Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

First time poster having problems with Ebuyer.com


aneesh99
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4273 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The problem is that you'll start sounding like an expert and not a consumer. The 'time limits' still stand as a barrier.

 

I just used GPU-Z, it's software that saves logs from the sensors onboard the card, nothing more. Should I still not bother?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Still refusing a refund. She said she would allow to replace it with any card of equal value but at this time, Ebuyer are overpriced and have nothing I want. Even kept denying the SOGA stuff when I brought it up. Now what?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why did you speak to them over the phone?

 

http://www.which.co.uk/consumer-righ...-of-goods-act/

 

Again send the letter Recorded.

 

 

Still refusing a refund. She said she would allow to replace it with any card of equal value but at this time, Ebuyer are overpriced and have nothing I want. Even kept denying the SOGA stuff when I brought it up. Now what?
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's just that she agreed to phone me about it and I really want to resolve this asap. I would have the patience and duke it out with them but I have a lot on my plate right now, and to add to that, I'm back to work and university in a month. Though after the call, I am in a mood to put them down :)

 

I'm working on a letter right now (would you mind if I PM'd it to you, any input would be great if that's possible!), but I'm not sure about rejecting the goods for a refund. It says within reasonable time? What I'm trying to say is that 4 months is fair time for a product to be rejected with a serious fault? Can I imply that with a serious electrical fault, repair or direct replacement if off the table, and the alternative of taking another product of equal value is useless because of the ridiculous prices? The only stuff worth paying for is the GTX 670 which I wish I could afford, it's more that 300 quid!

Edited by aneesh99
Link to post
Share on other sites

To get the refund you want, you need to set out your reasons in writing and send them to eBuyer's Head Office.

 

If the problem is that the card is too old for them to refund, why not take a replacement and, if THAT plays up, reject it immediately (again, by writing a complaint) and seek a full refund which you can put towards a purchase elsewhere.

 

Unfortunately, these matters take time and effort but you should get the result if you work at it.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure they don't want to offer me the same card as a replacement after what I told them about it being a common fault.

 

If I took a replacement of a different card as they suggested, could I reject that within 7 days because I don't like it (7 days being reasonable time to inspect the goods)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Aneesh,

 

Do whatever you have to do to get the product you want.

 

Try a replacement saying, "Perhaps the card I have is faulty and another will be OK."

 

Get the new card and, if it's OK, keep it and be happy.

 

If it fails again, complain promptly and seek a full refund based on your experience of the product's failure.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm at a loss about what to do now, do I send the letter and keep going after them or do I just take a replacement?

 

My point is that they have nothing worth taking as a replacement. If I take the same card then it might take months for it to become faulty, then I'm going to be in the same boat. I'm stuck as to what to do now!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Aneesh,

 

In your first post, you said :-

 

Brought a replacement graphics card from Ebuyer 4 months ago and from day one, I had issues with it black screening on me and continual driver crashes.

 

You didn't seek a refund until 4 months had passed, after trying all sorts of options to see if you could get the card to work properly. Because of the time elapsed since the purchase, the supplier doesn't want to refund.

 

So accept the offer of an exchange card but, if anything goes wrong with the new one, reject it immediately.

 

You should be in a stronger position to demand a refund because :-

 

1. You'll be rejecting the item as soon as any errors show up.

 

2. You can say you've tried two cards, both of which have failed, so you have no faith in the quality and reliability of the item.

 

If they refuse to refund, you can write a Letter Before Action giving them 14 days to refund or you'll sue them for the item's cost, P&P, court fees and interest.

 

You could also mention that you are a CAG user and will have no choice but to publicise eBuyer's refusal to acknowledge the product's faults and refund fairly.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I don't have a legitimate ground for asking for a refund right now, but I would if another one failed? I'd rather not have to go through all that hassle again, especially if the card takes another 4 months to go bad. Should I still send the letter and see what happens?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not try my suggestion.

 

It may be that you had a lemon, and the new card works fine.

 

EBuyer reviews for the card seem to rate it highly although I note you say there's criticism elsewhere.

