Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Excessive bailiff fee's (Newlyn), already paid for by landlord. Received no warnings.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4242 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

Have recently moved to the UK and have been stung with £240 of Bailiffs fee's after having not paid council tax.

 

The Bailiffs went to our landlords house after I never registered for council tax, our Landlord paid the bailiffs fee's and council tax, I registered for council tax and paid the owing amount, the landlord has since been refunded except I now owe £240 of fees for a single visit.

 

This seems excessive.

 

What are my options here?

 

Ask the landlord to send of a template letter for a break down of the fees? I guess the letter needs to come from the Landlord since she has paid.

 

What should I ask the council regarding these costs?

 

I also feel like the Landlord must have had warnings from the council and obviously did not notify me. I never received any mail or warnings. Is that normal?

 

Any advice is appreciated

Edited by depps
bad attachments
Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to contact the council to find out how much you actually owe, then contact the bailiff for a full breakdown of fee's.

 

If the landlord got mail in your name, and opened it, then paid the debt, then you have the possibility of filing criminal charges against them, although im guessing its the last thing you want to do right now.

 

The bailiffs are bound by set figures which they can charge, but some decide to ignore it. If you are in arrears with the council, then pay them direct. NEVER pay the bailiffs. Only pay them the amount they actually are entitled to for their fees.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx100 – Instructions on uploading pdfs

 

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets

as a picture file

remove all pers info inc barcodes etc using paint

but leave all figures and dates.

go to one of the many free online pdf converter websites

convert the image to pdf format.

or ir you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

NB:you can set where it goes in the post by hitting insert inline.

the hit reply button

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know owe anything now, the week this happened I registered with the council and setup a direct debit.

 

I dont think the landlord got mail in my name and opened it, she must have been registered for council tax as the property was vacant for a short while. I dont really want to aggravate my landlord as ultimately it was up to me to register with the council and pay council tax. I do however wonder why the bailifs went to her house, i.e. not the flat I live in where I was owing council tax.

 

So now that I've done that and owe nothing how do I proceed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dpps, the images are too small to read properly and you've left personal info on them.

they need to be pdf

 

Lets try that again with the docs -

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]38274[/ATTACH]

and

[ATTACH=CONFIG]38275[/ATTACH]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. so overall they say you owe them a few hundred for a visit? Nope. I think the most you owe them is around £25 although someone should be able to clarify that.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the first post you said "I now owe £240 of fees".

 

So - your landlord paid the fees originally. Has your landlord had the £240 refunded, and the bailiffs are wanting you to pay them?

 

Or do you mean you owe it to the landlord?

 

Or have you paid the landlord in full, and want to get the £240 back from the bailiff?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bailiffs went to our landlords house after I never registered for council tax, our Landlord paid the bailiffs fee's and council tax, I registered for council tax and paid the owing amount, the landlord has since been refunded except I now owe £240 of fees for a single visit.

 

Looks like the landlord paid the full amount, then when the OP spoke to them the landlord got a full refund. Then the bailiffs started charging excessive fees.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the first post you said "I now owe £240 of fees".

 

So - your landlord paid the fees originally. Has your landlord had the £240 refunded, and the bailiffs are wanting you to pay them?

 

Or do you mean you owe it to the landlord?

 

Or have you paid the landlord in full, and want to get the £240 back from the bailiff?

 

The landlord paid the council tax the next day as she was scared about having her stuff repossessed. She also paid the bailiffs fees. I paid the council tax shortly after. She has been refunded the council tax she paid now that I have paid what I owe/setup direct debit.

 

The landlord is now requesting that I pay her what she paid the bailiffs as I should have paid the council in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like the landlord paid the full amount, then when the OP spoke to them the landlord got a full refund. Then the bailiffs started charging excessive fees.

 

Landlord paid council tax and bailiff.

I registered with council, paid outstanding amount and setup DD.

Council refunded landlord what she paid in council tax.

 

Landlord is requesting I pay her what she paid the bailiffs - £240.

