Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just a little something for consideration When a card is compromised, the replacements can be set up to automatically allow or manually re-add, old recurring transactions. The card issuer may ask you to confirm legitimate transactions which they would effectively 'migrate' to the new card Some do - some don't. Some staff on some cards seem to be entirely unaware/uncaring about this. Some card issuers expect you to sort it all out manually.   BUT if the leak is an ongoing lyca leakas it seems - as soon as you or your CC supplier give it to lyca/the leak source - compromised again     A note on security DONT use the same email or phone number for your banking as you do for sims etc. Although a bank eg santander leak would compromise this Infp seems to suggest that single/compromised multi factor authentication customers are priority targets, with more robustly secure cards being hit by 0.00 tests first Consider that the email address is one of the OTP recieving options AND one of the OTP security checks prior to sending the OTP - with the phone number being another So if they've got your card and email (same email for banking and end contact) - and you aren't forcing a phone OTP - you are compromised.  
    • Thanks for posting up the back of the NTK. The good news s that as it does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act, it means that you are not liable for the charge as the keeper as I explained in a previous post.  The PC fails for two reasons. The first is that it does not specify the period of parking. All it does is list the arrival and departure times of your car. Obviously that does not include the time taken to drive to the car parking space, manoeuvre the car into the space and later drive from the space to the exit. Nor does their times include things like getting kids disabled people out of and into the car as well as things like returning the trolley whilst still being parked. All of which can add a fair bit of time to the parking period which can then be subtracted from their ANPR times and makes your actual parking time a lot shorter than 118 minutes they seem to think it is. The second reason is that they failed to ask the keeper to pay Schedule 4 Section 9 [2][e]  (e)state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges You as keeper are now in the clear which is a good reason for you to contact Sainsbury  stating that you are being pursued as the keeper when you are not liable under the Act as well as the oher things I suggested in my previous post. If you don't get it cancelled with Sainsbury this could drag on for months with endless letters unlawfully pushing the price up to scare you into paying.  
    • Brilliant! That's great to hear and honestly pleased I'm wrong, my advice was out of concern. I checked some of your previous posts last night and you've been giving great advice to others at times. Bringing a claim can be serious (counter-claims etc) and it didn't appear you were knowledgeable based on posts so far. Far from an expert myself, just interested and will try to help. I'll sit on the sidelines, best of luck with the claim!
    • Thank you so much for the advice  I will try and up my savings to £500 for the next 6 months. Although I do still have an uphill battle, I feel more able to deal with it.  I hope my experience with the cifas marker helps someone else who finds themselves in that quite horrible situation. It is a huge weight off my shoulders getting it removed.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CapQuest chasing 1999 abbey Overdraft - Court Claim Received


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 398 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

that's why they did it

ok so you've a reasonable idea of the address they are after now then?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 258
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I think so.

 

I have a street name and postcode but no house number.

I don't even know what years I lived at that address for.

 

And now that I have this court judgement thingy against me,

bailiffs are a very real threat,

something I have dreaded from day one.

I just don't know what to do for the best.

 

This has been going on for so long now and I am in a worse position than when it all started (with CapQuest).

 

I don't know how I would be able to find out where I lived in 1999.

Why don't the bank or CapQuest have this information already?

 

I'm just going round and round in circles and now this,

having to write to them again with an address that I might have lived in in 1999.

Why can't they talk to me on the phone?

 

I explained my medical history.

But no, has to be in writing.

 

What if that address isn't the right one?

Where do I go from there?

More letter writing and more time for the bailiffs to arrive at my door.

 

And I'm sorry for swearing in my previous post x

 

I honestly feel like I'm tied up in knots :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

they need the address for data protection issues..

 

on a side note

did you follow and read the full sar thread? and include a copy of your current CTAX bill

to prove who and where you are now when you sent it?

 

as for bailiffs

yes I know its one of your pets worries.

 

well forget it.

this is a CIVIL DEBT.

 

any bailiffs that could ever get involved

have no right of entry whatsoever

and can safely be ignored.

 

if its a county court bailiff

they are on your side and will help you

 

if the claimant gets the High Court lot

you can also laugh at them.

but neither will/can happen anyway

as your N244 stop any further action till the set aside is resolved.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did not enclose a copy of my current CT bill with the original letter,

I will send one with the letter tomorrow.

 

What is an N244?

Is this something I should have done?

 

Is this the thing with the £200 fee or something like that?

If so, I haven't done one of those because I don't have £200 spare.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the set aside will stop things progressing

as with andy

I've not heard of it being done via MCOL.

 

 

the lack of response to the SAR

might well be because to date they cant verify you.

that's why if you rea the SAR thread

and you have moved

we recommend proof of now

like a CTAX bill copy.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

today received the documents from Santander.

There are 16 pages in total,

some showing screenshots and a few which looks to be a kind of bank statement type of thing.

The last time I personally used the account was on 11/04/2007 and the account was closed with the description "Account closed contact collections and recoveries" on 13/12/2007 with a balance of £1523.00.

