Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • dx100uk
      EVRI have lost parcel £300 model kit

      By dx100uk · Posted

      ignore wrong thread dx
    • BankFodder
      EVRI have lost parcel £300 model kit

      By BankFodder · Posted

      Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • T911
      G24 anpr PCN - Double Dipping - Wigan Robin Retail Park

      By T911 · Posted

      "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • Strider713
      EVRI have lost parcel £300 model kit

      By Strider713 · Posted

      I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • LilMissM
      Can I get a Cifas marker removed?

      By LilMissM · Posted

      Sorry  Noted x   Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

Parking Charge Notice Issued

CHL LAU NAT
 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4456 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

CHL LAU NAT

CHL LAU NAT

Posted
Posted

A few weeks ago I received a ‘Parking Charge Notice’ from a private company called LDK Security Group Ltd. I had bough a parking ticket and I was well within the time limits of my stay. However, when I returned to my car the ticket was not on the dashboard where I left it, but it had fallen onto the floor. It was face up and you could see the ticket from the outside. I have already sent a letter to appeal the PCN, but they have replied and said that I still have to pay. They have also acknowledeged that I did actually have a valid parking ticket, but that it was not displayed correctly and the parking attendant did not see it on the floor. Do I have a case to argue or not? I have read other threads which say that I should just ignore the threats of debt collection agencies and court procedings from companies like this.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Tony P

Tony P

Posted
Posted

Having appealed (unsuccessfully - what a surprise!) you go back to all initial advice - I G N O R E.

 

Depending on your wording in your 'appeal' you may have admitted to being the Driver at the time (or you could have been a passenger in your own car!).

 

Knowing the identity of a Driver is just the first of many problems they have before any County Court Judge throws out their speculative claim.

 

Sadly you will receive a series of threat-0-gramms dressed up with nonsense legal phrases (sometimes even in red ink) promising everything from flogging and public execution down to trying to just get you to pay them something - even if a reduced amount, having failed to scare some out of you with big amounts!

Link to post
Share on other sites
CHL LAU NAT

CHL LAU NAT

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Based on previous threads I am going to ignore the letters that I receive from LDK in the future. However, one point that I would like clearing up (as I have been reading other similar threads) is with regards to entering into a contract with the landowner. Is it not the case that by entering the car park, driving past the information board which states the terms and conditions of parking, is that not an acceptance of the terms and therefore you are bound by any penalties?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Tony P

Tony P

Posted
Posted (edited)

First hurdle - who was the Driver to take action against.? They know you were there, that's all!

Second hurdle - How can they find out who the Driver was? All they get from DVLA is the Registered Keeper who has no legal obligation to inform who was the Driver, except to the Police or Local Authority

Third hurdle - Courts will not back up claims for penalties.

Fourth hurdle - All they can claim is their loss. You can prove you paid for the time you were there - so no losses!

Fifth hurdle - PPCs do not go to Court because continually losing is bad for them as word gets around. The only dubiously successful cases were almost certainly against 'planted victims'. We even get PPC plants on these forums giving 'advice' to pay!

 

That is why you will get a series of increasing threats but no stamped Court Papers. Some PPCs have even sent out blank or unstamped Court papers trying to frighten the weak and wavering into GIVING them money they do not have to.

Edited by Tony P
Link to post
Share on other sites
CHL LAU NAT

CHL LAU NAT

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks. Its just a bit worrying after reading other threads on this subject that I will no doubt get all this 'junk mail' from them threatening all sorts. I don't want any debt collector appearing at my door threatening my family!

Link to post
Share on other sites
havinastella

havinastella

Posted
Posted
Thanks. Its just a bit worrying after reading other threads on this subject that I will no doubt get all this 'junk mail' from them threatening all sorts. I don't want any debt collector appearing at my door threatening my family!

 

Well pay it then!

Link to post
Share on other sites
dadtaxi

dadtaxi

Posted
Posted
Well pay it then!

 

Probably not a plant but mabye havinastella was a bit short. What he meant to sat that these 'invoices' are printed in BOLD RED SCARY print designed exactly to scare and intemidate you to pay up.

Ignore them and they will go away.

However if you are nervious enough and rich enough to just want to make them go away then by all means pay up. However I assume yiu came to this site for advice and all the prevailing advice is to IGNORE.

 

there, was that big and scary enough?

Link to post
Share on other sites
DBC

DBC

Posted
Posted

Debt collectors don't turn up at people's door. They don't work that way. They rely on the stupid "threatening" letters to scare people into paying up. It's not worth their while to make home visits. Perhaps you are confusing them with proper bailiffs . They are " officers of the court" and only get involved if the case goes to court (very unlikely) you lose (very, very unlikely) and then you omit pay whatever the judge orders within 28 days. Debt collectors on the other hand are just private citizens with no special powers. They cannot enter your premises, they cannot seize goods and they cannot damage your credit record.

Link to post
Share on other sites
havinastella

havinastella

Posted
Posted
Probably not a plant but mabye havinastella was a bit short. What he meant to sat that these 'invoices' are printed in BOLD RED SCARY print designed exactly to scare and intemidate you to pay up.

Ignore them and they will go away.

However if you are nervious enough and rich enough to just want to make them go away then by all means pay up. However I assume yiu came to this site for advice and all the prevailing advice is to IGNORE.

 

there, was that big and scary enough?

 

 

:razz::razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...