Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Taking British Gas to Court


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4121 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

I'n new to the site and am hoping someone can help. I am taking British Gas to court because for 4 years they have been billing be as a business whe I am a residential customer. I have wrote to them , called them and emailed them for over 4 years telling them that I am a residential customer. They have sent me ridculous bills (which I have not paid beciase I am not a business) and they have still not transferred my account to a residential one. An invoice for over £7k was the last straw so after them investigating the matter for 6 months and getting nowhere I decided I had enough and filed a claim against them to which they have responded with a defense and a counter claim for thousands of pounds through there solicitors Eversheds? Does anyone know anything about this firm or has anyone taken BG to court? The couter claim has worried me a bit so any advice would be helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you put up the claim, defence and counterclaim please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

sorry Im new to these forums I have the defense scanned in my email and I have the claim partuculares (i think thats what theyre called) that I can copy and past how do I put the defense up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I email it all to you?

 

yes - to our admin address please

Link to post
Share on other sites

We need to see the details (redeacted if required), you can post them up as pdf's. If the docs are in word format they can be converted using many free print to pdf applications or docs can be scanned to pdf.

 

Its not clear what exactly you are suing BG for ?

 

You may be interested to read Ferguson v BG, a well known legal case > http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2009/46.html

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

nshy, we now have the documents and BF will be with you soon :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

So far as I can see you had an account wiht BG since 2007 and they treated it as a business account but in fact it should have been a residential account.

 

They have been billing you on that basis - which is a higher rate than you should have been paying.

 

You are claiming £3800 for wasted time and you want the account closed and written off.

 

Let me start out by saying that these are not achievable objectives - so you will need to have a serious rethink.

 

You may be able to claim for the time you have put in trying to solve the problem - if you are in the wrong, but it would have to be a reasonable amount of money and you would have to support your claim with evidence of how long you have spent, what it has cost you and how calculate the total claimed for this.

The court will be very suspicious and you are best off keeping your claim for this part very modest - and well supported by evidence.

 

You will not be able to get the court to write off the debt. What you may be able to do is to get the court to agree that you only owe £XXX - being the residential rate.

 

I see that BG are counterclaiming £6200 for unpaid bills.

 

I think that you need to be warned that there is a real risk that this claim may be allocated to the fast-track. If that happens, then if you lose, you will be facing an order for some costs on top of your loss.

 

I think that you need to amed your claim quickly to reflect a more reasonable claim.

 

I think that you need to work out what you would owe if the gas had correctly been billed at the residential rate. this money shoujld be paid quickly so that the amount of the counterclaim is reduced.

 

People often make the mistake of getting angry and witholding all the money - owed and not-owed. This is wrong. You should always try to reduce the value of the dispute by paying what you believe you do owe.

This reduces the value of any cliam and it also demonstrates to the court that you are sincere, that you have acted reasonably and that you are not trying to pull a fast-one.

 

Is there any reason why BG might have thought the address was a business? Who was the supplier before BG? Did you live there before 2007?

You need to start gathering evidence that it is residantial - and that it always has been. Phone bills, bank statements, driving licences - anything.

 

I would find out what you would ose if it was residential - and pay it

amend the POC to reflect a more realistic expectation of expenses - and get rid of the request to write off the debt.

Send BG an SAR to get all info they hold on you about this.

 

I would base my claim on their contractual breach to conduct your account correctly, to treat it as residential and to bil you correctly on it.

I owuld do a very calculated claim for wasted expenses and effort trying to sort it out - at a very reasonable rate per hour - maybe £10.

 

See what that all adds up to.

 

Do this quickly vefore the claim is allocated. You need to amend by means of an N244

Link to post
Share on other sites

I second BF's comments.

 

It is all too easy for an individual to feel hard done by, start (sometimes misguided) court action and ignore the £5000 small claims limit and before they know it, the claim is on fast track, they are in court facing barristers and they lose and are given a bill of many tens or sometimes hundreds of thousands, people have been ruined or lost their homes over such matters.

 

I agree with BF that all you can realistically claim is the differencve between the residential and commercial cost, any extras or essentially damages are only to restore you in the position you were in before, this would probably only be a small amount, I'd suggest perhaps using a rate of £18 as they is the litigant in person rate although technuically you are not actually claiming 'costs' at this stage.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi noshy, I see BG have instructed Eversheds as their legal advisors.

 

This firm is ruthless, so it might well be in your interest to have a rethink of where you are going with this and follow BF's advice.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi noshy, I see BG have instructed Eversheds as their legal advisors.

 

This firm is ruthless, so it might well be in your interest to have a rethink of where you are going with this and follow BF's advice.

 

Thanks Guys my claim is for under £4000, I'm worried now I dont want to end up in an even worse situation owing more than what the counter claim is, If I contact their solicitor and ask them to mediate and to come to an agreement that they change the account over to residential straight away, and the balance that they are counter claiming for already has a standing order going out each month do you think that would be reasonable, the just dont correct the account i have asked them so many times, also if I ask them for a break down of how the got to their counter claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

But surely their counterclaim is incorrect as its based on commercial rates ?..however it would appear there is some merit in it as clearly you do owe something.

 

You can suggest mediation, but they dont have to agree to it, but it may help your case later if you can show you were willing to mediate, some Judges push the mediation option strongly, others do not.

 

A slightly worrying thought is that because their counterclaim is over £5000 it still may go onto fast track, perhaps others can advise more on this.

 

It does appear that you are one of a large number who perhaps rushes into court action a bit too fast without weighing up the pros and cons first, (especially if there is a risk of fast/multi track and subsequent costs).

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your address was always a residential address and you can prove it then you will succeed.

Get your evidence together carefully as I have suggested earlier.

 

Contact the court and tell them that you would like to use the mediation service. Yuo may find that easier

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your address was always a residential address and you can prove it then you will succeed.

Get your evidence together carefully as I have suggested earlier.

 

Contact the court and tell them that you would like to use the mediation service. Yuo may find that easier

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi guys

just wondring if you can help again, had a case management meeting and the judge said that theres no real legal basis for my claim unless I change it to a claim for stress and anxiety and to get a solicitor, he was really nice about it and extended a stay for 6 weeks to negotiate a settlement but he said as it stands my case may get struck out, he cant go down the small claims route because the defendant has made their claim over 5k and wont aggree, hopefully we can settle before but BG dont negotiate well. Just so I know what happends if my claim is struck out? what will happend to the counter claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly the long number for your MPAN, does it start with "01" or "02". If any other number, then it is business rated MPAN. If you supplied proof that it is residential, BGAS should have downgraded. Did you request to be downgraded at any time? Does the meter serial number on the bill match the meter serial number on the meter which is on the property? Surely when you first registered with BGAS as a supplier, you would have approached them as a residential customer?

One way to lower the amount into the small claims court is to pay off some of the amount owing as either way you are liable and it will be payable. Over 4 years on domestic rates, I would estimate that you would owe BGAS at least £3200 if it is only for electric, i.e. no gas heating. If not, then it should be about £2000. I cannot see if you mention whether it is gas or electric. Generally business rates can be cheaper than domestic rates depending on supplier.

At the moment the judge is correct. If you can supply answers to the above perhaps I can help further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...