There is nothing regarding CapQuest and no further action on the account after 2007.

There are no letters to say the account is being sold to CapQuest

and no letters from CapQuest to the bank.

it looks like nothing happened between 2007 and 2011,

when I started paying CapQuest as per my original post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and your last use in 2007 was?

so not looking like it was statute barred before they issued the claim.........?

so resit right back to the original thread start..

the debt is mostly bank [penalty] charges that tried to reclaim but gave up on..

any data to support that?

as you need a defence to support the set aside?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The last use by myself was a cash withdrawl from a cash machine.

The next entry is "Account closed contact collections and recoveries".

And yes I do believe it is bank charges, that rings a bit of a bell with me.

As it is now looking like the account wasn't SB'd and I do owe the money

I am going to contact them to offer a payment of £100 per month.

I do not want bailiffs coming to my house,

especially now I have my recently blinded brother living with me,

I simply can't handle that kind of stress.

My question to you is,

should I contact them by telephone or put it in writing or email?

And do you think £100 a month is a reasonable offer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

bailiffs?

where'd that idea come from?

so how is the set aside going?

whats the latest on how this stands legally ?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just want to pay it off. I need it off my back, it's really making me ill

The set aside, yeah I haven't done that.

Completely forgot about that.

I'd actually forgotten about all of this to be honest.

My brother has lost his eyesight and came to live with me recently so that has taken over everything.

It was only when he asked me last night how this particular issue was going that I remembered,

"Oh yeah, I still have to deal with that"

I'm assuming it is now too late to do the set aside?

And even if I do manage to get it set aside,

what's the point if I'm still just going to have to pay it back?

Link to post
Share on other sites

since you got the letter of judgement

have you had anything from anyone else chasing payment?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well on historic charges reclaiming + interest

£1283.20 and a bit

is not actually too much too diff to amass

 

can yo not have a scan thru the statements from day one

and tot up the fixed sum [£30.£20 etc] penalty charges [Fees] they have levied ?

see what you can find

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok this has got me even more confused now!

 

I have gone through the statement that they have sent me

, which starts at 31/12/2006 and ends at 13/12/2007

 

I have added up all the "Unauthorised overdraft charges" and the "Unpaid direct debit charges" and it comes to a total of £420.

 

There are other fees such as interest charged while account overdrawn which range from £4.81 to £19.52

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you not got statements from 1999 is it when this opened?

 

Your doing good

Sadly you can't reclaim the int

But

Once in our spreadsheet that will calc it back on them for you

 

Keep going

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No

all they have sent me is a few pages of transactions and some screenshots of their system which don't show dates or anything so don't really mean anything to me.

Is there any way I can send you images of what they have sent?

You might be able to make more sense of it than me.

Sorry for being a bit thick 😕

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there anything in the sar that relates to your charges complaint years ago?

Have you got anything on say an old PC somewhere?

Is there anything on cag under a previous username

You've forgotten?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is nothing in the paperwork they have sent me that relates to a charges complaint, only what I have written already.

 

Back in 1999 I didn't even know how to use a computer so sadly there isn't anything stored there.

 

I did have another username on here, LilMissMoosh,

but I think one of the Site Team either merged the two accounts or just closed the LilMissMoosh one.

 

It's hard remembering things and the more I try to remember, the harder it gets :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

no you are correct usernames were merged and your old posts are here under your present username and in this thread

 

it was just I was puzzled

 

you joined cag in 2006 but have no posts prior to 2012..weird.

 

I was trying to find any post relating to the reclaim you started

but cant find any.

you must have done the reclaiming post 2006 as you did it with info from cag

so was wondering if you are on the same PC or still had it many have with docs hidden

i'm trying to guage what figures you came up with then

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah that sounds about right.

I had my first brain haemorrhage in 2007 and that took me 2 years to recover from.

Then I had a few years of stressful events, so my first post being in 2012 does sound about right.

I don't think I have ever posted anything regarding this debt in another post somewhere.

I think the first time I mentioned it was the beginning of this thread when I needed help/advice.

Sorry, I feel like I'm not being at all helpful here :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

how did you go about the reclaim that failed in the early days?

you must have done some documents and or calculations or letters then

even if you just read cag to get the info.

obv you used a PC to do it

do you know which machine and if it still exists?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

go back and read the first 12 say posts of this thread it might jog your memory

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Having heard nothing since the court judgement thing,

I have today received a 'Statement' from CapQuest with a letter attched explaining that under the terms of the CCA they are required to send me regular statements detailing any activity on my account.

I'll receive one statement every year whilst the balance remains outstanding.

Details on the statement are:

Type of account: Bank Account

First movement on account: 30th April 1999

Amount of credit: Your agreement was terminated on 10th November 2007, so your credit limit is £0.00

Then it goes on to show 'Adjustments' in April and May 2016 which show a total of £194 being added to the original balance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

legal costs?

but doesn't matter

its not after payment

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...