Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Whatever the nuances of the law, they will be lost on OPS, who like the rest of the PPcs never bother to get planning permission, ever. When they get a new contract they don't want to delay issuing PCNs by deigning to follow the law, especially as the period when they take over and the parking restrictions are new is the time when they can catch most drivers out.
    • I had some contact with this company earlier in my working life but I'm afraid there's not a lot I can suggest that you haven't already done. During your grandfather's time  British Celanese was a subsidiary of Courtaulds. Courtaulds was subsequently (after your grandfather had stopped working there) acquired by Alzo Nobel. They in turn closed down the Spondon site and sold it. I have no idea what the number is that you are trying to call. It's a Derby (Spondon) area code but the number appears not to be allocated. From my slim knowledge of the history of the company I would have expected your grandfather's pension to be in the Alzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme.  But Willis Tower Watson are the Pension Scheme Administrator of that scheme and would be the people who should know if your grandfather had contributed. Is your grandfather certain he contributed? Joining pension schemes wasn't compulsory in those days. Or might he have got his contributions returned when he left them? That happened sometimes back then. Sorry not to be of more help.      
    • I am sorry I am not aware of this report from IAS assessors? The Court will consider my application at a online hearing in June. The Court instructed me to send Bank copies of my sons condition proving he could not have been the driver I have heard nothing further. My son is not aware of any proceedings I have not involved him to avoid causing him distress, he has been sectioned a fair few times and I need to avoid this happening.
    • I am very pleased that the Court has taken the decision to allow you to  represent your son and hope that he is happy enough with that to relieve the stress he will also be feeling. I do agree that Bank parking are so insensitive, greedy, horrible etc etc to continue proceedings considering  in what it is a very minor case of a wrong number plate . Even their  own  IAS Assessors, who are normally hopelessly biased in favour of their members, went out on a limb and said  " The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." That is damning evidence and you must take that report with you as well as including that in your Witness Statement which we will help you with. I would expect that Bank would discontinue the case at that point.  But I am sorry to say  that you should not count on it.  
    • Evening all,   I have deliberated over this offer for two weeks and I have decided to take their offer. I do understand that some may prefer us to go to court and receive a judgement but with our personal circumstances and my current military commitment that could become an issue. I am so grateful for all the help and support you have all offered me over the last few months. I will continue to monitor this site and push all those that are being wrong to get in touch.   Thank you! what you all do is truly amazing!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help Parking Ticket!! Advice please!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4680 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

New to the forum here. On the 2nd May 2011 (Bank Holiday) was shopping with the Mrs in Aldi. Returning to my car I find a Parking Charge Notice on my vehicle on a bank Holiday! 40quid Fuming as you can imagine.

 

1. The Parking Charge Notice is from UKPC saying the following contravention is: Parked without clearly displaying a valid pay and displace ticket.

 

 

 

2. Then a Month Later I recieve a letter on 2nd June 2011 from ANOTHER Company called Parking Collection Services. Notice to owner FINAL REMINDER. It states: On the date that the parking charge notice was issued, you were the registered keeper. The parking charge notice was issued to the driver of the vehicle because the vehicle was allegedly involved in the following parking contravention: No Valid Pay & Display ticket. Parked without clearly displaying a valid pay and display ticket.

Then it goes on to say The driver was allowed 14 days to pay a discounted. Any sum already paid, was recieved outside the discounted period. It is now too late to pay the discounted rate. Failure to pay the increased amount or make representation withing 14 days of this reminder will result in our client forwarding the outstanding amount to a debt recovery agency where you may incur further costs. Now the fare is 80 quid.

 

 

 

I recieve another letter from another company called Debt Recovery Plus LTD on the 21st June 2011. Read Below what they wrote me:

 

3. We act on behalf of UK PARKING CONTROL (I dont know who they are only Parking Collection Services and UKPC).

 

Our client has written to you previously explaining that your vehicle was parked in breach of the agreeds terms and conditions regarding parking on their client's private land. Our client has now instructed us to recover the above moneys (138.99) from you as the driver at the time the vehicle was parked.

 

It is essential that payment is made to us within 7 days of the date of this letter. If you are having difficulty in making payment then please contact our office to discuss your proposal for payment.