 

I feel that amount is too high for a single visit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If she wants the money back, she needs to deal with the bailiff. Especially as the landlord got conned into paying unfair fees. Theres no reason why you should have to spend £240 purely for his/her mistake.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

If she wants the money back, she needs to deal with the bailiff. Especially as the landlord got conned into paying unfair fees. Theres no reason why you should have to spend £240 purely for his/her mistake.

 

Her argument is that this wouldnt have happened if I had of paid council tax in the first place.

 

I quote -

 

"We have received a refund from the council for the amount we paid in August, but minus the bailiffs fees which were subtracted before they passed our payment to the council.

 

The total charges applied by the bailiffs came to £236.74 - please see attached docs for details (for some reason they have randomly split the payments into two statements).

 

Given the bailiffs would not have been sent out if you had set up your account as legally required in your tenancy agreement (again, please see point 3.3 in the attached doc), please could you arrange a transfer of the full £236.74 into our bank account (HSBC XXXX1234 sort code 00-00-00)."

 

I also dont want to push it too far with her and end up getting evicted or make her life unnecessarily hard given this is partly my fault. I also dont want to throw away £240..

Link to post
Share on other sites

She can argue whatever she likes. You could counter it with her opening your mail, which is a criminal charge. She probably doesn't realise the charges were excessive and she was conned. If she did, she would be contesting them.

 

Give it a few until the regulars, such as jamberson come back and they should be able to tell you the correct fees and what to say to your landlord.

 

Remember, if all else fails, she did open private letters addressed to you.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

She can argue whatever she likes. You could counter it with her opening your mail, which is a criminal charge. She probably doesn't realise the charges were excessive and she was conned. If she did, she would be contesting them.

 

Give it a few until the regulars, such as jamberson come back and they should be able to tell you the correct fees and what to say to your landlord.

 

Remember, if all else fails, she did open private letters addressed to you.

 

She didn't open letters addressed to me. She must have received letters warning her about unpaid council tax however and did not inform me.

 

Will wait and see what the others have to say as you've suggested.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you had already said you were resident at the address, then the letters would have been addressed to you. The only way she would have letters addressed to her is if she was still saying she lived at the address, otherwise she could have notified the council that the house was empty.

 

The reason i know that is because my brother is a landlord of 7 properties, and the only time he gets letters is when the houses are empty and he notifies the council as such.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you had already said you were resident at the address, then the letters would have been addressed to you. The only way she would have letters addressed to her is if she was still saying she lived at the address, otherwise she could have notified the council that the house was empty.

 

The reason i know that is because my brother is a landlord of 7 properties, and the only time he gets letters is when the houses are empty and he notifies the council as such.

 

I hadn't registered with the council. The letters went to the landlords house where she lives.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh i get you now. But still, why would she be getting the order for the full amount if the council doesnt know you live there. The most she should be invoiced is a very reduced amount, until you do register. Then you become liable for the amount from the date you sign the tenancy.

 

 

Knowing me, im probably missing something, but some of it just doesnt add up, mainly the fact that shes getting bailiff letters and demands, when from your info, the council doesnt know that you live there.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh i get you now. But still, why would she be getting the order for the full amount if the council doesnt know you live there. The most she should be invoiced is a very reduced amount, until you do register. Then you become liable for the amount from the date you sign the tenancy.

 

 

Knowing me, im probably missing something, but some of it just doesnt add up, mainly the fact that shes getting bailiff letters and demands, when from your info, the council doesnt know that you live there.

 

 

Maybe she notified the council that a tenant had moved in? It is a little weird. Unless the previous tentant owed money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could be. Lets see what others think cos it does sound a little strange.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very strange, was OP resident there for the Whole Periods covered in the Liability Order(s)?

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

so the money is all paid up to council and now bailiffs say you owe them for there fees

 

the liability order is satisfied/settled no more

 

bailiffs have nothing to act on no levy for fees

 

the debt is settled you owe bailiffs the grand sum of nothing if they come back tell them to play with the traffic and do one

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You didn't ask the landlady to settle your debt for you, so legally you are not obliged to pay her. It's more of a gift from her to you! But, if you want a quiet life and good relations with her, then I guess you'll have to reimburse her.

 

The situation is between you and your landlord. There may be other disputes between you and the council, or you and the bailiffs, but this one is between the two of you, as I see it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...