Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Banks have different limits above which they require Probate. So it may be Probate is not needed, although as he died with no Will that could complicate things. Is all the £28k with Virgin Money? Your wife should contact all banks who hold his money with the death certificate and ask them what they need to release the funds to her. Most banks have a central "bereavement department". Check their websites. Use that department rather than general call centre or bank branch if they have one. Nearly every bank website has a section on "what to do when a customer dies" so have a search for that. Your wife may also have to provide evidence that she is his daughter. When his wife died it sounds like they had a joint bank account so that's why her money just went across to him. But as it isn't a joint account now transfer to your wife won't be quite that simple.  
    • That explains it then. MET's fantasy is that it's a pay car park.  You're only let off paying if you are a Starbucks customer which you can't be when Starbucks is closed.  'Cos otherwise lots of people would abuse the car park facilities on the far edge of the Stansted Airport area in the middle of nowhere to ... admire the bushes?  Look at the cloudy sky? The important thing is that we have around 140 cases for this site, and MET have only tried court seven times.  Even then, they had no intention of getting as far as a hearing, they were attempting to intimidate the motorists into paying, when the Caggers defended the cases MET discontinued.
    • She's an only child and he as a brother and sister. He has no will and we have done a check on this to find out if he had left one and nothing has come up. He has savings of around 28k His sister and brother are well off so 28k is nothing to them and aren't interested in his money. This just leaves my wife/his daughter. Would this still need to go to probate there is no estate e.g house or business to sell and the amount left in his bank is just small? When his wife died they just closed her bank account and moved her money across to his account and we just assumed that once my wife has handed in the death certificate and shown evidence of who she is the same would apply to her? We don't know yet the council have only just written to us today with a guide of what to do next.  
    • Did your FiL leave a Will and if so who is the Executor? Strictly speaking banks could refuse to take instructions until Probate is granted but In practice I would expect the bank to take instructions to cancel the DD if the Executor presents the death certificate and a certified copy of the Will
    • Hi   Sorry I probably wasn't clear enough. He had lived in the flat until December 2022 with Dementia by this time it was unsafe for him to have capacity to live on his own and he had to move into a nursing home. We had left it too late to apply for power of attorney so approached a solicitor in March last year for Deputyship. We were still in the process of dealing with it by May 2024. He passed away a few weeks ago and the solicitor was contacted to halt the application and we will just pay the fees of what work he has done up until now. My wife was the named person on her dads bank account but we didn't have the ability to alter any direct debits hence the reasons for applying for Deputyship as we were having problems trying to stop some payments coming out of his account Eon being another difficult company. We kept his flat on from December 2022 - August 2023. it was at this point I contacted Sancutary housing to inform them he was no longer living in the flat, it had been cleared out and was ready for a new tenant and that he had Dementia and had moved into a nursing home December 2022 and explained the reasons why we kept it on. As the named person to speak on his behalf I asked them what proof they needed in order to give notice on the flat e.g proof of dementia and proof that he was living in a nursing home and anything else they wanted. The lady in the upstairs flat and some of the other residence in the street had asked about him and we had told them he had moved into a nursing home. The lady in the upstairs flat wanted his flat for medical reasons so asked us once we had given notice could be let her know and she'll ask them if she can have it. We explained the difficulties and it was left at that but I did tell her I would let her know once notice was given. I contacted the company by email a number of times and also telephone conversations and nobody followed it up and it wasn't till the end of February this year that the housing manager for the area wrote to our home address to ask about him that he had been to the flat a couple of times and nobody answered and he had asked some of the residence in the street and they hadn't seen him for sometime. There was an email address on the letter so I contacted him and copied in the last 2 emails I sent Sanctuary regarding me wanting to give notice on the flat for at least 9 months explaining that it went ignored as well as telephone calls. I also stated I wanted to have his rent payments returned from the date I wanted to give notice which was from August 2023 as the bank wouldn't let us stop the DD without POT or deputyship explaining we were in the process of Deputyship. He gave some excuse about not having POT to cancel on his behalf and spoke to someone in HR and said he would contact the nursing home to confirm he was there with Dementia and if it all checks out we can give notice on the flat which came to an end on the 22 March 2024. There was not mention of back payments for the rent already paid or the fact I had asked to give notice in August 2023. Despite someone living in the flat from 1st April they continue to take DD payments for the flat and have taken another 2 payments of £501. another concerning thing despite Eon not allowing us to cancel the DD to his account the lady upstairs informed Eon that she was moving into the flat February 2024 and Eon refunding the account to his bank and said in an email sorry you are leaving us and canceled his account. Something they wouldn't let us do but a stranger. She also changed her bank account to his address despite the fact notice hadn't been given on the flat yet. So we need to find out how much information Sanctuary actually had for her to tell her power company she was moving into the flat in February despite the housing manager only just getting in contact to find out where he was. So a complaint is going into Eon and Sanctuary and we are going to take advice and ask the bank to charge back the rent. My wife hasn't taken the death certificate to the bank yet to inform them of his passing.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Esa Appeal turned down, can't claim Jobseekers allowence help me!!!


