Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Employer wants 3 years of salary back!!! - ** Case struck out **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4341 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I need some serious help :-o

 

I have just been sent a claims court letter stating that my ex employer wants every penny back he paid my wife for the past 3 years even though she had an employment contract, paid tax and NI and all above board. He even wants the company car benefits paid back to him and the neagtive equity on the car we left with him when both of us resigned.

 

Am i stupid in believing this is something he cannot win or is the law daft enough to let him?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Agreed. We need to know the Particulars Of Claim

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK here goes - I was employed on a contract running the company for him. I wasnt living in the area and worked from home for 3 weeks out of the month. Between us; the directors and me - we felt it better if i moved to the area. This meant my wife had to finish work so they gave her a contract and she just stayed at home but it meant we had the same overall income.

 

We moved up and all fine for 3 1/2 years. Then the owner starting dodgy stuff and I told him and we had words and in the end he suspended me. I stayed at home for 6 weeks and then dedcided to resign giving 3 mths notice. They sdaid they would take 1mth so that was fine and I did and left on 7th oct and went into a new job on 10th Oct. Just before I left i heard the newspapers were onto him about some fraudlent behaviour and I was interviewed by both paper and police about it all. He has been arrested and bailed and due in court this month. He thinks I have shopped him but i havent.

 

They have also sacked the finance direcrtor as he too didnt like what was going on. They also owe me about 70k in commission but only admit to 47k of which i have already had 23k of it before i left in carious guises.

 

my wifes salary is seperate from mine but could argue that is all mine i suppose but nonetheless can they take it? There is no mention in my contract or hers about company car etc so I am assuming they trying to say cos it aint in threre then they want it back and as my wife never came into work then they want that back..

 

My cynical mind is saying they trying to wind me up as they know I am a votaile person with no fuse whatsoever but i am not sinking to those depths and ending up in prison for GBH...I want to do it all legally!

Link to post
Share on other sites

so, the wife had a signed employment contract and terms and conditions?

 

it sounds like they are on a major wind up in the hope you lash out and do not defend their claim for some reason.

 

is it possible to scan in the court letter (covering personal info of course) or typing up the exact wording of the claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, signed contract with T&C's and paid for 3 years with no issues. All tax and NI paid and company car declared on P11d's.

 

Attached 3 pages from their submittal to court.

 

Thanks for everyone's reviews.

img011.jpg

img010.jpg

img009.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, signed contract with T&C's and paid for 3 years with no issues. All tax and NI paid and company declared on P11d's.

 

Attached 3 pages from their submittal to court.

 

Thanks for everyone's reviews.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to the Employment Forum

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly the images are too small to read. Any chance of getting them larger. Use Photobucket or upload as PDFs?

 

Best edit out the case number too if possible.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all you need to acknowledge service of the claim and indicate your intent to defend the claim in full.

 

Insofar as the defence is concerned you need to respond directly to the POCs in that the claim has no merit, the POCs are insufficiently detailed to provide any cause of action. The claimant alleges that money has been unlawfully and illegally taken, yet no such suggestion has been made by the claimant previously, nor has there been any police investigation into any 'theft' alleged by the claimant. You and your wife were employed under a contract of employment for which an agreed remuneration was paid, including the use of a company vehicle and you have received no more than was agreed by contract in return for the services provided.

 

Even though this case appears to have no merit and appears to be malicious and even vexatious, I would strongly recommend that you take legal advice in view of the amount involved.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

This is shocking especially your POC they are saying "We are claiming for recoveries of money unlawfully and illegally taken from the company while employees of the company, which led to their employment being terminated on 7th October 2011".

 

It may just be me but if it is as serious as the POC makes out then:

 

1. Why has the Employer not called in the Police to investigate this?

2. Why has they Employer filed the Claim Online?

3. Has the Employer informed HMRC of this? (as per POC as it involves NI Contributions is the Employer not obligated to inform HMRC of this as would this not be classed as fraud)

 

I may be wrong but this Employer is basically accusing you of theft and that was the reason your employment was terminated.

Edited by stu007

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you both for your comments and advice. I will respond to the claim. One thing I forgot to mention is that both of us resigned. I resigned on 22nd September and left their employ on 7th october and my wife resigned on 5th October and was supposed to leave their employ on 31st December but they stopped paying her after 1mth saying that her salary was part of my commission!

 

I personally think they are trying to intimidate me bbecause of the MD's pending court case plus all the information i have about what has gone on in 3 1/2 years (although I have not used that information nor was intending to - that may change).

