Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Massive potentially that payment has been made in some form as accompanying evidence to your financial difficulties.     
    • I have just found an email (and checked and verified it on my MCB account online) and I did make a payment to them, but then obvs didn't after that. Will that make any difference to my case? 
    • This is what I have said in my email of complaint:   On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I have found myself in financial difficulty and I contacted you on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months and I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name.  I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this.  What I would like you to do is to please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP. If you fail to resolve my complaint within 8 weeks, or if matters are not settled to my satisfaction, I will have no alternative but to refer my complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service. I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully, Should I send something along those lines to the CEO? 
    • Right... Misuse of Facility is a Cat 6 and is considered the worst out of all of the CIFAS Categories for CIFAS Markers.  However lets see what happens when MCB come back to you. Make sure you refer it to the CEO.    IF YOU DONT HAVE A VALID REASON FOR THE ISSUE WITH PAYMENTS ETC - Then the marker will stay.   
    • That "oh dear" doesn't sound good  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cl Finance sent court papers for a HSBC debt Help Please !!! *** Discontinued****


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4631 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Ok just an update phoned HC on Tues and they have said they are still awaiting the documents so they sent me a fax saying that they acknowledge receipt of my CPR 31.14 and as they are a bulk issuer they are unable to store all the documents on site and are in the process getting me the documents that i requested.

Please accept this letter as our agreement to a general extension of time and when they have sent me the documents they will then grant me a further 14 days in which to submit my defence.

So i rang the court and let them know and emailed a copy of the fax to them HC also sent me a copy through the post.

I am still waiting to hear of HSBC about my SAR.

 

TTS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

ok time for an update on this thread this morning i have received a notice of discontinuance for the claim however it is only in my husbands name so i am assuming that they have sent one out for me aswell and i have not received it yet otherwise my claim would still be valid ? so with them discontinuing now where does it leave us can they try to claim against us again as i feel that they cannot get any of the paperwork that they require my SAR from o/c hsbc is on its way.

 

TTS

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok time for an update on this thread this morning i have received a notice of discontinuance for the claim however it is only in my husbands name so i am assuming that they have sent one out for me as well and i have not received it yet otherwise my claim would still be valid ? so with them discontinuing now where does it leave us can they try to claim against us again as i feel that they cannot get any of the paperwork that they require my SAR from o/c hsbc is on its way.

 

TTS

 

As expected TTS , ok was it separate Summons or joint with one claim number? If its one claim number then the NoD is effective for both of you.

 

Well done

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet your glad you didn't take the consent advise now!!!!!:wink:

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all your advice Andy and everyone else who advised me along the way, this was a claim where they issued me and my OH with individual paperwork but we had the same claim number on both of our paperwork.

Does this prove that they have no paperwork to back up their claim as it was bought of and original creditor and account number is all wrong as well do i now forget about this or will they try to claim again in the future.

 

TTS

Link to post
Share on other sites

TTS make sure you check with the Court re the NoD they have received it and that case as been stopped.Other may try to bring the claim again but retain the Notice for safety as they would need permission of the Court.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy was going to ring the courts anyway as i have read in others threads when u receive a NoD to make sure that the courts have got a copy aswell, will keep the NoD in a safe place, so glad i did not go down the consent route as u mentioned earlier as you have helped me a lot through this do i no longer need to pay this now

 

TTS

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a decision for you to make TTS, but I am sure you know what i would do:wink:

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy I do lol would like to say that if I am successful in securing any of my PPi claims that I will definately be donating this site has been fantastic going to see the CAB on Fri about my next problem with Paragon I am slowly getting sorted.

 

Will continue to use this site as i have learnt so much :-D

 

TTS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy I do lol would like to say that if I am successful in securing any of my PPi claims that I will definately be donating this site has been fantastic going to see the CAB on Fri about my next problem with Paragon I am slowly getting sorted.

 

Will continue to use this site as i have learnt so much :-D

 

TTS

 

Your very welcome hope you stick around and help others, why bother with the CAB far more experience here on Cag

start a new thread with your problem.

