Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi T911 and welcome to CAG. As you say, an interesting screw up. So much for quality control! Anyway, our regular advice is to ignore all of their increasingly threatening missives... UNLESS you get a letter of claim, then come back here and we'll help you write a "snotty letter" to help them decide whether to take it any further with their stoopid pics. If you get mail you're unsure of, just upload it for the team to have a look.
    • Thanks @lolerzthat's an extremely helpful post. There is no mention of a permit scheme in the lease and likewise, no variation was made to bring this system in. I recall seeing something like a quiet enjoyment clause, but will need to re-read it and confirm. VERY interesting point on the 1987 Act. There hasn't been an AGM in years and I've tried to get one to start to no avail. However, I'll aim to find out more about how the PPC was brought in and revert. Can I test with you and others on the logic of not parking for a few months? I'm ready to fight OPS, so if they go nuclear on me then surely it doesn't matter? I assume that I will keep getting PCNs as long as I live here, so it doesn't make sense for me to change the way that I park?  Unless... You are suggesting that having 5 or so outstanding PCNs, will negatively affect any court case e.g. through bad optics? Or are we trying to force their hand to go to court with only 2 outstanding PCNs?
    • That is so very tempting.   They are doing my annual review as we speak and I'm waiting for their response once I have it I will consider my next steps.    The debt camel website mentioned above is amzing and helping to. Education me alot    
    • Sending you a big hug. I’m sorry your going through this. The letters they send sound aweful, and the waiting game for them to stop. But these guys seem so knowledgable and these letters should stop. Hang in there, and keep in touch. Don’t feel alone 
    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Debts sold to Hillesden Securities t/a dlc


cyllid
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3842 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I'm really worried as my boyfriend just receieved 2 re-directed letters through the post this morning (we recenty moved a few months ago), both from dlc (direct legal & collections) writing to inform him that the outstanding balance has been transferred to them effective 28/01/11 (the letter is dated 26th May 2011).

 

They go on to say that although the bank has transfereed the outstanding balance, he can still contact the bank in relation to any complaints about the time when they held the account.

 

"You have right to access (on payment of a fee) and, where it is inaccurate or incomplete, to update, your personal data." It then gives the address for such requests as a PO Box address for Lloyds Banking Group but then goes on to say all contact regarding the account should now be directed to dlc.

 

Both letters are accompanied by letters from Lloyds with the account numbers and reiterating the dlc letters with the balances; one for a 'loan account' balance as at 28/01/11 of £2954.93 and the other a 'current account' balance as at 28/01/11 of £1,279.68

 

Now my boyfriend tells me that he believes one is a credit card which he used before he moved to Australia back in 06/07 (he's of dual citinzenship) and when he came back he (stupidly) didn't contact the bank to notify them of his (many) change of addresses (bit of a nomad until he met me and we got settled). Now I'll be making sure he pays this debt (the larger one) albeit on a monthly plan of some sorts but the other one for the 'current account' we can only possibly think it may be an overdraft facility which has perhaps been racking up fees?

 

So my first question is, who does he contact first? should it be Lloyds for all the paperwork (as he has none) or should it be dlc to acknowledge the letters? It's lucky we even had a redirection set up as we wouldn't have even had the letters.

Secondly, where does he stand on the repayment of what is possibly overdrawn fees? He knows he's in the wrong on the credit card and accepts he must pay that but he doesn't ever remember leaving an overdrawn account - he thought it was just empty.

 

Thanks for taking the time to read!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Cylid

 

Welcome to CAG :welcome:

 

With regard to the credit card, thre are likely to be charges on there which can be claimed back, with interest. This could put a big dent in the debt which your OH owes.

 

For the moment I wouldn't bother with the dca and certainly do not contact or talk to them on the phone.

 

If it were me, I would send a subject access request (SAR) to the bank. It will cost £10 and they will have 40 days to respond. The SAR will give you all the information that the bank hold on you in respect of all dealings with them. This will nclude statements, transaction history and all other paperwork etc.

 

It will be the starting point for getting this sorted out and will also enable you to formulate a claim for the refund of the charges on the credit card. There may also be a ppi claim of there was any such insurance on the card.

 

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys. So ims, should I not even get him to contact the DCA to inform them that we're at a new address now? I'm just a bit worried as I think our redirection on the post is due to end in 2 weeks and then any further correspondence they send could get lost.

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

If it was me I wouldn't bother the the dca but this is up to you. If you do decide to get in touch with them, make sure everything is in writing and not via the phone. If you are going to start claiming back back charges etc you need to start to keep a paper trail of events.

 

For the SAR, you only need to do one because both accounts are with the same bank. Hence you only need one fee. The SAR will contain a request that they should supply everything they hold in connection with your dealngs with them on ANY and ALL accounts that have been held with them.