 

We are a member of the British Parking Association (BPA) and its Approved Operator Scheme and we adhere to its code of practice. As the registered keeper it is important that you inform us immediately if you have sold/hired the car. Or if you were not the driver, that you provide us with the name and address of the person who was driving the vehicle at the relevant time. This is important so that we can avoid pursuing the wrong person.

 

The BPA code of practice states that "the courts do not look favourably on motorists or consumers who try to withold information from operators when it has been asked for with genuine, reasonable and proper cause".

 

Accordingly, if we do not recieve full payment or contact from you with your proposal for payment, this matter may be passed to our solicitor to commence County Court proceedings.

 

From Collections Manager

 

 

 

Then on the 28th June 2011 i recieve another letter again from Debt Recovery Plus LTD stating:

 

4. NOTICE OF INTENDED LITIGATION

 

Further to our previous correspondence we confirm that in order to prevent potential County Court proceedings being issued against you, payment must be sent to us in full 7 days from the date of this letter or telephone us to discuss making payment arrangements. The outstanding amount is 138.99

 

If you do not contact us following the reciept of this letter we will have no alternative other than to assume that you are avoiding payment. In this situation our Solicitors may issue County Court proceedings against you (or a decree in Scotland)

 

Please note that if the case reaches court and a County Court Judgement is obtained, the amount outstanding will increase. We will seek to recover:

 

*The Principle sum of 138.99 plus

*Interest at the County Court rate of 8% per annum plus

*Court Costs, which may include: 30 pound court fee, 50 solicitors cost on claim, 22 solicitors cost on entry of judgement

 

A County Court Judgement may seriously affect your ability to obtain credit in the future.

 

Yours Sincerely

 

Litigation Manager

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ive been following a few threads and been ignoring there letters. Im feeling nervous. What do you lot advise me to do next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just keep ignoring, it's as simple as that. Please don't fall for their stupid, meaningless threats. You will see those letters are full of the magic word "may".In other words they are not going to take any action, they are trying to fool you into believing they will.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to let you know UKPC are UK Parking Control and Parking collection services are Debt recovery Plus.

 

I think they believe by mixing and matching who the letters come from intimidates people.

 

Carry on ignoring them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advise so far folks. If they keep on sending me letters i will post some updates on here.

 

 

 

 

You don't need to type out the wording. All the letters - the whole letter-chains in full from dozens of PPCs - are already shown in pictures on another site but for some reason this forum won't let us link it, nor do they show it as a sticky thread like other forums do. I think that's odd and have said so, because posters like you are not being given the info you need to laugh at each letter.

 

Just Google 'private parking letters, what to expect' to see the letter-chains in full from UKPC, PCS and DRP. They are on another very well-respected forum. Your letters are already shown there, you can see what comes next and which is the last threatogram.

 

HTH

Link to post
Share on other sites

broken record...........

 

post something diff

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

these PPC threads have been running for years on CAG

there has never been any call till recent to have a copy of the chain letters

nor any calls to post links to where they are held

 

we have not needed them till now and to be perfectly frank

these calls are solely coming from one direction only.

 

dx

siteteam

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well there be a project for someone then...

 

more than welcome to stickie threads/posts constucted to show.

 

but at the end of the day it only warns against something they will get anyhow and p'haps heightens fears when they do come

 

oh i've got letter 3

now 4

 

they must be serious

 

we see it all the time on threads here

 

ignore and people don't.

 

or the

i've got a diff wording

do i still ignore...

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why re-invent the wheel? There is a perfectly good letter chain list over on MSE. Why not just link to that? Pepippo are happy to do that. Why not CAG?

 

As for "frightening people".It should have the opposite effect becuase it will reassure them that they are not a unique case, being specifically targeted by a PPC, but just another potential victim receiving bog-standard, computer generated letters. Let me quote this from a recent posting on PePiPoo:-

 

"When it happened to my parents who are both in their 80's I simply went to the stickies area and accessed the copies of the paper trail that they would receive. I printed them and left a copy with them which they matched in perfect order.

 

That way the letters did not come as a shock and they felt more able to resist."

Edited by DBC
Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see BD100uk`s point there though if diff wording but I did get posted a link and I more believed that I wasn`t the first!

