Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I have an old outstanding debt from 1994 due to MBNA for £20,000. The debt has been passed to various DCAs and is currently with PRA Group.  I sent them a CCA letter in January 2024. They acknowledged this letter and stated they would come back when they had more information, however the information did not arrive within the 12 working day scenario.. I have just received a copy of the agreement which goes back to 1994 from them. In their response letter they have stated " Please find enclosed documentation received to date: we are waiting further documents in order to complete your request. We have currently deemed this debt as unenforceable which means we are not able to take court or further action against you to recover the outstanding balance". They then go on to state "we are still legally entitled to:  1.Contact you to ask and repay what you owe 2.Pass your details onto a third party collection agency 3. Continue to report your account with the credit reference bureaux (as appropriate)". I'm at a loss as to what I should do next and would appreciate any guidance on this matter. I am currently paying £5.00 pcm. TIA      
    • A sinister tactic known as shoulder surfing is on the rise in the UK. Fraudsters are watching unwitting people log in to their mobile banking apps over their shoulder.View the full article
    • My understanding is that they won't provide the name to me whether the investigation is Live or Closed, & I have no legal rep as I didn't have P.I. Cover on my policy, & am intending to claim using OIC.org.uk, but remain completely stuck as they 100% cannot open a claim on the portal without both the Reg. No. & Name of the other driver.  
    • thanks again ftmdave, your words are verey encouraging and i do appreciate them. i have taken about 2 hours to think of a letter to write to the ceo...i will paste it below...also how would i address a ceo? do i just put his name? or put dear sir? do you think its ok?  i would appreciate feedback/input from anybody if anything needs to be added/taken away, removed if incorrect etc. i am writing it on behalf of my friend..she is the named driver  - im the one with the blue badge and owner of the car - just for clarification. thanks in adavance to everyone.       My friend and I are both disabled and have been a victim of disability discrimination on the part of your agents.   I have been incorrectly 'charged' by your agent 'excel parking' for overstaying in your car park, but there was no overstay. The letter I recieved said the duration of stay was 15 minutes but there is a 10 minute grace period and also 5 minutes consideration time, hence there was no duration of stay of 15 minutes.   I would like to take this oppertunity to clarify what happend at your Gravesend store. We are struggling finacially due to the 'cost of living crisis' and not being able to work because we are both disabled, we was attracted to your store for the 10 items for £10 offer. I suffer dyslexia and depression and my friend who I take shopping has a mobility disability. We went to buy some shopping at your Gravesend branch of Iceland on 28th of December 2023, we entered your car park, tried to read and understand the parking signs and realised we had to pay for parking. We then realised we didnt have any change for the parking machine so went back to look for coins in the car and when we couldnt find any we left. As my friend has mobility issues it takes some time for me to help him out of the car, as you probably understand this takes more time than it would a normal able bodied person. As I suffer dyslexia I am sure you'll agree that it took me more time than a normal person to read and understand the large amount of information at the pay & display machine. After this, it took more time than an able bodied person to leave the car park especially as I have to help my friend on his crutches etc get back into the car due to his mobility disability. All this took us 15 minutes.   I was the driver of my friends car and he has a blue badge. He then received a 'notice to keeper' for a 'failure to purchase a parking tariff'. On the letter it asked to name the driver if you wasnt the driver at the time, so as he wasnt the driver he named me. I appealed the charge and told them we are disabled and explained the situation as above. The appeal was denied, and even more so was totally ignored regarding our disabilities and that we take longer than an able bodied person to access the car and read the signs and understand them. As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us. I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge.     After being discriminated by your agent my friend decided to contact 'iceland customer care team' on my behalf and again explained the situation and also sent photos of his disabled blue badge and proof of disability. He asked the care team to cancel the charge as ultimately its Iceland's land/property and you have the power over excel parking to cancel it. Again we was met with no mention or consideration for our disability and no direct response regarding the cancellation, all we was told was to contact excel parking. He has replied over 20 times to try to get the 'care team' to understand and cancel this but its pointless as we are just ignored every time. I believe that Ignoring our disability is discrimination which is why I am now contacting you.     I have noticed on your website that you are 'acting' to ease the 'cost of living crisis' : https://about.iceland.co.uk/2022/04/05/iceland-acts-to-ease-the-cost-of-living-crisis/   If you really are commited to helping people in this time of crisis ..and especially two struggling disabled people, can you please cancel this charge as it will only cause more damage to our mental health if you do not.  
    • I've also been in touch via the online portal to the Police's GDPR team, to request the name of the other Driver. Got this response:   Dear Mr. ---------   Our Ref: ----------   Thank you for your request which has been forwarded to the Data Protection Team for consideration.   The data you are requesting is third party, we would not give this information directly to you.   Your solicitor or legal team acting on our behalf would approach us directly with your signed (wet) consent allowing us to consider the request further.   I note the investigation is showing as ‘live’ at this time, we would not considered sharing data for suggested injury until the investigation has been closed.   If you wish to pursue a claim once the investigation has been closed please signpost your legal team to [email protected]   Kind regards   ----------------- Data Protection Assistant    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is the bank taking your Benefits ?


