Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
    • Just to update this. I did apply to strikeout and they did not attend the hearing. I won by defualt and the hearing lasted 5 minutes (court only allocated 15). The judge simply explained that the only matter he was really considering is if the Defendant could have any oral evidence to defend the claim. However he said he had decided that based on their defence, and their misunderstanding of law, and their non attendence he did not think they had any reasonsable chance so he awarded me SJ + Costs on the claim form + the strikeout fee. Luckily when I sent the defendant the order I woke up the next day to a wire trasnfer for the full sum of the judgement
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Announcement: ESA claimants now have the option of having their WCA recorded


ErikaPNP
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3642 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

yes to a degree, however there is situations where some aids have to be disregarded, in this case it can be about walking. eg. if a specialist has deemed a wheelchair as unsuitable for use, the ATOS assessor is supposed to not assess based on ability to mobilise in a wheelchair. Of course the ATOS assessor can choose to disagree with a specialist and then still assess based on mobilising in a wheelchair.

 

Also the bit I posted about walking was from the DLA handbook.

 

Yes I had the wheelchair issue disregarded as it would not be suitable for me - but then I'd gone into great detail as to why it wouldn't be suitable on the ESA50.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The Indie 29 August 12:

 

'Atos has 98 recording machines ......'

 

98 - 11 (assuming the broken ones are now repaired) = 87 new machines. Wow!!

Between 148 Atos centres. Double wow!! Soon have one per centre.

Are we convinced:?::?:

Can we justify this expense to the taxpayer:?::?:

 

A cynical Margaret.

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

If it also messes up ATOS' deadlines for getting everyone off IB, that's an even bigger bonus. In fact, I believe earlier in this thread I suggested that everyone going through reassessment should ask for a recording because they definitely have nothing to lose.

 

could i take my own duel recording equipment and give the hcp a copy on completion of the medical???

Link to post
Share on other sites

tony1512:

 

Errr ...... probably not. Even if you do have your personal sound engineer in tow. The procedure for audio recorded messicals changed late last year. Revised guidance finally made it into the Atosssers' work capability assessment handbook on 5 July 12.

 

Current procedure for getting one's messical audio recorded?

Read the preceeding thirty-five pages of this thread and you'll be as wise as the rest of us. Or not. Every statement from DWATO contradicts its' predecessor.

 

'everyone going through reassessment should ask for a recording'?

 

My personal opinion is that everyone going through reassessment, or initial assessment, who wants an audio record of their interview should ask for it. Not everyone wants, or can wait for, an audio record because of:

Being stuck on assessment rate employment and support for months on end.

The sheer stress of fighting for an audio recorded messical.

Not feeling comfortable with being recorded or the sound of one's own voice.

 

Should you be facing an Atos appointment that you want recorded;

Good luck, Margaret.

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

tony1512:

 

Errr ...... probably not. Even if you do have your personal sound engineer in tow. The procedure for audio recorded messicals changed late last year. Revised guidance finally made it into the Atosssers' work capability assessment handbook on 5 July 12.

 

Current procedure for getting one's messical audio recorded?

Read the preceeding thirty-five pages of this thread and you'll be as wise as the rest of us. Or not. Every statement from DWATO contradicts its' predecessor.

 

'everyone going through reassessment should ask for a recording'?

 

My personal opinion is that everyone going through reassessment, or initial assessment, who wants an audio record of their interview should ask for it. Not everyone wants, or can wait, for an audio record because of:

Being stuck on assessment rate employment and support for months on end.

The sheer stress of fighting for an audio recorded messical.

Not feeling comfortable with being recorded or the sound of one's own voice.

 

Should you be facing an Atos appointment that you want recorded;

Good luck, Margaret.

 

 

unfortunatly i am not in the position of being able to wait. as i missed a medical. so now i have only had 2 crisiss loan totaling £160 since june, and been refused another on the basis that the original person who sanctioned me has decided he was not wrong. so i am not entitled to any money from them until i go to independant apeal. my medical is for a new claim that they have told me probably will not be successful as it is for the same reasons as my original claim( severe depression. and agrophobia)

they told me to claim jsa, but would be turned down because i am clearly not fit for work. and if i claim jsa i would be admitting i dont need esa.

dammed if i do, dammed if i dont.

if they turn me down on wednesday. for sure i am going to be another statistic, because if i dont kill myself. i will die from starvation.

so please please please.... do as they tell you. or the punishment will be severe.

