Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX 2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.   Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4261 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Need some advice.

 

I am looking to hand in my notice and as I am going to a rival company, I am likely to go on garden leave.

 

Nobody is sure of the notice periods but the company say it is a month, but we have never been given a contract. I have been here almost 6 months and I beleave it is only the statorary week.

 

The concerns I have are:

 

1) If I give a months notice, if my employer gives me garden leave, can he just give me a weeks pay. (Apparently the employer changes this to suit themselves from other people leaving)

 

2) Commission due to date. Others who have left have not been paid what is due to them to the day they hand in their notice. The employer says that they do not have to pay commission.

 

3) Bullying. This is common practice by the owner. He has done this a number of times to me and other employees. Sometimes he will bully those that are leaving, then not pay commission.

 

4) Holidays booked. I have a weeks holiday booked. Can they rescenf this and make me work to the end of the notice period?

 

Any help would be appreciated as I have to hand in my notice soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you don't have a contract, you only have to give one week's notice. They don't have any legal argument to say that you should give a month's notice if they didn't put it in a contract.

 

1. If you do give one month's notice, you should be paid for the whole month. If they choose to put you on garden leave and they tell you it's for a month, that's what you should be paid - although they could put you on only a week's garden leave and pay you for just a week.

 

2. Commission is usually written into a contract, but in the absence of a contract, you could argue it was an unlawful deduction from wages for them to withhold this as it was a payment which was customary.

 

4. They can only retract holiday if they give you twice as much notice as the holiday booked - so two weeks' notice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So if you give them a months notice, they can then rescend this to one weeks garden leave?

 

How about staff sickness. They state that you can have 5 days per year off paid. I assume they can take this poff your holiday time due?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have taken sick leave then you would only be paid full daily rate of pay for 5 days then would either revert to SSP or would have to claim ESA for the period of illness. If you have taken sick leave they can't (as far as I'm aware) turn round later and say you owe them x number of days leave in lieu of sick days taken - if you're only entitled to 5 days but they pay you for more than that it's not your fault. If, however, you are entitled to 10 days leave for the pro rata'd time of the leave year you're there but you've taken 12 days then they can reclaim payment from you and, if you've only taken 8 days leave, then you should be paid for the 2 days not taken.

 

I am sure others more knowledgeable will be along to correct me if I'm wrong.

 

Feebee_71

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have taken sick leave then you would only be paid full daily rate of pay for 5 days then would either revert to SSP or would have to claim ESA for the period of illness. If you have taken sick leave they can't (as far as I'm aware) turn round later and say you owe them x number of days leave in lieu of sick days taken - if you're only entitled to 5 days but they pay you for more than that it's not your fault. If, however, you are entitled to 10 days leave for the pro rata'd time of the leave year you're there but you've taken 12 days then they can reclaim payment from you and, if you've only taken 8 days leave, then you should be paid for the 2 days not taken.

 

I am sure others more knowledgeable will be along to correct me if I'm wrong.

 

Feebee_71

 

Thanks. I am a little worried as I have experienced bullying with the owner. We had someone leave earlier in the week.

 

She lost her commission, even though she was told she would receive it, plus they have docked some holiday time leave due to sickness. She gave motive until the end of August and now they are not paying until then. They are coming up with a number of reasons why she won't get paid. She is livid as she was experiencing a number of sexual suggestions from the owner, witnessed by all.

 

Another colleague was dismissed two weeks ago. She was off sick. Even had a doctors note. They said she was in probation period and that she was hardly there.

 

Looking at others I know, all the same has happened. Including bullying from the owner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I have another update. I have handed in my notice and have worked this out. I am now on my last day. I was told that I would be receiving £990 commission from the last commission run by my supervisor. I was told by accounts that this had gone through.

 

I came in this morning and I have been advised that I would only be receiving 50% of this. According to accounts, they will be unable to do another wage run as they have issued a P45.

 

Where do I stand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...