Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • There are example threads where AOS is done but defences are submitted late, it happens, sometimes because MCOL is broken! As the claimant you will be able to reference a late filing and request it be struck out for not following Court Directions, for example if the defendant arrived at court with it on the day without submitting... but I believe there is some (slight) wriggle room for defendants (reasons depending) on late defence. I believe you just need to continue your claim, no defence and not following court directions will almost certainly strengthen your case
    • I'm afraid it's against site rules to recommend lawyers. You could look on the Law Society's Find a Solicitor page for local firms with the right expertise, or google nwnf lawyers in the uk, then check out reviews on social media, review websites and so on, to see how other people rate them. If they say they don't do nwnf, I would ask if they know a firm that does. 403 - The Law Society SOLICITORS.LAWSOCIETY.ORG.UK HB
    • Thanks for that information. I seem to think they have similar names and similar addresses and I thought it was Aldi that was offering the great deal that attracted you to that car park. So we are still stuck with Nexus. Please do not call DCBL about a settlement figure.The first reason is that they have your telephone number which is not something you want to give to those vultures as you rightly call them. They will then harass you on the phone and try and send you last minute details the day before the case -which they shouldn't do. And second they are already charging you £60 to £70 more than they should lawfully, to that they will then add the Court costs that they haven't yet paid or incurred and then say that they will give you this great offer of £150 to avoid going to court.Big deal-not. Were it around £50 that would be a better deal but they would not accept that.   
    • Hugo, how are you getting on? the deadlines can creep up on you. It's useful to have a week or two in drafting a defence, so you can understand it for yourself before submitting. Read other like threads for examples and tailor to suit you. Get one drafted and posted (without personal info) and let us take a look
    • OK thx jk2054 I'll go that route, does anybody have any positive reviews of NWNF law firms they've had experience with? I did consider InjuryLawyers4u, but apparently they're more of a broker, & who you end up dealing with can be hit & miss.  Would rather try & get a sharp firm that are on-top of things if possible.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Do you have charges going back more than 6 years?


BankFodder
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1915 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

 

 

 

 

Thanks Paul,Glenn,Alan for you comments and pointers...they are aware of the concealment issues as this has been mentioned by me in the last letter sent to them on the 18th Oct 06... we stated we will be submitting sections of the Limitation Act 1980 as evidence.

 

Even if it all falls apart at less we have got £232 off the buggers in our Halifax account that they paid in, but we would love the buggers, to pay for all the other years they put me and the wife into more of a financial crisis, by adding these unlawful charges (like being fined for being skint).

 

It becomes very hard to keep on top of your finance when on benefits... due to long term medical condition for both myself and wife.

 

And one other point, if it was all lawful and they have incurred a financial loss because of me not paying monies into the account on time...how come some little clerk can click a few buttons on her computer, and instead of saying computer says no (cough) in me face… say ok we can do it this time... but make sure you have enough funds in you account next.

 

Can someone also explain why you can claim on being miss-sold endowment policies and why they are not statue barred? Or does that come under other regulations

 

Thanks again guys

Ron

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks Paul,Glenn,Alan for you comments and pointers...they are aware of the concealment issues as this has been mentioned by me in the last letter sent to them on the 18th Oct 06... we stated we will be submitting sections of the Limitation Act 1980 as evidence.

 

Even if it all falls apart at less we have got £232 off the buggers in our Halifax account that they paid in, but we would love the buggers, to pay for all the other years they put me and the wife into more of a financial crisis, by adding these unlawful charges (like being fined for being skint).

 

It becomes very hard to keep on top of your finance when on benefits... due to long term medical condition for both myself and wife.

 

And one other point, if it was all lawful and they have incurred a financial loss because of me not paying monies into the account on time...how come some little clerk can click a few buttons on her computer, and instead of saying computer says no (cough) in me face… say ok we can do it this time... but make sure you have enough funds in you account next.

 

Can someone also explain why you can claim on being miss-sold endowment policies and why they are not statue barred? Or does that come under other regulations

 

Thanks again guys

Ron

 

If they took money from your benefits suggest you go after them & here's why!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Social Security Administration Act 1992

Miscellaneous

Certain benefit to be inalienable **

 

187- Subject to the provisions of this Act, every assignment of, or charge on-

(a)benefit as defined in section 122 of the Contributions and Benefits Act;

(b)any income-related benefit; or

©child benefit,

and every agreement to assign or charge such benefit shall be void; and, on the bankruptcy of the beneficiary, such benefit shall not pass to any trustee or other person acting on behalf of his creditors.

If they took their unlawful penalty charges from any benefit they may HAVE to refund it as they may have again acted unlawfuly.

