Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot chasing old Barclays student account from around 2002!!


lakesidelady
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4242 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You should ignore them, if you do send them anything please do not sign, just type your name, and head any letter with....I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY OR ANY COMPANY YOU CLAIM TO REPRESENT.

Believe me there are good reasons for doing this

Kind regards

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably easier first of all just to phone Barclaycard and ask when the account was defaulted, when the last payment was made, and exactly when it was sold and to whom.

 

Follow up with the SAR if you think they give you duff info – although if Barclays’ info implies it IS SB, then you might first want to demand evidence of payment from Cr-a-p-bot. Could save yourself a tenner.

 

The number for Barclaycard Recoveries is 0844 556 0066.

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE]Barclays Bank advise that you made payments of £140 after it defaulted with the last payment being received on 3rd April 2007.

 

What a surprise.

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its a barclays loan sadly.

 

is there a magic number for them donkey?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a loan account and I have no details (account number etc.) should I still contact Barclays

 

I'm sure that I've made no acknowledgement of this debt in the last 6 years and the last payment would have been to wescott as opposed to Barclays.

 

Sould I write again to Cabot or ignore them and just try and find out info from Barclays?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there were any payments to Westcot – as you imply there were – then it may not be SB. Never, ever claim a debt to be SB if you are unsure, as it weakens your position.

 

Make the calls or do the SAR as suggested. You should be able to pass security with your name, address from the time, and security questions.

 

Does the documentation sent by Cra-p-bot not have reference to an account number?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies guys. There is an account number on the letter, I assumed this was a Cabot generated number but maybe I am wrong and it is in fact a Barclays account number.

 

I will try and phone Barclays and if no luck will send an SAR. Is there any other letter to send to Cabot requesting proof that these so called payment transactions took place?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

UPDATE: After getting no Joy with Barclays, basically they said I could only receive a copy of the documantation if I picked it up in a Barclays Branch in person - I live in Northern Ireland and there are no branches this side of the water.

 

I then sent a letter requesting Cabot to provide me with the Credit Agreement and included the £1 fee. Stupidly I didn't post it recorded and this morning I have had another letter from Cabot saying if they do not hear from me my account will be handed to the pre litagation department where they can take out a charging order, obtain an attachment of earnings, obtain a bankruptcy Order! All very scary sounding stuff.

 

Should I send the letter again this time by recorded delivery and see where I get then.

 

Please advise, I'm completely confused.

 

Thanks

 

Lakesidelady

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lakesidelady, please do not worry, i have seen this bunch off on three debts due to no CCA's or a dodgy recon. As the good boy's and girls say there blowing phis and wind..... There pre-lit division is in the ladies changing rooms third floor,,, they are trying to scare you into admitting this debt. Let's get the paperwork first. Even if you did pay Westcott, so what it's not statue barred, they will have to produce an agreement signed by you and 100% watertight on its wording. I can tell you I had two Barclays cc and a loan from 2003 and 2004 which Cabot bought and Barclays can produce only 1 recon and for court they will need an original. So I am in stalemate with them, they keep asking I keep saying produce the original please.

 

The fight has just started, under no circumstances part with your hard-earned to these leaches.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Happyhippy1959

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have a certain modus operandi these guy's, if they have not got a CCA they will try and bang a recon for you if the OC don't do that for them they will use the line of ( well you have been paying it before so that is admission of debt ) all you do is write back and say, that is not the issue here, I am exercising my right to see the contract in the form of a signed CCA and then quote various court cases where a company has tried that on. The law is the law, any pre 2007 credit agreement needs a signed agreement to allow them to enforce. Any post 2007 and a recon and statements will suffice. They know it, You know it. I have seen off £30k of debt this way and have had DCA's offering up to 80% off, why pay the 20% I say, my credit rating is band jaxed so be it. After 6 years it will fall off. Rather tell em to do one now. Crabot will huff and puff, but hey what can they do in the end. NOTHING. ( simples )

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Happyhippy1959

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will bear this in mind thanks, Happyhippy1959,

but can I ask what is a recon?

sorry I'm not really up to speed on all these terms.

 

The debt is not on my credit file and I have had no probs getting credit over the past few years (although I exercise responsible borrowing now:oops:),

which is why I'm thinking it is probably statute barred

 

it's just as I said I'm not 100% sure as that whole time frame is a bit of a blur

and I have had no helpful info from Barclays as I'm not on mainland UK

so can't just call into a local branch to receive the paperwork!

Link to post
Share on other sites

recon is recontructed agreement.

 

if this det is pre 2007 then they cant use that in court

 

but as you say your cra file is clean

 

i think they are on a phishing trip

to catch a mug that knows n better tha pay up

 

no DCA has any legal powers

so up to you

pers i'd ignore them

 

dx

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Lakeside lady and thanks DX for putting it so simply. This sounds a very iffy case and it looks like Cabot are trying to make up my bill with a chance of snaring a mug... I think and I hope I'm right you have nothing to worry about. Especially as your getting credit now.... So just have fun with the muppetts, will keep you happy on rainy day's.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Happyhippy1959

Link to post
Share on other sites

Response from Cabot:

 

Dear xxxxxxxx

I understand you have made a request for information pertaining to your account under section 77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

Please be assured we have contacted Barclays to obtain the relevant documentation to comply with your request, and upon receipt, this will be forwarded to you accordingly.

I trust I have set our position clear.

yours sincerely

xxxxxxxxxxx

 

I take it I should now just wait to receive more info from them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cabot have the usual 14 days from the date of your CCA request, to respond with a copy of the agreement,if not you will find a letter in the site file and you can put the account IN DISPUTE,and this dispute will apply until such times as they fully comply with your request.

 

Being Barclays it could take some time to comply fully.So not to worry at all,when the 14 days have expired get the Dispute Letter of,send it recorded.

 

Like dx100uk I think Cabot are chancing their arm ,so if you just ignore them,it is probably the best way forward,just keep us in the picture as and when you receive a letter from Cabot.

 

Regards FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Yep oh this brings back memories for Hippy,,, bang the account in dispute letter. You will get a weasel y reply of DUE TO THE AGE OF THE ACCOUNT BARCLAYS ARE EXPERIENCING A DELAY IN RETRIEVING THE INFORMATION WE WILL KEEP YOU INFORMED BLAH DE BLAH...... Now a horrible thought just struck me and I do not suggest in anyway that Crapbot do this, but I hope you did not sign your CCA request Lakeside Lady ???? has been know for a signatures to be uplifted and I have never heard of Cabot doing such a illegal act, as far as I am aware they are reputable in as much as a Debt buying company can be and seem to stay just about inside the law of the land ( in writing anyway ) they may push the boundaries with little porkies on the phone.

 

H.H.

Ispa Scientia Potestas est.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Happyhippy1959

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...