MARTIN3030
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4070 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My Mother telephoned this morning to say my Sister was distraught. When I arrived, and found that the problem was the bank have been taking charges of £33.00 from her account. This was as a result of her going overdrawn by £0.66. She is a single parent, and this represents 40% of her weekly income!!

 

After the Post Offices closed down, she was given no option but to open an account with the bank to get her benefits paid in.

 

I stormed to the bank, livid, and following some commotion, I was shuffled into the Managers office. He informed me that they could not guarantee the account would not go overdrawn, as I requested that it is Debit only. She has no direct debits, and I can only assume that the £0.66 o/d was caused by a £2.00 monthly service charge applied.

 

He informed me that he would investigate and contact her directly, and if she was not a persistent offender, any charges made would be reimbursed.

 

She has recently been sent a letter from them stating a £6 a day charge for unauthorised overdrafts, and I believe this is a clever way of informing her of an alteration to the Terms and Conditions of the original account.

 

It's not often I lose my cool, but I am hopping mad about this.

 

How many people are doing without basic necessities because they have been forced to open a bank account to receive their benefits?

 

Also, why has there been no intervention by the Government to prevent those struggling (my Sister is unable to work due to medical reasons) from becoming the victim of these profit hungry leeches?

 

How can anybody take the food off the table of my nephew after deliberately placing my Sister in an overdraft position?

 

I cannot comprehend the morality behind this.

 

Sorry to rant but I am livid, will decide what to do when I calm down (NEVER ACT IN ANGER).

 

Absolutely livid

 

Tide

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Completely with you on this one.

 

I take it this is Lloyds the barking mad bank. Where Barclays recently slashed their penalty charge to a one-off £8, Lloyds raised their penalty charges. £2 overdrawn, £200 penalties in short order is the norm with them. I would more than support CAG joint action to single out Lloyds without waiting for the Test Case to trundle to an eventual verdict -- in 3 years time?

 

Justice delayed is justice denied.

 

New Law - Breach of the Banking Code can now be prosecuted by the OFT or Trading Standards

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tide if she's willing get the media involved now......£33 for going over by 66p & it turns out it's the banks charges that have caused it not feckless spending. Christ the press will love this

 

She MUST also write to her MP asap

Edited by JonCris
Link to post
Share on other sites

JonChris

 

Couldn't agree more. Especially as the 66p was caused by the bank's own service charges - why didn't they exercise their right to not charge it and not provide the service? Oh, I forgot, they make a lot more money this way :mad:

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tide.

 

I am also with LTSB for my banking and they have recently taken money out of my benefits for BCs.

