and would like to request part time hours, which i know the company may well accept our request if its put in the correct wording in email.

 

can anyone help me with the text for the wording, i was thinking of

 

"please can i request part time hours as I am due to go back to college next month" - but this seems a bit short, anyone please help me with a good draft which sounds good and is solid

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to tell them *what* part time hours - how many you can work and when you are available. Or they may say "sure, 2 - 5pm" which I am guessing clashes with class?

 

I'd also add that you are good to do extra in holidays, as holiday cover may be attractive to them.

 

and I would only worry about making your OWN request look good - don't help other people. They may only have room for one part timer and you want it to be you...

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should also certainly include the fact that you hugely enjoy working for the company and would love to be given the opportunity to continue to contribute to the business.

 

Along the lines of:-

 

Dear Sir,

 

As you may be aware, I am due to return to college on [DATE] which will naturally have an impact on my ability to fulfill my current working hours of 2-10pm. I am very keen to continue to work for [COMPANY NAME] however, and would be extremely grateful if you would consider a request for me to continue in a part time capacity. My schedule at college would allow me to work [HOURS] on [DAYS], and I would appreciate it if you could investigate the possibility of me working shifts around those times.

 

I have thoroughly enjoyed working for the company, and would love to continue to be a part of the business in whatever capacity you are able to offer. I would welcome the opportunity to discuss any proposals that you might have to allow me to remain in your employment.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

OK - the last bit might seem over the top, but I'm sure you get the point!

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I went and signed up with REED job agency in yorkshire and they gave me an evening job from 4pm to 11pm, this lasts until xmas.

 

I've been at the job since June but now I want to leave because the hours are not good, i did not think of this before, but now it will be getting darker earlier and its a long way to travel as well.

 

I've told the person at REED that gave me the contract that I want to leave and to apply for otherjobs - they have turned around and told me "........you must stick out your contract to the end..........you knew about the hours when you applied...................etc"

 

I am desperate to leave this place, the hours are unsociable..........I have been looking for other jobs and have been using the REED job web site, every single job that I have been applied for that is advertised by REED (which would have been given to me without doubt, if I was not working) I have been rejected, even the most basic of jobs, they have been rejecting me - i know the real reason why this is happening is because i want to leave the job I am at at moment and by rejecting me for all other jobs that I have been applying for - they feel this is the way they can drag me out to last the full term of the contract till xmas.

 

When I have spoken to other staff at the agency, they all say "......the job is taken or sorry your working at xyz place so we can't consider you"

 

My contract does not state that I am not allowed to apply for other jobs - its a temp job and people in tem jobs go from job to job, its a fact

 

What action can i take against REED - because they have been rejecting me for every job I have been applying for, the full staff at REED are all doing this and they have placed a note on the system to say - don't allow her to apply for jobs and reject her for all jobs

 

What can I do, I'm sure what REED are doing is against the law

Link to post
Share on other sites

I went and signed up with REED job agency in yorkshire and they gave me an evening job from 4pm to 11pm, this lasts until xmas.

 

I've been at the job since June but now I want to leave because the hours are not good, i did not think of this before, but now it will be getting darker earlier and its a long way to travel as well.

 

I've told the person at REED that gave me the contract that I want to leave and to apply for otherjobs - they have turned around and told me "........you must stick out your contract to the end..........you knew about the hours when you applied...................etc"

 

I am desperate to leave this place, the hours are unsociable..........I have been looking for other jobs and have been using the REED job web site, every single job that I have been applied for that is advertised by REED (which would have been given to me without doubt, if I was not working) I have been rejected, even the most basic of jobs, they have been rejecting me - i know the real reason why this is happening is because i want to leave the job I am at at moment and by rejecting me for all other jobs that I have been applying for - they feel this is the way they can drag me out to last the full term of the contract till xmas.

