Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Debts sold to Hillesden Securities t/a dlc


cyllid
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3843 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Don't want to put a spanner in the works here but

 

am I right in thinking the debt is still at the early stages of being chased (not been to court) and this debt also built up from 2007.

 

 

 

If thats the case then is it not possible to drag this out for several more months

until you are up to the point that the court wouldn't even look at it (CCJ) due to the length of time (6 years)

 

at which point you can tell the bank/DCA/Mercantile and anyone else with their hooks in this to take a hike

because basically speaking none of them will ever be in a position to get a warrant to remove property against it???

 

My knowledge of debt recovery is admittedly out of date so if I am incorrect please chime in :D

 

Edit: the reason I am viewing this forum was research into DLC/Mercantile as I have received both letters and emails since February. The emails I have a filter set up for which basically automatically forwards them back then places the original in the trash :D

Edited by LAMA
afterthought...
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

All, as an update - this is still ongoing! OH has, unsurprisingly in this climate, not sold his car yet and it doesn't look like it will go anytime soon.

 

I will post back later with full info but he rec'd letters from DLC offering a chance of reduced settlement back in Feb (I think) but he didn't have the cash and we are still not convinced that they are chasing for the correct debts.

 

To recap, credit file shows defaults for a CREDIT CARD and current account but debts being chased are for a LOAN and current account. The Loan/Credit card defaults are differing amounts but the a/c default has the same amounts on the letter to the credit file. Then last month he rec'd letters from a different DCA called Mercantile Data Bureau Ltd who said DLC had passed the debts onto them for chasing.

We responded to both DCA's basically asking for clarification as to what exactly they're chasing for as there are incongruities within the information supplied under the SAR and on OH's credit file. Yesterday DLC responded asking for a copy of OH's credit file and said that they assume the other debt is not in dispute and they will continue to chase for payments on that one (the bank account). Although i would argue that the account is only in default because they tried taking repayments out for a loan he doesn't remember (with an unsigned agreement provided by SAR) and then lumbered him with hefty fees for going overdrawn at £200 a pop!Will type up letters later.

 

 

if they have offered a discount there is somthing wrong with the debt

 

they'll never go near a court

 

safe to ignore them then.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I have a question with regards to Subject Access Requests and credit files;

 

my OH applied for a full SAR with Lloyds when he had chaser letters from them and the DCA who were sold the debt(s).

 

A large pack of information was delivered but within it there was an unsigned credit agreement for a loan.

 

letters have gone back and forth trying to dispute the debt(s) as OH's credit file is showing a credit card debt

and not a loan debt with Lloyds, but no reference to a credit card within the pack of info supplied under the SAR.

 

Now the DCA are requesting a copy of OH's credit file to confirm what he's saying is correct.

 

So Q1 - When obtaining info under a SAR, does the company have to provide you with ALL pertinent information?

(ie, could they have excluded reference to a credit card for some reason?)

 

Q2 - Does OH have to send a copy of his credit file to the DCA or is the onus on them to prove that he is liable?

 

ThanksCyllid

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

SAR should get you what you asked for.

 

If you only specified the loan account in the SAR request then that is all you will get. If you said in the SAR that you want ALL information on ALL and ANY accounts ever held then you should get everything.

 

How was your SAR worded?

 

No you don't have to give up your personal credit file to a DCA.

 

Did he actually have a credit card account with this lender?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

SAR was worded:

Further to your letters dated 26th May 2011,

please supply me with copies of all the data which you hold on me in relation to any matter

and in any form and for any period of time.

 

Please note that I require disclosure of any personal data which you hold on me for the entire period of my dealings with you.

 

The Subject Access is not limited to my transaction history

and it is not limited merely to 6 years of historical information.

 

Additionally, where there has been any event in my account history over this period

which has required manual intervention by any member of your staff, or any other person,

 

I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention,

or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my banking business with you.

 

If you are unable to supply this data because there has been no such manual intervention, then please be so kind as to confirm this in your response.

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10; you have 40 days in which to comply.

 

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity,

 

please let me know by return.

 

Please note I have moved and the address to which you should send any further correspondence is detailed above.

I would be happy to collect any Data from my local branch.

 

OH can't remember specifically what he took out

- he did think it was a credit card but then when the info came after the SAR referring to a loan account

then he thought he was mistaken.

 

I wasn't with him when he got the loan/credit card

and he has moved numerous times since so doesn't haven't any supporting paperwork of his own to back it up.

 

He has tried going to CAB but the woman there was beyond useless

and refused to properly look through all the paperwork,

instead saying OH should just make a repayment plan.

 

I don't know where to turn now and what to do.

 

No wonder people bury their heads in the sand when they are chased for debts,

 

I feel like doing it and it's not even my debt to worry about!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Hi, been a while since I posted here but to quickly follow up,

 

we sent the CCA letter to the DCA and they keep sending a letter of ackowledgement

every 21 days "we are following up your request with the original lender.

...when this becomes available we will forward a copy to you".

 

However in the meantime,

Mercantile Data Bureau (another arm of DLC I believe?)

have sent letters saying the account was transferred to them.

 

Sent them a copy of the CCA letter which was sent to DLC

and then DLC replied saying MDB had passed the letter to them and

"we note your comments that the above account is in dispute

however you have not provided any details or evidence to substantiate your claims.

In order to investigate this matter fully, please provide further details,

along with anyevidence that your claims rely upon".

 

To further muddy the waters, OH received another '21 days' letter from DLC yesterday

and a letter from MDB claiming he had not responded to their last letter.

So now we're very confused about who is dealing with what.

Assumedly OH should not send anything to the DCA?

 

All going to plan, OH's debt becomes 6 years old next spring so do we just sit it out and wait for it to become statute barred?

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 threads merged again

please keep to one thread.

 

pers i'd be ignoring the letter.

 

you keep entering into letter tennis

 

they'll think they've found a mug.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry DX, consider me told.

 

We reply as we don't want it to come to CCJs. At present, it's 'just' defaults on his credit file but we're trying to save for a house deposit and I want these cleared before we make any joint applications for a mortgage and have OH's credit file leaving a negative mark on mine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol::lol:

 

don't worry about it..better to have all the confusion

as to what debts he has with Lloyds in one place!!

 

ok so's its getting near house buying time.

 

lets look at actually WHAT issues these debts are causing.

 

from what is showing on the CRA files?

[forget the others not showing total!]

 

what are the listed default dates?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

All references to a defaulted debt must be removed from your credit files after 6 years has passed from date of default,

whether paid off or not.

This is so that someone who continues paying something even after 6 years from default should not be at a disadvantage

to someone who pays nothing after default and ends up with a clean file after 6 years.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so by end of may next year they will vanish.

 

prob not worth doing anything else

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is automatic

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Just wanted to update on this - we're still getting letters BUT after carrying out another credit search on OH, his defaults have mysteriously dropped off his file (statute barred Feb & May next year) and his credit rating is in the 'excellent' range. We're very happy - just need need to concentrate on saving even harder for that house deposit now!

 

Thanks all for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...