Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It's normally that information is usually given how it is stored. I.E. if kept physical then physical copies get sent out. If kept digital then digital copies get sent out. It's the idea that the information you get back is exactly how they keep it and exactly how they hold your data. It's why you'll quite often see screenshots of CRM systems on SARs and such
    • I think final version of WS now prepared with exhibits added.  All numbered properly. Of course it can still be tweaked if necessary. Laura will not need it on 25 June as that is just a Preliminary Hearing for her to represent her son. But as DCBL messed up and thought it was WS time why not prepare things calmly in advance. Defendant's WS - versione 3 + attachments.pdf
    • Your case shows the idiocy of employing a solicitor to do things you could easily do yourself. Had Countryside dealt with their own case they would have entered judgement on 4 June and there would have been no way back for you. But they thought they were clever by running to Rachael and Sean of BW Legal for a more "professional" (aye, right) service.  These dodgy solicitors can only make money on private parking cases by doing everything on the ultra cheap and certainly cant check the judgement date for every single separate case. Ho!  Ho!  Ho! Anyway, glad you got the defence filed OK. The next stage is that the central bulk court will send out a simple form called a Directions Questionnaire to you and to Countrywide which is part of the allocations process to your local court.  If you read this short thread you will see all the stages of the court process  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/406892-highview-parking-anpr-pcn-claimform-urban-exchange-manchester-claim-dismissed/#comments
    • It is already trespass, nothing further needed to make out trespass. Not sure where ‘interference with goods’ helps you / how you’d bring a claim for that that stops them parking there.
    • Thanks Dx,    For some further information, the holiday was booked as a package holiday for 2. One of the 2 had to be changed, and changing costs £700 for a new flight as "tickets had been issued and they cant do a name change". I cant quite figure out how compensation works for things when it comes to package holidays.    From what I can tell  - The plane was due to land in Turks and Caicos to drop off passengers, something happened during descent, resulting in technical fault.  - The rest of the original flight from Turks & Caicos -> Montego Bay was cancelled  - A New flight was put on today, which was then delayed by 1.5hrs aswell  - Hotel was provided for the night after much hassle.  - 1.5 days, 2 evenings of holiday lost  If I understand correctly, since the original flight (LHR -> Turks -> Montego Bay) was cancelled, they are both entitled to a refund on that full flight? I can't quite work out if they are only entitled to a refund for the equivalent of Turks -> Montego Bay, or for the full LHR->Turks->Montego Bay, since it was issued as one ticket/all Virgin, and they should have arrived yesterday..?)  I can't work out how to get the cost of that compensation, or whether its a set figure, and how the loss of days of holiday is factored in   I am aware:  If you received less than 14 days’ notice of the cancellation, you are generally due compensation, awarded in pounds or euros depending on where your flight was due to depart from, according to the following scale: £220 / €250 for all flights of 1,500km or less (e.g. Glasgow to Amsterdam); £350 / €400 for all flights between 1,500km and 3,500km (e.g. East Midlands to Marrakech); £520 / €600 for all other flights (e.g. London to New York). Compensation will be reduced by 50% if the arrival time of the replacement flight doesn’t exceed the arrival time of the original flight by: two hours for flights of 1,500km or less; three hours for flights between 1,500km and 3,500km; four hours for all other flights. So I "think" its £520pp for the flight part as compensation (7500km)... but some sites say its a full refund for the flight... is it both?  Thanks,  Ryan  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can they do anything?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4503 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello guys,

 

my story is that I work in retail. Have been in my job for over 8 years. Never had a problem with till shortages (maybe once actually but it was sorted after)

 

We have a new staff member who started as an xmas temp and were allowed to stay on. They are probably the most useless staff member we have. Even after being part of the team for 4 months their shelf filling is awful, they always have problems on the tills.

 

Their till has been down a fair bit, an odd £1 or so.

 

Anyway. I was on the tills the other day and little did I know the till I decided to go on was the same till that staff member had been on earlier. Had I known this I wouldnt of gone on it.

 

The main manager is off on holiday but the deputy was in charge and I cashed up with her. The till was £8 down. After rechecking it was indeed £8 down (only a week ago the till was £10 down but I wasnt on it that time). The deputy got quite nasty and had to do an incident report. She put something like "Till is £8 down, only 2 staff members used the till and I will give you their names if required" in a harsh way.

 

She then demanded I pay £4 back (the other staff member would be asked to pay the other £4) or I would have severe consequences.

 

First off what good would it do paying £4 back when the report has already been put through the system?

 

I told her that since our hours are cut I just simply dont have the money to give away like that when the chances are it isnt my mistake. I told her that im saving for some important things and because of that my money is tied up and im living on just £10 a week for a while.