 

But this is your choice. If you want to send your letter seeking a refund, do so. Post a draft here first if you want.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

[My address]

[My address]

[My address]

 

Ebuyer (UK) Limited

Howden

East Yorkshire

DN14 7UW

 

Order number: [Order number :)]

 

Dear sirs/madams,

 

On 10/04/2012 I placed an order for a [Graphics card name and model] and received it on 12/04/2012. I have discovered that the graphics card has the following problem; it repeatedly black screens on me when under load (usually gaming, sometimes during work or general browsing) and restarts the driver. It has recently come to my attention that this has become a common known issue with the very card in question. A quick search on the net for ‘[model] black screen’ almost exclusively brings up threads about this card with the same SKU. The nature of the fault is serious; there are inherent design defects pertaining to electrical and heat issues, that luckily, as of yet, have not affected the other components in my PC. This can’t be repaired, and I feel that it is quite possible that a replacement will have the same issues further down the line, and the Technical Support manager, [name of manager], agreed. The other option presented to me was to take a replacement of equal or greater value (in which case I’d have to pay the difference). The products that are available are of no interest to me, the products at the same price point are the same graphics card model that’s in question, which I will not take due to the outlined problem. Taking a replacement card of greater value is of no benefit to me as I simply cannot afford to spend any more than I already have.

 

The Sale of Goods Act 1979 makes it an implied term of the contract that goods be as described of satisfactory quality and fit for purpose. As you are in breach of contract I am rejecting the [Graphics card name and model] and request that you refund the sum paid to you of [£££.££].

 

I also require you to confirm whether you will arrange for the card to be collected or will reimburse me for the cost of returning it.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in the next seven days.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Aneesh [surname]

 

If I left anything else in there that should be hidden, feel free to give me a shout. Is the basic premise of the letter okay? I feel like I may have gone into too much detail but I want to get my side of the story across.

Edited by aneesh99
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Aneesh,

 

That should do fine for starters and let us know how they respond.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Got an update. They agreed to replace it with a new and different card at a cost reduction (and extra £10 which I paid with a CC :D) which I received yesterday. I am now however having a problem with them as there was a promotion for a free game, which I did not receive. They are now claiming my order was taken before the promotion started. My order was processed on the 12th, the same day the promotion started. More than that, it even says on my invoice that the card comes with the game! Thinking of ditching the card on SOGA, though I guess I also have a 7 days cooling off period right? Just can't seem to get a break!

 

Edit: Just got an answer to my enote, apparently, I need to pay for postage? It does say in the Ts and Cs that the consumer needs to pay for return postage, but I also read this:

 

Consumer Protection (Distance Selling) Regulations 2000 (SI 2334) Which specifically states that, where goods are returned as a right due to a breach of a term imlpied by statute (specifically s. 14 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979), the rights, given by r. 14(5), of a seller (yourselves) to require the buyer (myself) to bear the cost of a return is disapplied.

 

Do I have grounds for them to refund postage or am I out of pocket?

Edited by aneesh99
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Aneesh,

 

Personally, I'd try to get them to agree to send the game which they should have done when you were sent the 1st card, if you agree to pay for the return postage.

 

How much is a Jiffy Bag and a stamp.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They refused. I think I didn't explain it very well. The replacement item for my dead card wasa different card completely, the AMD 7950. It came with game, which they are denying that I should have received. My invoice states

''Sapphire HD 7950 OC 950MHz 3GB GDDR5 DVI HDMI Dual Mini DisplayPort PCI-E Graphics Card includes free Sleeping Dogs Game Download Coupon''

 

To my knowledge, are they not obliged to provide what has been paid for on the invoice? I said the item was misrepresented under SOGA, once again, they denied this. The sticking point is that return postage is around £10, which I feel is totally unjustified as it is their fault, not mine.

 

They keep telling me SOGA doesn't apply as the item wasn't misrepresented, that the system changed the title on the 12th to reflect the offer and the order was placed on the 11th. I agreed to the new item and they processed the order (i.e. paid for it, then it was picked and dispatched) on the 12th. Do I have any grounds to make a stand here or should I just drop the money for postage and be done with them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Aneesh,

 

If you're happy with the new card, then you could just drop the matter.

 

OR, if you're still unhappy and want to try once more you could point out, in writing, that SOGA applies because the card was faulty and they have a duty to refund or replace the item and cover the costs of P&P.

 

Re the free game, if the invoice says you should have the voucher, tell them they should supply it as per the invoice.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...