Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Indeed, it’s all up to date at the moment and no missed payments and no issues from a credit file perspective everything is up to date in that sense 
    • follow it thru, plenty of time to poss arrange a tomlin or consent later on. ............   pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466952-lowelloverdales-claimform-old-cap1-debt/?do=findComment&comment=5260464 .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] .............. dx
    • so you've never been issued a default notice ever and all these accounts still show on your credit file?  
    • No i decided I would try and keep paying this down as best I possibly could and have paid over 35k off of the total amount. It’s been hard as hell tbh but just seems too much to do with the prospect of job disruption looking. the issue I have with pro rats is the credit file is trashed anyhow like you are defaulted anyhow is it not? I am willing to trash it for 6 years if needs must but having it trashed for over a decade seems crazy. This is the dilemma I am in
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bank has preempted my court action and is taking ME to court


m55dlc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6086 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm just about to send the LBA to Lloyds TSB on four accounts when I received a court pack from them. They are taking me to court over an overdraft I have not paid back. They are claiming £2600, but my charges in the last 6 years amount to £7600 on this account alone. Over the other three accounts there is a further £7000 in charges I am going after. My gut feeling on this is that it is an intimidation tactic and that I will use the amount and nature of charges in my defense. Has anyone else suffered this twist in their actions? I'm a little bit nervous at this turn of events, but will post a defence and fund a solicitor and attend court.

 

If anyone has any experiences like this please let me know.

 

I have a number of other issues regarding a personal loan with Lloyds TSB (and being charged for payment protection) but that is another story and I'm going to persue this one later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I received a letter yesterday saying they were not going to enter into any more correspondence with me regarding my preliminary letter, then the moneyclaim pack arrived this morning. I'm not worried as yet, Lloyds have messed up on numerous occasions and have acted fraudulently on other matters. I'm still going to send the LBA to all four accounts and post a defense.

 

All help / comments / guidance on filling out the defence would be greatly appreciated

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, then, for starters, they are in breach of the CPR, as they should give you a "reasonable" (usually deemed 28 days, that's why we give them the 14 + 14)time to try and settle out of court. That's not wise of them. :mad:

 

Can you post here their exact particulars of claim, so we can advise on defence? Cheers.

 

Oh, and I'm going to move your thread to the LTSB forum, as this one is likely to be going on for a bit :razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't worry about it.

 

This is potentially excellent news for you because if you are sure of your level of charges then you will use that as the bases of your defence and they will have to produce evidence to show their costs.

 

You may not realise it but this is the best thing that could happen to you. Send me a private message and we will deal with it

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I'm turning into a real CAG anorak - I just clapped my hands together with glee - this is soooooooo exciting. Best of luck!!!!!!

Cat

29 March 2006 Data Protection Act Request sent for ac 1 (then she got a bit distracted but got another charge so...)

27 May Prelim letter sent for ac 1

27 May Data Protection Act Request sent for ac 2 & 3

21 June Prelim Letter sent for 2 & 3

14 July LBA sent with schedule for ac 1 & 2 & 3

7 August MCO filed – defence expected 10 September

11 September defence filed - signed Sean Copping

12 September AQ form received

18th September AQ sent back to Lambeth Court and copy sent to solicitors both recorded delivery

13th Feb 2007 Court Date Set

15th Feb Reclaimed Money is in my bank Account

 

Cat's opinions are those of a nurse and most definitely, definitely not those of an accountant or solicitor, although she was always quite good at sums and elocution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Outside? There's an outside?

NatWest, claimed £521.00, settled in full.

Data Protection Act to LTSB (sent 15th June) Received statements 10/7/2006. Claiming £570.50. Sent claim 17th July Reply received 21st July. (sent LBA 22nd July) Then the procrastination started. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/11169-peters-progress.html

Settled in full £905.18, confirmation faxed to the court the day before I appeared, which meant I didn't know 'til the Judge told me.

Letter requesting disclosure of account info from Thoburn's bailiffs. (sent) Data Protection Act to follow.

Ooh, the suspenders is killing me!

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

We've been involved in a long running saga with LTSB for nearly two years over this. I've had one SAR ignored (Dec 2004) and one partially fulfilled. They have deleted entries from their records - one of which is really dumb as I have a letter from them quoting their entry - but that's not directly related to this. I've had solicitors letters from them on a number of occasions threatening this and that and they have appointed DCA's (four at the last count) all of whom eventually get the message that I am not going to repay any monies to them until they address my charges issue. As such, all went quiet on the LTSB front until I sent them a poke in August, saying they should get someone from Customer Services to talk to me or I'd take the CAG approach. Their response was to appoint yet another DCA for yet another round of letters and phone calls and yet more reiteration that under no circumstances was I going to pay this until someone addressed my very relevant and pertinent issues.