 

 

Today was my day off and I was txting some of the staff there. 1 who was working today reminded me that its in my best interests to pay the money when im back in tomorrow.

 

After thinking of it I just couldnt be bothered. I was going to take the money into work tomorrow to pay and demand each day I go on till, its my own till that nobody else has been on.

 

That was until I went into work today. The deputy had already gone home and the supervisor was left in charge. I was told by staff that the deputy was saying that its suspicious that im budgeting money/having money troubles and all of a sudden the tills are down. Then went on to say when theres an investigation they are going to be told this and I will be out the door.

 

I have done nothing wrong, can I really get in trouble for not paying it back? what shall I do?

 

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Deputy cant do anything, or demand anything, I'm supposing you work for a chain of stores? I would go to next in line of command, speak to them about how you feel, your suspicions about new staff member. Remember this is bullying in the work place, I suspect a word in the ear of someone higher up will soon put a stop to it (hopefully)

I know my rights Mr DCA I'm with the CAG......hello hello where you gone Mr DCA8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must register a grievence about

the unfounded allegations, does

your employer have a staff manual

laying down procedures for this kind

of situation??

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Clearly, its irrational to ask someone to pay back money when there is only a 50% chance its their fault. You say it was the deputy - why don't you ask for main manager for a quick chat and explain your concerns? I would have thought that a competent manager would not let an issue like this get out of hand, particularly over a miniscule sum like £8.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Although I am sure that you are fully conversant with the following piece of legislation, I still send you to it...

 

ERA 1996, ss 17-18

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/18/section/17

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys,

 

Yea I work for a retail chain, Theres no staff manual or anything in the shop. I did ask ages ago to look at the retail handbook but was told by the manager there isnt 1.

 

The problem at current is the main store manager is not back at work for another week or so as shes had 2 weeks holiday but maybe I should have words when she comes back then?

 

Thanks for the link Bigredbus so that means pretty much its up to them to take it out of my wages on payday if they investigate and see its down due to not doing my job right?

 

I do think their system is unfair at work. I havent had to pay money back before but others have, it doesnt add up also since the tills were put through on the system as £8 down, now if it went through tomorrow as £8 up (if I paid) it would be classed as an overage and according to the system if the tills are up, a report also has to be done (if things were done by the book and put through).

 

Too right about them bothering for a measly £8. I mean realistically. In the past 3 years the tills (not mine) have been down by an overall total less than £100 (in the last few weeks it was down the most it had ever been). Theres cameras in the shop actually facing all the tills and staff on the tills, bag and pocket searches are done whenever anyone finishes their shift. Potentially nobody could steal from the tills as they would be caught without a doubt.

 

I did think earlier that maybe its not worth head offices time coming down to investigate because afterall, theres too many factors, it could of been anything ranging from a till fault to a note falling down the back of the screwed in till drawer or a mistake when cashing up. Fair enough if it was £100 down in 1 day as its more obvious its someone being dishonest and would be easy to pinpoint. You never know with them though

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is why shops should not allow an employee to take over from another employee on the same till without the 1st person cashing up 1st.

It's just money saving for the company.

All I ask is to be treated fairly and lawfully.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, and also it seems to be about cutting corners for management. We have 4 tills for example, if 4 till staff were in that day and they had a till each it would mean at the end of the day the manager/deputy/supervisor who cashes up has 4 tills to count, bag up the floats and put through the system. Whereas to them if 3 tills had the floats put in (but not emptied) and recorded what was in the float, they would only have to count and bag 1 till, the other 3 can just have the floats put back in the safe.

 

The day in particular I was doing an afternoon shift. The newest staff member (who does makes mistakes/is useless) was doing the morning but had finished before I got there so I had no idea they had been on that till. Nobody bothered to tell me, and since she has been here she has already had to pay back till shortages about 6 times.

 

 

I think its a security procedure of not cashing up in between peoples shifts because that would mean carrying a load of cash and coins from 1 end of the shop to another when the shop is packed with customers (also they cant actually put it through the system until the end of the day. Every day each till can only be put through the system where it says if its up or down once).

 

Guaranteed whilst the manager isnt back, tomorrow is going to be a day from hell with the deputy in charge on her own expecting me to have the cash with me to give her.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yea we all have our own pins, the problem with it for this instance is identifying who was on the till at certain times may not reveal where the money went missing, of course if it was lost by giving too much change they will never be able to find that transaction

 

 

 

Also forgot to say that on a typical day the tills are also used by management for refunds and they may even jump on each till for a bit

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see what you're saying. I just thought that they could identify transactions from the ID number.

