Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. ( Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM   1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack  Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached   2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00.  The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month.   3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement,   Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us.   Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement   9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate   4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:-   a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement number 756050. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     Thw total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by Firrst class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges ]= 5.  A the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or  alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage.   Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs.   Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024   What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help needed please with Vanquis Default!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4283 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

looking good then

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx. Emailed the SOC across- which the Manager said he would look into. Briefly, phoned me to ask if I can send documents- they can't trace call but going to investigate with the moblie operator.

 

He did mentioned briefly, that his representatives had not handled the account as he would expect ( I am assuming he means his DCA) asked if I had lodged with the OFT and will make a decision within a day if he can get call listened too. If not, he will have to be forced to make decision on what he has found out so far- which he would rather not too. Did mention that distress and inconvenience would be factored into his decision.

 

What would you advise next, do I need to contact Orange to verify their documents they emailed- I just feel as though they are now stalling, Mentioned going for a joint mortgage soon and he did sound emphatic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

orange?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

orange?

 

dx

 

 

Phone bill, dx :)

 

OP was asked to provide evidence of telephoning Vanquis as their records apparently didnt show this call made.

 

OP emailed copy of the ebill and Vanquis are demanding a hard copy !!

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

do keep up dx

  • Haha 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol thanks both dx and Citizenb!

 

Although we provided him with an email-with the same info we would post,

why would the postal one be any different to tracing

- something does not add up!

 

Vanquis state they have a good relationship with the moblie operators.

 

If they can't trace it, why make us go through hoops when he has listened to the calls from the DCA and clearly hear a dispute is going on.

 

Furthermore, those charges make the default amount now invalid.

 

Furthermore,

 

f I formally requested a full SAR does this need to include a credit agreement, default notice and log of calls they made/transcripts in addition to the statments etc.

 

If they can't trace the call- this is stalling the complaint.

 

They have listened to a few DCA calls but not all.

 

The DCA knew there was a default for at least 6 months prior to the regsitered default date of 31st May. 2012

( still don't understand the relevance of the 31st) their incoming calls/notes would show we discussed this with them,

in addiion to the letters we sent.

 

Why the DCA did not go back to Vanquis when the complaint was placed on hold every 14 days- is something that baffles me!

 

They have tried to cut us short of settlement by over £140 and over the phone he skirted over the issue of our agrreement request

- something is not adding up here.

 

Our balance should now stand at £70 and not the incorrect £547 they are recording!

 

Any advice on what to do next would be greatly appreciated-as I envisage another stalling tactic next week .

Edited by Snowyandfudge
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone- just received this update from Vanquis:

 

Dear xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Thank you for providing an interest calculator.

 

As previously advised to you, interest was only charged on this account until February 2012.

 

It would appear that your calculator is calculating interest until the current date - this is therefore incorrect.

 

In addition, we have only charged interest on default fees that were applied since May 2011.

Therefore any charges prior to this date are not eligible.

 

I confirm that upon receipt of a SAR we would supply screen shots containing a summary of calls made to/from us.

It would not include calls to/from third parties acting on our behalf (we do not hold this data so any request for it would need to be made to them).

 

It would include a copy of the default notice but not the credit agreement (this would be provided in response to a request under S78 of the Consumer Credit act).

 

I have been informed that the document supplied by you does not conform to the format previously seen by our telephony department.

Combined with the fact that we cannot trace the call it is believed that the matter can only be progressed further by our telephony partners

by providing the original documentation to them.

 

They will then contact Orange in order to attempt to resolve the matter.

 

Any advice please on what to do next- greatly appreciated.

Edited by Snowyandfudge
Link to post
Share on other sites

use the edit button and add some line breaks please next time.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone- just received this update from Vanquis:

 

Dear xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Thank you for providing an interest calculator.

 

As previously advised to you, interest was only charged on this account until February 2012.

 

It would appear that your calculator is calculating interest until the current date - this is therefore incorrect.

 

In addition, we have only charged interest on default fees that were applied since May 2011.

Therefore any charges prior to this date are not eligible.

 

.

 

wheres the proof of this?