mandyjay
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3679 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Kelcou - can you not qualify under the rules regarding that if you are found fit for work, this will cause you serious health problems? As I understand it, you have a lung / chest disease; so surely working and being around ill people (even those with just a cold) will make you very ill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

To be honest, Nystagmite, I don't know about the rules you mention. Yes, I have Severe Chronic Bronchitus (stage 3), which puts my lung efficiency down to the 35-40% across the board. I am incredibly susceptible to anyone with a cold / flu! You probably recall me posting about the number of days sick I had last year apart from my general symptoms. End of December through to mid-march with one chest infection after another. Touch and go whether I was hospitalised which, not surprisingly, all concerned felt would probably kill me off with infections!

I'm fortunate with friends and family - they ban me from their homes at the slightest sign of an illness ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mandy, please listen to the advice you have been given. You are on ESA. You are in WRAG. You DO NOT have to apply for any jobs nor attend job interviews nor any such nonsense. That is an absolute fact. Do not make yourself more ill because one person in the Jobcentre has no grasp whatsoever of her job. Why not telephone your DWP distribution centre for further advice? (I'm fortunate in coming under the one at Chippenham and, throughout the three plus years I have been on ESA, they are always extremely helpful). Oh, and throughout those 170 weeks I have NEVER been asked to look for work, apply for jobs. Nor would I expect to be ...

 

I have just read on another forum that the Work Programme is compulsory if your Advisor and JC feels it to be in your best interest, they still cannot make you work or seek work and they also have to take your health condition into consideration in choosing the activities you are able to perform. If you refuse to attend this your payments will be sanctioned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just read on another forum that the Work Programme is compulsory if your Advisor and JC feels it to be in your best interest, they still cannot make you work or seek work and they also have to take your health condition into consideration in choosing the activities you are able to perform. If you refuse to attend this your payments will be sanctioned.

 

Also on the DWPs website it states its mandatory if its expected the person to be fit for work within 3-6 months which given the frequency of assessments in that WRAG I expect is the majority of people in that group?

 

http://www.latentexistence.me.uk/dwp-edits-documents-to-pretend-work-placements-werent-compulsory/

 

There was also a newspaper report stating that the work programme they using for tesco was planned for people on ESA as well. I assume those in the WRA group.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel like I'm saying this twice a day at the moment, but let's just be clear: ESA claimants are not required to participate in the Work Programme. Those in the WRAG will be required to attend six interviews - they cannot be forced into work or training.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel like I'm saying this twice a day at the moment, but let's just be clear: ESA claimants are not required to participate in the Work Programme. Those in the WRAG will be required to attend six interviews - they cannot be forced into work or training.

 

Sadly I think that is due to change because of the Welfare Reform Bill

 

 

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/policy/disability/welfare-reform-bill-2011-and-disabled/

 

The Welfare Reform Bill 2011 will make it clear that work-related activity can include work experience or a work placement, depending on the individual’s circumstances. We expect these powers to be introduced by April 2012.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly I think that is due to change because of the Welfare Reform Bill

 

 

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/policy/disability/welfare-reform-bill-2011-and-disabled/

 

Hmm, yes, had heard that now you mention it. Well, here's another can of worms - just what ESA needed....

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell me about it :x

 

Just been put into WRAG, normally I would have glad, but now know I risk being sent on training courses,

or work experience, even though been found unfit for work.

 

I was going to appeal as I believe have grounds to be put into the support group.

