Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If there is a whitelist and few intruders there only seems the residents to make money from. It would leave wondering what the incentive was for the MAs if there was nothing in it for them except the obvious complaints from the residents. Not that I am saying that they are getting a backhander but there seems little other reasons unless they are trying to show how well run the place is managed-not. If they ran it properly there would be no need for OPs.
    • we're much better. pers i'd stat fighting back with debt, as if you don't you will never be rid of it. you've already most probably extended the life of all your debts by another 6yrs by going the IVA route, because the IVA will fail..they always do. these providers always find some reason at the end of the 5yrs to extend it by inventing some weird and wonderful schemes like sell our mates your equity in your home before we will say it's finished and sign you off. despite all the bluff and bluster these companies come out with, there is really very very little legal wise they can do to you id you tell them to go......and stop paying and ignore them. as i said a few postback im really shocked you fell for the IVA and are now falling for more bluff and bluster and thats why you are in the state you are in. by the way. i was going to ask Credit Expert are a credit file company, are you sure they are the ones Hanover have got to pressure you? doesn't sound like their remit to me, 1st ive heard of a CRA company winding up debtors for a fee. can you dump all these emails into a PDF file after redaction so's we can see.? read upload dx    
    • now do you want help or just come here to rant at the 1st chance. is this indictive of why you have this issue with BG? there isn't one really just you being pedantic? now give us a chance to decide lets have some info. we don't accept .jpg picture files as they are displayed directly to screen whereby anyone members or not can see them, hence we require a multipage pdf properly redacted. theres a good upload guide to read on that. so ball is your court... we still would help our worst enemy regardless . dx
    • A new savings sweet spot has emerged, and short-sighted savers could miss out on higher returns if they stick with the ever popular one-year staple.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Debts sold to Hillesden Securities t/a dlc


cyllid
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3843 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi ims, these are the fees charged as a result of the loan being collected and defaulted. Besides this, there are no other fees. If he can't claim back on any that's fine; we don't want it drawn out for too long. He's going to sell his car and pay off a lump sum; do you think it's worth asking if they'll accept the majority from the sale of his car and then wipe off the rest or does it not work that way?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi

 

As mentioned before, if the figures you quote appear on a current account then reclaiming them is really a non-starter.

 

If there are charges that have been aded to the loan then these will be fair game. Your SAR should give you the transaction history for the loan account and it is there that you need to look.

 

As regards making a payment they won't refuse you making a lump sum. However, it is extremely unlikely that they will write off the balance and so you would have to make a payment arrangement for that.

 

Have a look at the loan statements for extra charges first though.

 

Regards

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ims, no fees that I know of directly related to the loan. I'm still questioning the offer letter which they returned as they gave him an unsigned copy. Should he ask for a copy of the signed version and/or is it enforceable without a signature?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I don't think it wise to rely on peprwork errors. There's a thread on the subject here that might be of help in this regard....

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?314597-Challenging-Reconstituted-Agreements...

 

Can you have a look through the SAR transaction history and let us know the date of the last payment on the overdraft and on the loan?

 

And continue to ignore the dca for the time being.

 

Thanks

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I don't think it wise to rely on peprwork errors. There's a thread on the subject here that might be of help in this regard....

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?314597-Challenging-Reconstituted-Agreements...

 

Can you have a look through the SAR transaction history and let us know the date of the last payment on the overdraft and on the loan?

 

And continue to ignore the dca for the time being.

 

Thanks

 

ims

 

ims, had a look at the transaction history and the last payment made to the loan was £115.70 on 3rd Sep 07. At this point the overdraft goes £454 overdrawn on what was a £300 limit. The next repayment of £115.70 taken on 1st Oct 07 bounces and thereafter they keep trying to take the repayment up to May 08, all bouncing. Of course, they allow the fees and charges to accumulate.

 

Also, going to post in the other thread you linked to but interesting to find out that the loan agreement was issued under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and the bank have not supplied a signed copy. Apparently this could potentially make the loan unenforceable?

Edited by cyllid
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

I have posted in another thread about a debt my boyfriend has with Lloyds bank who have since sold the debt onto a DCA. Please see the link for further info:

Debts sold to Hillesden Securities t/a DLC

 

Anyway, to cut a long story short, a SAR was sent off and all info returned by Lloyds. However, the loan agreement provided is an unsigned copy. The agreement clearly states it is a "fixed-sum loan agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974" and I've been reading up and am led to believe my boyfriend should have received a signed copy; is this correct?

 

I'm just seeking some clarification as to what he should do next; does he need to contact the bank again and ask for a signed copy or as he had previously sent the SAR, does he just question the enforceability straight away? And where does the DCA sit in all of this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

threads merged

 

please keep to one thread per debt

 

i have gone thru this thread and am trying to get me head around it.........

 

it appears you've had a few threat-o-grams from a dca

have gotten an sar off lloyds

 

found there was a overdraft and a loan that might be the reason for the dca letters?

 

have you checked your BH's CRA file?

 

we need concrete info - that might be the place to look.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry - ims was the only one kindly answering and couldn't advise on the CCA hence why I posted again.