Edited by tony1512
Link to post
Share on other sites

tony1512:

 

This is going to be short and sweet cos I should've been elsewhere like fifteen minutes ago.

 

Trawl back through the pages of this thread and you'll find my plan B, which is taking notes. The Atossers don't like it but even they admit it's legal. You may have to wave the relevant pages of section 4 of their handbook at the assessor.

(Copy of the handbook on the Work n Pensions website.)

 

Should you be technology literate (I'm not, but trying to learn in case I need it) this thread also discusses covert recording for them as can cope with it. Like notes, it's legal, but unfairly, it carries a risk of Atos saying you failed to attend if you're caught.

 

Best wishes, Margaret.

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

If writing notes get a companion to do it, as I am fairly sure someone writing notes who is been assessed would be found fit for work just on that basis alone.

 

There are many self employed secretaries that take shorthand for a reasonable fee. Writing notes longhand will take time and important bits could be missed - shorthand is much better.

Plus you can call her/him as a witness to the Tribunal if necessary to verify the contents of those notes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Employing secretaries, witnesses, paying for doctors letters, medical records. How long before we see 'getting you through your WCA, and appeal' insurance?

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

'getting you through your WCA, and appeal' insurance:

 

According to Mr Duncan Smith we've already got it. Can't remember where, but I read one newspaper article wherein he was moaning that, 'the site we don't mention' offers refunds if an application for a disability benefit is unsuccessful. :der:

 

We wish.

 

Margaret.

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Guardian 3 September 12:

 

Among the comments;

 

'They insisted on recording it (an Atos assessment)...... At the conclusion of the 'examination' the machine gave an error message.' The asessor refused to test the playback claiming it would breach data protection.

 

:mmph: A genuine mistake? Or their latest 'get out' clause? :mmph:

 

:suspicious: Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

This acknowledgment particularly caught my eye me amongst a number of reluctant responses to well-aimed FoI requests finally produced a tthe WDTK site today

 

" If a claimant states that s/he wishes to record theirWCA using their own equipment, for example mobile phone, the HCPwill offer to reschedule the WCA for another day when Atos recording equipment is available." (DWP)

 

From:-

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/126477/response/313874/attach/3/3712%203229%20Mr%20Slater%20Response.pdf

 

Please note:

 

1. The circumstances concerned are that a claimant ('all innocent'), without prior communication about recording, turns up saying he or she wants to record – e.g. on a mobile phone.

 

2. The HCP must proceed as the DWP has stated above – because the now well-known case CIB/3117/ 2008 says they have to do at least that.

 

3. The claimant thus secures a deferral of the WCA. DWATO have no option.

 

4. According, again, to CIB/3117/2008, in these circumstances, the advice as to how the rescheduled WCA can be recorded must be given to the claimant IN WRITING. (And given the communication inadequacies of DWATO that could take a very long time indeed.)

 

5. However, the DWP has not advised claimants at large and in advance in writing about the current recording rules and does not want to - because that would alert far more claimants than they can handle to their entitlement to a recording. So the DWP are hoist with their own petard.

 

The proper and fair way out for all concerned is for DWATO fully and clearly to advise claimants of their rights ,no later than when submitting a claim - new or 'renewal' - rather than remaining 'screwed-shut'. But they dare not, and have not these past several years.

 

So, er, 'use a screwdriver' on them.

Edited by nolegion
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

:And in another reluctant response from whatdotheyknow:

 

Relevant to those of us who've already requested an audio record of a messical;

 

'If audio recording has been arranged for an assessment, is it standard practice to send the claimant written confirmation?'