 

When I have spoken to other staff at the agency, they all say "......the job is taken or sorry your working at xyz place so we can't consider you"

 

My contract does not state that I am not allowed to apply for other jobs - its a temp job and people in tem jobs go from job to job, its a fact

 

What action can i take against REED - because they have been rejecting me for every job I have been applying for, the full staff at REED are all doing this and they have placed a note on the system to say - don't allow her to apply for jobs and reject her for all jobs

 

What can I do, I'm sure what REED are doing is against the law

You can hand in your notice, as with every other job, and unless the employer is prepared to release you early, you will have to work out your notice. However, unless there is a penalty clause in the Contract (read the small print), there is no financial redress which Reed may take against you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know I can hand in my notice anytime, but REED are simply rejecting every single job application that I am applying for other jobs because I want to leave the present job they have given me, they have told me I have to work out my notice BUT my friends that are also employed with them are applying for other jobs through REED and they don't have the same problems as me - with REED staff rejecting all my applications and fobbing me off over the telephone.

 

How can REED possible take financial redress against me, its a temp jobs and people in temp jobs move from job to job when they want to if they are fed up with the job they are in

 

REED are doing this to me on purpose because all they are concerned about is their bonus - if someone lasts the full term of the contract and nothing else

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can apply for jobs with other agencies, but the ones I am applying for with REED - the whole entire staff are fobbing me off and rejecting me for every single job, whereas my friends are not having the same problem with them and they work with me in the same job!

 

REED are telling me to stick the contract out or resign and they will THEN consider me for other jobs I apply for - surely this is illegal

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can't force you to work longer than your notice period, but the problem is that they can argue that you took the job on the understanding that it was until Christmas, so if you leave now they could argue that you might not see through another contract if they place you soemwhere else. It could well be that if you resign and are on the market they'll let you apply for other jobs, but the only way to know would be to resign, and it would be better to get another contract lined up before doing that.

 

Maybe the jobs you're looking at are not being handled exclusively by Reed - Hays, Michael Page, etc., may be advertising the same jobs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're leaving before the end of the contract, they may blacklist you as being unreliable. Unless they're discriminating, I don't see there's much you can do.

 

If you're working at one placement, and you were expected to stay for the duration, you cant reasonably expect them to find you another place before the contract expires. Or have I misunderstood?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they have a fair point, you are renaging on your commitment to them and how do they know you won't do the same at another company? it is their reputation as well as yours that you are tarnishing.

 

For the sake of what, 16 weeks or so, I would stick it out. Not their fault you did not plan ahead.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have signed a contract, and that is legally binding. However, Reed's treatment of you appears unfair, as they could easily replace you in these times of high unemployment, especially as you are very unhappy.

 

I would write a polite letter direct to Reed's CEO explaining your complaint and ask whether Reed is part of a regulatory body (for recruitment agencies) and state you will take it up with them if they continue to sanction you, all because of a reasonable request. You could ask to have the detrimental note about you - that no-one at Reed should deal with you - removed from the files.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

REED are doing this to me on purpose because all they are concerned about is their bonus - if someone lasts the full term of the contract and nothing else

 

They are a business, not a welfare organisation - what would you expect them to be concerned about? Their first, last and only concern is how to keep the person who pays them happy. That'd be the company you are working at.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I would write a polite letter direct to Reed's CEO explaining your complaint and ask whether Reed is part of a regulatory body (for recruitment agencies) and state you will take it up with them if they continue to sanction you, all because of a reasonable request.

 

In honesty I think that is a shallow threat (about the regulatory body) as Reed are doing nothing wrong here. If anything escalating the complaint will cause OP more trouble. After all, presumably they will need another job when this one ends. I honestly would let sleeping dogs lie.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see both sides here. Yes, the recruitment industry focusses too much on what they see as their 'clients', the fee payers rather than the fee earners, and yes, if they can accomodate you they should do so. If they have placed a note on their systems to say they won't deal with you then this is wrong and they should remove it.

 

However, from their point of view they placed you in a contract until Christmas, and the conditions, i.e. working hours, were known at the time. Imagine if it was the other way round and the company or the agency stopped the contract when you were counting on work until Christmas.

 

You could complain to either the Recruitment and Employment Confederation or the Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate, but I think if you are going to complain you should raise it with Reed and ask that you be given due consideration for any roles which might come up.

 

Practically though, my advice would be not to complain, stay in the job in the meantime as its not too long until Christmas, and if you are really keen to move before that then apply for jobs with other agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There seems to be no evidence that there is a note on the file. OP has assumed there is. I expect it just says she is in a contract until... andd ass soon as that contract is finished all will be well.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...