Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Interesting. Thanks for that London.  That’s what I’m gathering.     iv no doubt they would send me fake documents but would they really dare present fake documents to a court of law?
    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Moorcroft chasing debt that has no CCA


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3753 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

After a bit of advice.

 

I had a Loan with LLoyds from 2003.

 

In 2005 I couldnt afford to pay anymore and the debt was passed to CCS Collect.

 

I arranged to pay them £60 a month and up until a few months ago, stopped paying them.

 

After using this helpful site, I took advice and CCA'd CCS collect and SAR'd Lloyds.

 

I discovered that Lloyds didn't have a signed copy of the CCA.

In fact, they didnt have a CCA at all.

 

CCS told me they didnt have one either.

 

So I stopped payments and basically wrote them the letter saying they are in breach and the debt is not enforcable, etc etc.

They sent me 2-3 letters and have now stopped.

 

It is worth noting that the entry on my credit report shows this debt as "settled" and in December this year,

it would have been 6 years since the last entry was made meaning it will drop off my credit history (although the debt is still outstanding with the DCA).

 

Today I got a call from Moorcroft.

 

It appears the debt has been passed to them now (or sold by CCS?).

As expected, very pushy.

 

Asked me to clear the balance there and then and then asked me to set up a payment plan.

 

I laughed and told them Lloyds have been SAR'd and CCS had been CCA'd and they had no copy of the agreement.

Because of this the debt was defaulted until they can provide a copy of it.

He said "yes the debt is defaulted because you havent made a payment since June."

 

He told me that I didnt know the law and that the debt is still outstanding.

He then said collectors could come to my house.

I mentioned that they wouldnt be able to without a CCA to provide to the court.

I asked him to send me a letter and I would respond to that.

I have not even received a letter from them yet so that was the first I know about the debt being passed to them.

 

 

So, what do I do now?

 

I know they dont have a CCA and from what Ive read, they are the worst of the DCAs.

Am I right that the debt is still not enforcable?

CCS have been dealing with me for years and when I was happily paying them each month, not a peep.

 

Now they know I know the law, they pass it onto a new DCA within a month instead of sending more threatening letters.

 

 

I assume the same rules apply to this DCA?

 

My credit entry shouldnt be affected either as it has been marked as settled for 5 and a half years now.

And I assume they cant create a new entry on my credit record as only 1 record can be made against the original debt, is that correct?

 

Thanks in advance!

Edited by Poster
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Just to add to Cerbs advice, some times a basic approach works,

Just write and state this alleged debt has been round the block,

no agreement has ever been produced please GO AWAY:madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with both above. I too have Moorcrap chasing a LTSB loan - cca'd them - latest was LTSb cant find one and probably wont so advice is not to pay. Moorecrap now vitually begging me to pay

 

Intend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send it to Moorcrap they are the last contact you:madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

and stay off the phone!!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I just ask what happens if Moorcraft pass the debt back? Will it go back to CCS or Lloyds? The reason I ask is because Lloyds have actually sold the debt so it doesn't belong to them anymore. They have marked my credit file as satisfied and I want the entry to drop off in Decemeber. I'm worried that if it does get passed back to Lloyds, they will update it. Even though I was making payments to the DCA, none of these payments have been recorded on my credit record.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will return to ever owns it now, whether it's returned to the original owner is between those two parties but as it stands now it remains unenforceable.

 

Any adverse entries on your credit file will/should drop off after six years, they can only update it for that period of time. They cannot re-register a default. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will return to ever owns it now, whether it's returned to the original owner is between those two parties but as it stands now it remains unenforceable.

 

Any adverse entries on your credit file will/should drop off after six years, they can only update it for that period of time. They cannot re-register a default. ;)

 

Can they change the status from settled to default now? It's not been 6 years since the settled status was applied to the entry. I'm just wondering if I should tag moorcraft along for a few months until the entry has been removed and then tell them it's still in dispute with CCS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it has been defaulted once it cannot be defaulted again.

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can they change the status from settled to default now? It's not been 6 years since the settled status was applied to the entry.
It's not from when the status of the debt was marked as 'settled' it's from when the default was first registered.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, the entry is as it should be, and clearly shows the

assignment to another company, the new company may

make entries regarding the management of the account,

while it's in their hands the original data cannot be changed

or a new default added.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. CCS managed this debt for 5 years and never made an entry at all so I think I should be ok. I will send them the letter above once I get their first letter so I can use reference numbers, etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a text message from CCS today regarding the debt asking me to make a payment. I'm confused though. How can CCS still be chasing the debt it Moorcroft are as well. Unless Moorcroft passed the debt back as the account is still in dispute.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If CCS send me a new letter about this, shall I send the harrassment letter as the account is still in dispute. They haven't actually acknowledged my last letter stating that there is no CCA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes do exactly that by return of post, then they'll probably

try to flog it off to some pond life further down the food chain.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I SAR'd Lloyds. They just sent me a statement showing my monthly payments to CCS (which I thought was weird as I was under the impression CCS owned the debt and Lloyds wouldn't have a record of the payments) and a record of CCS's details as well as my previous addresses. They had nothing else. As far as I can see, I had no charges and I don't think PPI was ever taken out for this loan. I could be wrong though. it was taken out quite a long time ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you received from Lloyds is not compliant with a SAR

they must supply all the data that existed on the account

if they cannot for any reason comply they must tell you in

writing.

Did you use the CAG template for the SAR.?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Often the CCA is not supplied with A SAR as it's covered by the

act and doing the CCA request, and it's assumed that the

customer has kept a copy of the original themselves.

It would be interesting to see their letter.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...