Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi T911 and welcome to CAG. As you say, an interesting screw up. So much for quality control! Anyway, our regular advice is to ignore all of their increasingly threatening missives... UNLESS you get a letter of claim, then come back here and we'll help you write a "snotty letter" to help them decide whether to take it any further with their stoopid pics. If you get mail you're unsure of, just upload it for the team to have a look.
    • Thanks @lolerzthat's an extremely helpful post. There is no mention of a permit scheme in the lease and likewise, no variation was made to bring this system in. I recall seeing something like a quiet enjoyment clause, but will need to re-read it and confirm. VERY interesting point on the 1987 Act. There hasn't been an AGM in years and I've tried to get one to start to no avail. However, I'll aim to find out more about how the PPC was brought in and revert. Can I test with you and others on the logic of not parking for a few months? I'm ready to fight OPS, so if they go nuclear on me then surely it doesn't matter? I assume that I will keep getting PCNs as long as I live here, so it doesn't make sense for me to change the way that I park?  Unless... You are suggesting that having 5 or so outstanding PCNs, will negatively affect any court case e.g. through bad optics? Or are we trying to force their hand to go to court with only 2 outstanding PCNs?
    • That is so very tempting.   They are doing my annual review as we speak and I'm waiting for their response once I have it I will consider my next steps.    The debt camel website mentioned above is amzing and helping to. Education me alot    
    • Sending you a big hug. I’m sorry your going through this. The letters they send sound aweful, and the waiting game for them to stop. But these guys seem so knowledgable and these letters should stop. Hang in there, and keep in touch. Don’t feel alone 
    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unfair Dismissal - ** RESCINDED **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4322 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I believe my employer has unfairly dismissed me.

 

The events: A work mate at the time took two drinks from the shelf at work, then went to the back of the store were no cameras could see. I then went out the back and chatted with him, he drank both of the drinks then put them in the bin, the security guard then came down seen the two empty drinks in the bin. We were both then called up stairs to have separate meetings about the incident, during this I told them that I didnt see the work mate drink them and said they were just placed on the side then we left. Following these meetings we were both suspended so the case could be investigated. While we were suspended he handed in his resignation before the disciplinary hearing, I attended my hearing told them that he had drank both of them. However I was believed to have been guilty as I changed my story and they fired me on the grounds that they believe that I consumed one of the drinks.

 

Since this conclusion I have expressed that I wish to appeal the decision and will bring a letter to them tomorrow stating this. I have also got a signed statement from the work mate that drank the two drinks saying he did so to take as evidence of my innocence.

 

Just writing to ask is there any advice on my situation anyone can give, I've went to the citizens advice bureau and they said to first give them my appeal letter then get in touch with the employment tribunal.

 

Thanks for your time

Link to post
Share on other sites

On precisely what grounds have you been dismissed? Theft?

 

Whilst you may well have grounds to appeal (and indeed should) against any charge of the theft itself, your employer may still have grounds to dismiss you fairly for acting as an accomplice/being complicit in an act of dishonesty/breach of trust. This would be on the grounds that you were aware that a colleague had stolen items and did nothing about it, or, that you lied when asked about the theft. On that basis, it may be that the employer could hear your appeal but still choose to dismiss, but equally, a well worded appeal might also persuade the employer to downgrade the dismissal to a warning.

 

I am wondering why the CAB would advise you to go to an Employment Tribunal. If, as you say above, you were untruthful when asked about the drinks, then a Tribunal case will be a non-starter. This is not a matter which requires proof beyond reasonable doubt, merely that the employer is required to have a belief on the available evidence that you were involved in an act of dishonesty. A Tribunal will not assess whether the employer was correct in their assumption, merely whether their actions in dismissing you were a reasonable response to the matter in question. Sadly, I fear that not disclosing information during an investigation into a theft will be seen as covering up for the thief, and that dismissal would be a reasonable response on the part of the employer.

 

Sorry - I am certainly not making you out to be as guilty as your former colleague, but believe that in the way you have worded your post, the employer has got you either way. You must appeal because you are not guilty of the theft, but in that appeal you will have to have a pretty convincing explanation for why you did not speak out at an early stage if you knew that your workmate had stolen drinks, and why you acted in such a way as to cover for his dishonesty. Misguided loyalty would seem to have cost you dearly.

  • Confused 1

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

From what you have said your Employer has taken the reasonable belief route mainly due to you changing your version of events.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your words, I have sent in an appeal letter to the store on Friday waiting for word back after the bank holidays this week. I was dismissed with the allegation of theft through consumption. They said because I changed my story it was unclear as to what the truth was and it left them with the reason to believe that I consumed the other bottle. Im hoping that the appeal letter and my sincere apologies along with the statement from the other colleague stating that I had no part in it may change the outcome but the longer it goes on the more I'm thinking it doesn't look good. Very upsetting.