 

Having been on the right side of the law with respect to this debt and DCA's, I've had the full brunt of a number of different organisations endeavours to make me pay - quite enlightening really - I'm not surprised people cave in and pay up - but all this has meant is that I know their game, I'm aware of what they can and can't do and I'm not intimidated at all by anything they do or say (apart from the court appearance thing - still a little bit nervous about that, but committed and able to defend).

 

The thing is, I've got over 10 years experience in the DM (and EDM) industries and have access to information (erm, lists of a certain type) which, if I had the inclination to use, would open the claim floodgates on a truely national scale. If they persist in continuing to deal with me in this manner, I may well be forced to hit them where it hurts (their bank balance for a change!)

 

I'm as frustrated as the rest of you regarding their practices and I've been embroiled in it for two years now. Can you sue for lack of sleep? stress? etc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh what a wonderful thread, this is going to be an exciting 'read'. I too will be claiming from LLoyds TSB but not for a while yet (we have 3 personal a/cs, and 2 business a/c's with them) and need to 'get our house in order' before I can consider taking them on. So this thread is truly going to be one to watch.

Good luck and keep going, you have my support.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've filed the Acknowledgement of Service at Reading County Court. I'm going to post my defense around the 12th. Once this is done we shall see if they progress the claim any further. I'll keep you posted.

 

On a different account with Lloyds TSB, I've just sent my LBA, just to keep the screw turning. I've got two other accounts with them which I'm going to begin the process on them as soon as these other two complete.

 

I'm now confident that I'm in the right and the court doesn't seem so scary.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just thought I'd add that I've now filed my AQ and, despite a little bit of a wobbler over the court trying to charge be £1700.00 to post a counterclaim, all seems well. I'm waiting to see if LTSB have completed their AQ. The deadline for the AQ is today (14/11) so we'll wait and see what they do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had to make a post to subscribe.

 

One thread I'm sure we'll all be following.

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just called Reading County Court and it appears LTSB's solicitors haven't posted their AQ yet and the deadline was 8 days ago. Surely their claim should be struck out just leaving my counterclaim present? The court officer I spoke to said they would send a following up letter to LTSB's solicitors, but that as they've had to do that it would go in my favour with the judge.

 

Just thought I'd keep you all informed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well as you've seen my thread you know we are in similar boats though you are slightly ahead of me and they owe you a lot more (lucky you :D).

 

Best of luck with your counterclaim and I'll be watching you to see how mine is likely to go though I think we all know there is only one way they can go :D :D :D

All my posts are made without prejudice and may not be reused or reproduced without my express permission (or the permission of the forums owners)!

 

17/10/2006 Recieve claim against me from lloyds TSB for £312.82

18/10/06 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

03/02/07 Claim allocated to small claims. Hearing set for 15/05/07. Lloyds ordered to file statement setting out how they calculate their charges

15/05/07 Lloyds do not attend. Judgement ordered for £192 approx, £3 travel costs and removal of default notice

29/05/07 4pm Lloyds deadline for payment of CCJ expires. Warrant of execution ready to go

19/06/07 Letter from court stating Lloyds have made a cheque payment to court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck!!

Son v Halifax settled in full £292

Another son v Halifax settled in full £30

Bigmama59 v NatWest settled in full £4739.69:)

Son v Halifax 2nd claim settled in full £130

Bigmama v Halifax settled in full £1125

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a letter from Reading CC following my prompt. It gives [problem] 7 days to file their AQ and pay the £100.00 fee. That is up on Wednesday, so we'll see then what the Judge says. Hmmm.... Should I now just go for the whole lot, or write them a letter giving them a chance to settle before I go for the big claim? I believe the letter option would go down better with the judge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

OOOOOOOOH!!!!!

 

The claim against me has just been thrown out of court (no AQ from [problem] and LTSB) and I'm writing for clarification from the judge on my counterclaim.

 

Strangely enough, a different customer services department has contacted me from LTSB saying they are sorry to hear of my grievances and will fully investigate my issues and will get back to me within 4 weeks of the date on my letter. Funnily enough, I haven't written to Lloyds TSB since mid-September (the letter prompted this whole court thing in the first place). I'll give them a little bit of rope and see what they say this time, even though I've received 3 final response letters from them now.

 

I'm finalising my claim for £18k as we speak and will hopefully be posting it before Christmas

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's also not just bank charges. My issues with LTSB are long, so has the fight (2004!!!!!). We've got theft, unanswered SAR's, incomplete SAR's, edited SAR's, misplaced agreements - to name but a few. I may well reach the court room!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...