Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

my son's father died - i couldn't afford funeral - now Debt Recovery Bureau LLP are adding 50% charges to the debt!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4691 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Pay the legit fees and stat charge and tell the ***** the rest.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did a bit of under taking when I was a student, and was staggered at the profit they

made, they are sometimes parasitic in their attitude.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Company Profile Report (CPR)

 

Commercial Debt Management

Company Name: THE DEBT RECOVERY BUREAU LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP

 

 

 

Previous Name(s): NDCB LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP (until 06/03/2006)

 

Registered Number: OC316500

 

Registered Office: ONE CRANMORE

CRANMORE DRIVE

SHIRLEY SOLIHULL

WEST MIDLANDS

B90 4RZ

 

Incorporation Date: 01/12/2005

 

Country Of Origin: United Kingdom

Company Type: Limited Liability Partnership

 

Accounting Reference Date: 31/12

Last Accounts Made Up To: 31/12/2009

Next Accounts Due: 30/09/2011

 

Last Annual Return: 17/11/2010

Next Annual Return Due: 15/12/2011

 

Company Status: Active

Type of Accounts: TOTAL EXEMPTION SMALL Accounts

 

Nature Of Business: None Supplied

 

 

Filing History

 

 

02/12/2010 ANNUAL RETURN MADE UP TO 17/11/10

02/12/2010 LLP MEMBER'S CHANGE OF PARTICULARS / MR CLIVE AUBREY MARGETTS / 08/11/2010

18/08/2010 LLP MEMBER'S CHANGE OF PARTICULARS / MR CLIVE AUBREY MARGETTS / 31/07/2010

05/08/2010 31/12/09 TOTAL EXEMPTION SMALL

12/01/2010 ANNUAL RETURN MADE UP TO 17/11/09

07/09/2009 31/12/08 TOTAL EXEMPTION SMALL

22/01/2009 ANNUAL RETURN MADE UP TO 17/11/08

22/12/2008 MEMBER RESIGNED JOANNE SWANN

19/02/2008 TOTAL EXEMPTION SMALL ACCOUNTS MADE UP TO 31/12/07

27/12/2007 MEMBER'S PARTICULARS CHANGED

27/12/2007 ANNUAL RETURN MADE UP TO 17/11/07

30/09/2007 REGISTERED OFFICE CHANGED ON 30/09/07 FROM:

G OFFICE CHANGED 30/09/07

23 HIGHFIELD ROAD

EDGBASTON

BIRMINGHAM

WEST MIDLANDS B15 3DP

28/09/2007 TOTAL EXEMPTION SMALL ACCOUNTS MADE UP TO 31/12/06

22/11/2006 ANNUAL RETURN MADE UP TO 17/11/06

06/03/2006 COMPANY NAME CHANGED

NDCB LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSH

IP

CERTIFICATE ISSUED ON 06/03/06

01/12/2005 INCORPORATION DOCUMENT

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

 

 

Mortgage Data

NONE

 

 

 

 

Report Generated 27/06/2011

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have seen a similar type of operation before, about a year ago. What the DCA is doing is acting as if the debt is commercial, where adding collection fees etc., is allowed. The opposite is true where a consumer debt is involved, which the funeral expenses are. They are no doubt hoping to capitalise on most people's ignorance of the law and their rights.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That seems absolutely right I notice the act for members of quite a few trade associations

on debt so if the FD has gone through a TA they'll try it on.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

My son was definately next of kin, his father had two brothers but we were told that the costs must be paid by my son. He was working at the time and we couldn't claim anything from the social fund etc.

 

I would question the advice given that your son had a legal obligation as next of kin to pay the funeral costs. If he was told this by the funeral directors prior to signing the contract with them, then I would check the advice given. The contract could be made null and void, if he was advised of a legal duty that did not exist.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I find more and more problems with the ''Trade Associations'' who use companies

like this, the organisations are paid to list the trades person, and they are then given access

to this kind of company.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I often find that threads can get confusing for the OP, just because of the way it develops with various bits of info being chipped in.

 

To summarise, I would say the OP needs to send the letter onto her son and suggest that he takes further advice about this ( Citizens Advice ?). As far as we understand it, this is a consumer debt, NOT commercial, so the collection fees cannot be added. There is also a question as to the information he was given when he signed any contract with the Funeral Director, as it would appear he was told he had a legal duty for the fees as the next of kin, before he signed the contract. The OP's son should find out exactly what fees he would have had any legal responsibilty for. It is suggested that only 'certification fees' are a legal priority to pay. If he can find out the exact position with this, then hopefully get the debt collectors to back off and negotiate a settlement with the Funeral Director, as to what is legally due.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to all who have posted, my family are trying to get the money together to pay in one go in the next week or so, we will take the money directly to the funeral directors (aalthough the Debt Recovery Bureau states in their letter it has to go direct to them to save "significant delay processing through ourselves") Then they can whistle. Fair enough?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, the plot thickens! I have just spoken to my son who has spoken to the funeral directors. My son asked for a copy of the contract to be sent out. The FD said there isn't a contract as such, just a copy of the estimate with my sons signature on it. He has also said that they have in fact sold the debt to to the Debt Recovery Bureau (although the letter from them states; "we have been instructed by the above named client in order to fully recover the outstanding amount", and that it is now out of their hands) yesterday when I called the FD said they would contact the DRB to see what they could do to reduce the charges, then called me back to say that at a minimum the would be adding the £150 admin cost. I get the distinct impression that someone is talking c@$p! Does the absence of an agreement put a different spin on things?????? I really don't understand what the hell is going on!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is honestly the biggest load of twaddle from a supposedly professional business, an estimate

is not binding on either party but a quotation is, this is totally unfair trading and I think a minimum of a

complaint to trading standards and a formal complaint to the DCA and the undertaker and put the account into dispute.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on the estimate form being used i.e what it says. If it makes it clear that by signing the form, the consumer is responsible for the amount of the estimate for the services to be provided, then I cannot see a problem with that. They are entitled to pass/sell on the debt, after they have allowed reasonable opportunity for the bill to be paid. But I don't think the debt collector can in these circumstances add on any charges. They can only collect the amount that is outstanding.

 

What I would suggest that the OP's son does is make a complaint using the NAFD code of practice. http://www.nafd.org.uk/funeral-advice/about-us/code-of-practice.aspx

 

This will involve a written complaint to the Funeral Directors, advising that you will refer this to the NAFD if necessary to look into the way matters have been conducted. Once the matter is subject to a complaint I would expect the FD to contact the DRB people to advise them to stop collection activity while the complaint is ongoing or to take the account back until resolved.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...