By the way the banks know they shouldn't take benefit monies but they do it anyway in the hope the debtor doesn't know. Lovely souls aren't they!! Ask freebird

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mis selling occured because consumers where not advised that the value iof their endowments could go down & that there was a risk they might be a shortfall for paying off the capital sum of the mortgage.

 

The time starts running from the day you receive a red letter warning of this. The endowment providers have been required to send out these letters for some time & only when you are advised via the red letter does the limitation clock start ticking

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bankfodder,

 

Re your original request:

 

I have statements going back 7+ years to July 1999.

 

I am now in position where I can

 

A: Submit a prelim for c. £600 inc interest on charges back to my six-year cut-off point and c that through to the bitter end

 

B: Submit a prelim for c.£800 inc interest back the seven years to July 1999 and c that through to the bitter end.

 

OR

 

C: Submit a prelim for the first £600, get that relatively quickly, then pursue the rest of the charges (plus any others if my mum's got my old statements) and c that through to the bitter end.

 

I know seminole let c.1,000 slide on his 11,000, but may pursue it later (he hasn't stated his intentions here)

 

I also know another guy got c.£5,000 going back to 1997 after his bank (unnamed) sent him a letter of intent to defened, then settled before they went to court.

 

I think option B, considering the figures, might stand a chance and set an interesting precedent, but will complicate the process and delay any remuneration.

 

I'd love to hear people's suggestions.

 

Best,

 

Haole.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to HSBC requesting all the statements from date of opening account - roughly Jul 88 - to Jan 03 and they just sent me all statements from the past 6 yrs - again!

 

This was my letter...

It has come to my attention, from an HSBC employee, that you do keep all copies of charges applied to my account since I originally opened it. I would be most grateful if you could send me a comprehensive list of all the charges that you have made to my account from the date of opening to January 2003 inclusive. Each charge should be listed showing the date and amount of each charge, and a description of what it was for. I make this request using my rights under the Data Protection Act and expect your response within 40 days.

 

If your company still insists that records are destroyed after 6 years. Please can you send the proof of authorisation containing my account number for the records to be discarded.

 

I understand that my account is now closed with HSBC, but this information should still be available.

Capital One - Charges

PAID OUT IN FULL WITH 8% INT

 

HSBC - Charges

PAID OUT IN FULL WITH 8% INT

 

Unfair Dismissal

PAID OUT FULL COMPENSATION

 

NCP PAD Parking 'Fine'

FULLY CANCELLED

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest peed orf

I sent a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to HSBC 7 weeks ago, got a reply Monday saying they don't keep statements more than six years. So I'm using the statements I've got, estimating the total, then I'm planing to go for contractual interest as well! (unless I'm given a good reason not to!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

have a look in banktemplate letters, there is a DPA non-compliance template. also banks usually have a microfiche record of older data that they can access.

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haole

 

Option B is IMHO the best option, don't be fooled into thinking that just because you leave out the pre 6 years charges that your bank will settle any easier.

 

iwghunter

 

FWIW i have just taken the Co-op to court for much the same thing. I now have data thats over 9 years old, but initially they thought they only held stuff for 6 years. If you want to complain to the Information Commissioners Office then i would do so, i took the Co-op to court and if you want to go that route then feel free to plagiarise my info in Glenn Vs Co-op.

 

Peedorf

 

See advice above and either take them to court, complain to the Information Commissioners Office or both.

 

HTH

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received my statements from barclays from 1996 to 2005 when th e account was closed. I have a claim in process for the last six years £2300 approx before costs and interest. From when I opened the account until six years ago and have calculated my charges, they come to £1100 approx.

As an experiment I used the spreadsheet to work out the interest due on these at the rate Barclays would have levied on me - it came to £3500 approx (the first charge being £30 in 1996).

I was using a rate of 25% which is Barclays standard rate for unauthorised borrowing I think.

I am holding fire on claiming these until they have settled the first claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

JonCris,no m8 they have never tried to get deductions from our benefits, its just that we were on and still on benefits,and when some bugger sends out a letter and charges you £30 for it, that becomes a problem.

 

Cheers

Ron

I'm not sure what your saying but if the bank took their penalty charges from your benefits that where paid directly into the bank then they shouldn't have & they must be refunded.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that note about benefits, JonCris!

 

As a disabled person on benefits, I have watched my bank take up to £60 at a time in charges out of my account, which only contains benefit payments. Funny how many banks wanted to get business from benefit recipients when the giros/order books stopped...

 

On a charges over 6 years note, I have sent an SAR to the Halifax for my old account (opened december 1994, still apparently open but untouched since last attempt at regular payments 2002) which is at least £1500 overdrawn. I'm looking forward to seeing what information I get back.