 

Whichever way it is done, people still want reassuring no matter how many posts you read!

 

So the multitude of individual replies to ones own post is very nicely recieved!:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

broken record...........

 

post something diff

 

dx

 

 

 

I post what I think is the most useful advice for the newbies.

 

I post on C.A.G., pepipoo and MSE and find that the PPC posters on here are given the short straw, not given enough info. That's why CAG threads about PPCs go on and on, much more than MSE and pepipoo PPC threads, because the posters are just told to ignore but not told what will arrive (specifically). So they come back in a panic (gawd knows how many don't come back at all but just pay up when they get the first unexpected Debt collector letter!).

 

On pepipoo they have the MSE link unashamedly set as a sticky - and both sites have the Watchdog paper aeroplane link. CAG has neither and if we dare to post a link to MSE we have our post edited. There is no evidence that these links frighten people, quite the opposite, they INFORM.

 

The reason CAG never needed such links before would be twofold I think:

 

1. The links never existed until a couple of years ago (MSE letter chains thread, and Watchdog), and

 

2. The PPC menace was rarer in those days. Now we have posts on the subject on all 3 forums every single day.

 

So the situation now calls for some instant helpful info here, and it's not just me who thinks so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

listen last comment..........

 

links are not allowed read the site rules............

 

this is a self help site not a spoon feeders paradise.

 

the idea is people read the threads where the info and the videos are already posted several times.

 

simple ans is if you dont like CAG rules move elsewhere.

 

dx

 

last warning

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

All I can say is google led me here and saved me paying these pirates.

It worked for me so it must be doing something right.

Don`t knock it and if you do then go elsewhere if you think it is better but the

overall game is to help people and the various sites are probably doing so so leave it at that

and spend time helping people rather than winge about the various scenarious.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Strange that last October when CAG was being threatened by a PPC for use of the word sc*m in posts in relation to their company, CAG itself was happy to be directed to the MSE thread for examples of letters that the PPC's send, and was subsequently supplied with unedited originals.

 

Yet ordinary users are prevented from being directed to those same letters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

listen last comment..........

 

links are not allowed read the site rules............

 

this is a self help site not a spoon feeders paradise.

 

the idea is people read the threads where the info and the videos are already posted several times.

 

simple ans is if you dont like CAG rules move elsewhere.

 

dx

 

last warning

 

 

 

 

Right I have had enough, I am off back to MSE (Coupon-mad) and pepipoo (SchoolRunMum).

 

Delete my membership please this is daft.

Link to post
Share on other sites

listen last comment..........

 

links are not allowed read the site rules............

 

this is a self help site not a spoon feeders paradise.

 

the idea is people read the threads where the info and the videos are already posted several times.

 

simple ans is if you dont like CAG rules move elsewhere.

 

dx

 

last warning

 

Well, I am really quite shocked at your aggressive attitude towards your members. I wouldn't treat people face to face like that and neither I hope, would you.

As for links. You are quite happy to have links on MSE pointing towards your site - I did one myself; You should be happy to reciprocate as other web sites do, including mine. Shame on you for your behaviour even if it is in the so called rules. We are all fighting the parking company rules and they would be well pleased to see cracks appearing in our solidarity. Think again about your rules or live to rue the day.

Cheers

Colin OW

Link to post
Share on other sites

DX i am to am a little shocked.

 

I have used this site since its inception and i know what this site is for.

 

Whilst i understand links may not be allowed i dont think its called for an attitude and i hope you were just having an "off" day

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

UPDATE. Broken record i know......I will keep on ignoring as advised. Letter number 5 from Debt Recovery Plus LTD

 

REDUCED PAYMENT OFFER

 

Further to our "Notice of Intended Litigation" letter.

 

We have referred your case to our client and proposed issuing County Court proceedings against you (or a decree in Scotland). If the case reaches court and judgment is obtained costs may increase the debt as follows

 

* The principle sum above (138.99)

* Interest at the County Court rate of 8 percent per annum, plus

*Court Costs, which may include

 

30 court fee to issue

50 solicitors cost on claim

22 solicitors cost on entry of judgment

 

In order to prevent this , our client is prepared to accept a reduced payment of 111.19 if paid within 7 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...