 

I'm not sure what you mean by CRA file? If this is the credit report then yes, we got his report from Experian and he has a default from Lloyds for 2 items. Having just checked them again one of the amounts differ. So to try and keep this as simple as poss, he received 2 letters each from Lloyds & DLC saying:

1) Lloyds have sold the current account balance of £1,279.68 to the DCA

2) Lloyds have sold the loan balance of £2,954.93 to the DCA

 

Now double checking the defaults registered on the credit file he has:

1) Lloyds TSB bank Plc Current Account

Started 01/07/07

Default £1,279

Defaulted 21/05/08

 

2) Lloyds TSb Bank Credit Card/Store Card

Started 21/12/04

Default £4,689

Defaulted 28/02/08

 

Now I've only just noticed that the credit file talks about 2 different debts in the loan and credit card. None of the paperwork provided shows anything about defaults on the credit card. So this has just confused things even more?!

 

My original reason for posting a new thread was because OH has been provided with an unsigned CCA agreement and we didn't know if this was enforceable or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as imi intimated in post 31, i would not bother with any 'get-out' by using a paperwork error.

those days are long gone.

there is a clear financial 'link' shown for both the debts.

 

from the cra it looks like the debts are still with lloyds

and the dca's are just 'chasing' payment.

 

i would doubt that lloyds will go anywhere near a court with the OD as there are unlawful bank charges in the balance they are claiming is owed

- so pers, i'd forget about that debt for the time being.

 

the credit card needs a BIT OF LOOKING INTO.

 

IF YOU'VE GOT ALL THE STATEMENTS, WE NEED TO FINDOUT IF THEYHAVE BEEN [opps sri caps] adding charges

like late/over limit etc etc

 

so's we can do a bit of reclaiming

have you got the credit card statements to look through handy?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No statements have been provided for the credit card - in fact the only evidence there was a credit card is one sheet of paper with 'application data' showing a print out of the LTSB Asset Gold Credit Card and application Status: Accept dated 21/12/04. So the date matches the credit file but there is nothing else provided that shows there was any debt here.

 

OH doesn't actually remember taking a loan and you'll see from post #1 he actually thought the 'loan' was the credit card but the statements for the account clearly shows a transfer of £4k going in in Jan 06 and thereafter monthly repayments. The credit card isn't mentioned in the chaser letters so does this mean that they aren't chasing that debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there was a credit card account, there should have been a transaction history in the SAR.

 

If you are absolutely sure there was a card then the bank have given an incomplete SAR in my opinion. Especially as there is evidence or mention of it amongst the papers.

 

ims

Edited by ims21

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

cc's are a diff dept of lloyds

so it could be coming sep.

 

so there are three debts here?

 

loan/OD/CC?

 

what does not show on his cra i would ignore, unless his old addresses are not shown as 'linked' or 'previous' on his cra.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh my, all very confusing!

 

Yes, looks like 3 debts I guess but cra only shows the credit card and current account whereas the DCA & Lloyds letters only refer to the current account & loan account. The loan was at the same address as the credit card & current account so should have been noted on the cra I would have thought?

 

Lloyds wrote to my OH when the information was ready to collect so shouldn't they have mentioned if there was more to follow? It does sound like they've given an incomplete SAR but then at the same time I'm concerned about 'rocking the boat' and asking for the credit card info if they're only chasing him for the loan and current account debts. The credit card debt seems to be the biggest and scariest debt!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You asked whether an unsigned credit agreement was enforceable. The answer is 'yes' unless you can convince a court that, on balance of probabilities, you never had such an agreement. In other words, that it belongs to someone else.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bugger! Thanks Steven.

 

It's frustrating as OH swears he can't remember having the loan, just a credit card. I've tried telling him there is a £4k transfer in his bank statements which corresponds with the banks copy of the agreement! He must just have a very poor memory.

 

Interestingly, and completely differing to OH's memory, I went through the paperwork again this morning just to check I wasn't missing anything and came across one page that listed all of his products with the bank - no mention of a credit card?? He had:

Young Savers A/C (start date Jan 1995)

Select A/C (start date July 2001)

Exclusive Saver A/C (start date Jan 06)

LTSB Personal Loan (start date Jan 06)

 

Is it likely the default registered for the card debt is wrong? Or is it, like someone else mentioned, that the credit card department would hold seperate information?

 

C.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All, I'm still confused as to what the next steps are? OH is going to sell his car and will get between £5k - £6k for it so will use it to repay, but if he has 3 debts then obviously he can't pay them all back. We don't know wether to pay the two (loan & current account) that are being chased or the two (credit card & current account) that are on the credit file. Any further views much appreciated as it's worrying me sick. x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you going to try to get full & final settlemetns for a reduced amount

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

All, as an update - this is still ongoing! OH has, unsurprisingly in this climate, not sold his car yet and it doesn't look like it will go anytime soon.

 

I will post back later with full info

but he rec'd letters from DLC offering a chance of reduced settlement back in Feb (I think)

but he didn't have the cash and we are still not convinced that they are chasing for the correct debts.

 

To recap,

credit file shows defaults for a CREDIT CARD and current account

but debts being chased are for a LOAN and current account.

 

The Loan/Credit card defaults are differing amounts but the a/c default has the same amounts on the letter to the credit file.

 

Then last month he rec'd letters from a different DCA called Mercantile Data Bureau Ltd who said DLC had passed the debts onto them for chasing.

 

We responded to both DCA's basically asking for clarification as to what exactly they're chasing for

as there are incongruities within the information supplied under the SAR and on OH's credit file.

 

Yesterday DLC responded asking for a copy of OH's credit file and said that they assume the other debt is not in dispute

and they will continue to chase for payments on that one (the bank account).

 

Although i would argue that the account is only in default because they tried taking repayments out for a loan he doesn't remember

(with an unsigned agreement provided by SAR) and then lumbered him with hefty fees for going overdrawn at £200 a pop!

 

Will type up letters later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...