But I was told my review is in 18 months, and if I appeal and win, I could be reassessed sooner.

So it's a gamble I not going to take.

Link to post
Share on other sites

... can you not qualify under the rules regarding that if you are found fit for work, this will cause you serious health problems? ...

 

Still don't know anything about this. Anyone have further details / linky thing? ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

because of the claimant's illness, there would be a substantial risk to the mental or physical health of any person were they found not to have limited capability for work. This exceptional circumstance is the same one as applies in the PCA, and arguably the case law that applies to it should apply here.

 

http://www.cpag.org.uk/cro/wrb/wrb204/wca.htm#except

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rae, you'd be looking at ESA Reg 35:

 

35.—(1) A claimant is to be treated as having limited capability for work-related activity if—

 

(a)the claimant is terminally ill;

 

(b)the claimant is—

(i)receiving treatment by way of intravenous, intraperitoneal or intrathecal chemotherapy; or

(ii)recovering from that treatment and the Secretary of State is satisfied that the claimant should be treated as having limited capability for work-related activity; or

©in the case of a woman, she is pregnant and there is a serious risk of damage to her health or to the health of her unborn child if she does not refrain from work-related activity.

 

(2) A claimant who does not have limited capability for work-related activity as determined in accordance with regulation 34(1) is to be treated as having limited capability for work-related activity if—

(a)the claimant suffers from some specific disease or bodily or mental disablement; and

(b)by reasons of such disease or disablement, there would be a substantial risk to the mental or physical health of any person if the claimant were found not to have limited capability for work-related activity.

 

Edit: Ninja'd by Nystagmite ;-)

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Antone, duly noted! I wish I'd more fully understood that at my last Tribunal. The panel were desperately trying to make me fit the descriptors and were visibly upset that they couldn't do so ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't want to make another thread so thought this one was close to my enquiry.

 

OH been on ESA contribution based since going onto half pay at work (from where he was subsequently 'let go'), was turned down, he appealed and won easily. Another medical 5 months after, turned down and awaiting appeal.

 

With new law, is it worth him pursuing this appeal as his 12 months will be up on contribution based ESA? As he has a pension from work which is by no means healthy but JUST enough to stop him qualifying for income based ESA when my small income is taken into account. He couldn't even get through a pathways to work interview (or whatever they're called now) without breaking down when his old job and how he was treated was brought up. He is also physically disabled but has never claimed DLA or anything as we managed.

 

Just wondering whether it's worth the bother of going through the appeal (which he could mentally do without) if it means he gets nothing anyway? Heavens knows what he would do if trying for JSA but suppose he would have to if he wanted any form of income.

 

Any help appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I hope you get to see this reply Mandyjay as I have had exactly the same symptoms as you for the last 7 years. I have found out that I do not have fybromyalgia, despite all DR'S insisting I have. I have a viral bacterial illness which attacks joints, muscles and bones alike. I found out by accident when taking antibiotics for a different problem. After 36 hrs on antibiotics my symptoms disappeared as quickly as they hhad appeared 7 years earlier. I urge you to try antibiotics as it will change your life! Unfortunately as the medical profession hate to be proved wrong (in my experience), they refused to let me have more than 3 weeks of antibiotics, so I am in the process of proving my diagnosis by seeing a consultant. Please do not ignore this reply as many dr's who are stumped by symptoms, take the easy option of diagnosing fybromyalgia, even though only 50% of the profession acknowledge its existence. Good luck :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

hi

new to this group and looking for help please.. just failed my medical yet again to which i will apeal against yet again but this time there telling me to claim jobseekers allowance so my benifits dont get affected.. will this jobseekers allowance claim affect my esa apeal, last thing i need is starting all over again with an esa claim..

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel like I'm saying this twice a day at the moment, but let's just be clear: ESA claimants are not required to participate in the Work Programme. Those in the WRAG will be required to attend six interviews - they cannot be forced into work or training.

 

Is that 6 interviews in one year? Whilst on Wrag ( up until my recently failed repeat medical) I had to attend every 4 weeks ..meaning some months I had to go twice lol at the beginning and end of the month. Food for thought there

 

apologies, only now noted the date of that post, no doubt there have been changes by now lol

Edited by Katelyn25
added comment
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...