 

(DWATO's SPG, not mine)

'It is not practise for claimants to be issued with a letter to confirm that their work capability assessment would be recorded, as it is confirmed when the claimant contacts Atos Healthcare to confirm that they will be attending the appointment at the Medical Assessment Centre.' :der:

 

As to why some, but not all, claimants get letters:?: Further fudge:?:

 

And allegedly; only '9 requests for audio recordings have been turned down, which were due to the unavailability of recording equipment ......' :der:

 

:mad2: Margaret :mad2:

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

This acknowledgment particularly caught my eye me amongst a number of reluctant responses to well-aimed FoI requests finally produced a tthe WDTK site today

 

" If a claimant states that s/he wishes to record theirWCA using their own equipment, for example mobile phone, the HCPwill offer to reschedule the WCA for another day when Atos recording equipment is available." (DWP)

 

From:-

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/126477/response/313874/attach/3/3712%203229%20Mr%20Slater%20Response.pdf

 

Please note:

 

1. The circumstances concerned are that a claimant ('all innocent'), without prior communication about recording, turns up saying he or she wants to record – e.g. on a mobile phone.

 

2. The HCP must proceed as the DWP has stated above – because the now well-known case CIB/3117/ 2008 says they have to do at least that.

 

3. The claimant thus secures a deferral of the WCA. DWATO have no option.

 

4. According, again, to CIB/3117/2008, in these circumstances, the advice as to how the rescheduled WCA can be recorded must be given to the claimant IN WRITING. (And given the communication inadequacies of DWATO that could take a very long time indeed.)

 

5. However, the DWP has not advised claimants at large and in advance in writing about the current recording rules and does not want to - because that would alert far more claimants than they can handle to their entitlement to a recording. So the DWP are hoist with their own petard.

 

The proper and fair way out for all concerned is for DWATO fully and clearly to advise claimants of their rights ,no later than when submitting a claim - new or 'renewal' - rather than remaining 'screwed-shut'. But they dare not, and have not these past several years.

 

So, er, 'use a screwdriver' on them.

 

 

Good post, nolegion! Permission to copy to other disability groups, please? :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ATOS booking staff are still routinely saying that home assessments cannot be recorded. This is not true, some assessments have already been recorded and mine was booked as a recorded assessment and confirmed as such on the appointment letter, though it hasn't actually happened yet.

 

Whether your assessment is at home or not though, if you have asked for a recorded assessment and your appointment letter (appointments must be confirmed in writing) doesn't state that your assessment will be recorded you can

 

1. turn up anyway (or let the doc turn up) and tell them you're going to record using your phone/MP3/whatever. If they have arranged for recording equipment they tell you there's no need and your assessment goes ahead. If not, they'll then offer you a 'proper' recorded assessment, you go home (or the doc leaves) and wait for the appointment. How long you wait does seem to depend upon area.

 

2. phone them to check and ask for confirmation in writing if they say they'll have to cancel and reschedule.

 

3. email customer services to check.

 

4. record covertly.

 

Which option you choose may depend upon how much you enjoy wasting ATOS' time (and your own), how much you trust what ATOS booking staff say on the phone, and to a certain extent how long you can afford to wait for your benefit to be paid at the proper rate.

 

In my opinion, you should always get everything in writing from ATOS and if you ask for written confirmation it never seems to turn up, so I'm now using email. Customer services might trying to tell you they can't rearrange appointments on your behalf, but if you're persistent they do do it eventually.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Everything in writing:

 

Can't over empathise the importance of everything in writing to and from Atos, one way or another;

 

Snail mail, signed for if you can afford it cos even if it doesn't get there you can prove it was sent.

 

Or, print the electronic mails.

 

During the last five years or so, a friend and I've had three failure to attend disputes, all of them caused by DWATO errors. We've won every one of them cos we've had a paper trail to sling at Jobcentreplus.

 

One of the incidents gave us a laugh. Out of the blue, and nine months after the event, I received a disallowance notice. My paperchase was safely filed away. The paperchase the decision maker thought she needed had been sent into Work n Pensions storage and couldn't be retreived. :biggrin:

 

So ...... everything in writing. You may, more likely will, need it.

 

Sincerely, Margaret. :flame:

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry to seem a little thick here, but what does DWATO means....?

Drop the P from DWP and the S from ATOS put them together and you get DWATO

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, as i said, got a lot of health issues at the mo and my brain will not engage at all................................... either that or I am am getting old........lol :lol:

Keefy (:-)The "Moaner":rolleyes:)Boy

Prepared to take on anyone until I win...................

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...