 

ims

  • Confused 1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ive had a running in with hillsdens and it wasnt very pleasent . they bought a credit card debt from mbna which they had a signed credit agreement so i offered to pay them a small amount each month with they accepted then 1 day out of the blue they sent me court papers i was in a panic but asked for help from this site and got some fantastic help , i requested some information which they didnt have at the time so the court case was stayed , so i offered them £300 to settle the account in full and final ( amount they wanted was just over £5000 ) the first response was if you settle within 30 days we will accept £600 but i told them i only had £300 which they them accepted , just wanted to let you know my dealings with them,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow thanks - that's certainly useful to know. My boyfriend and I were due to start saving for a house deposit this year (unfortunately neither of our parents are in a position to help us) but until this gets sorted, it looks like we won't be buying for a good 2-3 years. If he can get anywhere near the success story you had then it would be great.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I payed them by cheque from a familys account and wrote on the back of the cheque only bank if accepting full and final payment and took a photo as proof , it did take afew emails to get the account status on my credit file updated but got there in the end . Before you do anything though have a good look and get information by the good people who know on here .:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All,Just an update -my boyfriend sent off the SAR and a postal order for £10 which they replied back and acknowledged receipt of. They also stated that as my boyfriend had a different address to what they had on file then he would have to pick up the information from his local Lloyds bank (of his choice which he went back and confirmed) and provide evidence of ID. Fine so far, but they also stated that the information would be available from 13th July. So should he make contact with them again or just wait it out? I'm conscious of him getting a CCJ (if he hasn't already - keep meaning to get him to carry out a personal credit search) and don't want it to drag on if he should be making the next move?? Advice much appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I'd just give them a quick call to make sure its ready and tell them which branch you want to collect it from (after all, they did say 13th and we are now at 15th)

 

Regards

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, so we have the documents

- a big old pack of information,

most of which seems to be a glossary of abbreviations! What happens next?

 

The copy of the loan agreement is not signed

- does this have any bearing on what my boyfriend does next?

 

The statements show his loan repayments start bouncing in Oct 2007,

18 months after he took out the loan and right at the time he moved to Australia.

 

As the DD mandate wasn't cancelled, Lloyds kept trying to take payments for 9 months,

during which time the £300 overdraft is exceeded and the charges are:

o/d interest,

o/d excess fee,

account charge,

unpaid DD (£35),

unpaid loan (£25),

returned DD (amount varies between £20 - £70),

unplanned o/d fees (£215!)

 

Thanks in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Earlier in the thread you mentioned Credit Card and a Loan. Go through the papers you have received and find the transaction history and/or statments for those.

 

These will show up any charges such as late payment fees etc which have been applied to those accounts and it is those payments that you are going to claim back.

 

You have already found the loan agreement....is there any ppi on it? Similarly isthere any ppi on the credit card?

 

Regards

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya, I'll have to have a look. It seems to be that although he had a credit card, there was no debt from this, it was just the loan and the overdraft. I don't believe there was any PPI but I'll have another look tonight. My boyfriend hasn't suggested any repayments to them yet; should he do this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I've had a look and there doesn't seem to be any PPI.

 

I'm assuming I am only looking at just the excess fees, returned DD fees, unplanned o/d fees - basically any charges related to the bouncing payments of the loan? What about the o/d interest, does this get included? There is also a monthly 'account charge' of £7 but as this seemed to be charged even before the loan payments bounced then this is to be discounted?

 

Thanks :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

What you are looking for is on the laon account and credit card. I know there wasn't a debt on the card but you should still look for the late payment/over limit fees on that.

 

Reclaiming charges on a current account is pretty much a non starter.

 

So, can you identify any charges on the loan account or the credit card account?

 

Regards

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sorry ims I hadn't realised you'd replied - it didn't come up in my notifications. Got him to do a credit search and thankfully no CCJ's have been registered but still keen to sort this out. I've gone through the statements again and there are no credit card fees. In relation to the loan, there are the following:

Nov 07 - £35 unpaid DD

Nov 07 - £25 unpaid loan

Dec 07 - £70 returned DD

Jan 08 - £215 unplanned o/d fees

Jan 08 - £20 returned DD

Feb 08 - £215 unplanned o/d fees

Feb 08 - £20 returned DD

Mar 08 - £20 returned DD

Apr 08 - £20 returned DD

Thereafter the account was closed. Can he make a claim against any of these? The amounts and terminology chop and change.

 

We're just a bit stuck as to what the next steps are. Also, I mentioned in one of my earlier posts that the copy of the loan agreement he has on file is not signed; does this matter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Just one thing....unplanned overdraft fees seem to imply a current account going over an agreed limit? Are you sure this is on a loan?

 

Might be a silly question but just want to make sure we are talking about the right thing here.

 

Regards

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...