I'm sure there are people on here more knowledgeable than me about this, but I'm sure that if you do an X or Z read on the till it will provide that info, maybe I'm wrong but I am sure someone else will know for definite if that is possible.

Are you a member of USDAW (union of shop, distributive and allied workers) if so, might be worth having a word with your union rep.

At the end of the day, if your employer does not have concrete proof that you took money from the till, why should you give them £4? I know it's only a small amount of money, but next week they might want £40!

And as for their comment about you saying you were short of money that is ridiculous....do they think you're working for love of the job or to pay your bills?

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the thing though, lets say the till was down cause the customer gave too much change. The transaction on the receipt could show the customer bought something for £7, the customer gave them a £10, meaning it would be £3 change, however the staff member mistook that for a £20 and put £20, gave £13 change, meaning its £10 down, but untraceable since if the found that transaction it will just look like the customer did give them £20.

 

 

Nope sadly not part of a union :(.

 

I totally agree there, also even though the £4 may seem small, its a big amount for the hours staff have been cut down to. Its just 2 or 3 at tops 4 hours shifts. Even losing £4 is getting close to an hours wage lost.

 

Exactly, to me its silly, people work to earn money, if I did have money problems as bad as the deputy thinks £8 out of a till would never solve them and it means the chance of being fired so the "money problems" will just get 10 times worse

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly!

As an earlier poster said it might be worth putting in a grievance.

Is the HR department within the store or at head office? Might be worth speaking to them.

Also, try and get hold of the company procedures regarding till over and under rings.

I just think it is wrong on so many levels that they make staff pay till shortages out of their own pocket with no proof!

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm on a rant now..... The other thing is say a manager uses the till and they make an error and the till is short and then you use it later and make no errors, the till will still be short because of the managers earlier error... Would you still be expected to make good the shortfall or does the manager put their hand in their pocket to make it up as well?

Is there ANYTHING in your contract that mentions making good till shortages?

also, I appreciate that you might not want to name the company on here but you can pm me it if you want.

I have a relative that works in retail who may be able to get more info on this for you.

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks again everyone.

 

 

HR is located at head office so perhaps as you say I should get hold of them.

 

Gbarbm Theres nothing in my contract about making up till shortages, indeed that is true, if the manager went on earlier and made a mistake, chances are they wouldnt say anything and thus when it comes to cashing up and they see the till is down they will ask anyone who has been on the till that day for money. I will pm you the company

 

Honeybee, nope they dont, in fact what they usually do is if a tills up, not put it through the system as up, but just leave it in the till in case someone has a bad day on the till and its down.

 

Whats unfair is if I was on the till 1 day on my own, and it was a few quid up, they wouldnt put it through so the till would remain a few quid up, but then if another staff member's till was down the next day that few quid would be used to balance their till and they wouldnt be asked to pay anything back

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks well i tried to pm you but it just said I need 15 posts minimum to send a pm :(.

 

Just to say today went well, the deputy didnt say a thing about the money and the "useless" staff member was working yesterday, they were on their own till and it was down by £5... So I think to the deputy thats full blown proof that its not my fault the tills are down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Greivance procedure must be put into

place by the store manager and if it is

not you need to inform HR at the head

office.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again, well I hope that's the end of it.

 

Just to mention though guys that we often see on the forum that raising a grievance in a public sector company may not make you employee of the month and can lead to other problems.

 

Loontwo, would a group grievance be an option if this becomes a problem again? Strength in numbers and all that.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks, yea I think raising a grievance is a last resort since it could turn people bitter, I mean management isnt too bad and they act fair, however they do have days when they are completely out of order for no reason.

 

The main problem in the workplace is people want to protect their own jobs, whilst people would agree with me in person, on facebook or even via txting, if it came down to me putting in a grievance they would keep quiet.

 

 

Maybe this time from what people here have said its good to put it down to a misunderstanding (although I didnt get an apology) and if it does happen again then pull the guns out for the war

Link to post
Share on other sites

The main problem in the workplace is people want to protect their own jobs, whilst people would agree with me in person, on facebook or even via txting, if it came down to me putting in a grievance they would keep quiet.

 

I think you're absolutely right. It's been said many times here that colleagues will fade away when you need support.

 

Also, from experience of this forum, please be very very careful about what you say on facebook because it causes huge problems. In fact, to be on the safe side, I would recommend saying nothing about work on FB. That way you can't be caught out.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do yourself a favour, do not put anything about this on facebook, a very very slippery slope.

I'm not on facebook so don't know if you can remove stuff you have already put up, if you can, do it.

All I ask is to be treated fairly and lawfully.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...