 

Well done!!!

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy i have started a thread and from what i have read abt this company some caggers on here have also used the CAB so could just do with that extra backup that may be needed to give them the heave ho and also i have a few others things going on and my son is not good again at the mo hopefully my thread can help someone else and i would love to have the experience like some on here to help others I think that i have definately started a journey on here. :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can understand that Mike i am going fri will see what happens i am following a few threads at the mo and doing a bit of research so i know how others have challenged and won.

 

TTS

 

This was just my obervation from my experiance on this particular occassion, not a general rule o.k.?

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Multiple Defendants

 

Where there is more than one Defendant, the Claimant may discontinue all or part of the claim against all or any of the Defendants (r38.2(3)). The Notice of Discontinuance must specify against which Defendants the claim is discontinued (r 38.3(4))

 

Think about it, if each indivual was issued with a seperate claim there would be no need for the above rule, it is not uncommon to issue a claim to multiple Defendants with one claim number

 

I wouldn't celebrate just yet, by your own admission 2 seperate claims were issued against you and your husband, accordingly Howard Cohen & Co have only served notice that your husband be discharged from the proceedings.

 

I have represented people in similar positions identical to yours,(HSBC/CL Finance/Howard Cohen & Co - 2007) the only difference being that they had not ceased any payments or breached the concessionary repayment agreement as you did, you may wish to read monyl's thread, Howard Cohen & Co served monyl a notice of discontinuance without even receiving a defence, possibly because they monitor the forum and where Howard Cohen & Co provide a standard POC (as with yours) they knew monyl's defence would be based on points of law.

 

I offered advice on a consent oreder as a way forward because you were not in a good position having written offering payments then not making any of them as you had stated.

 

That is evidence against you and I would imagine you signed them at the time, by and on your own behalf, acknowledging to full outstanding balance.

 

Howard Cohen & Co are not fools, you would be foolish to underestimate them.

 

 

Originally you wanted to just continue paying monthly and avoid a ccj, you appear now to believe you can walk away without paying anymore, unfortunately when you read all your thread, CL Finance Limited bought your account, HSBC sent you notice of assignment as did CL Finance Limited, the transaction was lawfully executed, you made payments to CL Finance Limited and received a PPI refund from HSBC, your now of the opinion you do not have to repay the debt on the strenght your husband was served a notice of discontinuance

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi TTS

 

Just to reassure you yet again, on the NoD does it state reason for discontinuance? Attached to the NoD (or separate) there should be a notice to all parties.Have you received a copy yourself (not hubbys)

IE you, have you been informed and have they asked your consent?

 

Procedure for discontinuing

 

38.3—(1) To discontinue a claim or part of a claim, a claimant must—

(a)file a notice of discontinuance; and

(b)serve a copy of it on every other party to the proceedings.

(2) The claimant must state in the notice of discontinuance which he files that he has served notice of discontinuance on every other party to the proceedings.

(3) Where the claimant needs the consent of some other party, a copy of the necessary consent must be attached to the notice of discontinuance.

(4) Where there is more than one defendant, the notice of discontinuance must specify against which defendants the claim is discontinued.

 

If they have failed to follow the correct procedure of Discontinuance you could threaten to set a side the notice unless a NoD is served on you also,

should you have to.

 

Regards

 

Andy

  • Confused 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

your misinterpreting CPR 38, the Claimant does not need the consent of the Defendant to serve a noticeof discontinuance nor do they have to give a reason why to the Defendant or the court. If anyones in any doubt google CPR 38 and then HMCS form N279

Link to post
Share on other sites

In this matter two sets of summons were issued both in joint names both with the same claim number.The debt is joint and several

so any NoD applies to both parties.The Claimant as made an error in only naming one defendant.

 

In response to the post above I'm fully aware of what a N279 states and proposes in accordance with the CPR the red highlight

signifies the errors made by the claimant.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...