 

Sorry it took so long to reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When the events were as straight forward as you say how could you have provided different versions of the events? think you need to elaborate here on what the difference is as something does not add up

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the fundamental point here is that the employer would be justified in the dismissal, they have dismissed you for theft, that is incorrect and you are appealing on the basis of new information, namely the statement which you have obtained from your ex-work colleague.

 

The difficulty here could well be that in any event your employer would say that there has been a break down in trust and confidence that they have placed in you, and as a result of that that breakdown is fundamental to your continuing employment and therefore you would be dismissed on those grounds.

 

Unless you have any other information?

 

Could I ask how long have you been employed with the employer? Note that you are unable to claim Unfair Dismissal for the first 12 months of work if you were employed prior to April 2012, however after this date it is now 24 months.

 

Also note that your limitation (date of which you must bring a claim) for Unfair Dismissal would be 3 months less one day from the date of dismissal.

 

However, based on the above information it would not seem as though you have a claim to take forward to an Employment Tribunal.

 

You may want to take legal advice, it seems you have been to the CAB but if you have legal expenses insurance on your property you may be able to call them and seek some advice.

 

Hope that helps.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When the events were as straight forward as you say how could you have provided different versions of the events? think you need to elaborate here on what the difference is as something does not add up

 

Because the other workmate said in his interview that he handed them to me to put in the fridge, this didn't happen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the fundamental point here is that the employer would be justified in the dismissal, they have dismissed you for theft, that is incorrect and you are appealing on the basis of new information, namely the statement which you have obtained from your ex-work colleague.

 

The difficulty here could well be that in any event your employer would say that there has been a break down in trust and confidence that they have placed in you, and as a result of that that breakdown is fundamental to your continuing employment and therefore you would be dismissed on those grounds.

 

Unless you have any other information?

 

Could I ask how long have you been employed with the employer? Note that you are unable to claim Unfair Dismissal for the first 12 months of work if you were employed prior to April 2012, however after this date it is now 24 months.

 

Also note that your limitation (date of which you must bring a claim) for Unfair Dismissal would be 3 months less one day from the date of dismissal.

 

However, based on the above information it would not seem as though you have a claim to take forward to an Employment Tribunal.

 

You may want to take legal advice, it seems you have been to the CAB but if you have legal expenses insurance on your property you may be able to call them and seek some advice.

 

Hope that helps.

 

I've worked for them for 3 years, I'm apart of the law club with the company which provide legal advice and representation. I'm going to get in contact with these for some advice around the issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Copy of the appeal letter,

 

 

Dear *****,

I’m writing this letter to inform you of my decision to appeal against the decision reached on the 24/05/2012 regarding my dismissal from work. The grounds for the appeal are as follows:

 

I understand that I should have told the truth from the beginning and none of this would be happening, and have regretted not doing so ever since. I felt pressured into sticking up for Dominic and should have handled the situation differently; I made a huge mistake and want to make it clear that I would never think of stealing anything. I’ve never been placed in a situation like that before and didn’t handle it correctly; it would certainly not happen again if I was to be given a second chance. I have worked for the company for almost three years and throughout these three years the company has looked after me very well, transferring me back and forth to stores while I’m at University and back home. I’ve been under enormous pressure the last couple of months as I am currently sitting my final exams at university and was wishing to get a place on the graduate scheme within the company so I shouldn’t have jeopardised my chances of this by not being honest. I have never done anything wrong in my time with **** and I’m sure anyone I’ve worked with in the bakery will confirm that I am not the type of person that would steal anything. Following this decision I have since gathered a signed statement from Dominic clearing me of the allegations surrounding the events that took place and will bring this with me to the appeal hearing.

Yours Sincerely,

Conor

Edited by honeybee13
Removng your surname to provide more anonymity.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Conor,

 

Just to make you aware that if your employer fails to reinstate you and you want to refer the matter to your representatives for legal advice your limitation date would be 23rd August 2012, this is the date that a claim must be submitted by which is 3 months less one day from the date of your dismissal.

 

Has the appeal letter been submitted? Also, please take your name off the bottom of your previous posting.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Wow! Have to admit that I am surprised in the light of the circumstances, but am delighted for you. Well done for sticking with it.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I was told 9 out of 10 times I would have been out the door, but the store manager had spoke to the people I had worked with and the managers in charge of me and they all had good things to say. I'm extremely lucky and thankful that I got it back, I thought it was hopeless trying to get it back but just goes to show if you want something enough and keep at it you'll get there.

 

Thanks for the previous advice aswell, none of the tribunal stuff matters now thankfully threw all that stuff in the bin with the biggest smile on my face.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...