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting for me, too, that one JC. Our current account input is almost entirely composed of Child Benefit and Tax Credit payments. We just got stung £25 again from Smile :x - even though I got them to pay back the last lot of penalty charges by e-mailing them the Template "fiduciary" prelim letter ! I'd like to be able to quote a regulation, clause or statute if I could, next time. Can you tell us where and what ?

 

Emma - fellow night-person - be careful the Halifax don't try the old trick of offering you the moon, getting you to accept in full & final settlement, and then simply crediting it to your old O/D'd account. MBNA did that to me, and I'm still after them for it. From the word go - SPECIFY that you require payment by cheque or draft !!

 

They're sods, they really are.

 

...sorry, miss ! :smile:

 

Bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

emmaf01, thats what happened to me, on was in receipt of disability benefits and the bank took charges the charges from it, my mortgage company then proceeded to pass admin fees on to me while dwp were paying part of the mortgage, its horrendouse, you just cant back on your feet while this is going on. good luck with your claim.

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had my account with Lloyds for 27yrs when it was originaly just TSB. I had 2 old mortagets with them etc. My question is because the bank has changed names will they still have all my information for the past 27yrs. I know we paid thousand in chargers because in 1984 our mortgaed was defaulted,theychanged it from a endownment to repayment without our agreement. When I recently sent them my SAR i requested information covering my banking history would they have not sent all this to me if they had it. Should I send another SAR and another £10 this would seem unfair to have to pay twice don't you think. How would you advice I follow this up

Pen

:x if i have been off any help to you please click my scales

 

cases won

28th July Single Claim for bank charges against LTSB, £6,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement

 

18th July Joint Claime against LTSB £7,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bill-k.

 

Believe me, I've seen most of the tricks the Halifax have tried to pull, and I expect nothing less from them! Great idea to specify payment from the start, I'll remember that.

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had my account with Lloyds for 27yrs when it was originaly just TSB. I had 2 old mortagets with them etc. My question is because the bank has changed names will they still have all my information for the past 27yrs. I know we paid thousand in chargers because in 1984 our mortgaed was defaulted,theychanged it from a endownment to repayment without our agreement. When I recently sent them my S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) i requested information covering my banking history would they have not sent all this to me if they had it. Should I send another SAR and another £10 this would seem unfair to have to pay twice don't you think. How would you advice I follow this up

Pen

 

Pen, I believe the merged bank also has "merged" responsibility for your records. They will, however, quite possibly try and fob you off with less data than they actually hold, and you might well have to be a bit forceful and determined with them. I don't think another £10 will get you anywhere, personally - your original £10 should cover everything.

 

You might have to complain to the ICO (you can lodge it online) if they don't come up with your data, and/or good reasons why not.

 

HTH

 

Bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't see your sig, JC - I dunno what they're doing, but sigs seem to be intermittent.

 

Think they only appear on posts of 100+ words - and even then only once in a thread as far as I can see ... ?

links to my current claims ...

My claim - Yorkshire Bank Visa

chezt V RBS Mastercard

Chezt v RBS Joint Account

chezt v Abbey Credit Card

 

Settled ...

chezt V Duet Card/Creation Finance

chezt v's Studio Cards

chezt v's Littlewoods Catalogue

 

Next ...

Abbey Joint a/c & Single a/c

Barclaycard (Mine & Hubby's)

Anyone else I can think of ...! :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't see your sig, JC - I dunno what they're doing, but sigs seem to be intermittent.

 

Have a look here for the answer to the signature question :)

 

Cheers

 

Michael

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law.

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I have posted a PM to jonchris, Jon maybe you can PM the sig to me if you don't mind that is

Thanks

Pen

:x if i have been off any help to you please click my scales

 

cases won

28th July Single Claim for bank charges against LTSB, £6,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement

 

18th July Joint Claime against LTSB £7,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I have posted a PM to jonchris, Jon maybe you can PM the sig to me if you don't mind that is

Thanks

Pen

 

Pen if you click on JonCris name and select 'public profile' there is an option there to view all threads he started - you should be able to find the one you want from there - hope this helps?

links to my current claims ...

My claim - Yorkshire Bank Visa

chezt V RBS Mastercard

Chezt v RBS Joint Account

chezt v Abbey Credit Card

 

Settled ...

chezt V Duet Card/Creation Finance

chezt v's Studio Cards

chezt v's Littlewoods Catalogue

 

Next ...

Abbey Joint a/c & Single a/c

Barclaycard (Mine & Hubby's)

Anyone else I can think of ...! :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1915 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...