 

It saddens me that I gave 3 1/2 loyal years and brought in so much business that kept them aflioat and this is how they treat us. Thanks again and I will update as we go along....great forum by the way!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, just one more question please - now the claim has been defended by me what happens next with the on-line claim? Does a judge sit and reveiw and decide to go ahead or not or do I now go to court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know Cag can move mountains, but for this kind of money I'd be sorely tempted to get professional advice on this one. On the face of it, the claim is completely ludicrous and I can't imagine a judge taking it seriously, but when the money you're talking about equates to some folk's mortgage it's probably worth playing safe.

 

I'll be fascinated to see how this pans out, and I wish you the best of luck. It must be a real worry for you and your family.

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with most of the comments above, as the amount is so high it should involve some soprt of professional representation, dont forget that the claim would be on the multi track which would allow costs (which could be significant) to be recovered.

 

Its true that as it stands the POC contains no justification or explanation of their claim, It may be worth looking at the provisions of CPR 24 (Summary Judgment) and CPR 3.4 (Strike Out of Claims), these provisions allow claims that have no merit to be struck out at an early stage before either parties spend anymore on costs, although as the amount is so high you would be wise to seek further advice.

 

I cant really for the life of me see how they could possibly explain that they have paid n3 years wages but want it all back, the only claim I can think of is that you somehow did zero work for those three years (i.e you hid under a table or something).

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, just one more question please - now the claim has been defended by me what happens next with the on-line claim? Does a judge sit and reveiw and decide to go ahead or not or do I now go to court?

 

Have you sent an acknowldgment or full defence.

 

The next step should be 'allocation', AQ's will be sent to both parties, however as I suggested..you should give some thought to using Summary Judgment (CPR 24) or Strike Out (CPR 3.4) so maybe the claim can be dismissed before allocation. (The rules on this do say that SJ/SO applications should be as early as poss). However DO get further professional advice.

 

Given the strange nature of this it may well be that the judge will want some kind of case management/direction/allocation hearing so he can try and work out whats going on, and perhaps (if hes generous) give a hint to the claimant that his claim may fail.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Please consider Professional Advice the amount is certainly large and Multi-track allocation. Me being me would take a walk with the docs to the local nick, and say you want to be questioned on the alleged theft which you are sure they would be aware of.... you are innocent so nothing to lose. The old bill with either laugh at you, or interview you. The police will then investigate the claim....and cause more ***t for the MD, certainly the DJ will love to hear how the particulars have no truth per the old bill investigation - but of course this is what i would do :-)

 

I suggest a 24 or 3.4 per andy above may be a better legal avenue.

 

Following this with interest, good luck - see a solicitor asap....

 

Oh maybe a counter claim for the monies owed to you as they are listed on the POC / schedule !

 

N

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys...Firstly yes, i have filed a defence. I am going to contact a solicitor on Tuesday and I see the cooperative have a no win no fee for employment law matters so going to see what they can provide. I will also look at a 24 and/or a 3.4 per Andy's advice.

 

The stress is taking its toll but we will get through it somehow....

 

thanks again for all relies and advice, very much appreciated...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Can't help with the legal stuff, but see you have plenty of the guys on here to give you sound advice on that

My input is really to make sure you've got documentary evidence to assist your case;

Do you and your wife have a contract, written agreement or particulars of engagement in respect of thus employer?

Do you and your wife have P60 certificates and P11D forms for the last three years

Do you have any form P2 (notice of coding) from HMRC

Do you and your wife have payslips in respect of this employer

Was your salary/commission paid by BACS, CHAPS or cheque and do you have evidence of the payments by way of your bank/building society account.

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Can't help with the legal stuff, but see you have plenty of the guys on here to give you sound advice on that

My input is really to make sure you've got documentary evidence to assist your case;

Do you and your wife have a contract, written agreement or particulars of engagement in respect of thus employer?

Do you and your wife have P60 certificates and P11D forms for the last three years

Do you have any form P2 (notice of coding) from HMRC

Do you and your wife have payslips in respect of this employer

Was your salary/commission paid by BACS, CHAPS or cheque and do you have evidence of the payments by way of your bank/building society account.

 

Yes to all of the above - thanks for the list as I am sure I would have neglected to dig all this out - whereever I have field it :-)

 

Feeling a lot better today after all your comments on this forum so thank you for making me feel more relaxed and confident. Will see what transpires now as we have daughters wedding in a few weeks and trying not to allow it to affect that!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...