 

can you scan up all the statements for the period of the charges please

 

i'll pull it apart.

 

dont like this sounds wrong

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

 

Don't have them all, but will upload what I do have. ( think I should full SAR them).

 

 

What I don't understand, is what he is saying regarding the format of the bill we sent him

 

- it will still be the same if I post this to him, what will be the diffference ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Snowy, looking in as asked given the figures you have provided the default should be challenged as dx and cb have said.

The guidance is that if a default sum is made up of charges without which the account WOUL NOT HAVE DEFAULTED NO

DEFAULT SHOULD BE PLACED, so it is unfair and unreasonable I think all but around £70 of the balance being charges.

 

Take this as a separate complaint to the Date Controller at Vanquis.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the great advice as usual.How would I find the number/address please for the data controller for Vanquis?

 

What do you advise regarding the phone bill we emailed Vanquis. The format is still the same, even if we have to post.

 

.He states without this call he would be unable to decide to remove the default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Goes to their head office, marked confidential, I find it hard to believe that there is no record of that call exists, I think you write the formal complaint quoting the the date of the call not acknowledging that there is any doubt about the call.

 

If you need help with the letters let me know and I'll try and draft something over the weekend there may be a little delay as my duaghter and son inlaws flat was burgled last night and I have a few things to doo.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much Brigadier2JCS thanks for the advice, sorry to hear about your Daughters burglary.

 

 

 

Received a further email.

 

 

Interest was never charged on the penalty fees applied to xxxxxxxxx account prior to May 2011. As interest was not charged, no refund of interest is due on those fees. Finally admits these are penalty fees!

 

In order to obtain a SAR, xxxxxxxx would need to write to each organisation requesting one and enclosing a £10 statutory fee. There is a 40 day maximum statutory period for response.

 

As previously advised, other than you advising the DCAs that the account was in dispute, we have been able to find no evidence to support that the request for default fees to be refunded was ever made to us. We repeatedly placed this account on hold- mentioning these default sums. Sent letters. DCA sent discount letters as mentioned above.

 

As previously advised, I will reimburse the cost of providing the original Orange documents. If these are not provided I will, reluctantly, decide on my proposed resolution without this information.We don't have orginals- we use ebilling.

Edited by Snowyandfudge
Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter to the Data Controller

Vanquis Bank.

 

Ref: (account number xxxx)

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

I refer to the default place on my account and the entries made on my credit reference filles having taken advice on this matter I believe that the default is unfair given that

the default sum is made up of charges without which the account would not have defaulted the actual balance less these penaly charges amounts to around £70.00.

 

I am sure youare aware of the Technical Guidance on the placing of defaults in this situation and would now expect you to remove the default status of the account and remove entries from credit reference file.

 

I would send this RD.

 

Sorry for the delay!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much BRIGADIER2JCS I did not expect this so soon after what happened to you Daughter- thank you so much. Will it help that the complaint manager actually called these penalty fees in his last email when previously was calling these default charges?

 

I also found out from 1st Credit yesterday that they went back to Vanquis on the 1st March after we disputed the balance made up of these charges. Vanquis then replied to 1st Credit on the 20th March saying the balance is correct and that to continuing collecting. Was instructed then to start offering discounts upto their maxi level ie 50%

 

The account was then sent back to Vanquis on the 24th May 2012 as they had been unable to collect payment due to the dispute over the balance.

 

On 31st May 2012, the same date as the DEFAULT was registered, we received letters from C.A.R.S introducing themeselves and asking for the FULL BALANCE.

 

On the 6th August 2012 we re- contacted VANQUIS who said they were placing our complaint on hold and stop collection from C.A.R.S.

 

C.A.R.S state that the account was only placed on hold on the 13th August 2012.

 

Emailed CEO and within a week, Vanquis wrote to us, stating they would refund charges. The interest is somthing though that we are still disputing. When home today, I plan to look for the statements, that we do have to see if interest was applied from DEC 2010 to MAY 2011.

 

I will post the letter tomorrow lunchtime- does any one know where the Data Controller will be located at Vanquis- as found two addresses? Thanks.

 

Thanks everyone so far for your advice- greatly appreciated.