 

Now i applied for a Crisis loan stating the reason why and was turned down due the the fact that LTSB have a agreement with ALL benefits offices not to take charges out of benefit money according to the benefits office.

 

the bank is currently investigating if this is true as the person my OH spoke to does not know anything about it but the supervisor remembers seeing a fax about 6 mths ago regarding this.

 

I am going to PM u a phone number the DSS gave us to contact the bank with regarding this it has so far worked with us as the next lot of chrges have been waived and we may be getting the last few lots back when they move there ass about it.

Edited by The GodMother
spelling.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There have been several reported cases of Banks taking charges from accounts that have benefits paid into them by DWP and Social security.thus leaving them with little or no money.

Here is a template letter to take or send to the bank to address this.

It is important to let the bank have this BEFORE you expect to have funds paid in by DWP or the Inland revenue.

A new letter should be sent for each payment that you expect to be protected,customise as required by adding the benefit/type of payment.

 

 

 

 

RIGHT OF APPROPRIATION

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxx

 

I am writing to inform you that I am due to have a Tax Credit payment of £xxx paid into my account on xx/xx/xx, and I wish to use my first right of appropriation for this money, for the following purposes;

Rent £xx

Utilities bills £xx

Housekeeping money £xx

I will withdraw the money on the day that it is deposited for the above use, and I would be grateful if you would ensure that any other payments out of my account do not interfere with this withdrawal.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

[signature]

 

[print name)

hi does that apply to state pension as well, the halifax want to take £70 of my £110 pension on the 14th for refused direct debits

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi VS

 

For information - to send someone a PM, click on their name or avatar and it will take you to their profile. There is a tab labelled "Contact Info" which, if you click it, will offer you the option to send a PM to that person.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tide.

 

I am also with LTSB for my banking and they have recently taken money out of my benefits for BCs.

 

Now i applied for a risis loan stating the reason why and was turned down due the the fact that LTSB have a agreement with ALL benefits offices not to take charges out of benefir money according to the benefits office.

 

the bank is currently investigating if this is true as the person my OH spoke to does not know anything about it but the supervisor remembers seeing a fax about 6 mths ago regarding this.

 

I am going to PM u a phone number the DSS gave us to contact the bank with regarding this it has s far worked with us as the next lot of chrges have been waived and we may be getting the last few lots back when they move there ass about it.

 

 

GF if this is correct please post the details as this will be of immense help to some I'm assisting

Link to post
Share on other sites

My brother has been hit with charges as TV licencing tried to take a direct debit of £70 for his quarterly payment! Funds obviously not in so charges taken from his JSA. I tried arguing with customer services - useless.

 

A number would be no end of use but even just the appropriate letter to hit the branch with would start things off as I know this has happened before on his account.

 

(Have won 2 battles there already for folk - manager hates me. Which upsets me, it really does....hehe)

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

:D Great big heartfelt thanks to you Godmother, and to you Tide Turner. I know its not hundreds, but its a lot when you're on benefits.

 

How busy will their Monday morning be :lol:

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

How would I find out if Nationwide also made an agreement with the benefits department so that I could contact them and make them aware of this? As finding out info from the benefits department all depends on who is in fact in reciept of that piece of information.

I'm fighting back and ready to go :D who will be my first victim? LBL, Brighthouse.

 

..."If you have no confidence in self, you are twice defeated in the race of life."

 

I am not here to insult or offend...just to offer advice and seek advice as all this is a learning experience, such is the cycle of life...for those that would wish to insult me for my thoughts or deeds...Stay Blessed for I know my heart is pure with no ill thought towards YOU. :cool:

Nationwide Won:D Benefits returned £577

Link to post
Share on other sites

Enormous thanks to all concerned. :-) Big smile through tears.

 

I wonder, though, if this is why a charge I was advised would be coming out of my account on the 1st this or last month (in my case, dyslexia forbids accurate remembering as some of the longer standing members may remember), was never taken. I've been keeping the money in my account just in case they "surprise me"

 

I have another matter upon which I would like information and guidance but I can't find the pertinent letter. I'm wondering again.....could the money placed back into my account have come from this ruling to NOT take charges.