Edited by Snowyandfudge
Link to post
Share on other sites

If there isnt a specific address for the Data Controller, send it to their Head office/Registered office address - Mark clearly for the attention of the Data controller.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there isnt a specific address for the Data Controller, send it to their Head office/Registered office address - Mark clearly for the attention of the Data controller.

 

 

Registration Number: Z767493X

Date Registered: 03 March 2003 Registration Expires: 02 March 2013

 

Data Controller: VANQUIS BANK LIMITED

 

Address:

1 GODWIN STREET

BRADFORD

WEST YORKSHIRE

BD1 2SU

This register entry describes, in very general terms, the personal data being processed by:

VANQUIS BANK LIMITED

This register entry contains personal data held for 10 purpose(s)

Purpose 1

 

Staff Administration

Purpose Description:

Appointments or removals, pay, discipline, superannuation, work management or other personnel matters in relation to the staff of the data controller.

Data subjects are:

Staff including volunteers, agents, temporary and casual workers

Suppliers

Complainants, correspondents and enquirers

Relatives, guardians and associates of the data subject

Advisers, consultants and other professional experts

Data classes are:

Personal Details

Family, Lifestyle and Social Circumstances

Education and Training Details

Employment Details

Financial Details

Goods or Services Provided

Racial or Ethnic Origin

Religious or Other Beliefs Of A Similar Nature

Trade Union Membership

Physical or Mental Health or Condition

Offences (Including Alleged Offences)

Criminal Proceedings, Outcomes And Sentences.

Sources (S) and Disclosures (D)(1984 Act). Recipients (1998 Act):

PENSION FUND ADMINISTRATORS

D C I F A S

Data subjects themselves

Relatives, guardians or other persons associated with the data subject

Current, past or prospective employers of the data subject

Healthcare, social and welfare advisers or practitioners

Education, training establishments and examining bodies

Business associates and other professional advisers

Employees and agents of the data controller

Other companies in the same group as the data controller

Suppliers, providers of goods or services

Persons making an enquiry or complaint

Financial organisations and advisers

Credit reference agencies

Debt collection and tracing agencies

Survey and research organisations

Trade, employer associations and professional bodies

Police forces

Central Government

Voluntary and charitable organisations

Ombudsmen and regulatory authorities

Data processors

Employment and recruitment agencies

Claimants, beneficiaries, assignees, payees

Transfers:

Australia

India

Malaysia

South Africa

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much was about to address letter to the office in London- so much appreciated.

 

Have checked statements and no interest was applied since March 2012 as Vanquis stated

 

.Not sure how to work out interest on statements between Dec 2010 and May 2011 which is when they state no default interest was applied, ( which he is correct- I have checked statements) but purchase interest at 2.840% (34.07 annual) is applied during this period.

 

Also, after May 2011 default interest and purchase interest are both applied.

 

Would appreciate any advice please over this interest !

 

Does it help my complaint that Vanquis actually called these penalty fees?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much was about to address letter to the office in London- so much appreciated.

 

Have checked statements and no interest was applied since March 2012 as Vanquis stated

 

.Not sure how to work out interest on statements between Dec 2010 and May 2011 which is when they state no default interest was applied, ( which he is correct- I have checked statements) but purchase interest at 2.840% (34.07 annual) is applied during this period.

 

Also, after May 2011 default interest and purchase interest are both applied.

 

Would appreciate any advice please over this interest !

 

Does it help my complaint that Vanquis actually called these penalty fees?

 

 

Be careful vanquis charge 2 for one possibly Overlimit charge £12.00 also Late Charge £12.00 and Finance Charge so make sure you get all thats been added.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

July statement.jpgThanks again. Have uploaded July 2011 statement. Before May 2011 only purchase interest was added.

 

We received postal statements but also noticed evanquis- not sure what this is, it also appears on 1st May 2012 statement. Even though passed onto DCA in Feb.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as expected = overlimit charge £12.00 also late payment charge £12.00 == £24.00 then they charge on the default charge £1.54. etc. make sure that all is credited back to you, did me after phone call to them no arguments.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...