 

The sum (£125,) wouldn't have, in any way, covered all the charges they've taken in the apst but perhaps it was what they deemed fit. I was understanding it to be something form a cheque which had been held back from 2004. I'll find letter and give more detailed info on this then ask what you think.

 

I was thinking that, had I been corrrect in my initial understanding that this should have been accompanied by interest on the amount going back to 2004, from which time it had been held by Lloyds.

 

Would Lloyds be likely to be repaying charges deciding that they would go back just as far as 2004?

Link to post
Share on other sites

2004 makes no sense. 2002 would be 6 years and you could understand that from the Limitations Act. And I don't think Lloyds are paying back charges without being severly hassled to do it.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Steven and JonCris.

 

I was actually cagbotted once for giving a phone number on open forums so that is why i did not put it on and chose to send it via PM.

 

This to was a useful number regarding a different company from memory i think it was studio cards non 0870/0871 number.

 

If this rule has changed then i did not know about it but i will post any relevant phone numbers in future.

 

Please could everyone be ware tho this number may just be for my local area and not all over. Tho if it is not you may be able to get the phone number from yur local DSS office or from the telephone operator themselves.

 

Sweet. All i did was apply for a crisis loan from the dss with all the relivant info. like how much they had taken out of the bank and when.

 

I was refused but that is when i found the posted info out.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi GM

 

Quite a few of the bank conctact information threads have phone numbers (eg http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-bank/74934-natwest-contact-information.html#post652087) - I think it depends on which phone number is on the open thread (eg NatWest CEO's home number might be removed, office number not IMHO). Certainly I tink that any office number for a financial or other institution is fine.

 

BTW

This is because my baby, which they think is a girl, is due within the first 10 days of June
today is the 10th, what news? :)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Please could everyone be ware tho this number may just be for my local area and not all over. Tho if it is not you may be able to get the phone number from yur local DSS office or from the telephone operator themselves.

 

Sweet. All i did was apply for a crisis loan from the dss with all the relivant info. like how much they had taken out of the bank and when.

 

I was refused but that is when i found the posted info out.

 

Well I gave my local a call and the employee didn't know anything about benefits and banks but she did say she would pass me on to someone who should know, so I am waiting for a call back though I will not hold my breath:D dont wanna be turning blue now do I as it could be fatal:D

I'm fighting back and ready to go :D who will be my first victim? LBL, Brighthouse.

 

..."If you have no confidence in self, you are twice defeated in the race of life."

 

I am not here to insult or offend...just to offer advice and seek advice as all this is a learning experience, such is the cycle of life...for those that would wish to insult me for my thoughts or deeds...Stay Blessed for I know my heart is pure with no ill thought towards YOU. :cool:

Nationwide Won:D Benefits returned £577

Link to post
Share on other sites

My advise to you sweet is to apply for a crisi loan and state the reason as

 

'Bank taking benefits money for charges against The Social Security Administration Act of 1992 section 187 Certain benefit to be inalienable says:-

187 Certain benefit to be inalienable

(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, every assignment of or charge on—

(a) benefit as defined in section 122 of the Contributions and Benefits Act;

(b) any income-related benefit; or

© child benefit,

and every agreement to assign or charge such benefit shall be void; and, on the bankruptcy of a beneficiary, such benefit shall not pass to any trustee or other person acting on behalf of his creditors.

 

They May ask u what bank it is but it does not matter.

 

The decision maker will then make a decision and let u know. They may then tell u they have the agreement.

 

Steven.

 

The only news is she seems to be staying put but the other half wants to know if a sink plunger and vax will help???

 

Tide not always are the ppl listed in the website and not always are the numbers correct so i dont rely on that.

 

All tho that has given me the correct telephone numbers on some things.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...